User talk:Avram44

License tagging for Image:That's Where You Take Me.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:That's Where You Take Me.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Britney Singing Toxic.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Britney Singing Toxic.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. RT | Talk 20:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at User talk:Example

Hello Avram44! I saw your message at User talk:Example. I removed it because Mr. Example's talk page isn't the place to ask for help (don't worry though: few people look on that page anyway). Anyway, I've found your setlist of the Oops!... I Did It Again World Tour article on this and this website as well, so you seem to be right. It's still a bit weird though. She really did exactly the same at every concert?
I've looked at the articles history and see that many users have edited the setlist. This and this edit from the IP adress range 190.40.*.* are most likely vandalism. The 190.42.*.* range also looks suspicious. Other users might have simply added incorrect information without knowing it. There isn't a lot you can do about it I'm afraid. Just keep guarding the article(s), and revert edits which you think are incorrect (consider using your watchlist). To give you an excuse to revert changes on the Oops! article, I've added the two websites I mentioned as sources. If someone adds wrong songs to the setlist again, just use an edit summary like: "rv: incorrect, see sources." Cheers, Face 17:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touch of My Hand

Please do not add back blatant advertising for the CD. Wikipedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view and are here not to promote a product or an artist, but to present a balanced, neutral information about the album. If you want you you can incorporate external reviews (both positive and negative) into a section ==Critical reception== or similar (see, for example, featured article Adore (album)#Reception and aftermath). However, in current state it is simply not acceptable. Renata (talk) 05:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of artists who reached number one on the Hot 100 (United States). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 22:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RADAR britney

Sorry but radar was released as a single only in the radios in a few countries, but if that song chart in many countries why we do not add it?. Sorry for my english--Albes29 (talk) 14:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ross Thomas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ross Thomas.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image you uploaded...

is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Disturbing_edits. Any light you could shed on the source and authenticity of File:That's Where You Take Me.jpg would be most welcome. Thanks :) The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 05:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:That's_Where_You_Take_Me.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:That's_Where_You_Take_Me.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 02:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:That's Where You Take Me Single.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:That's Where You Take Me Single.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:That's Where You Take Me Single.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:That's Where You Take Me Single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of That's Where You Take Me

I have nominated That's Where You Take Me, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/That's Where You Take Me (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Amalthea 22:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Files in your User Space

Hey there Avram44, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Avram44/That's Where You Take Me. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of images removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of That's Where You Take Me

A tag has been placed on That's Where You Take Me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:That's Where You Take Me back.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:That's Where You Take Me back.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:That's Where You Take Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:That's Where You Take Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.

If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.

If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maite Perroni

I would strongly suggest you look at WP:RS to see what reliable sources are. ----moreno oso (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anticipating

I'll take the fact that you are not willing to present your reasons for why the song is a single as proof that you have no arguments. So, I'll keep reverting the page until you stop or discuss it in the talk page. You have to gain consensus to make such a change. Xwomanizerx (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying, but I'd rather take Jive's word on it rather than her site, that is handled by some bloggers that used to call themselves "bitches". And Jive DID NOT include "Anticipating on" The Singles Collection boxset along with the rest of the singles. "Do Somethin'", for example, was not released in the United States, and there's still a single in the boxset. Same with "I Love Rock 'n Roll". The changes about the promo singles were made shortly after the boxset was announced. Xwomanizerx (talk) 20:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem notice

Hello. The article Hartley Sawyer has been flagged by another contributor as a copyright problem, but you do not seem to have been provided the requisite notice. It is due for administrator closure, but I will relist it to permit you time to response. The requisite notice follows. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Hartley Sawyer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hartley Sawyer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamar-abrams/hartley-sawyer-debuts-on_b_783537.html and http://www.gcsny.org/News/DistrictNews/1011/HartleySawyer.htm and http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/get_to_know_hartley_sawyer_A5Fu5X9u7pEMsTxF4f1gON to start, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Hartley Sawyer and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Hartley Sawyer, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Hartley Sawyer with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hartley Sawyer. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Hartley Sawyer saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Avram44, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! (chat) techatology 23:37, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad

Hello Avram44. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nicolas Mouawad".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nicolas Mouawad}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucky (Britney Spears song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sometimes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barechested.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barechested.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]