User:MintyFresh201/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:MintyFresh201. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Archive 1

MAY 2024

Speedy deletion nomination of FV Dudenhofen

Hello MintyFresh201,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ratnahastin, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, FV Dudenhofen, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Draft:FV_Dudenhofen. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

FV Dudenhofen

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into FV Dudenhofen. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

SC Spelle-Venhaus moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SC Spelle-Venhaus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

SC Blau-Weiß Papenburg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SC Blau-Weiß Papenburg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay, will do.

Thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Palm Ridge

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Palm Ridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

@MintyFresh201 and CycloneYoris: From my speedy deletion edit summary: "This could be about a place in South Africa, a Roblox game, an American football junior competition, or perhaps something quite different. I see no good reason to WP:DRAFTIFY this." MintyFresh201, I see you are new here, but could you possibly identify what this was intended to be about? Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

FC Schüttorf 09 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to FC Schüttorf 09. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 11:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Blau-Weiß Brühl moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Blau-Weiß Brühl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 11:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blau-Weiß Brühl (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blau-Weiß Brühl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, MintyFresh201! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry, can you take it out of the draftspace and I can add the sources to the article.

Regards,

MintyFresh201 MintyFresh201 (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Once you add sufficient sources to the article, you may submit it for review as was said or you may move it yourself. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay, thanks, I appreciate your help MintyFresh201 (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Football clubs in Kingston

Hello, MintyFresh201

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Football clubs in Kingston for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yue🌙 03:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin

Hello, MintyFresh201

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ToadetteEdit, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadette^Edit! 07:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Okay, no problem, Thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TSV Kornburg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Knowingly citing an unreliable source is disruptive editing. Please don't do that again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Alright, no problem, however, it was just the Transfermarkt link that was unreliable correct? MintyFresh201 (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Links for a more detailed break of what sources are and are not considered reliable in this subject area. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

However, on Transfermarkt, users must have their changes reviewed, similar to submitting a draft on Wikipedia. Therefore the information is credible as it is reviewed by trustworthy sources MintyFresh201 (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

SV Victoria Seelow moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SV Victoria Seelow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

TSV Sasel moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to TSV Sasel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

SV Steinbach moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SV Steinbach. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Askania Bernburg moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Askania Bernburg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

FSV Barleben moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FSV Barleben, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality of your articles

Hi MintyFresh201. I appreciate the intention of creating articles of notable football clubs. However, many of your articles have been moved to draftspace because they lacked sources that would indicate notability and yet, you are still creating articles like SV Victoria Seelow that have zero WP:SIGCOV and very few WP:inline citations. Please slow down and familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirements. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I just noticed that SV Victoria Seelow had also been moved to draftspace and then ten minutes later you recreated it. The correct procedure is to edit the article in draftspace and then resubmit the article.

Be aware that the three sources you added do not indicate significant coverage, which is required for notability: the first reference is the club's website, the second and third references are database entries. We would need newspaper articles or books covering the football club to demonstrate notability. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Alright, I will ensure to take my time when writing articles.

Appreciate it,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article FSV_Barleben. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Note: In this edit, you added a link to 'en-academic'. In this one you added a reference to 'wikiwand'. Both very clearly note that the source of their material is Wikipedia. Additionally, please do not remove maintenace tags from articles until you've actually addressed the problem. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Bremer TS Neustadt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bremer TS Neustadt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 22:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)