User talk:121.54.32.168

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to VHF omnidirectional range has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: VHF omnidirectional range was changed by 121.54.32.168 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908986 on 2014-12-05T10:18:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Annaliza because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Imbestigador. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:17, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Govindaharihari (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aerobic exercise. Hertz1888 (talk) 13:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Editor-in-chief seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ambrosio Rianzares Bautista with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 04:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Google Questions and Answers

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Specifically, you seemed to post a question there that was meant for google; this article is about the service itself. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Vanamonde (talk) 07:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Marianna251. I noticed that in this edit to Public key certificate, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 12:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hydraulics— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 07:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Charles's law have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Enteng Kabisote 10 and the Abangers

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Enteng Kabisote 10 and the Abangers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to StreetDance 3D— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marco Laurel (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marco Laurel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 121.54.32.168, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Quinton Feldberg. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Planned Parenthood— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quinton Feldberg (talk) 15:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Inang Yaya— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boko Haram. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beta7 (talk) 03:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.