A sword identified as Tizona was given by Ferdinand II of Aragon to Pedro de Peralta, count of Santisteban de Lerín in c. 1470. This sword was long kept in Marcilla Castle, later in the Army Museum in Madrid and since 2007 in the Museo de Burgos.
The name used in the Cantar de Mio Cid is Tizón. The form Tizona has been in use since the late medieval period (14th century). The blade inscription on the Marcilla sword, presumably of the 13th or 14th century, has the form TIZONA.
The older form of the name, tizón, is a word for "firebrand" (leño encendido, from Latin titionem). Sebastián de Covarrubias (1611) recognizes this as the plausible origin of the name Tizona, but also adduces possible derivation from τυχωνα, the name of the lance of Severus Alexander, or from τύχη "fortuna".
James I of Aragon (r. 1213–1276) according to the Llibre dels fets had a sword named Tisó. The description of this sword makes no reference to El Cid, suggesting that tizon "firebrand" was in use as a generic term for "sword" (c.f. the same use of English brand). The extended (feminine) form tizona, by reference to El Cid's sword, could later also stand in as a poetic synonym of "sword" in general.
According to the Cantar de Mio Cid, El Cid won the sword from its previous owner, King Yucef in Valencia. Afterward, it was given by El Cid to his sons-in-law, the Infantes de Carrión but eventually returned into the possession of El Cid.
In the poem, Tizona's power depends on the wielder, and it frightens unworthy opponents. When the infantes of Carrión have Tizona, they underestimate the power of the sword, due to their cowardice, but when Pero Vermúdez is going to fight Ferrán González and unsheathes Tizona (a gift from El Cid), Ferrán González yells and surrenders, cowering in terror at the sight of Tizona (verses 3642-3645):
|Él dexó la lança, e mano al espada metió;
cuando lo vio Ferrán González, conuvo a Tizón,
que antes qu'el golpe esperasse, dixo: -¡Vençido sói!-
|"He [Pero Vermúdez] let go the lance and took the sword in hand;|
when Ferrán González saw that, he recognized Tizona
and before the expected blow said, "I am defeated!"
According to legend, after his death in 1099, the body of El Cid was seated in full armour and in the monastery church of San Pedro de Cardeña, and there with the sword Tizona struck down a Jew who plucked the dead hero's beard. The monks revived the stunned Jew, who let himself be baptized and under the name Diego Gil became the servant of El Cid's squire Gil Diaz.
The Tizona sword long held by the marquises of Falces and kept in their Marcilla Castle, now in the Museo de Burgos, has a length of 93.5 centimetres (36.8 in) long and a mass of 1.15 kilograms (2.5 lb). The broad blade is of type XIII, typical of c. the 12th century, with a narrow fuller running along less than half of the blade's length. The hilt is later, added in the time of the Catholic Monarchs, with the elaborate curved crossguard typical of the "Hispano-Moorish" style of the period.
- YO SOY LA TIZONA ~ FUE : FECHA ~~ ENLAERA : DE : MILE : QVARENTA (Yo soy la Tizona [que] fue hecha en la era de mil e quarenta, "I am the Tizona, who was made in the year 1040")
- AVE : MARIA GRATIA ~~ PLENA dOMINVSSMECVN (Ave Maria gratia plena; dominus mecum [sic], "Hail Mary, full of grace; the Lord be with me")
Debate on the sword's authenticity concerns the blade. If authentic, both the hilt and the inscription would have been added later (the inscription possibly in the 13th to 14th century, the hilt in the 15th century). The date "1040" given in the description is traditionally identified as given in the Hispanic Era (38 BC), i.e. designating the year AD 1002. The name Tizona itself suggests a late medieval date, as early references use the name Tizón, with Tizona being recorded only from the 14th century.
Menéndez Pidal[year needed] considered the entire sword to be a 16th-century forgery. By contrast, Bruhn de Hoffmeyer (1988) assumed that the blade may be identical to the sword listed as La Colada in the 1503 inventory. A 2001 examination performed by the Complutense University of Madrid concluded that the blade may indeed date from the 11th century.
Álvaro Soler del Campo, curator at the Museo del Ejército, points out[year needed] that the sword is formed of three joined pieces[clarification needed] and that their typology is the same as that of the handle, adornment, and the inscription, from the era of the Catholic Monarchs.
A sword identified as Tizona is listed in the treasure stock of the house of Castille, transferred by Álvaro de Luna, recovered in 1452 and placed in a 1503 inventory of the Alcázar of Segovia. The 1503 inventory reads "a sword called Tizona, that belonged to El Cid; it has a channel in each side, with gilded lettering; it has a hilt, and cross, and a block of silver, and in relief castles and lions and a small golden lion on each part of the cross; and has a scabbard of red leather lined with green velvet." This does not fit the description of the extant sword exhibited as Tizona, but the suggestion has been made that the sword listed as Colada in the same inventory may be the same now known as Tizona (Bruhn de Hoffmeyer 1988)
According to Prudencio de Sandoval's Historia de los reyes de Castilla y León(1615), Ferdinand II of Aragon gave a sword identified as Tizona to Pedro de Peralta y Ezpeleta, first Count of Santisteban of Lerín (also cited as Antonio Carrillo de Peralta, 2nd marquis of Falces[clarification needed]), for services rendered in the negotiations that led to his marriage with Isabel of Castile in 1469. This sword remained in the possession of the Marqueses of Falces, from at least the 17th century kept in the Palacial Castle of Marcilla.
Marcilla castle was plundered by the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War, but it was recovered by the Nationalist faction upon taking Figueres. The sword was properly stored in a crate, with a note "Comrade, respect this sword, it is the sword of El Cid" (Camarada, respeta esta espada, es la espada del Cid). The sword was moved to the Museo del Ejército in Madrid and was on display there during 1944–2007, while remaining the property of the Marqueses of Falces. The 14th marquis in 1959 bequeathed ownership of the sword in equal parts to his two children, Pedro and Olga Velluti. The siblings in 1980 confirmed the sword's loan to the Museo del Ejército. Pedro Velluti, the 15th marquis of Falces, died in 1987. In a will made two years earlier, he made Salustiano Fernández and his wife Jacinta Méndez his sole beneficiaries, "for lacking forced heirs and having a sister [Olga] who abandoned him to his Luck, which could not have been better." Salustiano Fernández, an Asturias fisherman, and his wife had cared for the blind marquis prior to his death. The title of marquis passed to Olga Velluti, who in 1997 trensferred it to her son, José Ramón Suárez del Otero y Velluti, 17th marquis of Falces.
In 1999, Suárez del Otero announced his intention of selling the sword. The Ministry of Culture began a process of estimating the value of the artefact. The sword was declared Bien de Interés Cultural in January 2003. In October 2003, the Ministry offered EUR 1.5 million, and the Suárez del Otero accepted the offer. However, a 2007 report cast doubt on the sword's authenticity, and the Ministry withdrew its offer, reducing the estimated value to EUR 200,000 – 300,000. The study in question was authored by Jose Godoy, who concluded that the sword was a "false relic". The Suárez del Otero voiced his disappointment to the Spanish press, stating "I would dare to say that that man has never seen the sword in his life". The sword was eventually sold in 2007/8, for a reported price of EUR 1.6 million, by the autonomous community of Castile and León and the Cabinet of Commerce and Industry of Burgos, and since then has been on display in the Museum of Burgos alongside other presumed relics of El Cid. In 2011, a lawsuit was filed by the two daughters of Salustiano Fernández, demanding to be paid half of the purchase price, assuming that the sword after 1959 had been co-owned by Olga and Pedro Velluti. The lawsuit went on to the Supreme Court, which in 2016 finally ruled Suárez del Otero the sole owner of the sword. This judgement reversed two previous verdicts which declared the plaintiffs co-owners of the sword. The Supreme Court decision was based on the uninterrupted ownership of the sword by Olga Velluti following the death of her brother "for more than the six-year period established by the Civil Code [of 1955]".
- Sebastián de Covarrubias. Tesoro de la lengua castellana o española, 1611.
- Vicente Joaquín Bastús y Carrera, Nuevas anotaciones al Ingenioso hidalgo D. Quijote de la Mancha, de Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra (1834), p. 82.
- Julius Leopold Klein , Geschichte des spanischen Drama's, vol. 1 (1871), 315f.
- Juan Tous Meliá, Guía histórica del Museo Militar Regional de Canarias (2000), p. 30.
- Joan Francesc de Masdéu i de Montero, Historia critica de España, y de la cultura española vol. 9 (1791), 388f.
- Bruhn de Hoffmeyer, Ada, "Las armas en la historia de la Reconquista", Gladius 18 (1988) 31–101, cited after Montaner Frutos (2011) p. 611
- Jiménez, José Manuel et al., "Modelos para la datación de hierros y aceros antiguos aplicados a Tizona", Gladius 21 (2001) 221–232. "La tosca empuñadura, que presenta en la actualidad, pertenece a los siglos XV-XVI, siendo las inscripciones latinas realizadas al ácido, algo anteriores a esta fecha. Este hecho ha provocado que numerosos especialistas, basándose en su tipología, consideraran que la actual Tizona es una falsificación muy posterior al siglo XI. [...] De los cálculos realizados, se deduce que el acero de Tizona se fabricó y forjó hace pues, aproximadamente, 950 años, lo que la sitúa en la época del legendario Cid Campeador." c.f. Alonso, J. I. Garcia; Martinez, J. A.; Criado, A. J. (1999). "Origin of El Cid's sword revealed by ICP-MS metal analysis". Spectroscopy Europe. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 11 (4).
- Alberto Montaner Frutos (ed.) Cantar de mio Cid, Barcelona, Galaxia Gutemberg; Real Academia Española (2011), 942–944
- El Mundo 26 May 2007 ("Me atrevería a decir que ese señor no ha visto la espada en su vida").
- "La Junta y la Cámara recuperan la Tizona para el patrimonio burgalés." Diario de Burgos 23 May 2007. "El valor de un icono", Diario de Burgos, 24 Mary 2007. Reuters, 25 May 2007[permanent dead link].
- El Español 23 November 2016. Pulso 24 November 2016.