User talk:Athul noble

Welcome!

Hello, Athul noble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Athul noble, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Athul noble! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Athul noble/r4rating.com has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 08:08, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC r4rating.com (August 25)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 15:12, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC r4rating.com (August 26)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Rima Kallingal because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:30, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: r4rating.com (October 1)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:26, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Veera Dheera Sooran. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 10:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 10:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources and potentially spammy content

Hi Athul noble, I've noticed that twice you've attempted to wedge in movie reviews from "r4rating.com" at Drishyam, for example here and here. I'm not sure what your angle is, but looking through your edit history, and noticing that you attempted to create an article on r4rating.com, my guess is that you either own or work for/with the company and are trying to legitimize the company by forcing it into various Wikipedia articles. If you own or work for/with the company, then you have a conflict of interest and you should not be editing Wikipedia articles and inserting your promotional content. Spam is garbage, so please stop. The contributions at Drishyam are unnecessary because there are already a number of reviews of the movie, so tacking on a review from your site doesn't improve the article, it just makes the article look like a promotional puff-piece. The r4rating site needs to first establish itself as a reliable source of critical content before the content can be included at Wikipedia. Please read WP:RS. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Medulla Oblongata (film) that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Josh3580_talk/hist 07:10, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okee dokes!

Hi Athul, since you don't seem receptive to the discussion I started earlier on your talk page, and since you seem insistent upon forcing this "R4 rating by you RATING" r4rating.com website into articles, namely Drishyam as you did after my last reversion here, I've decided to run the site past the Reliable Sources Noticeboard for the community to decide whether or not the site should be included in articles as a reliable source. You're welcome to participate in the discussion here, but if you keep forcing that site into articles to legitimize the website, the community will notice, and you could wind up blocked, and your site could wind up on the Wikipedia blacklist. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:31, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Medulla Oblongata (film). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diffs: 2 edits then a resubmission of the same disruptive content. Wikipedia is not a promotional site. Please stop trying to advertise here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Drishyam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Diff: [1] Re-re-re-introduction of unreliable spam website into article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:37, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- John Reaves 05:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Athul noble (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your Why my website is considered as spam all others are doing the same. Athul noble (talk) 05:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't get to put links to our own websites on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why my website is considered as spam all others are doing the same.

Oh, have you decided to participate in a discussion now that you've been blocked? "Other stuff exists" is not a valid argument. The fact that other garbage websites are being spammed into articles doesn't mean that Athul noble gets carte blanche to spam his garbage website into articles. If you are offended by garbage sources, then report the garbage sources. But don't add MORE garbage sources and whine about how unfair it is when yours gets removed. Your behavior is considered spam because you are heavily promoting your website, which doesn't generate any original content, but appears to TAKE from wherever it can, and with no attribution (You've got some really sweet High-Res photos in some of your articles. Did you take those photos yourself?) Your website copied Wikipedia content without attribution here and then you went back to the Wikipedia article and tried to sneak in a "reference" to your copied site, which basically means that a Wikipedia article is using itself as a reference. That's so confusing I don't even know how to explain it to admins. Further, you've done little else here but to promote your website, article after article after article, which I have reverted. Did I answer your question? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, something to consider. There are various other options that can be used to prevent sites from spamming on Wikipedia. If your site continues to be spammed, it will probably be added to the WP:BLACKLIST which will very effectively stop the spamming. Please don't make this step necessary. Ravensfire (talk) 15:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com

Hello Athul noble. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "r4rating.com".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/r4rating.com}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]