Jump to content

User talk:Anypodetos/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

you can have my vomit

wrong. i feel like vomiting right now. do you want it?

just because you are an employee of Keflex and trying to deny FACTS does not give you the right to deny the facts. Stopde (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

References are required per policy. Thus please find a reference to a high quality source. Cheers --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Doc, thanks for the addition of nausea/vomiting and the reference. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

clopidogrel

(cur | prev) 14:36, 9 January 2012‎ Anypodetos (talk | contribs)‎ (23,079 bytes) (Undid revision 470431632 by 167.1.176.4 (talk) It is sold under countless names of the type "Clopidogrel XXX", no reason to single one out.) (undo)

firstly, thanks for the informative article on clopidogrel.

the reason I added the line about Clopidogrel Dr. Reddy's in England is that one might reasonably infer from your article that Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis are the only legal sources of clopidogrel outside of India. however, Clopidogrel Dr. Reddy's is a generic and is routinely prescribed in the NHS, and supplied by chemists handling NHS presriptions. I believe that it also available in Germany, so I am guessing that generic clopidogrel is legally available in many countries, though perhaps not in the Americas. by all means, use Clopidogrel XXX if, on re-reading, you think that your article needs re-balancing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.1.176.4 (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining! I added that it is often available as "Clopidogrel", and qualified the bit about it being produced in India. Do you think it is clear now? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mortality
Lanatoside C (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oral
Moracizine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mortality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Reversion of edit to urea

Hey,

You reverted my edits to urea without providing a reason. I was removing factually-dubious material that has been unreferenced for two years, and which I could not find a reference for. Is there any reason you feel the material should stay? Best, Felidofractals (talk) 18:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I didn't revert you -- this was User:Brichcja. However, I have to agree with Brichcja that looking for sources would be better than deleting. Sorry, I missed that you did look for sources. (And the template is not quite correct: one of the uses is sourced.) Cheers, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Ah, apologies, not sure how that mixup happened. Thanks! Felidofractals (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
No problem! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Renin inhibitor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Affinity, Bipartite and Potency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the welcomeElectrogrl72 (talk) 13:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Diuretic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diuresis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Oxybuprocaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quicksilver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Fenfluramine/phentermine

Nearly a year ago, you helped me edit Fenfluramine/phentermine. I have not edited anything since and have lost my even my rudimentary Wiki skills. I just noted that this item has been wiped out by an anonymous source who left a totally unjustified attack. Can you help me getting this adjudicated? Since I don't review Wikipedia, could we correspond either thru email or twitter.

PietrH (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Replied at Talk:Fenfluramine/phentermine#Reverting back to June 2011 version and notified PietrH per email. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Proto-Indo-European society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Iranian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Milbemectin

Hallo Anypodetos. Bezüglich deiner Strukturformel besteht unter de:WP:RC/BW#Artikel und Stoffgruppen ein Wunsch. Magst du den selbst erfüllen? --Leyo 12:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Erledigt. Danke für den Hinweis. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Danke! --Leyo 20:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Acetonide (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Acetonide (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Acetonide (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). DMacks (talk) 07:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology

I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 09:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Not sure why you did what you did

Hello. I reverted you for two reasons.

1) there was NO reason to remove that wiki link for "Apologize" in that added section, as you thereby made it inconsistent with the rest of the examples that all had wiki links for their examples. (And to make it clear, I'm not referring to the Wictionary word either. If that had to be changed, that's fine... I'm referring to the actual Wikipedia word "Apologize". Not sure why you undid the wiki link for that, as there was no real reason to, maybe it was a mistake when you re-did the actual Greek word part. Not sure.)

2) You said that what I put was not stated in the source. That's simply not true. There was NO "original research". It was a PDF, so maybe you somehow missed it. But the notion by some that a full apology should consist of an "explanation" along with it, in keeping with the original meaning, etc, IS in that ref. So not sure what you're talking about. (As an example, right in that source it reads: "Dr. Aaron Lazare, a psychiatrist and author of the influential book On Apology, cites four principal components of apology: acknowledging the offence, communicating remorse, providing explanations, and making reparations.") Both those changes in that edit were not valid or warranted, sorry to say, hence why I undid those. Just letting you know. Again, I'm serious here. When I saw what you did, I was a bit puzzled, because to be frank it made no sense. You removed the wiki link why exactly? NO valid reason to do that. And also, what I stated (remember we're NOT supposed to copy and paste verbatim from refs, but get the main gist and points from them) IS clearly in that ref. So there was no "original research" anything to warrant your tagging that ref or whatever. For real. Seriously. It is in that PDF page there. You apparently missed it though. By the way, I put back your other edit regarding the exact Greek word. Regards. Hashem sfarim (talk) 22:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. My apologies for not being clearer, and thanks for your post!
1) Sorry for removing the link. As you suspected, this happened accidentally when I fixed the claim that "apologian" was a Greek verb. I see you have fixed this.
2) My reason for adding the "original research" tag was that an etymological fallacy "holds, erroneously, that the present-day meaning of a word or phrase should necessarily be similar to its historical meaning" (quote from article). As far as I see, your source doesn't claim that people think an apology implies an explanation because of the word's "original" meaning. I'm a bit sceptical that this should be so because most English-speaking people probably don't know the word's etymology. Did I overlook something in the source? What are your views? Thanks, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 09:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

WP Languages in the Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Languages for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Rapamycin

Hey, Figure 3 looks like its missing the O from the macrocycle-closing ester. As an aside, any idea what domain catalyzes the closure? is it a cyclization domain in the last nrps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlineAlgae (talk • contribs) 02:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out my error; it is fixed now. The article says that the NRPS RapP cyclizes the chain, but I don't have access to the full text of the reference, so I can't tell you any more. Cheers --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 13:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Polyestradiol phosphate

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Nisoxetine

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Nice drawing

I am really impressed with your drawings.

Mark Cobbold, University of Birmingham

Thanks a lot :-) --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 16:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

TfD

It appears that no one cares, so go ahead and merge them if you want. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Done, thanks! --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

New name of Affitin

Hello, Just to answer your question about the Affitins : Nanofitin is not the name of a brand of Affitin, it is the new name of this binding protein derived from sac7d family, that's why I wanted to replace Affitin by Nanofitin each time on the Affitin article. Please find a proof on the following link : https://data.epo.org/publication-server/document?iDocId=7779470&iFormat=3 It is a scientific publication from this year and it is written at the beginning [description part 0009] that "Nanofitins (were) formerly known as Affitins". So for these wikipedia pages to still be correct, the Affitin page should become Nanofitin page and on the page Antibody mimetic, Affitin should be replaced by Nanofitin in the table. Thanks in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lejiho44 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for your explanation! I hope I haven't been to harsh when I undid your edits, but besides changing the name you also broke the wikilinks (links to other articles). No harm done :-) I've changed the name to "nanofitin" again and also renamed the article to reflect the change. I also re-added your example targets (peptides etc). Thanks for your contributions, and feel free to contact me if you need any further help. Cheers, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ERCC8 (gene), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Splice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Welcome Drppanda

Thank you for creating a page and welcoming me.

Permutomino listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Permutomino. Since you had some involvement with the Permutomino redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Moving L-methylfolate

According to the article's history, you changed the target of the move proposal made the previous day, then 19 minutes later and without any discussion, moved the page. This does not follow established guidelines on page moving. - Stillwaterising (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Hm. I didn't see this as a change of the merge target as I only replaced a redir (5-Methyltetrahydrofolate) with its target (Levomefolic acid). The merger wouldn't have needed any discussion in the first place because L-methylfolate and Levomefolic acid are synonyms. I have to say that my edit summary ("Moved target of merge proposal") was rather misleading. Was this still a breach of guidelines? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
You were following the project's consensus on INN naming conventions, however the (now finished) renaming project suggested leaving the Move proposal up for a long time (over a month) to make sure it's consensus. For example, the renaming of Tetrahydrocannabinol to INN dronabinol would totally be in the project's guidelines, however it would not make sense to 99.99% of the readers who read the page. Similarly, if you look at my (re)naming proposal in Talk:Levomefolic acid back to L-methylfolate, I show that the scientific community has not adopted the name and prefer to use the name "l-methylfolate" used as the generic name for the product patented by Merck. I'm not sure what to do with the article now. It talks about the chemical 5-MTHF, the "drug" (that doesn't exist in pharmacology as Levomefolic acid (because it is an acid it cannot be formed into a tablet and must remain in solution?), and the commercial drug l-methylfolate calcium and varients. Perhaps it needs to split again? - Stillwaterising (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Anypodetos. You have new messages at Stillwaterising's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Category:Top 200 US Drugs of 2011 is undergoing deletion review

Thank you for your input on the WHO Model Lists of Essential Medicines. I'm notifying everybody who has been part of that discussion about a pending Categories for Discussion review regarding the newly created Category:Top 200 US Drugs of 2011. I've also put a notice on the project talk page here. Thanks again. - Stillwaterising (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crofelemer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiviral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

 Done --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Crofelemer

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Rhodocene dimerisation.PNG

Hallo Andypotedos,

die von Dir erstellte Grafik wird u.a. auch in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia im Artikel de:Metallocene verwendet. Was dort natürlich etwas "stört" ist der englische Text. Möchtest Du eine entsprechende deutsche Version erstellen, oder ist es okay für Dich wenn ich das übernehme? Gruß -- Bert.Kilanowski (talk) 17:15, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Bert! Ist erledigt: File:Rhodocene dimerisation-de.svg. Ich hätte eigentlich gedacht, dass Text von der Wikisoftware jetzt richtig geparst wird, aber das Wort "Raumtemperatur" ist trotzdem nicht ganz zentriert. Falls dewiki lieber in Kurven konvertierte Texte hat, kann ich das gern noch ausbessern. Viele Grüße, ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Perfekt und danke für die extrem schnelle Arbeit. Gruß -- Bert.Kilanowski (talk) 18:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anypodetos/Archive_4&oldid=1254584781"