User:Moonriddengirl/Ctjf83

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Ctjf83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

This report covers contributions to 394 articles from timestamp 2007-01-10 22:05:36 UTC to timestamp 2010-03-13 20:55:23 UTC. Created to facilitate check requested by the contributor himself at my user page, here.

  • Green tickY Means that problems were found with duplication or close paraphrasing of previously published content.
  • Red XN Means that no problems were detected.
  • "Red XN reverting" means that the contributor was not adding new original content, but reverting to an older version

Articles 1 through 20[edit]

Articles 21 through 40[edit]

All reviewed and presumably addressed.
  • Green tickY. This one started as a close following of [6] and needs a bit more revision. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Green tickY A problem compared to [7].(This one needs to be address kind of quickly, please.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Green tickY, from [8]. Any lingering or derivative text needs to be revised. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
  • I understand attribution now, is there anyway to attribute that copy and paste to its original authors at I-235 Pedestrian Bridges? CTJF83 chat 23:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Cools. :) Sorry for the redundnt wording (and the missing "a"; my lptop hs a sticky key!), but I work upside down sometimes, and I didn't wnt you to run into the issue before the explanation in cse you didn't. The thing to do is to attribute in edit summary; just indicte the date of copying, wikilink the rticle nd add something like "see talk for detils." If you add the {{copied}} to the talk pge, it cn include the diff where it ws dded s well s the exct revision of the other rticle from which the content was copied. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles 41 through 60[edit]

Presumably all addressed.
  • That should be ok, I usually previously only have a problem with online references, from just copy and pasting and then editing down, I don't do that anymore thanks to this report. :) CTJF83 chat 23:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
  • ? Weirdly, the only hit I got in this ws to book in snippet view on the Ukraine. Pretty sure tht's a flse positive. :) Since I cn't check the sources, I'll just hve to sk you to compre it for yourself. I didn't find ny problems, but I cn't verify tht it's cler. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles 61 through 80[edit]

  • ? The sources seem to be gone, nd so does the content. This is good, becuse frnkly, I'd be worried bout this content. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Articles 81 through 100[edit]

Articles 101 through 120[edit]

Articles 121 through 140[edit]

Articles 141 through 160[edit]

Articles 161 through 180[edit]

Articles 181 through 200[edit]

Finished this section. All clear.
Extended content

This report generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2010-03-14T13:32:52+00:00 in 0.43 sec.