Talk:V.A.M.P. (G.I. Joe)

This page was proposed for deletion by Jontesta (talk · contribs) on 28 November 2022.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject G.I. Joe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.G.I. JoeWikipedia:WikiProject G.I. JoeTemplate:WikiProject G.I. JoeG.I. Joe articles

Toys Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Comics: Marvel Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This redirect has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Requested move 26 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Closing as no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 20:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

V.A.M.P. (G.I. Joe) → V.A.M.P. – Unnecessary disambiguation. – Gorobay (talk) 15:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:28, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gorobay and In ictu oculi: There are various VAMP abbreviations. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is there anything else called V.A.M.P. though? Gorobay (talk) 17:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "V.A.M.P." should redirect to the disambiguation page, since using English grammar rules, several of the items can be properly spelled that way. -- 65.94.171.217 (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, see disambiguation page. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:22, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and this RfC. Note that V.A.M.P currently redirects here. Ppp ery 19:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
support - It doesn't make sense for V.A.M.P to redirect here instead of vice versa. The article could use a For other uses see hatnote pointing at the DAB page. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support only topic consistently used with this styling. SST flyer 09:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to multiple entries using the "VAMP" acronym on the disambiguation page. Since every capitalized letter in the acronym discussed here is followed by a period, the stylization is not distinct enough to distinguish itself from entries on the disambiguation page that are also all-caps acronyms. (For example, if the stylization of this subject was "VA.MP" or "V.AM.P", my rationale regarding the title's ambiguous stylization would not apply.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.