Jump to content

User talk:Aultabulta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear Aultabulta, The article you created at General_Maximus_Decimus_Meridius is full of typos and formatting errors. Besides, text gives the impression that Maximus was a real character. Please consider reading Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:Your first article, they will help you in creating factually correct and well formatted articles. Dipa1965 (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kamal-as-marudhanayagam.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert-Zemeckis-1-web.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gabriele Muccino.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Tiffanybrissettepoto.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiffanybrissettepoto.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TiffanyBrissette.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Marla.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marla.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Appukutty

[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Appukutty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chupan Chupai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Lady of Fatima Church, Krishnagiri

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Our Lady of Fatima Church, Krishnagiri, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Nosebagbear (talk) 15:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vinnarasi Madha Church, Kandikuppam moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Vinnarasi Madha Church, Kandikuppam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs prose content with citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 18:58, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elathagiri moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Elathagiri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs prose content with citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 Talk 22:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adaikala Madha Church, Elathagiri moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Adaikala Madha Church, Elathagiri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Aultabulta! Your additions to Periyanayagi Madha Shrine, Avur have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 00:59, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta

Thank you for creating Elathagiri.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please search for the village's name in https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx and use the population data from there

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you update.

this village Elathagiri is comes under the Palepalle village panchayat. when a check the population details using the above link I can get the population list based on the palepalle panchayat not exactly for Elthagiri village.

please find the below link for your reference https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/SearchDetails.aspx?Id=747939 Aultabulta (talk) 08:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve St. Antony's Church, Sundampatti

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta,

Thank you for creating St. Antony's Church, Sundampatti.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references - reliable sources with significant coverage of this church.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sundampatti, Krishnagiri district moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sundampatti, Krishnagiri district, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli (March 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at St. Francis Xavier Church, Kethanahalli instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ts12rActalk to me 08:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Aultabulta! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rActalk to me 08:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipally for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru these information gathers from local Parish priest church book Aultabulta (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru these are the documents are added and updated based on Dharmapuri Diocese monthly news letter. we unable to provide this reference due to this is a physical papers. Aultabulta (talk) 08:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Adaikala Madha Church, Elathagiri

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Aultabulta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adaikala Madha Church, Elathagiri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Presentation Church, Mathapuram

[edit]

Hi. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is to add the tag to indicate the page in under construction. This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:39, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kind check the official website's about us page for your reference Aultabulta (talk) 06:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Aultabulta, you do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. According to WP:VERIFY, "Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed." It also says: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Best regards, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri

[edit]
Notice

The article Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG ORGCRIT. Source eval:

  • Database Contact information page :: 1.  "Rreference to the location of this church". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • List of clergy, no coverage of subject :: 2. ^ "List of priest in this Fr. Heny Bonal in mentioned this list". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • Database Contact information page :: 3. ^ "This church mentioned in". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • Primary, contains information about all congregations in parish :: 4. ^ Fr. Susairaj (12 June 2020). "History of Shoolagiri Parish". Roman Catholic Diocese of Dharmapuri (in Tamil). Dharmapuri: Dharmapuri Pastorial. Retrieved 23 May 2021.
  • Database Contact information page :: 5. ^ "This church mentioned in indian roman catholic website". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • Database listing page :: 6. ^ "village in Krishnagiri Dstrct Goverment ledgger". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • Funeral information, no SIGCOV about subject :: 7. ^ "this church is mention when St. Don Bosco relic placed in this church". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
  • Primary, no SIGCOV about subject :: 8. ^ "about convent sisters of this parish". Retrieved 10 April 2023.
BEFORE showed nothing with IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  18:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  18:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TimothyBlue history of this are taken from the book release from the Roman catholic diocese of Dharmapuri. I belong to this diocese. Aultabulta (talk) 20:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969 we have the limited history about this Church it's shared by the priest of this Church and has been approved by the Diocese Administrator. This Organisation magazine published the same information of this Church but they don't have the web document on this. Aultabulta (talk) 13:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri

[edit]
Notice

The article Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability, no independent indepth coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli, is not suitable as written to remain published. It may be notable, but currently there are not enough citations from reliable, independent sources to show that notability. In addition, there are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 TT me 09:56, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hi Aultabulta! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created a article for Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri which defines the Church. Shoolagiri ia a Vilage located in India. Some one merged these two article which is inappropriate. If some one wants to read article for Shollagiri village they are also reading a church article. So I undo the article and spited both as different article.
I request to view the article also request to do the same. Aultabulta (talk) 14:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fram (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri

[edit]

Please be advised that the above mentioned article was merged pursuant to a discussion that took place over a month ago. (See Articles for deletion/Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri [1]). It was not random. Feel free to improve the Main article. Manannan67 (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Manannan67 [Shoolagiri] is a Village.
Our Lady Of Velankanni Church, Shoolagiri is a church located in Shoolagiri village. Both are different. If you want to delete the church article it's ok don't merge the article to Shoolagiri village article Aultabulta (talk) 04:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why would you want to lose the information re the church? So far, apart from demographics, it's the only information about the place. Surely it must have some importance to the village. Manannan67 (talk) 04:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Manannan67 No, it is a part of building structure of this Village you can remove the appended church article from the Shoolagiri village article. Aultabulta (talk) 04:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. Thank you for your work on Dinnur, Krishnagiri district. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

please add the population (with a good reference) according to the latest indian census

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. Thank you for your work on Pushpagiri, Krishnagiri. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

please add a reference from the indian census site for the population figure

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: As per your request Added census report details of this village Aultabulta (talk) 15:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. Thank you for your work on Kathanpallam. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a ref for the population from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli 2

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Aultabulta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sacred Heart Church, Harur

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sacred Heart Church, Harur, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Heart Church, Harur.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 23:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aultabulta (talk) 04:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC) don't delete this page, the article seems to be complete and informative. Kindly share the the valid points for deletion @Sohom Datta:[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. Thank you for your work on Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Nellimarathupatti. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Our Lady of Rosary Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Thenkaraikottai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creepTalk 11:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Our Lady of Rosary Church, Averipalli 2

[edit]

Hello, Aultabulta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Our Lady of Rosary Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Infant Jesus Church, Selliampatti

[edit]

Hello Aultabulta, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Infant Jesus Church, Selliampatti, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infant Jesus Church, Selliampatti.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Our Lady of Lourdes Church, Visuvasampatti

[edit]

Hello Aultabulta, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Our Lady of Lourdes Church, Visuvasampatti, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of Lourdes Church, Visuvasampatti.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aultabulta&oldid=1224152698"