User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 6

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bongwarrior. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

→

You deleted my page.

Why should I be held to the standard of a moderator whose name is "Bongwarrior." Put my page up for proposed deletion. But don't just remove it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardothe3rd (talk • contribs) 08:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey, don't be discouraged. I got a chuckle out of it. I'm sorry I had to delete your article, but I had no choice. I know you didn't mean any harm, but your article didn't have any references, and it could be considered libelous. We have to take things seriously here. Have a look at the welcome page, and let me know if you need any help. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

thanks for the star!

KuRiZu (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

wow, thank you very much for the star, hope you have a good day! --KuRiZu (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Sandbox

Is there any chance I could get the code back from "Los Arboles Negros" so that I could use it in my sandbox or user-page? Thanks. Sorry to be rude in my previous post, I was frustrated because I spent two hours making that article to have it removed before I could hit refresh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardothe3rd (talk • contribs) 19:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

There's a pretty good chance, but I'll have to think about it first. I'll talk to you about it either later on today or tomorrow. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for at least considering it. I'll follow up later tonight then.--Ricardothe3rd (talk)20:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Have you come to a decision? - Ricardothe3rd (talk) 03:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ordinarily, I'd be happy to just restore this to your userspace, where greater latitude is usually given. However, due to the possible libel concerns I mentioned above, I wouldn't be comfortable having this in userspace either, as presently constructed. My main concerns are the pictures and the presumably real names. If you'd like to rework the article to omit these, and post it on your userpage or something, I wouldn't have a problem with that at all. I'd be happy to email you a copy of the article for this purpose, or if you'd like to have a copy for your own use (make sure your email is enabled under preferences). Just let me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Hey, I must have missed this - who did what to my userpage? TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

A banned user added a sockpuppet tag to it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Really? Can you tell me who? TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

It was Toughhead 7 (talk · contribs), now blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Weird - don't know where that came from, then... thanks for catching it, tho! TheRealFennShysa (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, thanks for reverting that user's edit to my user page (bit late I know ;D), but appreciated - Kingpin13 (talk) 08:14, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Same from me, thanks Melburnian (talk) 08:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

:(

You're just jealous, and a hater. 98.238.188.211 (talk) 18:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Leave Me Alone

I'm a much better editor that you are, so can you give the jeliousy a rest? I can edit pages to be biased against Stephanie Meyer if I want, it's not like anyone cares. Okay, maybe rabid fan girls, but those are the kind of people who throw acid in guys faces.

And the thing about Stephan King was true. (Not that the things I wrote about Meyer aren't)

So can you give it a rest? Hollisterisluv (talk) 20:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Hollisterisluv

Roses

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Roses are red my love and violates are blue sweetness is green and so are you but not as sweet as you! 204.133.215.130 (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, that's very kind of you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcoming

Hi, thanks for welcoming new users. In future, please remember to put the welcome message into a new section - it gets them into good habits immediately, with how to manage their talk page. Keep up the good work though; cheers, Chzz ► 14:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure that's required at all. The template that I used ({{welcome}}) specifically omits the heading, while a duplicate template ({{welcome2}}) includes it. It seems to be a matter of preference. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

why?

why did you delete my page? i was still working on it it's hard to start off —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabang1122 (talk • contribs) 04:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocking User:Fishing Fishbones 294

The block doesn't seem to have worked...--Oneiros (talk) 11:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing POV and material without reference.

Hello,

Since the Blockland article was nominated for Deletion, a lot of information has been added to the article by WP:SPA's. The new information is pretty much POV and no new references have been added. I have already went through the article and removed all POV and all material without citation to try to make the article fit WP:NPOV, only for my edit to be reverted by one of the Single purpose accounts. I am just wondering if I should go through the article again or not. Any input is appreciated. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I would probably just {{fact}} tag the disputed material first, and see if any references turn up. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks, I will try that for a while.--gordonrox24 (talk) 21:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

'Sup?

What's with the deletion? Gizza page, plx. Ewin really is a heroic figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cucumbers (talk • contribs) 23:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Template:911ct, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards — Cs32en 08:26, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

why did you delete the frank "sinatra aids" scandel page?

are you not aware that this is a real event?

what if i wrote about Freddie Mercury (another singer/songwriter who had AIDS) contracting the deadly Virus, would THAT be defamatory? no, it wouldn't be. Diseases and handicaps aren't considered libel. you should know that, dude.

in any case, this was a real event. even if viruses were considered defamatory, one cannot hide the truth. if i wrote a biography on Hitler, could i be sued for explaining the fact that he is considered by many historians to be a megalomaniac? no...then why was this page pulled down?

reinstate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeyinredresponse (talk • contribs) 07:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Monkeyinredresponse (talk) 07:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent removal of vandalism comment in Moon article

When I made that comment, I was concerned myself that it might provide the "recognition" that vandals seek, so therefore it might actually reinforce the vandalism. But I thought I'd give it a try just to see if it would be helpful. Since it's invisible, and therefore doesn't actually "clutter" the article itself, I assume that you have something more against the idea that you have not shared yet? I'd appreciate your counsel and guidance on the matter. ^.`^) Paine ^diss`cuss (^^`. 10:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I just didn't find it very useful, although it was an interesting idea. If we left a personalized hidden note for everyone that vandalized, an article like Great Barrier Reef would reach 400K in no time. While it's true that it doesn't actually clutter the article, it does slightly clutter the edit window. Sometimes hidden notes can be useful for recurring vandalism from multiple editors (the Atlantic Records "you suck" vandalism, for example), but I don't think a one on one approach like this offers enough of a benefit. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I understand. I was hoping that such a comment might be effective enough so as to ease the recurring vandalism challenge rather than to add to it. However, I agree that the benefit might well be minimal. And I realize that editors whose focus is on vandalism are continuously looking for ways to meet the vandalism challenge. I was undoing vandal edits long before I became a member of the community, and I will keep tabs on any new ways to fight vandalism that Wikipedia editors create. Best of everything to you and yours! ^.`^) Paine ^diss`cuss (^^`. 20:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Floyd Mayweather

In reference to Floyd Mayweather, I have asked the user why they are changing the redirect to an unrelated boxer, but they have not replied. I will treat any such edit warring as vandalism from here on. Thanks for your assistance. prospider ‡ 05:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll try to keep an eye on it, thanks for your assistance as well. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

RE: TFA Protection

Hey there Bongwarrior (cool name, btw, haha)! Yeah, definitely no worries on the unprotection, if you ever think I'm away and have done something out of sorts, revert away mate. Apologies for the confusion on the edit summary; I had semi-protected the previous three or four day's main page featured articles after they had been vandalised dozens of times, and I accidentally used the same text when typing in the "other reason" (my browser saves what I type in those boxes, and I must have just glossed over it). I figure since the previous several day's featured articles hadn't been vandalised much since I put the semi-protection on, it would be a good idea to semi-protect the main page featured article starting at the beginning of the day. If you'll look back to the main page featured article's this week, you'll see little to no useful content coming from users hiding behind IP's.

Since the main page featured article is supposed to represent some of the best content we have to offer, it only makes sense that when people click on Learned Hand or any other featured article of the day, they should get to learn about the judge, and not be subjected to silliness regarding the size of a part of this chap's anatomy.

Furthermore, since the article is just about as good as it's going to get, as it's been through the FA process and many volunteers have devoted hours upon hours to this article, it is unlikely that it's going to benefit much from one more day's worth of additional content. That is, while I don't think we should semi-protect all featured articles, they can definitely do with being semi-protected for one day.

In addition, that guideline hasn't been discussed in months, and I took the opportunity to be bold. :D Thanks for the note mate! ocee^{Conas tá tú?} 21:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey again! Thanks for the note, but I'm not sure if we're on the same page. I actually completely agree with you that anonymous users contribute an enormous amount of time writing quality content and that most users who have registered started out editing anonymously. I definitely don't assume that the bulk of anonymous users are vandals; quite the opposite actually! However, since the featured article of the day is unlikely to be improved much and the clear history that the vast majority of people using IP's to edit that page on that day are doing so to vandalise the page, it only makes sense to keep the article semi-protected. If they'd like to edit the featured article of the day in the future, they can just register an account; it's easy and there's a clear link pointing them towards how to register an account when they find that they are restricted from editing that page.

I appreciate your wiki-ideology and I agree with it to an extent. I think it's great that anyone can volunteer their time to help build an encyclopedia; it's an amazing project and a testament to what can be accomplished when people work together. However, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of pages on the English Wikipedia that are protected in some form. I believe that the means justify the ends with regards to semi-protecting the main page, as we are ensured that the article represents the best we have to offer, ensures that the work that the dedicated writers put in won't be besmirched, and also ensures that each visitor gets to read a quality article free of vandalism. I'd be happy to get the community's opinion on the issue, and if it's determined that there's a clear mandate not to semi-protect the main page featured article, well then great! I'm more than happy to follow the community's decision on this, but since WP:NOPRO is only a guideline and there hasn't been much discussion lately, I think that semi-protecting the featured article of the day is definitely the way to go. ocee^{Conas tá tú?} 16:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, not sure that signing this page as requested does anything for you, seeing that I'm apparently "hiding behind an IP". Reason being that I don't have the time to devote to Wikipedia to even figure out how to "come out". Anyway, I just tried to remove a bunch of vandalism from today's main page and have to agree that protecting or semi-protecting the main page, at least for the day, is a sound principle. Please keep doing it. I keep telling everyone I know that Wikipedia is totally cool and doesn't feature much vandalism, it's really sad when the first sight of it looks different. Please do, everyone, protect (or semi-protect) the main page for that day. (Anonymous) 09:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.126.85.141 (talk)

Vandalism?

Hello, Jeff G. and Quaeler didnt answer my at my talk page so i ask you. Was my edits at Ordinal number? The Interwikilinks linked to wrong article in some languages so i moved dem to the correct article. (Ordinal number (linguistics)) --Utvik (talk) 05:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

u just falsely accused me of vandalizing a page. I removed a large amount of unencyclopedic content from the Kingsclere page. The edits were needed as the page was in incredibly poor condition, and much of the content was unsuitable for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.197.232 (talk) 20:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

WHY DID YOU DELETE CARLOS VEGA

HE IS THE GREATEST MAN THAT WILL GO DOWN TO HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by MEXICANAMERICANO (talk • contribs) 18:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism on my User Page

User:ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds/Vandalism |}

That's no problem, thanks to you too. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Hi

just reverted vandal edits in your page. Hope its normal now Subash.chandran007 (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Dr. Steel (Dr. Phineus Waldorf Steel0

Hey there, regarding the deletiong of the Dr. Steel Information page, can i get the reasons for the deletion, he is a well know musician who has done many live performances and has also established an almost cult following on the internet, also there was no deletion notice, as the article was instantly deletedPelenor1 (talk) 04:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

It was speedily deleted by me as a repost of material that was previously deleted as a result of a deletion discussion. The previous discussions that I could find are here, here and here, as well as two deletion reviews here and here. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

ryan whalen

why did you delete "Ryan Whalen"? it was very well written in my opinion and i really enjoy reading the amazing story of this man i think the article captures the reader in with amazing celebrity kudos and then keeps them in with down to earth, opinionated, articulate phrases that keeps you on the edge of your seat. So can you please apologize tell the wikipedias to putt back Do Jai Sai —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gurupiknika (talk • contribs) 21:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

flouride

umm I was just trying to point out that sodium flouride the stuff pump into our drinking water is rat poison if you dont believe me go to your local hardware store and go find some rat poison read the label and it will say 70-90% sodium flouride —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.90.93 (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You edited my shit about Axl Rose, but its true!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.38.249 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know

I changed this block to prevent talk page editing, but did not lift your block at all. They were trolling their own talk page. Hope that was okay. Thanks. Acalamari 21:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Of course, no objection at all. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

To a fellow-patroller

Hi Bongwarrior. I'm not an admin, but I do a fair amount of quality-control on Wikipedia - maybe you've spotted 1 or 2 warnings I've issued in the past. Of course I have noted that you do a LOT of such patrolling. We both know the system usually works very well, provided users are given fair and appropriate, escalating warnings, eventually being reported if they continue.

But it seems it can happen that the odd user is harder to rein in. Such is the case I fear with this user - would you say I've given them sufficient, clear warnings?

However, to my surprise, when I duly reported them, a single overseer apparently dismissed all my concerns in short shrift.

I think that, with your background, you too may have a contribution to make to what I had hoped might be a greater debate?

Equally, if I've missed some valid points of policy or protocol, I'd be grateful if you could point such things out to me, as you see fit. Thanks in advance for any time you could spare to this. Trafford09 (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't think this editor's contributions require any action. There doesn't seem to be any mass linking agenda here–many of their edits don't involve any date linking at all. I don't think the injunction was intended to prohibit the occasional linking or unlinking of dates, although I haven't been following the whole date linking debacle. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Hobo Knife

Dear Bongwarrior, I was viewing an article that contained a link to the "Hobo Knife" article and notice when I followed the link you had removed it. I am not an experienced Wikipedia user, yet I am trying to format this as well as I can. I'm am not going to write a big reply, but I just wanted to point out that this is a name of a real type of knife that I sell at the hardware store I work at. It is not meant to be slang or disrespectful. Here is a link to the major US producer, W.R. Case & Sons Cutlery Company[[1]] of quality knives: "Amber%20Bone"&View=1&Item=0052.

The Hobo

When the Hobo (54HB) is closed, it resembles a regular Trapper. The handle splits apart revealing a separate knife, fork, spoon and bottle opener. Case produced two variations of the Hobo ('51 and '52) from the early 1900s-1940. These were made with two to four utensil implements using a can opener, soup spoon, three-pronged fork, and knife blade. Case re-introduced the Hobo (54) in 1983.

The above information came from another Wikipedia page[[2]].

Thank you for your time! Fastskyl1ne (talk) 21:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)fastskylne

Hi Fastskyl1ne, thanks for dropping by. Don't worry, you aren't missing out on anything. The deleted article didn't have any content except for gibberish, probably just a test. Anyone who wants to make a serious attempt at creating the article is welcome to have a go at it, as far as I'm concerned. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocking

Hello,

I would like to understand why you blocked Poppypetty ? I am not sure why

(diff) (hist) . . mb Ceres (dwarf planet)‎; 20:05 . . (+19) . . GrouchoBot (talk | contribs) (robot Adding: mk:Церес)
(Block log); 11:19 . . CIreland (talk | contribs) changed block settings for Poppypetty (talk | contribs) with an expiry time of indefinite (account creation blocked, e-mail blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (per Bongwarrior)
(diff) (hist) . . User talk:Poppypetty‎; 11:18 . . (-576) . . CIreland (talk | contribs) (Respond to unblock reqeust)
(diff) (hist) . . m East African Campaign (World War II)‎; 09:05 . . (-82) . . Staberinde (talk | contribs) (not really relevant enough for campaing of such scale, also it was basically still italian unit)
(Block log); 07:32 . . Bongwarrior (talk | contribs) blocked Poppypetty (talk | contribs) (account creation blocked, e-mail blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (abuse of email feature)

Poppy (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey Poppy. The account was re-registered and used to send trolling emails. You can read all the gruesome details here. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Quick Question

Hi could you please Can take action against the constant vandalism on the Dennis Kucinich Page? It appears people keep changing Dennis Kucinich's name to elf and keebler. Possibly semi-protecting the page would be a solution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theownedpilot (talk • contribs) 21:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't think protection is required at the moment. ~~You~~ The IP has been warned and will be blocked if ~~you~~ they persist. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Cheers!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. Xhaoz ^Talk ^• ^Contribs 06:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Just thought that you should know...

...that you are the greatest admin ever. Thanks --t'shael mindmeld 10:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I guess I'm alright sometimes. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Home-made award

I've got a question from a friend. Is it okay for a user to make an award? --Abce2|AccessDenied 22:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

And can they give it to people?--Abce2|AccessDenied 22:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it wouldn't be much of an award if they couldn't :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info

You are the first one to get this award.

		A sack of potatoes
		Reason stated above----Abce2\|AccessDenied 22:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks very much. I'll cherish it always. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

WHY!Davegon1990 (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Why did my article on 'Sebastian Milford' get deleted under vandalism??

The article didn't vandilize anything, its a fictional factsheet on a made up character, for amusement purposes.

Davegon1990 (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Nice work!

I've run across your name several times tonight, and each time you've beat me to reverting vandalism. I think all of your hard work deserves a cookie! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 07:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Sophus Bie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks, appreciate it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm presuming this isn't you...

Found User:B_ngwarrior in the "new user" log... safe bet that this is yet another "fan". The account is now blocked, but I thought I'd leave you a note in case it (by some unrealistically small chance) is valid. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat _spy 07:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Nope, wasn't me. Thanks for the notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Attacking user

RE: this Can you block the account? It returned today with this. cheers, Enigma^msg 18:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

ANSWER ME!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegon1990 (talk • contribs) 02:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

You still around?

If so, I need help with something. t'shael ^mindmeld 05:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, what's up? --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Will you look at Kodiak Arrest and verify that I'm not acting like a total dick? And if you agree with me that it meets CSD Criteria, would you please delete it? Thanks. :) t'shael ^mindmeld 05:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Done, your tagging looked fine. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Wonderful. Thanks for your help. t'shael ^mindmeld 05:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Bongwarrior, I'd like to reinstate the Kodiak Arrest page on Wikipedia, what about it did not comply with wikipedia's guidelines? I'll make the necessary adjustments so that it is not deleted in the future. Thanks. Titan413 (talk) 14:45, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Just read the terms of the garage band/new band section referenced on T'Shael's page, and that seems to answer my question. Guess they need to have put out their album before they can be posted. Ah well. Sorry to take up your time. Titan413 (talk) 15:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

AN/i

I cannot defend myself on the page becasue you have protected it- I have been able to all night- please fix ThePizzaMakingCaveman (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Another favour to ask..

Could you look into SFKing415's latest article creations? t'shael ^mindmeld 10:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have time to properly deal with them now, but they don't look promising. I'll investigate more thoroughly tomorrow if they're still hanging around. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good to me, thanks. :) t'shael ^mindmeld 10:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know; two of them got speedied and the other is up at AfD. I appreciate your help, as always. t'shael ^mindmeld 22:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Why did u delete my page? it is a character in a book written by my brother who committed suicide im just honoring his memory Pinole101 (talk) 03:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. That sure came out of nowhere. =\ -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

George Clooney

Please stop reverting the changes on this page.

Many hours of work went into planning this prank, and it was pulled of successfully. Newsreporters and newspapers are picking up the story as I type. Thousands of students made reference to Clooney in their GAT today. Clooney's publicist even contacted Lucas Shipsides (the man behind the idea) to tell him the George is impressed. If this isnt worthy to go one the page, I dont know what is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.28.144 (talk) 13:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, the event looks a little more noteworthy than I had thought. I still don't think it belongs in the George Clooney article, because it's basically trivia. When your block expires, it might be best to bring it up on the article's talk page to see if there's any support for re-adding it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 14:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Xero Limited

From the look of their contribution log, this account would appear to only be used for vandalism - I don't suppose you could block them? --Muna (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Done. I usually prefer to give them a few more warnings first, but you're right that it does seem to be a vandalism-only account. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the damage to my user page AND for updating my vandalism count.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, no extra charge for the vandal count update. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I would also like to thank you for changing the block setting for User:Laeral Silverhand by blocking him from sending emails. He sent me an abusive email today. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 00:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiPedia/createpage

Will you please delete this? I can't for the life of me figure out what to tag it as. Thanks, -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 03:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my userpage and blocking that editor in one fell swoop :) I appreciate it. Thank you. HarlandQPitt (talk) 05:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Bald Eagle

You left a message about my editing a page on the Bald Eagle? Sorry,but I think that was addressed to the wrong person.

70.240.192.210 (talk) 06:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)J

The message was referring to this edit from last year. Someone else probably had your current IP address at the time. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Also, you are free to remove it if you like. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:77.74.197.52

Thanks for the revert--I'm not a barbie girl at all! (And you didn't create Giant Penis...) ;) Drmies (talk) 21:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Skimperts

Is it worth blocking this user? His talk page suggests that his account is only for making personal attacks against User:Mentifisto--The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

He's already been blocked, I think. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

question

whats a smart person who wants to legalize weed doin going around editing wikipedia, theres a few cool tricks i know for destructive edits.--Rickrollisfun (talk) 01:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Lol

hehe Zoo Fari 07:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I know, I can be an ass sometimes :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Can you believe that since May 17 my userpage has been vandalized THIRTY TIMES!!!! and my talk page has also suffered several hits.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:07, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

No problemo. I can semiprotect your userpage for a while if you would like, just let me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate the offer, but I'd much rather have my user page attacked than the articles.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Good man, that's a good way of looking at it. Still, if it ever gets too heavy, just let me know. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Jesslovesthetigers unblock request

Says they're sorry and would like to edit articles about tennis and animals. This is the kind of unblock that moves me to offer a second chance. Your thoughts? Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for contacting me about this. I wouldn't have any objections if you'd like to unblock. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:56, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Bongwarrior, I have made an interesting discovery about this blocked user that you can see here.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 03:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Mary Surratt

Thank you! Wildhartlivie (talk) 08:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

RfC on Joseph Priestley lead image alignment

A RfC has been opened to discuss the issue of alignment of the lead image on the Joseph Priestley article. Because you have previously commented or been involved with this issue, your input is requested. Please stop by Talk:Joseph_Priestley#RfC_on_lead_image_alignment and leave any feedback you may have. Thank you. Madcoverboy (talk) 03:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Priestley lead image alignment

You previously have commented on the RfC at Talk:Joseph_Priestley#RfC on lead image alignment on whether or not the lead image should be left-aligned. A straw poll is under way to determine what, if any consensus have been developed towards resolving the debate. Go to Talk:Joseph_Priestley#Major_options and indicate your relative levels of support for each option. Thank you. Madcoverboy (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding an article I just made

I just made my first article for Las Hermanas Montoya, but whenever I do a Google search it keeps showing up as User:Hatman1960/Las Hermanas Montoya. Is there any way I can get rid of the User:Hatman1960 before the article title when performing a Google search? I've tried requesting an Administrator to delete the page created under my username, but it still shows up, so I recreated it just so it could serve as a redirect to the main article. How can I get the title to show up as just Las Hermanas Montoya in Google and searches? --Hatman1960 (talk) 05:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh yeah, also, would you mind responding on my talk page? It's just a lot easier for me when I get the alert saying someone has replied to me. Thanks! --Hatman1960 (talk) 05:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Chew Xuanjie

He belongs to ColourWolf, a highly dangerous banned user from Singapore that has been a menace here since 2007. He has apparently adopted the Grawp handbook now. What should we do? I know Grawp is absolutely deadly... Arbiteroftruth ^{Plead Your Case} 11:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

RBI works for me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment Reverted

I would like to know why you reverted my comment.Frogo Baggins (talk) 05:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The answer can be found on your talk page. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 06:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Attributing work

Wondering if you can answer a question I've been trying to resolve lately (the admin I previously asked has been away). To simply reiterate: I'm trying to figure out how I might give a proper attribution for work that was originally posted on a Wikia site (by me). This is in regards to the Beverly Hills, 90210 franchise article, which has adapted some material from its Wikia counterpart (though they are not exactly the same).

I've been reading over the WP:Plagiarism page and came across the link to planetary nomenclature. I've attempted to apply the method displayed there to the article in question. I'd just like to verify that it's been done the right way. If not, do you know how I might go about it? -- James26 (talk) 06:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You'll probably want to double-check with someone smarter, but it looks fine to me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 06:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Vandal Revert

Some vandal decided to vandalize your page see[3]and here[4]and I reverted him and reported as well. Thought I'd let you know;) RegardsSchnitzel MannGreek. 23:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for looking out, all the best. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I guess I should have checked to see that you were an admin and could have protected it yourself. --Bastique ^demandez 20:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I believe he keeps it unprotected so that I have something constructive to do. ;) -T'Shael,The Vulcan Overlord 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC 20:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, no worries, Bastique. It's the thought that counts. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You are wrong, Technically Franken is a senator go look at this!

United States Senate election in Louisiana, 1996! This is similar because it was contested and she wasnt seated until October, but her senate started at January 7, which mean Al Franken is a senator with 94th Seniority! I wish you all ADMINS will go do your research before deleting things on wikipedia!_BLuE ^DOg^Tn 20:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Please check the edit history of the article. I think you have me confused with someone else. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

wtf

Why do you keep deleting my articles? Why does it have to "meet the guidelines" of Wikipedia? It's freaking wikipedia, I thought that was the point of this website. If it's not offensive or causing any damage why does it have to be deleted????

Omglmaowtfbrb (talk) 05:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Because if Wikipedia didn't have notability guidelines, every bored high school kid would have their own wikipedia page. -Falcon8765 (talk) 05:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

And whats the problem with that? Not doing any harm. I fail to see the significance here. Why does it matter if every damn high school kid in america has their own wikipedia page? Nobody will ever see it, so what's the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omglmaowtfbrb (talk • contribs) 05:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Because that's not the purpose of Wikipedia. We're an encyclopedia, not a social networking site. If you'd like to find ways you can contribute, please take a look at the welcome page. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Seems like an admin power trip to me, but whatever, thanks for the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omglmaowtfbrb (talk • contribs) 05:59, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Bong

Do you smoke pot? Texcarson (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

No, I hate it. Up with hope, down with dope, that's my motto. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:02, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Also, regardin "You wouldn't vandalize a cute little bunny...would you?": Wikipedia doesn't look like a cute bunny... more like a fierce lion, given the latest news coming around. Texcarson (talk) 19:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

OH from the nick, i just assumed . . . . Cheers, Dloh cierekim 19:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I was being facetious above. Actually, I have been known to partake on occasion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

about external link deletion

Hi.. I submitted proper link only that was not a inappropriate link. Y you r deleting my links? and gave warning to me.

Regards Nirmala —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirmala hiox (talk • contribs) 04:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I'm sorry, but the links do not comply with Wikipedia's external link policy, in that your additions appear to be designed to promote a particular website. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Ron Artest

I had trouble keeping up with the IP vandalism and reverted to a less than optimal revision. You did a better job. I requested protection for the page a few minutes ago. Newportm (talk) 07:17, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it went crazy there for a minute. I reverted to a wrong version myself, it happens. Personally, I'd like to hold off on protection for now to see if they'll stop on their own, but you were right to request it. We'll see what happens, thanks for helping. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Just a note to thank you for the reversion on my talk page. This person is a sock by the way. Check the history of User:ECW500. !! Justa Punk !! 09:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Awarded to Bongwarrior for his January 1, 2007 grammatical revision in the Twelve-string guitar article. Your hard and diligent work is a noteworthy example of the overall, continuing effort to improve capitalization in Wikipedia articles. Tripodero 12:41, July 5, 2009 UTC

Ha, thanks! That was one of my first edits. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Christopher Warwick

I can't understand why you reverted the edits. Warwick's real name is Christopher Wrigley and he was convicted in 1999 of p&d of child pornography. Within the paedophile community he is known as Appy. Is it not permissible to include this information in his article? Please let me know. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnMalonn (talk • contribs) 04:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

It is not permissible to add potentially damaging claims about a living person without providing proper verification. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I need an independent administrator

Hi. I am currently involved in a content dispute and a couple of users who I think are obvious sock puppets have shown up and started edit warring. At first I blocked them, but then I thought again because I am involved in a content dispute on that page. I have unblocked them so as to allow someone not involved with the dispute at Rorschach test to make the determination. I clicked on the logs button and viewed all blocks to find an active admin and at the top of the list was:

00:16, 8 July 2009 Bongwarrior (talk | contribs | block) blocked Jasoninsolo

The pattern is like so:

22:10, 7 July 2009 Psychology12345 creates a new account
22:11, 7 July 2009 Psychology12345 removes images
22:25, 7 July 2009 Psychology12345 removes images
22:32, 7 July 2009 Zeitgest creates a new account
22:36, 7 July 2009 Zeitgest removes images
22:43, 7 July 2009 Zeitgest removes images

I would appreciate it if you could take a look at these accounts and come to your own conclusion as to if they are single purpose accounts for edit warring, and if any sort of block is prudent. If you don't have time or don't wish to do so for any other reason I will understand. Chillum 00:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, it seems pretty obvious that they are the same person, and they are probably going to be SPAs, but personally I would hold off blocking unless there are any future problems. I've left each of them a notice about edit warring and hopefully they'll decide to use one account or the other to start a dialogue. Hope that's satisfactory, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your help here. Thank you. Chillum 00:55, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, well, well

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You have reverted vandalism to my userspace a number of times and I always see you around fighting vandalism. For your hard efforts and great work as an admin, I hereby award you this barnstar. The Legendary Sky Attacker 07:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, happy to help out as always. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Article JTKurth

07:41, 9 July 2009 Bongwarrior (talk | contribs) deleted "Article JTKurth" ‎ (A7: No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion)

Can you please tell me what this was. Thank you 76.14.162.163 (talk) 08:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)JTKurth

Hi, it was a non-notable biography about someone named Toby. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

You wouldn't vandalize a bunny, would you?

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		That left me laughing the rest of the day! :) Abce2\|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) 22:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, the funny thing is that so far, it actually seems to be working. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Same.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) 01:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Whew, LOL of the week.
If the bunny is working, maybe it's the Bambi effect, combined with a variant of that experience described by budding comedians – they distracted bullies by making them laugh. Milo 02:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Dude...

...It's always nice to get them yourself: [5]. That must have been particularly satisfying. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:09, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Nah, not really. I just happened to be in the right place at the right time, I guess. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Fucking, Austria

Sorry, I wasn't censoring it, I was trying to revert the previous editor who censored it, and I missed most of them. Tried to undo my edit, but you must have just beat me. Cheers, — Deon555^talk_{I'm BACK!} 04:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem, I saw what you were doing. Thanks for helping, take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:39, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

last block

Note -- the account you just blocked (68.118.158.115 ; thanks) has a notation as to whom to contact ... see http://samspade.org/whois/68.118.158.115 --Epeefleche (talk) 07:25, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

This is pretty run-of-the-mill stuff to be bothering the ISP with, I think, but feel free to do so if you are so inclined. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

The mysogynistic stuff was pretty nasty.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Seth Green

Nice catch. I was paging back to find a good revision because I realized this revert (diff) didn't go far enough. Keep up the good work! Newportm (talk) 04:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Orks1a2da

Just a heads up that Orks1a2da, who you previously issued a final warning to for vandalism, has been vandalising the article on Robin Klein.
- Eliahna (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the head up. I've left a more recent final warning, for now, instead of blocking. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Polpescetarian

I am trying to add an article discussing a specific dietary lifestyle, that is defined and described in other articles, but have never added one before. Who do i look to for help in this regard? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballgamer09 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Polpescetarian

I ask yesterday about this after trying to start the article and now today it has been deleted. The problem is that the link placed in leiu of the article links to something different that is not Polpescetarian. There is a difference between the two, Polpescetarian is no mammalian flesh, while Pescetarian is nothing but fish. How is this corrected and not eliminated by one of the moderators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballgamer09 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Could you help me please?

Hi there Bongwarrior and thanks for reverting the vandalism twice on my user page. Could you please indef semi-protect my user page? the anon user you reverted is part of an ongoing sock puppet investigation. So I fear that this user will strike my user page again even with a block on them since their IP changes. I'm also involved with countering vandalism so I'm sometimes a target for vandalism myself and the vandals I reverted struck in the past. It would be nice to have one less thing to worry about. Thanks for your time! Elockid (talk) 09:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem, done. If you decide you'd like the protection removed, just let me know. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! Elockid (talk) 09:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I need some help for putting pictures on a article

How do you do this? Wigglesrock (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Wigglesrock

Caption

As long as the image has already been uploaded to either Wikipedia or Commons, usually something like [[File:Bad Title Example.png|thumb|Caption]] will work, which produces the image on the right. Just change the filename and caption as needed. Other options, such as forced image sizing or alignment, are available as well. The other options are listed at Wikipedia:Images.

If you still need to upload the image first, just go to Wikipedia:Upload and follow the instructions there. Please keep in mind that most images on Wikipedia should be free, non-copyrighted images, although non-free images are permissible in certain situations. The licensing stuff can be a little confusing, so let me know if you need any help there. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

final, final, final warning

Hey Bongwarrior, if you have a moment, please have a look at User talk:24.114.255.83. At the bottom of the page you'll find your old block notification, followed by a couple more vandal 4 warnings. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, William M. Connolley handled it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

64.106.113.197

I reblocked with talk page edits turned off. The date vandalism on others' comments on his own talk page seems too much to ignore. If you disagree, feel free to revert. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

User talk:51 Pegasi b

Dear Bongwarrior, you deleted the talkpage of User talk:51 Pegasi b, and I therefor do not know what the contents of this earlier talkpage was. Considering his recent contributions I would like to give the user a warning to please stop what he is doing. Could you please look into this his recent edits and consider creating a talkpage for this user. Kind regards, Taketa (talk) 23:08, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

No need to warn him, that user is already blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

And he's back. Michelle Lombardo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 98.248.32.178 (talk) 23:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Got it, thank you very much. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

IT IS YOUR 3RD WIKIBIRTHDAY! CONGRATULATIONS AND ENJOY YOUR DAY!

Party balloons to celebrate your big day!

Today in 2006 you made your first edit on Wikipedia. Since then, three long years have passed. You are an awesome Wikipedian and it is only fitting to say...

HAPPY 3RD WIKIPEDIA BIRTHDAY!!!

You've turned three on Wikipedia! Congrats! And now...three cheers for three years!

1. Hip Hip Hooray!
2. Hip Hip Hooray!
3. Hip Hip Hooray! --^{The Legendary}_{Sky Attacker} 02:18, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Sky Attacker, that brought a smile to my face :D --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Why did you block my page?

Hey there BONGWARRIOR I need you to tell me why the page that i created was blocked. It was literally up for 2 minutes and then you said it was vandalism. Can you please elaborate as to why you blocked it? I am new to this whole WIKI thing and any help is appreciated. Thank YouAmmodex2004 (talk) 05:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but we're supposed to be an encyclopedia. If you'd like to contribute in a more serious manner, you are more than welcome to do so. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Twilight sucks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and The-turd-monster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are accounts of the same person. Fred Talk 01:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

71.197.46.46

I liked Ulric's edit better. XD The Dingus (talk) 07:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

RE:Thanks

No problem at all, I could see you had your hands full. It popped up on one of the pages on my watchlist so I tried to find any lingering bits around and blocked a few proxies on the way. ;) Seems to have calmed now I think, Regards, Woody (talk) 11:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

User:LouriePieterse/Notepad

WikiThanks

Hi Bongwarrior. I just want to thank you for reverting the vandalism to my Notepad. I really appreciate it! Kind regards, Lourie Pieterse 13:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my User Page. Persistent little git wasn't he. Between the original and followups, I counted 4 different Comcast IPs that got used. Ulric1313 (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Erikupoeg

I have reported the ongoing issues with User:Erikupoeg - [here]. Thank you for your participation.--Rubikonchik (talk) --Rubikonchik (talk) 22:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

well, i didn't use TW, by the way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I'landhater (talk • contribs) 01:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Concerning the Doctor.

Ahail!
I won't blame you for deleting the article of Dr. Steel, since it's the rule to delete articles that were already deleted once, but I would like to know why Wikipedia doesn't accept an article about Dr. Steel. I've heard rumours of him being not known enough? Well, if I may be so bold to add; that's nonsense. His Toy Soldier army has 4825 'Soldiers', 397 'Nurses', 333 'Scouts' and 36 'Yellow Jackets', from all over the globe. And that's not all; many more people who don't bother to enlist know him, listen to his music, have heard of him, and thus would really much like to know what they're hearing about in the first place.
There should be a wiki article about him for these people, people who want to find out more about the man, like me and many others.

So to stick to my question; why may there not be a Dr. Steel article?

Greetings, Rick.94.213.19.118 (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Pardon me for interjecting, I've watched this discussion for a while. Dr. Steel has been the focus of a massive astroturfing campaign that has run for a couple of years now; it's been created at at least four different names, multiple times, has been contested through Articles for Deletion processes and deleted, has been discussed at deletion review, and generally beaten with a stick until dead. Every single time, the point has been raised that there are minimal to no reliable sources that have covered Dr. Steel - and the bit on Leno, the interview on Suicide Girls, and a couple of others that appear regularly have been rejected multiple times as not being enough to establish notability. If you think there's reliable sources to be found, then you're welcome to register an account and create an article in your user space; you can then take it to Deletion Review and ask for approval to have one of the names opened for recreation. It'll take a very large leap from the last discussions, though, so be advised. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

New Barnstar!

I award you with this barnstar:

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Awarded for reverting vandalism in within 60 seconds of the vandalism being done on the I Can Has Cheezburger article. Honestly, how did you do it? Either or, I am proud of your efforts. ConCompS (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, but it's no big deal. There are so many vandal patrollers on the job, someone is bound to notice it within 60 seconds. I just happened to be the one :) --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Good call.

Not sure why it was unprotected in the first place... –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

C'mon, everyone at the same time now: shocking. SHOCKING. Who would have guessed that's what would happen. </sarcasm> tedder (talk) 01:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, sometimes it's nice to try unprotection to see if people will behave. Usually they don't, but it's still worth a shot, in keeping with our Wiki ethos. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

It was unprotected because of an RFUP request (and related discussion). As BW says, just to see how it went. Encyclopedia anyone can edit and all =] I don't disagree with the re-protection (or even the indefinite period, it's clear that this article will likely never benefit from anonymous contributions). –xeno^talk 13:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Google

Silly WP:3RR nonsense, could this user be blocked for a while?--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk page

Learn to take a joke. PCE (talk) 23:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

you deleted me??

why did you delete the article about me?

Michael Botsis —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.212.199.202 (talk) 06:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but you don't appear to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements yet. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

are you kidding, did you even read it? I am an avid armature kite enthusiast and a Panarchanist! if thats not notability then what is, i bet there is a Wiki page on less important people than me for example, Tom Cruise.... Get a job! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.212.199.202 (talk) 06:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

He is the head of Australia's Panarchist movement and is currently writing a thesis. He might not be important in America but he is kinda a big deal among some circles in Australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.7.159 (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Not that big of a deal, it would seem. [6] --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:30, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

so your sole source of information is the internet?? you sad sad indevidual.. Tell me were you picked on a lot in school? a bit of a loner, heres the big question do you spend most your time yelling at kids though a microphone that is strapped to your head while your playing computer games late into the night, while most people your age seem to be outside??? does this describe you?, when you are out in a social environment do you feel awkward like you dont belong? So you think that there is something wrong with the world not you, so then somebody gave you a little "power" and you desided that this is you time to shine, you can take revenge on all those jocks that ripped on you and all those people that thought that you weren't that interesting. Well buddy lets just say if deleting harmless pages from a wiki makes you life better in some way then I'm glad to be part of making someone feel good about themselves today. Have a great weekend, I know I will. Thanks, Michael Botsis —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.212.199.202 (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Sticks and stones, Mike, sticks and stones. I'm sorry I had to delete your article, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free webhost for your personal bio. There are plenty of other websites for that. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

"I am an avid armature kite enthusiast and a Panarchanist! if thats not notability then what is, i bet there is a Wiki page on less important people than me for example, Tom Cruise"

^Surely that is satire?--EchetusXe 20:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey Bongwarrior

Does this interest you? --^{The Legendary}_{Sky Attacker} 00:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I'll keep it in mind. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Chocolate Gravy

Just FYI, it's real, not vandalism. It's mentioned on the 'Gravy' entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.71.9.7 (talk) 19:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Lloyd-Weston

Hey. Can I have the deletion log thingy for that? From Wikibin it looks like a good article, so if and when he makes his professional debut I can use that rather than start from scratch.--EchetusXe 20:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Sure, restored here. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.--EchetusXe 09:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Davy Crockett

Why did you reverse my correct info on the Davy Crockett page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.67.105 (talk) 23:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me

But are you busy at the moment? I would like to ask for your help on something.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:27, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Nope, what's up? --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm trying to get the article "Video game" back to GA status, or (only in my dreams) FA status. Could you help me review it so I can figure out what to work on?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

~~:::Could you also help with this mess? [[7]]Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)~~

That's finally fixed. So back to the third sentance.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:39, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll have a look at the article after dinner and see if I can come up with any suggestions. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, ~~tanhks~~, (I can't even spell today) I mean thanks. I'll look over it too to see what I could work on while you eat.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I got some refs that where needed, but I can't find anything about "core games". Do you know anything about them?Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 22:29, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

...Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I sort of took a spur of the moment wikibreak. I recently started a new job, and I thought it would be best to devote my full attention to it for the time being. I expect to be editing more regularly before too much longer, and I'll try to offer some improvements to the article whenever I am able.

And regarding core games, I'm afraid I have no idea. I looked around for some refs as well, but I didn't stumble upon anything useful. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Good to see that you are back.--Sky Attacker Here comes the bird! 07:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Interstellar Marines

Hi, I noticed you deleted the article on Interstellar Marines and it seemed that most of this decision was made because it seemed that Zero Point Software had given up production or something. Well they have just this month posted yet another update on their website of the continuing progress to their game. It is an independent production so it's not moving as quick as most games do, but I feel that deletion of it's page was a mistake. Here is a link to their site, where just Jan. 22, 2010 they released a small prototype for the gun play in the game. http://www.interstellarmarines.com/game/ I'm new to wikipedia so if I am taking this up with the wrong person please let me know. Thank you Sar07g (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sar07g, welcome to Wikipedia! I deleted that article as a result of this discussion, pretty much for the reasons you describe. But if work on the game is continuing and it ends up being released, then there shouldn't be a problem with restoring the article. However, I don't think it should be restored until a release date is announced, if you find that agreeable. In the meantime, I'd be more than happy to restore the article to your userspace. That way, it wouldn't be an "official" part of the encyclopedia, but you can still edit it and update it and whatever else you want to do with it. Or, if you prefer, you could start a new version of the article from scratch, if you think you're up to it :) Just let me know what you'd like to do.

Once again, welcome, and have fun. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. While I may still disagree with the original deletion, I can see from the discussion why it was deleted and seems fair to me. It would be nice if you could update it to my userspace, I don't know if I will edit it, but hey, why not.

Thanks again for your help, Sar07g (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)