Jump to content

User talk:Ahonc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive2005/Archive2006/Archive2007

My RfA

[edit]
wikipedia:requests for adminship/DDima Thanks for your support at my request for adminship, which passed today with 42/0/0!

I would like to thank Wizardman for nominating me, Ahonc and everyone else for their support and comments. I'll continue with contributing to the encyclopedia's content (hopefully writing an FA here and there :) and will help out with admin-related tasks which you just entrusted me with. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask!

Thanks again, —dima/talk/ 01:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zirka Kirovohrad.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Zirka Kirovohrad.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BorysfenBoryspil.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BorysfenBoryspil.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PFC_Olexandria_logo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PFC_Olexandria_logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 04:20, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

[edit]

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/June 2008#Ahonc. RFRBot (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Дякою

[edit]

Дякою за увагу. Поможу скільку зможу! Brudder Andrusha (talk) 22:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

Thanks for the award, I appreciate it and am thankful that you noticed me. --Shustfan (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updates on Ukrainian Football

[edit]

Moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine/Ukrainian Football

Signature

[edit]

Just to remind you that per this can you please simplify your signature. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 13:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I digged them out of the PFL website. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 02:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of Dynamo Kyiv (en).gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of Dynamo Kyiv (en).gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MFC Olexandria logo.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MFC Olexandria logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your thoughtful post.

Looking at all of those alerts above, I hate those copyright notices. Why can't they just leave people alone? Odessaukrain (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions in Tajikistan

[edit]

Could you please provide references for the changes in Lebap and Mary, along the same lines as in the other three velayats? Thank you. --Zlerman (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is Turkmenistan, not Tajikistan.--Anatoliy (Talk) 14:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Tajikistan, Uzbekistan

[edit]

Уважаемый Анатолий, у меня на руках карты Таджикистана и Узбекистана (2004-2008 гг.) и демографический сборник Таджикистана на 1 января 2008 г., как указано в сносках. К сожалению, все это только в печатной форме, приобретено "на местах". Если Вам эта информация нужна, я могу сканировать и послать электронной почтой избранные страницы демографического сборника и таблички с районами/райцентрами с карт Таджикистана/Узбекистана.

Ну меня в общем интересуют современные названия, а также количество городов/посылков. Потому что в Интернети разные источники разные данные дают. Вот недавно нашёл источник, что в Таджикистане 17 городов на 2007 год, хотя на момент переписи 2000 года их было 22. Особенно что касается нас. пунктов Таджикистана. Многие считают, что райцентры переименовали вместе с районами, но как я вижу, на самом деле оно не так.--Anatoliy (Talk) 11:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Между прочим, мне совершенно не понятно, для чего Вам нужно было поднять вопрос о карте районов Таджикистана, опубликованной Мировым банком. Для меня это добавочная возня, а результаты могут лишить читателей прямого доступа к прекрасной карте, опубликованной международными организациями для "всеобщего блага". --Zlerman (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ну там ведь изображение полностью взято из другого источника. По крайней мере под свободной лицензией его размещать нельзя. Можно было бы хотя бы цвета поменять, цифры изменить и т.п. Или взять ту серую карту участника Rarelibra‎ и там поставить цифры.--Anatoliy (Talk) 11:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Number of cities in Tajikistan

[edit]

По демографическому сборнику Таджикистана, в стране 2 города с населением больше 100,000, 7 городов с населением от 40,000 до 100,000, и 27 городов с населением от 10,000 до 40,000. Итого 36 "крупных", как в моей таблице в статье List of cities in Tajikistan. Кроме этих "крупных", в Таджикистане еще 37 городских поселений с населением до 10,000. Всего городских поселений (крупных и других) 71. Эти 71 делятся на две категории (не зависимо от численности населения): шахрхо (города) - их 17; и шахрахко (поселки городского типа) - их 54, итого 71, как раньше. Те 17 которые Вы нашли на Интернете - это шахрхо по административной классификации, не зависимо от численности населения. Насчет райцентров, однозначно могу сказать, что они не переименуются одновременно с районами. Если у Вас еще конкретные вопросы, пишите, постараюсь ответить. --Zlerman (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Вот здесь их действительно 17, а здесь их 22, причём, как ни странно, 17 из них областного/республиканского подчинения. Так получается за 7 лет Гафуров, Гиссар, Пяндж, Шураб и Яван (города районного подчинения) стали посёлками? P.S. Тоже самое с Узбекистаном: то что Пайарык в 1994, и Янгирабад в 1996 году стали городами, я нашёл. А вот по поводу статуса Шафиркана (здесь он обозначен как город) и Карманы (в том же источнике она является посёлком) непонятно.--Anatoliy (Talk) 12:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
На основании моего сборника, Гафуров - поселок, Гиссар - поселок, Пяндж - поселок, Шураб - поселок, Яван - поселок (а в Яване население 25,800!). Это ситуация на 1 января 2008 г. Честно говоря, меня такие изменения не особенно интересуют и я за ними не слежу, так что по Узбекистану соответствующей информации у меня нет. --Zlerman (talk) 12:39, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Так там есть данные по всем посёлкам? Пришли мне список. Напишу в русской или украинской Википедии статью типа Список посёлков Таджикистана.--Anatoliy (Talk) 13:13, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Прислать список чего? Что в этот список включить? Какие индикаторы Вам нужны? Начните с таблицы в List of cities in Tajikistan и детализируйте добавочную информацию. Сообщите, куда ее послать. --Zlerman (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ну хватит только населения (ну можно также площать, плотность, если есть). Прислать на Ahonc.ua@gmail.com.--Anatoliy (Talk) 14:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Население уже указано в List of cities in Tajikistan. Если Вам эти 36 населенных пунктов не достаточно, укажите какие типы населенных пунктов Вам еще нужны. Остальные 35 населенных пунктов (из 71), в которых меньше 10,000 населения? Эта большая работа. Для чего? Какой список Вы хотите создать? --Zlerman (talk) 14:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ну для начала, например, сделать вот такие шаблоны для областей Таджикистана.--Anatoliy (Talk) 16:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Кстати, по поводу List of cities in Tajikistan: сейчас туда включены города и посёлки с населением больше 10 тыс., но ведь могут быть и сёла с населением больше 10 тыс. (например, в России в крупнейшем по численности населения сельском НП проживают 62 тыс. жителей, тогда как в крупнейшем сельском НП Украины — чуть меньше 10 тыс.; в Казахстане есть аулы, в которых до 25 тыс.)--Anatoliy (Talk) 16:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Согласен, но к сожалению таких данных по селам у меня нет. Придется жить с тем, что на руках - или другим искать дальше. --Zlerman (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Tajikistan districts

[edit]

Вы мне писали: Сделал шаблони ru:Шаблон:НП Хатлонской области и uk:Населені пункти Хатлонської обалсті. Вот только непонятно из таблицы: какой поселок является цетром Бохтраского района: Исмоили Сомони, Бохтариён или Бустонкала. Кроме того, в Rumi district сказано, что Колхозабадский район переименован, но в таблице он Колхозабадский.--Anatoliy (Talk) 13:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Отвечаю: 1) Райцентр Бохтарского района: И. Сомони (по картам). 2) Колхозабадский район переименован в Руми в июне 2007 г., что еще не отражено в печатных источниках. На Википедии мы должны писать Руми. Если в таблице написал Колхозабад, моя ошибка.

Убедительно прошу, Ваши сообщения/вопросы вставлять новым разделом в конце моей страницы. Иначе я их не всегда нахожу. Например этот вопрос затерялся в массе старого материала и остался без ответа. --Zlerman (talk) 04:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tajikistan district location maps

[edit]

Вашы новые карты с положением западных районов Таджикистана -- превосходная идея и замечательное исполнение! Я надеюсь, что Вы продолжите этот процесс со всеми остальными районами страны. --Zlerman (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Я просто взял существующую карту районов и залил цветом нужные районы. Так что они не совсем новые. :)--Anatoliy (Talk) 10:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Да, но процесс надо продолжить и довести до конца! --Zlerman (talk) 10:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Для РРП сделал: commons:Category:Districts of Tajikistan. Для других сделаю немного позже. --Anatoliy (Talk) 10:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nurobod district

[edit]

Прошу учесть, что районы Таджикистана и Узбекистана на английском пишутся с маленькой буквы, "district", а не "District". Я поменял Ваши изменения на основании этого правила. --Zlerman (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Интересно, а почему оно так? Ведь Khatlon Province, Samarqand Province пишем с большой.--Anatoliy (Talk) 11:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Без особой причины. Так сложилось на Википедии (Provinces с большой, districts с маленькой), а сейчас не имеет смысла менять. Надо придерживаться одного стандарта. --Zlerman (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
А в случае с Россией, Украиной Raion тоже будет с малой буквы писаться?--Anatoliy (Talk) 12:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Я вижу, что по Украине пишут "Oblast", "Raion" -- оба слова с большой буквы (см. List of raions in Ukraine by subdivision). По России не могу сказать: Вам надо будет этот вопрос изучить, если Вы собираетесь вносить изменения или создавать новые районы. --Zlerman (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tajikistan districts: numbered map

[edit]

Ваша новая карта с нумерацией районов Таджикистана в Districts of Tajikistan -- важный этап в развитии проекта. Спасибо от имени всех заинтересованных пользователей. --Zlerman (talk) 01:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karakalpakstan districts

[edit]

Западная граница Амударьинского района лучше соответствует красной линии на Вашей карте, чем границе на карте Rarelibra. Одно замечание: там, где Ваша красная линия доходит до реки (черная линия), на карте Узбекистана граница Амударьинского района фактически поварачивается на 90 градусов на восток и доходит до реки там, где на Вашей карте имеется небольшое остриё (не доходя Назархана). Таким образом, на карте Узбекистана имеется очень узкий корридор между границей Амударьинского района и рекой, но это конечно не существенно. По моей карте не могу сказать, где красная граница доходит до северной границы района: как нарисовано на Вашей карте, или дальше на запад, у трехрайонного стыка границ. Мешают буквы слова "НУКУС" на моей карте.Какие еще конкретные проблемы с районам Каракалпакии? --Zlerman (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Я её рисовал примерно. См. также мой ответ на e-mail.--Anatoliy (Talk) 10:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Вахдат, Джиргатоль

[edit]

Посторайтесь найти еще ссылки на этот странный поселок, который вдруг стал центром Джиргатольского района. --Zlerman (talk) 02:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Вот нашел ещё две ссылки об образовании поселка: [2], [3]--Anatoliy (Talk) 09:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Оба источника идентичны, и в обоих говорится о "создании поселка Вахдат". К сожалению, ничего о переименовании или о перенесении райцентра из Джиргаталя в Вахдат. Очень странная история. В итоге, много источников упоминают Джиргаталь как райцентр, и только один источник (Президентские новости) бегло упоминает Вахдат. Я советую продолжать придерживаться большинства пока не найдем адекватной информации. --Zlerman (talk) 14:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ну так его могли перенести недавно и тот источник самый новый, кроме того, президентский, возможно, более авторитетный. Можно в статье написать, что районное деление по состоянию на 1.01.2007 и оставить Джиргаталь центром.--Anatoliy (Talk) 21:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need your advice

[edit]

Hi, I need your advice as a Commons administrator. Please look at the three files File:Bursa14.JPG, File:Bursa24.JPG, File:Bursa8.JPG. In all three images the focus is on an extraneous subject (a person), not on the concrete subject Doner kebab. Is this sufficient reason to apply for deletion of these three files? I would appreciate if you could answer me on my talk page. Regards, --Zlerman (talk) 09:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Благодарю за ответ на моей странице. --Zlerman (talk) 14:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metro / Vandalism!?

[edit]

What fucking vandalism!? Official web-site of the metro is www.metro.KHARKOV.ua — so KHARKOV! Furthermore, names of its stations must be given according to transliteration from their official names in Ukrainian, not Russian! -- Whiteroll (talk) 16:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But names of articles of lines are in Russian. At first, rename articles about stations and lines, then change in the article.--Anatoliy (Talk) 16:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can't rename them and have no idea how to do this =( -- Whiteroll (talk) 19:09, 3 March 2009 (EET)
{{Db-move}}.--Anatoliy (Talk) 17:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at Kharkiv Metro. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Moving

[edit]

Thank you for advice! But I find this way easier! -- Whiteroll (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

report

[edit]

I reported him above on that page for one article. You have him above that for another. Now he has three reports on that noticeboard. Perhaps remove the third? He will be blocked for it. Ostap 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Standings in Druha Liha B

[edit]

Pryvit! Both PFL and your Ukrainian version have FC Poltava with 3 losses in the standings - but if you look at the PFL calendar of matches and your own results matrix FC Poltava have 4 away losses.... PFL має забагато проблеми зараз. Будемо чекати яка наступна дружина буде ліквидуати.... Brudder Andrusha (talk) 04:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found only 3 losses: from Illichivets-2, Hirnyk-Sport and Tytan Donetsk.--Anatoliy (Talk) 10:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thx for the info and I found my error. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 13:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancies in Druha Liha A

[edit]

Pryvit!

I noticed that you corrected the standings in Druha Liha A as per the accumulation of results for the schedule of games in PFL (Kalendar). However, the standings that PFL publish on their web page does NOT match that calendar. While you might be right about what the standings should be the reference to calendar as the source of the standings is not correct because in the calendar web link PFL does NOT have and standings table. The standings in wiki should match the source where the official standings are displayed on PFL and that is not "kalendar".

Have you contacted PFL about this discrepancy? You are in Kyiv and it might be worth asking Svyatoslav Syrota about this problem. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They mistakenly included to the table result of match Obolon-2 - Desna-2 (0-1) and not include Veres - Kororten (it calculated as 0-0 instead of 3-0 as in calendar). If you calculate number of goals in calendar you get the table as I write (Obolon-2 20-30, not 20-31) and 26 games; Korosten 24-42 (not 24-39), Veres 23-37 (not 20-37). Btw, PFL site famous with their mistakes. And do not believe their onlines.--Anatoliy (Talk) 19:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Якщо порахувати ріщницю м'ячів за календарем, то вийде, як я написав. Я так зрозумів, вони помилково включили в таблиці результат матчу «Десна-2» — «Оболонь-2» (а він був анульований), бо раніше в календарі його не було (там було порожнє місце). Так само в матчі «Верес» — «Коростень» вони порахували 0:0, насправді, згідно з рішенням ДК ПФЛ там технічна поразка 3:0, як і написано в календарі.--Anatoliy (Talk) 19:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Просьба

[edit]

Просьба помочь со статьёй о русском языке. Она номинирована в хорошие, однако обнаружились некоторые недостатки, которые необходимо срочно устранить. SkyBonTalk\Contributions 16:09, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uzbekistan disrtricts

[edit]

Hello!! Thanks for your maps. I was wondering if you could use a higher quality File:Uzbekistan districts.png though and perhaps make some locators as I go along using this? I'll get the districts onto her eover the next few days and am making templates by province. Thanks for your help!Dr. Blofeld (talk) 20:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my maps. I only filled districts on the Rarelibra's map. However, the map of Karakalpakstan by Rarelibra is not correct: borders between Amudaryo and Xo'jayli districts; Beruniy and Ellikqala districts are wrong. There are also maps of Andijon Province districts: commons:Category:Andijon_Province (one user made articles about that districts in uk.wikipedia, and I made maps for that articles).--Anatoliy (Talk) 22:33, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Standings and Color schemas for Premier League

[edit]

Pryvit!

These wiki football admins are out of their mind. The standings indicated correctly that Metalist and Vorskla have qualified for the Europe League. You put the (Q) indicator and then they put those stupid designators in Qualification and Relegation which are completely wrong and will be until the YKPAIHIAH Cup is played. And then they delete (Q) because it does match their template. Fed up with doing anything with them. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I'd answer here because your question is related to this topic. It is consensus amongst all season article editors to put the Qs only while the season is still on-going; the Qs are then put only to indicate that a team has qualified for a certain round of a competition. Another consensus is to display every available qualification spot for European competitions in the league table at any time rather than to only insert them on successful qualification. I don't think that those consensuses have been fully understood by the Ukrainian editors, which is why they are not applied here, thus leading to a bunch of back-and-forth reverts.
In any case - the season is over, no need to put any Qs any more. Should Vorskla win the Cup, change the qualfication rounds and the colors, otherwise the article is good as it is now.
Should there be any further discussion needs, please put them on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football.
Finally - congratulations to Shakhtar winning the UEFA Cup, you guys clearly were the better team! :-) --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved for trial. Please see the request page for details. -- Tinu Cherian - 08:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot request

[edit]

Hi Ahonc I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AHbot has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot (talk) 06:00, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Ahonc's Day!

[edit]

User:Ahonc has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Ahonc's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Ahonc!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.RlevseTalk 00:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian Football

[edit]

Hi

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ukraine/Football#Ukrainian_Football_articles

thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned something about the book "Український правопис". What year is that? I have a different sources all of them translate Belgorod as Білгород, not Бєлгород. Спробуй цей сайт: English-Ukrainian dictionary. The Russian-Ukrainian dictionary of Izyumov (1930) translates Белгород (in Russian)(in Ukrainian) Бі́лгород, -ду (Dictionary). So what are your thoughts on that? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, also note that Izyumov's dictionary was based on accredited dictionaries of of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Here is a summary of that dictionary and briefly about his author (Izyumov's dictionary). What are your sources? The "20 грн. Український правопис" does not even sound as a convincing source. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 16:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Year of publication of the book 2007. Electronic version is here.--Anatoliy (Talk) 23:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And also you can see orthographic dictionary of MESU [4]. So, the form Білгороду in Genitive case is incorrect because the cities of male gender have the ending (закінчення) -а, -я (exception: Кривого Рогу), but not -у.--Anatoliy (Talk) 23:19, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leontovych

[edit]

Hey, I've significantly expanded the article on Mykola Leontovych over the past few months. Thought (maybe more of "hoped") you might be interested in expanding, correcting it, or editing in general to help bring it to good, or even featured status. :-)
--BoguslavM 02:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Формат файлов

[edit]

Лучше всего загружать файлы(эмблемы фк) формата .svg??? Alex (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Если есть такая возможность, грузите.--Anatoliy (Talk) 15:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Какую программу лучше использовать чтобы конвертировать .png в .svg??? Alex (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Попробуйте Inkscape, Corel Draw.--Anatoliy (Talk) 19:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Попробовал Inscape.Вот что вышло:[5].При увеличении теряется качество.Не знаете в чем моя ошибка? Alex (talk) 20:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Было бы всё так просто, я бы все логотипы, гербы, флаги грузил в SVG. А чем вас не устравивает тот SVG для Арсенала, который в uk-wiki? Там я брал картинку в ai-формате (с сайта ua-football.com) и конверировал ее в SVG. Формат AI — это уже векторный, поэтому при конвертации вектора в вектор качество получается намного лучше, чем при ковертации растра в вектор.--Anatoliy (Talk) 08:54, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Поглянь, англійські вікіпедисти нас почули і виправились :) --A1 (talk) 08:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect ??

[edit]

The Ukrainian government does not decide how to write in English on WP en. Most of my moves are correct, with y in the middle or the end of names, because IOC or IAAF, two governing bodies which official languages are English and French, use these translitterations (too). Writing Ukrainian names into English is not an easy task, but please do not refer to a Government that had changed many times the rules... Spasiba.--Enzino (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but IOC gives Valerii Andriitsev, Ibragim Aldatov.--Anatoliy (Talk) 21:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there are many errors in the London 2012 lists. Many Gs, and so on, so please, try to do, as usual, your best. Every (big) list is full of mistakes. But, usually, I did not create nothing that it is correct.--Enzino (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eight Requests

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your help at Eight Requests. For future reference, priority are given to pictures that are used in at least one article. These two images: [6] and [7] aren't being used in any article space. Therefore, work on them could be a waste of the editor's time. You can replace these two if you'd like, though it's not mandatory. Hope you'll continue to help out. Thanks! – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 18:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Writer's Barnstar
You get this barnstar for your works in List of Olympic champions of Ukraine. Best, Tito Dutta (talk) 21:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image

[edit]

Please see this section here [8]] and recover the picture that you erroniously deleted. Thank you. Giano (talk) 16:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Архітектор Адольф Кун

[edit]

I put this image here. Hopefully someone will take a shot at cleaning it up. There is no need to place it in the eight requests. – JBarta (talk) 06:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata and AHbot

[edit]

Please note that inter–language links are now added using Wikidata . Could you stop AHbot from adding old style links. Racklever (talk) 10:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Eight Requests

[edit]

Hi

Thanks for updating the requests at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Photography workshop/Eight Requests.

I think you may not have noticed that when the requests are updated, the completed requests are placed into an archive, manually, by the updating editor, per the instructions: (link).

Don't worry, I added the relevant requests from the recent occasions when you did the updates to the 2013 archive: [9], [10]. Thanks again for contributing to the Photography workshop. Cheers. Begoontalk 14:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on English Wikipedia

[edit]

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 12:31, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerking on WP:CHU

[edit]

Thanks for your assistance, but per Wikipedia:Changing username/Assistance only a bureaucrat can accept or decline requests. Clerks are not permitted to use {{Done}} or {{Not done}}. If you want to leave a note, you can do so, but you can't actually accept or decline the request. Thank you. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 14:37, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Pmlineditor used it above, and than I used it too.--Anatoliy (Talk) 14:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since bureaucrats can no longer actually rename users, but we, global renamers can, I thought it was only logical that we at kstart using {{done}} for renames we perform and {{not done}} for non-controversial cases. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 16:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Are other bureaucrats aware of this? If this is indeed the case, then the pages should be updated to reflect the change. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 18:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WLM

[edit]

Здравствуйте Ahonc,

К сожалению, по правилам соревнования, нельзя менять фотографию после её подачи на интернациональный уровень. На самом деле, и на местном уровне нельзя менять после загрузки на Викисклад, но мы не можем, к сожалению, отвечать за местные жюри. Исключением являются случаи, когда модификация только техническая, например, удаление водного знака или рамки.

Удачи в международном соревнование!

Ynhockey (Talk) 13:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ahonc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ahonc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Ahonc|'''<span style="color:purple;">''Anatoliy''</span>''']] ([[User talk:Ahonc|<font color="indigo" face="Verdana">Talk</font>]]) : Anatoliy (Talk)

to

[[User:Ahonc|<b style="color:purple;">''Anatoliy''</b>]] ([[User talk:Ahonc|<span style="color: indigo; font-family: Verdana">Talk</span>]]) : Anatoliy (Talk)

Anomalocaris (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ahonc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Ahonc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

[edit]
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete revised pages

[edit]

AhoncHello dear, how are you? I hope you are well. I hope that you do not put a delete template on pages that have been reviewed by Wikipedia editors. Because this violates Wikipedia's terms of use, you can learn some editing basics here Wikipedia:Tutorial (historical)/Editing. Mohammed Ali Joke (talk) 07:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contra spem spero…--Anatoliy (Talk) 19:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that Ahmed Al-Hemyari is based on Ahmed Al-Sarori as they have the same club history. Weirdly, they have different DOBs though. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Sydney

[edit]

Hello there

Central Coast and Wollondilly LGAs do fall within the ABS definition of Greater Sydney. You need to click on the map in the source, choose the relevant boundaries (ie Greater Capital City regions and LGAs) and look. Unfortunately, I can't find a way to get a direct link to the two relevant maps, but it shouldn't be difficult for readers to do the search themselves.) Thanks. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Блокування

[edit]

Добрий день. Шановний Ahonc, звертаюся до вас таким чином, тому що не маю можливості написати вам на сторінку обговорення в Укрвікі. Мене заблокував користувач yakudza під надуманим приводом. Я повідомив користувачу goo3, що маю намір номінувати його на позбавлення прав адміністратора. Як я зрозумів, він попросив yakudza заблокувати мене, щоб я не зміг створити номінацію й представити спільноті докази систематичних порушень goo3. Після цього навіть стер мої повідомлення зі сторінки обговорення goo3 (можете подивитися в історії). Таке вже було 2021 року, коли я підняв питання порушень goo3 в кнайпі, yakudza заблокував мене під приводом використання проксі. Хоча проксі я не використовував, а подальша перевірка не підтвердила це і мене розблокували. Прошу вас розблокувати мене, оскільки не порушував правил і не збираюся цього робити, також не знаю, хто такий bodladub. Це не що інше, як тиск на мене й переслідування Пушинко (talk) 15:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Пушинко: Я не можу вас просто розблокувати без згоди користувача, який вас заблокував (така дія є небажаною для адмінів). Проте ви можете звернутися до Yakudza на його сторінці обговорення тут з приводу розблокування. Якщо ви не дійдете згоди, тоді можна розглянути інші способи врегулювання, зокрема і позов до АК.--Anatoliy (Talk) 19:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles during AFD

[edit]

Please don't move articles while they are under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion as it can cause confusion as well as mess with maintenance scripts. Stifle (talk) 08:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Брат

[edit]

Здарова, перейменуй статтю "Ильиновка (Украина)" на: Иллиновка (на росВікі). Топоніми не перекладаються. 45.158.247.119 (talk) 12:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is doing its job. Island92 (talk) 21:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We do not need to use redirects when we can use direct link.--Anatoliy (Talk) 22:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect is there to help it make easier. It does exit for a reason. Hence it can do its job when necessary. Island92 (talk) 22:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]