User talk:3jz01bcs

October 2007

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Wizards of Waverly Place episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 21:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in The Other Side of Me Box Set

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Other Side of Me Box Set, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Other Side of Me Box Set is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Other Side of Me Box Set, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 21:34, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to List of Hannah Montana episodes, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 15:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of Wizards of Waverly Place episodes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 22:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Hannah Montana books. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 17:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of Wizards of Waverly Place episodes, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 01:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of TheJackShowz

A tag has been placed on TheJackShowz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as TheJackShowz, you will be blocked from editing. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Hannah Montana books. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. NrDg 17:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Caged Fran

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Caged Fran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Caged Fran. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 23:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of TheJackShowz

A tag has been placed on TheJackShowz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Funeral 00:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Caged Fran

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Caged Fran, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Caged Fran. Thank you. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Don't Bet on It

A tag has been placed on Don't Bet on It requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rudget . 15:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Rudget . 15:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Hannah Montana episodes. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. NrDg 19:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of ICarly (Webshow)

A tag has been placed on ICarly (Webshow), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Solumeiras (talk) 20:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Phineas and Ferb episodes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 01:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Hannah Montana episodes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 20:57, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of TheJackShowz

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to TheJackShowz, you will be blocked from editing. Marasmusine (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Hannah Montana books, you will be blocked from editing. Making up information - bogus info to article and no references - continued pattern NrDg 22:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Penguins! episodes

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Penguins! episodes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of Penguins! episodes. NrDg 22:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Continued insertion of unreferenced, speculative or known false information. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NrDg 00:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to ICarly: Music From and Inspired by the Hit TV Show has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razor flame Report false positives 23:21, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jack Zwierzchowski! The Adventures of a Merman Live-er

I have nominated Jack Zwierzchowski! The Adventures of a Merman Live-er, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Zwierzchowski! The Adventures of a Merman Live-er. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Caldorwards4 (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jack Zwierzchowski! The Adventures of a Merman Live-er

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Jack Zwierzchowski! The Adventures of a Merman Live-er, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Miley Cyrus discography, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 23:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Forever (Miley Cyrus album). Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, NrDg 23:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NrDg 23:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 03:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 16:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of The Suite Life on Deck episodes. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you ShuffleStop (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Degrassi (season 11). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Victorious (soundtrack). Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wake Up (Youngblood Hawke album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:YoungbloodHawkeWeComeRunningSingleCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:YoungbloodHawkeWeComeRunningSingleCover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:YoungbloodHawkeWeComeRunningSingleCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:YoungbloodHawkeWeComeRunningSingleCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Youngblood Hawke - "Wake Up" album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Youngblood Hawke - "Wake Up" album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

Your edit history shows that you've been genre warring recently at Wikipedia. Considering the templated warnings you've received in the past, you should know by now not to add unsourced content to articles, as it contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, as you did here at Fortune (album), you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 04:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective descriptions such as genres should be attributed to the interpretations of notable individuals in the relevant field of scholarship, i.e. music journalists/critics. Retail sites such as iTunes present a conflict of interest with the product they are selling (the subject of the article) and are questionable sources. Please review the guidelines at WP:RS to learn more about identifying reliable sources. As I said before, the genres listed at Fortune (album) are based on what is attributed in the article's critical reception section. Dan56 (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Get to the River Before It Runs Too Low, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers

Please do not add iTunes placeholders as covers. the only image covered by the non-free media license is one that is the actual album cover. Album covers must adhere to international copyright laws as album covers are considered commercial works. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 16:47, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Up (Youngblood Hawke album) genres

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Wake Up (Youngblood Hawke album), you may be blocked from editing. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 23:48, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Laser brain (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Australia charts on Twitter

I don't understand why you keep trying to insert those links over and over. The warning you are given tells you that the AustraliaCharts account on Twitter is a forgery. Why do you keep attempting to insert links to it? If you really need to insert a link for a low-ranking Australian chart position, wait a few weeks and it will show up at http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/23790, which is a reliable source.—Kww(talk) 16:19, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for illegitimate use of an alternate account, User:Studiomusica. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—Kww(talk) 17:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3jz01bcs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a false accusation and my only Wikipedia account is 3jz01bcs. I am unaffiliated with user Studiomusica. J. A. Zwierzcowski (talk) 18:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. Decline is to be considered procedural only pending result of checkuser (should it come back positive, it will not be). — Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You'll have to excuse me for being extremely doubtful. Immediately after your block for edit warring on Wake Up (Youngblood Hawke album) expired, the Studiomusica account was created and its only edits have been to edit war back in the set of reviews that you had placed in the article. It's a slightly different edit war, but still your content being placed back into the same article. Perhaps some other admin will find your protestations credible.—Kww(talk) 19:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{checkuser needed}} due to block appeal.—Kww(talk) 20:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you due to the checkuser evaluation not being able to confirm the linkage. I'm still skeptical, but as long as you do not return to edit warring, I can't justify keeping the block in place.—Kww(talk) 04:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It is just a coincidence that Stidomusica showed up after I was blocked.

Better source request for File:Neon Hitch - Happy Neon (EP).jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Neon Hitch - Happy Neon (EP).jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbling Under positions

In regard to my reversion of your edit, please see WP:Record charts#Billboard charts: "On singles discography tables, do not add 100 to the corresponding Bubbling Under peak if the song never entered the Hot 100.... It should be indicated as an uncharted song with a footnote to indicate the Bubbling Under peak."—Kww(talk) 15:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Avicii - True album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Avicii - True album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 21:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Pitbull feat. Ke$ha - Timber.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Pitbull feat. Ke$ha - Timber.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Bloonstdfan360 / talk / contribs 01:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Monster (song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. STATic message me! 00:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 04:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs

http://loft965.com is a blog
http://www.josepvinaixa.com/blog is a blog
Zumic is a music review site of little to no importance: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/zumic.com

Generally, one should think twice about accusing administrators of disruptive editing in an edit summary. I've removed this material multiple times with a perfectly valid edit summary. Another editor has removed it for pretty much the same reason. Find legitimate sources or stop putting the material in.—Kww(talk) 16:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Show Me (Kid Ink song), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 18:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE

I only removed the DOUBLE chart you put in the table. If you don't even know how to update a charts, please don't do it! BTW, you don't even know how to leave a message to a user, so why are you on Wikipedia? --Zack Tartufo (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Girl (Pharrell Williams album), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me! 07:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enrique Iglesias - Sex + Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enrique Iglesias - Sex + Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. STATic message me! 20:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pressure (Youngblood Hawke song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to This Is How We Do. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Smoke + Mirrors (Imagine Dragons album) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smoke + Mirrors (Imagine Dragons album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Night Visions. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neon Hitch - Happy Neon (EP).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neon Hitch - Happy Neon (EP).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American Horror Story (season 6)

STOP adding this non-verifiable information to American Horror Story (season 6). If you can find a verifiable American site, then add it. Re-add the info as is again, and I will report your disruptive behavior. LLArrow (talk) 22:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AHS Roanoke poster.jpg

Hello. A tag has been placed on File:AHS Roanoke poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alex|The|Whovian^? 10:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 3jz01bcs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 115.164.90.170 (talk) 22:28, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 3jz01bcs. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Funk Wav Bounces Vol. 1, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ss112 02:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 3jz01bcs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 3jz01bcs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sea Wolf Old World Romance.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sea Wolf Old World Romance.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Getting Lost Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Getting Lost Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]