User talk:Brookie/Archive10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is Bot populated

Cristian Vogel biog piece[edit]

you moved my article ' Cristian Vogel ' - I have resubmitted an edited version of my biography - there are at least 10 articles referring to my name on the WikiPedia, I have been an active composer on the electronic music scene for over 11 years, so I consider that I should be included in the Wikipedia ( many of the people I have produced, as well as band members from my own bands have articles ! ) - I hope the edited version fits the bill better, I have removed links and references to current projects etc.

thanks


I see my resubmitted article has disappeared again , so here it is - please submit it , if you think its acceptable

Cristian Vogel is a composer and music producer, known for his experimental DJ and Live performances, studio composition and production. Born in Chile 1972 but growing up in the UK, he now lives and works in Barcelona. 

He studied 20th Century Music at Sussex University, under the tutor-ship of the British composers, Johnathan Harvey and Martin Butler. Over more than a decade he has recorded a number of albums and released on eminent experimental techno labels such as Tresor Berlin, Novamute and Mille Plateaux. He has toured consistently since 1992 as DJ and live performer, both as a solo artist and with the group 'Super_Collider'. As composer for dance, he has scored four pieces for Gilles Jobin, the renound Swiss choreographer. As remixer and producer, he has been invited to reinterpret songs by groups such as Radiohead, Maximo Park and Oval and has has been album producer for Chicks On Speed amongst others.

Cristian vogel 11:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC) cristian vogel [reply]

Happy New Year
[edit]

(Feliz Año Nuevo)


Happy New Year from Tony the Marine 02:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world this coming year.

Image:ABCQ1.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ABCQ1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECUtalk 21:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magging[edit]

It wasn't a silly page. Please do not refer to real events as silly, as that is silly within itself. Would you say the article on TPing is silly? Would you delete the article on TPing? would you delete the article on egging? No, and they exist. Magging is similar to those events. Simply because it has not spread to where you reside, does not mean it doesnt happen. Should you delete the article on farsi because you don't speak farsi? of course not. Let the article be.--Jalad.azadi 13:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - it doesn't establish any notability whatsoever - and looks like a neologism Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show me where articles like TPing or Egging show notability? These events started somewhere. and the term neologism was once a neologism itself and the concept is idiotic. Please explain to me how to go about recreating this page. What do you want so that it can be posted.
It is not a competition with other articles - it must live its own life. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magging on deletion review[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Magging. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jalad.azadi 14:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:ABCQ1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ABCQ1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Invite[edit]

Diez2 16:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the smile :)[edit]

It did make my day better. :) Gisele Hsieh 20:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Making a new page[edit]

Hi Brookie, I am a new user on Wikipedia. I figured out how to make a page because I had some info. about The Lord of the Rings thet I wanted to share withe the world. SnaX said I wasn't making the page right but I didn't get what he meant. So far, I haven't been able to get ahold of him. Could you explain the whole process to me on my talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Go USNA (talkcontribs)

After salting Tombomb, you left your signature on the page. This should not be done. --- RockMFR 04:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - have removed it Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 11:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request a copy of the last revision before the deletion of the Falling Sand Game article. I would like to resubmit it in a form that will meet criteria for an article. Thanks. Joh777nny 17:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Administration page[edit]

I was upon wikipedia and I happened to come across a page where many users were talking about me in a negative way. I am unaware if Wikipedia has any bitching policies but I may have to 'IAR' myself and contact an administrator to sort this little mishap out. You seem to point out that I have threatened Wikipedia. I don't believe I have, I have merely predicted the outcome of Wikipedia if I were not to become an admin. Anyway I must ask the question we are all dying to know, what is Wikipedia? Is it the definition, the meaning of our existence, the very thing, which controls our lives? Is this what I am threatening? Captaindansplashback 10:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

Hey Im hoping you can help me, I have read the Featured Picture process and don't understand it very well. Am I supposed to add a whole new bit to the peer review page or something? Thanks, Uwain

PS: I want to submit this picture Sunset in Canberra

You can either nominate it straight as a candidate for featured picture or nominate it initially for peer review - which will give you feedback and an indication if it is likely to make the grade. I would try peer review as a first step. You will need to sort out the license issue first - or it'll be a non-starter. Good Luck. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So all I need to do is add a link to the image on the peer review page?
Thanks by the way :)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwain (talkcontribs) 02:55, January 9, 2007

It definitely made my day better...[edit]

Thanks the the smile :) It made my day better, considering that I'm up at 4:11 am local time doing homework. :S Thanks :D --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 09:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good - it did its job then! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 09:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, haha! Nice to meet a fellow Canadian, err.. half-Canadian. :) Yes, and I agree the flower ring looks pretty nice.. although I think I might change it to blue to match the blue on my page. --lovelaughterlife♥talk? 22:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry[edit]

I'm sorry for the vandalism from this ip adress (64.105.41.210)

This is actually a school computer, one of about 30. I don't know who is leaving nonesense around, but I'll try to find out.

Thank you very much

SAB —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.105.41.210 (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks - kids eh! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unintentional removal of AKA pin[edit]

Hi, I am a new user to Wikipedia, but I have been observing certain pages prior to the registration of my username. On one of your edits to Alpha Kappa Alpha, you deleted the contact information to the sorority. However, you unintentionally removed the AKA pin. I decided to re-insert the pin because I personally felt that the pin is a historical artifact. I hope that this didn't violate any policy on Wikipedia, and I hope you have a great day. Real96 23:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No probs Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Said Galore[edit]

recently you placed a 'notability' tag on this article - just for your reference this has already been assessed by one of wikipedia's administrator and found to meet most of the criteria for notability. Dan arndt 23:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - have removed the tag Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beany McChimp[edit]

why won't you let me write about beanie mcchimp? I am trying to make a sensible contribution to wikipedia....its not theres really anything else i can write about that no one else has....so please allow me to continue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ipooponu334 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Stop being silly Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Dannatt[edit]

Hi Brookie, Not sure if you casn help with this or not. I put an image up on the Richard Dannatt article and put it on as crown copyright but some American bloke is telling me it fails the fair use test as it is a living person. If this is the case, I can't really see how any image of a living person can be left! If you get the chance maybe you could have a look as you seem to be better at the copyright stuff than me! Ta Rob 23:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on his user talk page Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Birch (Luthier)[edit]

Hello, this is Paulkstadden, author of the John Birch Article. It has recently been deleted, and it shows in the log that you are the one who has deleted it. I would like a reason as to why it was deleted. There was nothing undocumented in it, as I have spoken through email with Greg Dorsett, owner of Rock Stars' Guitars, who knew John Birch personally, I have spoken with John Carling, owner of John Birch guitars as well as personal friend to John Birch himself, as well as many others who have allowed me to use their images. I don't know what else I could have referenced in the article. It was deleted with no warning to me, unlike the image deletions. I was planning to re-upload all the images with appropriate copyright tags. I have the rights to use every one of them, as I have received authority to do so from John Carling and the owner of the Glitter guitar. I was not backing up the content of the article onto my hard drive because I believed that I would be notified of any copyright infringement and/or nonsense and would be given time to back the article up. I have already requested an undelete, but if you can shed any light on why this article was deleted, I would appreciate it. I put a lot time and hard work into the research of this article, so I don't want to see it go away. Please email me at paulk@stadden.com.

Thank you, Paulkstadden 18:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It read like a bad advert and had been tagged as such by another user. The article needed a lot of work before it would pass muster as an article. If it can be re-written and the mess of the photograps sorted out then fine - but it needs a lot of work. If you want I can post you the data on a sub page for you to work on to improve it.Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...)

Yes, please, send me the link for that.Paulkstadden 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for reposting the page, I will get to work on it. If you have any suggestions, please give them to me.Paulkstadden 05:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brookie - hello and Happy New Year. I'm still taking my City of London Guides course and enjoying it greatly.

Meanwhile, as you are MUCH quicker than me, can I please ask you a favour? I have been editing Buckingham Palace Gardens - there's still lots of work to do. But some changes need to be made.

1. Please can you change the article title to Buckingham Palace Garden . The singular form is correct.

2. Could you then do a redirect from Buckingham Palace Gardens to Buckingham Palace Garden.

3. Could you add to the disambiguation page for "Garden" the new article title Buckingham Palace Garden, pointing out that it is known as "the Garden". Would you also please add the Royal Opera House (I'm not sure if there is a Wikipedia article on this, but as you know, it is also universally known as "the Garden").

I have cross-referred to Buckingham Palace Gardens in a number of other articles but once you let me know these changes have been made I will chase up the cross-referrals. Basically, the cross-referrals are in: Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Holyrood House, Time Team, Party at the Palace , Prom at the Palace, Children's Party at the Palace , and Golden Jubilee. ALL should be corrected to reflect the correct SINGULAR form, but I can see to this.

Many thanks as usual. Please let me know on MY talk page when you have accomplished steps 1, 2, 3 above. Best wishes. FClef (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Kent Hovind[edit]

You recently made this edit to the Kent Hovind article. Please note that generally, any edit which removes sourced information relevant to the article should be discussed first on that article's talk page. Also, marking such an edit as "minor" and with a summary which simply says "Tidy" might be considered to be a misleading edit summary. Generally, only edit summaries which could not possibly be controversial should be marked as minor, and removals of content should be clearly marked as such in the edit summary. Thank you! Seraphimblade 08:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly - I merely added a paragraph break. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think you may be having some browser problems, or something (or I am!) In the diff I'm seeing, the following line is removed:
He has been ordered to forfeit $430,400 and faces a maximum of 288 years in prison.<ref>{{cite news | url= | title=Dr. Dino, wife guilty|publisher=[[Pensacola News Journal]] | date=2006 | first= | last= | accessdate = 2006-11-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url= | title='Dr. Dino' guilty on all counts|publisher=[[Pensacola News Journal]] | date=2006 | first= | last= | accessdate = }}</ref> (ref nowiki'd so it will show here.)
The same was true of the second diff, please let me know what you see here. If it really is showing us two different things, we should probably both get screenshots and put it in as a bug. Seraphimblade 10:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind-I misread. See what I get for editing without coffee. Very sorry about that. Seraphimblade 10:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NO worries - have an expresso on me! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(hello, i'm new) about citations[edit]

I've only done minor edits so far (not unde my actual account), but I haven't made any major edit because I realise these genrally need citations. But how do i actually list citations in my edit? are they left in comments or where? [I'm only trying small things so far, so just doing some small edits to towns in my local area -and yes, i realise I shouldn't insert any original research) The Mackstar 08:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on user page Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Thx for the Welcome. I luv Widipedia, more and more each day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisCBell (talkcontribs)

Don't we all? :) Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 18:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

Could you please unblock 202.76.162.34? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.133.248 (talk) 01:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry - No - see extract from the block log: (continuous vandalism from this address. this block affects anonymous edits only; if this block is unfairly impacting you, register an account.) Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped me out before, so . . . . . . . . . . . . ...............[edit]

I need some help setting up a Category page. What I'd like to see on wikipedia is Category: Sculptors who exhibited at the 3rd Sculpture International. More and more of the artists who were there are showing up at wikipedia, so there are (opinion) enough to get the category going. Here is a handful of them. Chaim Gross, Pablo Picasso, C. Paul Jennewein, Albert Wein, Adolph Alexander Weinman, Jo Davidson, Milton Horn, Jacques Lipchitz and more. There are 250 in all, though most of those are not in wikipedia . . .... yet. Anyway. I am hoping that you can set this page, or whatever, up for me. Life is good. Carptrash 00:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted [[Category:Sculptors who exhibited at the 3rd Sculpture International]] - I've added Chaim Gross as the first entry - good luck Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the thumbs-up - I have moved it to my barnstar page! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are so welcome. And checking the Thumbs Up page I see that this was not your first, which is why I came to you. I have a bad head cold- it's being a rough winter here- and am not able to do the thinking part of filling the category yet, but it will happen slowly. Carptrash 16:58, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hope the cold gets better soon 17:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I think that I botched my attempt at archiving,(luddite), but there will be others. Thanks for the wonderful bit of sculpture. Yes, it is mostly what I write about. I found your monument in a footnote in Margaret Whinney's, Sculpture in Britian: 1530-1830 and assume that since you did not have the sculptor wikilinked, that there is no article on him. I'll see if I have enough for at least a stub. I finaally got a fire going, so am feeling better, thank-you. Oh yes, it's not sculpture but I got my picture in here recently - check out KLDK - I'm the drummer with the Pathetics. Life is good. Carptrash 18:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting in there and doing whatever you did that fixed my archives. Now I can get on to the real business of wikipedia. Finding more places to put pictures of the Pathetics. Carptrash 16:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC) Oh yes, I have been busy here too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sculptors_who_exhibited_at_the_3rd_Sculpture_International , so thanks for that too.[reply]

Ah... thanks. The British penchant for "an heir and a spare?" Carptrash 17:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's the one! :) Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ferris wheel in MK[edit]

The ferris wheel is not a permanent fixture in Central Milton Keynes, unlike the London Eye in London - it is only here for one winter season. I don't think it is a valid addition to the page. (Also, I don't see what it has to do with the grid squares apart from you can see them from the top of it). Is there a good reason to keep it? --Concrete Cowboy 17:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its location on the page was away from other pictures but not directly relevent to that sub section. It may only be temporary but still worth listing - it is very impressive - even if the phot isn't! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured pic candidate?[edit]

Dear Brookie, Hello; hope you are going along OK. I have been working (ongoing) on Lord Mayor's Show recently and have incorporated this picture by User:Diliff. It's a great image.

I cannot log into Wikimedia Commons and don't know how these things work. If you like the pic, can you put it forward for a Featured Photo?

Thanks and best wishes to you. -- FClef (talk) 23:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons pictures work on the Wiki as do Wiki based pictures - see here about nominating a picture Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. It is a good pic certainly. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brookie - please visit Talk:Flypast. A user has placed the page on Military history project as needing revision because of "too much UK focus," with the withering second sentence "It might interest people to know that the UK isn't the only place where flypasts happen." My reply, which I posted on Talk:Flypast and on their talk page, is self-explanatory.

I worked very hard in getting an international perspective and any defending you can do will be appreciated.

I understand if people feel the article can be improved and anyone can have a go, but I feel that the second sentence was not only uncalled-for, but also not reflective of the spirit or writing of the article.

Thanks for looking. -- FClef (talk) 23:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note - and see the reply on the talk page - don't worry about one buffoonic post - ignore and carry on. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate encouragement. I misunderstood about this project and wish to exonerate RJASE1, to whom I will write separately. Sorry I had the wrong end of the stick, having not noticed the comment sig. Can you authorise me - or indeed can YOU - erase the the comment and discussion up to today's date from the article talk page under the circumstances? I will of course leave the Military History project banner. Please advise at my Talk. Cheers to you - you help make Wikipedia a nicer place for folk like me.

--FClef (talk) 09:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image tagging (I'm very sorry)[edit]

It did not occur to me that the name in the image credit might be your own. Looking at your other uploads I see that that is obviously the case, and that you are related to a notable person, which is clearly something to be proud of. Perhaps you could add "(User:Brookie)" or "(myself)" next to your name so that others don't make the same mistake. Given that the subject of the photo is deceased, I can see how I may have upset you. If I did, please accept my apologies and condolences. — CharlotteWebb 10:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flypast and Military History Project assessment rating[edit]

Dear Brookie

It appears that RJASE1 really likes this article and has proposed it as a good article. He also raised it to Class B on the assessment scale of the Military History Project and Looper5920 has undone this and replaced the article at the Start Class. Looper also feels the article has too much UK focus and advances that as a material argument against it. Please read my arguments to Looper at Looper's talk page and would you, as an admin, please take any action necessary to remind Looper of Wikipedia standards, or to respond to him/her in any way you see fit? (After my experience with Big Royal Dig I'm not feeling hopeful at all about this - I can see another merciless edit on the horizon.)

Would you kindly also look at the messages I sent to RJASE1's talk page regarding this article.

Please also bookmark the article itself. I would be grateful if you could support its nomination as a Good Article. Thanks. --FClef (talk) 17:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serendipity[edit]

Hi Brookie ! After much 'defense' on Serampore College (rather Senate of Serampore College), I had turned to Gurubrahma for help. Then, you sprung out of nowhere. Much delighted for the same. Around the same time I had also started a new article on Senate of Serampore College - but that got deleted after a week or so. Kindly help revive it. Further, long ago, I had also started articles on some of the affiliated colleges under the Senate of Serampore College. The Hermes had intruded there and also mentioned about 'unaccreditation' which again needs to be guarded against.

Under Serampore College, I wish to add list of Principals and matters relevant to the College alone. Once you revive Senate of Serampore College (was earlier started as The Senate of Serampore College, I wish to add a list of the Masters and the Registrars including affiliated colleges under it.Pradeep 17:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look - I have also just written William Ward - one of the College's founders, which you might want to look over. I am related to Joshua Marshman! Cheers. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't see any deleted articles under either of the names you mention in the Deletion Log - can you double check the exact name for me? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Senate of Serampore College[edit]

The article was started as The Senate of Serampore College - might be about ten days back (please see history pages of the following where subsequent editors had removed reference to it [1] [2]. Pradeep 18:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - actually what you had created was The Senate of Serampore College (University) - what I suggest is that you work out the article as fully as you can on a sub page and then we'll look at re-introducing it. I'll post a note to the Admin who deleted it to warn him. Alternatively - go for a deletion review. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I create a sub-page ? I'll anyway return to my PC after a week or so. Do let me know. Bye.Pradeep 13:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested[edit]

Vote early, vote often

in getting people to vote about this picture which was just removed from the sacrifice article, so am contacting everyone recent on my talk page. Please consider taking a few minutes, looking it over, and voicing an opinion. Thanks. Carptrash 03:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Personal Question.[edit]

Are you a gentleman or a lady? I expect an answer immediately. Return of Rodolfo 09:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'tis none of your business! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 09:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK then I withdraw my question and instead request to see a picture of you instead to prove that you are not a machine. Return of Rodolfo 09:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Brookie. I am new. How do I find vandalism and revert it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roodolfo (talkcontribs)

Well you could start with this! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry? What could I start with? Roodolfo 10:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to wikipedia[edit]

My friend told me of you and that you are an administrator. I do not know how to use wikipedia and would like you to help me. I would like to tell me how to use wikipedia without breaking any rules.Wikiepedia is great 09:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome notice posted with leads etc.Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank-you for all your help brookie!Wikiepedia is great 10:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Captaindansplashback[edit]

You might want to take a look at this and add what I missed. Agathoclea 12:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - as I suspected! 13:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome.[edit]

And sorry for the (almost unavoidable) breaches of etiquette from me from now until eeryione has had enough. I've had a read through the pages for beginners, and will do my best to make decent contributions. More attention to be pauid after lectures and work I expect. Many thanks, Ed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Edknowles (talkcontribs) 09:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Good luck! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Magnify Deletion[edit]

I thought that because they are quite well known as a band in New Zealand and this website said Magnify won Best Christian/Gospel album at the New Zealand Music Awards in 2004. I would add them, but I will stop adding the article. Mover85 08:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you can establish the notability - then that's fine - what had been done didn't. Read teh guidleines and if it complies then a re-post would be okay. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 09:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

That was unexpected...☺—Ketil Trout 03:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More is . . . .more[edit]

and this holds true in pictures as in many other things. I'm embroiled in a picture thing now - - scanning pictures from 1992 or so from the negatives. It's slow going and there is so much dust in New Mexico that I need to photoshop dozens of specks off each of them and I sort of don't like photshopping pictures for here too much because . . . . well it just does not seem like a good idea. Anyway Woodlawn Cemetery (Detroit) is growing by leaps and bounds and Life is good. Anyway, soon Major Edward Hartwick will be back among the living, since many of us consider wikipedia to be LIVING, so why should he be an exception? Carptrash 08:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Game over[edit]

see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Captaindansplashback. Agathoclea 09:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks for all your help on this - I'll unprotect the page now and get on with life! Thanks again. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 09:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of Liam Kearns article[edit]

Hi. I wonder if you can point me in the right direction. It appears you have deleted a contibution I made about Liam Kearns on 2 occasions. Each time I made the contrbutuion I tried to improve the article. Liam Kearns is a very well known person in Ireland as manager of the Laois GAA football team. I would appeal to you to reinstate my article or tell me how to do this. Regards, Heshs Umpire

The point is establishing notability - by reference to the guidelines; I deleted it as a repost as another Admin had already deleted it - it generally frowned upon to re-instate deleted articles without good reason. I suggest that you set up a sub page on your user page, and work on the re-draft there and then have another go. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brookie, thanks for the answer. Is there any way you could retrieve the text of the article for me? Even, stick it up on my discussion page? I don't pretend to be very tech minded but I've made a lot of contributuons in the last year (a lot of them less significant that Liam Kearns so I hope you can oblige Regards,

Heshs Umpire

yo[edit]

youu hve aq cool page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nshan13 (talkcontribs)


A question[edit]

I got a warning about deleting selections from a page I created today. The creation of the page was an iterative process, which is why things have been added and deleted as I go.

A question I have is how do I reference the information? The page periodically says that no references have been made for the information, but I don't understand where I even place the reference if the information is on a band and I'm IN the band, so it's first hand knowledge.

Thanks for the note - see Wikipedia:Citing sources - also always sign your posts with ~~~~ Thanks Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hatchment update (source)[edit]

Dear Brooky, You intervened in my text on Dutch hatchments. Do you need a source? I used "Van Fugelsang tot Fogelsanghstate" by Kees Kuiken ISBN 90 805545 8 8 Kollem 2003 (invented coats of arms of Dr. Pibo van Doma Blz. 26). The Dutch Republic was governed by "new men"...
Faithfully yours,
Robert Prummel 22:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have much of a problem - just the language was rather informal! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message[edit]

New message on your page from Heshs Umpire Regards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Heshs Umpire (talkcontribs) 11:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Re: KEN mode page[edit]

I've updated the page with sources. Could you give me a hint as to what more I need to legitimize the page? I've sourced as many online references as I could find. I won't be able to source print media until next week, but will do so Tuesday Feb 13th. Please let me know what you think and what more needs to be done. Jessmode 17:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better - you might want to find a contributor or wiki group that does a lot of these type articles and ask for feedback. Be bold - enjoy! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your neat vandal warning[edit]

I saw your vandal warning at User_talk:204.248.121.130 "Please don't be silly" and have to ask, is it a template? Just love it. --JohnCub 20:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've found a bug in it. I use it as {{subst:silly|PageName}} and when it is in the format of {{subst:silly|Talk:PageName}} it just spits out a nowiki version (text only). Thought you'd want to know. --JohnCub 23:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Hey - I hope that if i reverted an article more than three times than it could have been classed as "reverting simple and obvious vandalism", but please advise me if you don't feel that was the case. Will 17:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your point - you were well over the 3x rule and could be blocked - but I'm feeling kind today and so won't! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:14, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well for that I thank you. I was just quoting from the WP:3RR page that says if the edits in question are simple and obvious vandalism then that qualifies as an exception to the 3RR. I presume the reverting applied to that of Wikipedia:Wikipedia is failing, which was also reverted by many other users and the culprit was later blocked (via my warnings on his talk page and then reporting it to admins). I apologise for breaking the 3RR if you do not agree with me and I hope you will appreciate I was acting in the best intentions. Again, thanks for not blocking me. Will 17:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it was simple vandalism though, but life is too short to waste time on it - but I respect your intentions and vigilence and so no ban! Keep up the good work! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
'scuse me for offering an outside view here, but I'd say that was a very clear example of simple and obvious vandalism. The person being reverted was removing the entire essay and replacing it with text starting This was whinge from a controlfreak who couldn't control Wikipedia.. I can't honestly see how that could not be considered vandalism. Anyway, no lasting harm done by anyone, thanks for your vigilance Will. Worldtraveller 17:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No I disagree - but I am not going to waste beer drinking time arguing about it and the problem seems to have resolved itself. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 19:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that mystifies me utterly. If removing content and replacing it with an attack isn't vandalism, then I don't know what is. Worldtraveller 19:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I said life is too short to spend it on semantics ~ pub calls ... Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 20:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when you get back from the pub, or perhaps better, in the morning, maybe you could just spend 30 seconds explaining it to me? Perhaps I'm missing some point, or something. I genuinely would like to know how you could consider that as something other than pure vandalism. Worldtraveller 23:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your template on Odinic Rite[edit]

Would you mind being a bit more specific by leaving a comment on the talk page? The primary editors of that page are pretty new, so it would probably be more constructive to state your issues more concisely than the template does. Thanks! - WeniWidiWiki 17:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done! (And I like your user name!) Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 19:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and Thanks! - WeniWidiWiki 21:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

There is a difference between "simple" and "other" vandalism - the exception to the 3R rule applies to "such as graffiti or page blanking (this only applies to the most simple and obvious vandalism)" - that isn't what we had here - it was "other" vandalism and so the exception doesn't apply. As far as I am concerned this subject is now closed - I have other things to be doing. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page was blanked and then replaced with graffiti. Worldtraveller 10:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subject closed - I'm busy! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Donnas[edit]

You just speedily deleted an article for someone that was a member of The Donnas. As we have an article on that band, that is an assertion of notability. Please undelete. Catchpole 07:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - No! This article has already been deleted before and this re-creation failed to establish any notability whatsoever. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Allison Robertson. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Catchpole 08:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't make her any more notable - posted comment there. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Try to do some reading first. The Donnas sail through WP:BAND, but don't take my word for it, try the All Music Guide [3] and VH-1 [4]. Catchpole 08:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article has to establish the notability - that's the point. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It did. Would you delete an article that read. "John Lennon is a member of the Beatles?" and nothing more? Catchpole 08:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. You are violating WP:POINT with your deletion of Maya Ford. Catchpole 08:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Look - you have removed another editor's speedy tag - which was quite deserved - this is nothing to do with WP:Point. If you are not happy - put these up for deletion review as well.Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 15. Catchpole 08:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley face[edit]

Please view User talk:Ketiltrout#International banking. Please remove the smiley face immediately. --McTrixie/Mr Accountable 13:22, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly! My smiley was there first - I've sorted it out for you! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) has smiled at you! Smiles are good! and hopefully this one has made your day better. Why not smile at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend? Happy editing!

Silly template[edit]

Love your "silly" template. Going to be very useful. It's extremely non-aggressive, and probably very effective. ConDemTalk 17:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that was what I was aiming at - a gentle nudge and some help ! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is it used like other test templates? Like this {{subst:Silly|God}}? ConDemTalk 17:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's alright, I worked it out! ConDemTalk 18:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deleted -- Can We Get the Text and Re-Post?[edit]

Hi,

The page for our charity foundation, Starlight Starbright Children's Foundation has been deleted, and I would like to be able to recover the text and re-post. I believe the deletion had to do with the way our logo was uploaded -- can you advise, or direct me to someone who can help ensure we don't make the same mistake when re-posting our page... but, for now, how can I access the text to start fresh?

Thank you!

Audrey Allen Starlight Starbright Children's Foundation audrey.allen@starlight.org 323-556-3316 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slsbomm (talkcontribs) 19:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The article is still there - see the link - but it really does need some work - please read the guidleines on how to create a good article. Pay particlar attention to ensuring a NPOV. Also, please always sign your posts with ~~~~.Good luck! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

70.90.74.169[edit]

Could you please give 70.90.74.169 an indefinite block? He just vandalized Saturn and he has been blocked many times and doesn't seem to learn his lesson. Thanks Averross (utc)

Another Admin' has already zapped him for 2 weeks - let me know if he does any more after that and I'll do him indefinitely then. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Senate of Serampore College (University)[edit]

Dear Brookie, I'm back after a long leave. I have now created Senate of Serampore College (University) [5]. Please look into it and do the needful to avoid deletion by possible users/administrators. Pradeep 17:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of BTESSC[edit]

Dear Brookie, I have also created an article on the Board of Theological Education of the Senate of Serampore College (BTESSC) [6]. Kindly look into its further development in order to prevent deletion.Pradeep 18:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability was the issue that got it deleted last time. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Freshfields.jpg[edit]

Would you mind un-deprecating Image:Freshfields.jpg and providing a fair use rationale? You could use Template:Film-screenshot if it is a screenshot from a DVD or Template:TV-screenshot if it is a screenshot of live television or {{Non-free fair use in|Ballard Berkeley}} (and mention the source) if the image is snagged from elsewhere. Thanks, Iamunknown 23:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Iamunknown 17:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Asia Theological Research Institute[edit]

Dear Brookie, Saw your edits on Senate. Meanwhile, I have just re-created SATHRI [7] (which got deleted earlier). Kindly look into BTESSC and SATHRI too and thanks for bearing with me.Pradeep 11:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wall of Honor[edit]

My pal Brookie, How have you been? I'm just dropping you a note to let you know that I've included you in my Wall of Honor. Cheers! Tony the Marine 04:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Advice needed[edit]

I read the article Mozambican War of Independence,which was written by SGGH. I believe that it has the makings of an FA. I will nominate it for such on Friday, but before I do that, I want to consult with some of my good friends here who already have a featured article under there belts. That's why I would like you to look it over before I place it in nomination and if you have any advice to give User:SGGH, be my guest. Your friend Tony the Marine 01:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony - I have started to go over it - but a couple of intitial thoughts:
  • The grammar could do with some tightening up and there is a risk that the article is not portraying a NPOV - with blanket assertions of bad Portuguese behaviour etc - which might well be true - but at the moment looks unbalanced. Will go and have another go at it later. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aladdin[edit]

Resolved

Hi, this is usama92. i have written to talk about the aladdin pages i have recently been posting. may i tell you that this was just a school joke and i ensure you it will not happen again. please could you also delete all the aladdin pages created. thnx

Glad to hear it! Enjoy the Wiki and don't piss on it! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andres Lopez[edit]

Can you explain me why was the article deleted again? I added sufficient REFERENCES and content to make it different. I should add that there was a lot more information to add. I understand the article about Andres Lopez has been uploaded several times infringing copyright by the "Canda Venture user" but that biography is also within the scope of WP:COL. Can you explain why delete it then?--((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 15:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note - as I didn't delete it, I can't say - I deleted lopez with a small l.! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have looked at the articles again and have deleted the redirect and moved the article on lopez rather than Lopez to that spot. A lot of references in a foreign language are much good onm the English Wiki though. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Foreign language references are valid, WP:REF you can use babel fish to translate it. Otherwise I wouldn't have defended the article.. He is famous within the spanish speakers and for the Colombia wikiproject which intends to make you know more about the country and Colombians.. I guess that is working, you got to know abou him..--((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 15:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw it's back, but the creator claims the website is giving permission. As it's in Spanish, a language I can't understand, I'm not pursuing it any farther. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 17:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign langauge references[edit]

CF: "Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources should be given whenever possible, and should always be used in preference to other language sources of equal calibre. However, do give references in other languages where appropriate. If quoting from a different language source, an English translation should be given with the original-language quote beside it." If we are to have these foreign references please provide the translation - or i'll prune them again. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Nice work on Walter Mildmay[edit]

Clearly you're far more well-informed than I on the topic. I hate to ask work from you in addition to the marvelous job you've done, but I wonder if you could add citation references to the document now that it's expanded? I know that's always the toughest thing later--when no one can remember what source established what fact--and while it's fresh it would be lovely if you could "cite up" the article a bit. Honestly, I think it's comprehensive and well-written enough for at least GA if not FA status. Bravo to you for some fine writing, and clearly for your work in the community as well, since I see you are an admin. Thanks very much for the note--it's always nice to see how a stubbish article you've generated becomes something much better in the hands of others. :-) Best regards, Jwrosenzweig 01:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words - I can't claim the credit for the work though - I've just collated and edited it. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 18:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés López Forero[edit]

Resolved

On 13 March 2007 you removed all of the references under the article on Andrés López Forero. Why did you do that? You may respond on Talk:Andrés López Forero where I have left a comment. --Bejnar 23:04, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answered as requested. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 13:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FBruce.jpg[edit]

Noted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The UCFD[edit]

Resolved

Hi Brookie. I didn't change any of the code in the category; the only thing I didn't copy over from the old usercat was the category for mainspace articles. Before I touched anything it already thought it was both US and UK. I gather that it should've been UK only? Xiner (talk, email) 18:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I think I found out what was wrong. Check out the new usercat for the change. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 18:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Lewinsky.jpg[edit]

Resolved

It was 2 years and I really can't remember where it came from - as the pic is not being used now I have deleted it. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Shields[edit]

Hi Brookie, I've started an article on Mark Shields, the guy leading the Bob Woolmer investigation, whose a fairly prominent London copper. Can you check the copyrighting of the pic and if poss expand the article a touch? Ta Rob 16:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look at the article when I have a moment - the pic is already tagged re its fairuse status and I suspect that it fails the test. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your WoH plaque[edit]

My friend Brookie, here is your WoH plaque. I want to share this article which I wrote with you. It is about Mihiel Gilormini‎ a Puerto Rican who served in the Royal Air Force during WW II. Enjoy. Tony the Marine 15:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) <Award moved to Barnstar page> Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 19:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks - I'm just doing little stuff,[edit]

mostly pouting and that sort of thing. I don't know if you remember setting up a Category of artists who exhibited at the 3rd Sculpture International for me, but you kindly did and then I turned my back for a day or two and it got deleted,[8] along with all the information that it contained. it felt like a emotional setback and since I'm an emotional fellow, well, I'm emoting about it. But thanks for checking in. Carptrash 19:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I am not able to access my Watchlist right now. I can go any place but there. Do you have any sort of idea what that might be about? Carptrash 23:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Silly Template[edit]

Brookie:

The image : from the silly template got deleted from the server. I removed that code from the Template:Silly code until a replacement could be found. JohnCub 15:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Added new image - thanks for the note Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 09:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Henry Keigwin[edit]

I won't tell you my initial reaction to you starting up this article - I would get banned from Wikipedia for being stunned and using foul language (in a good way, naturally) - but that's pretty good! Nice bit of history going on there. I've made a few adjustments to the article but the history is there. Bobo. 10:28, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Resolved

I am new and started rummaging through Talk files placed throu Wikipedia. What I want to know is how to get the info and pictures I need, I have a girlfriend who is having pains, I am looking through anatomy and vital organs right now... but when I come across pages of Talk, Im not sure what to pic for what I should see or read. GaurdianShot 07:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Replied on his talk page Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture[edit]

Resolved

Subst:No fair Megapixie 12:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noted - not bothered either way. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me[edit]

Dear Brookie:

If I am to call you that, then I request that, for the purpose of this conversation and the conversations to follow, you refer to me, directly or indirectly, as Catnip, given its reference in my hometown to my last name. Now about the issue regarding the article recently created of Annie Riechert. She is a graduating memeber of the Senior class here at Thomas County Central High School. She is the lead softball player on the team, the Lady Jackets. After having signed with a school from the New England States, our teacher asked we create an article about her, should she pursue the road to greatness and become an international snesation. I believe that, in all essence, you deleted the article in question in haste, not allowing us the proper time to fully construct the piece. I do not mean anything negative towards Wikipedia, the creator of Wikipedia, the employees, employee's families, the sponsors of Wikipedia, or any person or business thereof associated with Wikipedia, or any side branches produced by Wikipedia. I hope that in the future, myself might be allowed to work side by side with Wikipedia, the creator of Wikipedia, the employees, employee's families, the sponsors of Wikipedia, any person or business thereof associated with Wikipedia, and any side branches produced by Wikipedia. I sincerely hope I have not offended you, and look forward to hearing back from you.

Sincerely, Catnip

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Massmedia07 (talkcontribs) 16:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Don't be silly! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of cover tree page[edit]

Resolved

I am trying to create a wiki page for a relatively new computer science data structure called a cover tree. Right after I made my first entry the page was deleted, and now I can no longer edit the page. I am currently doing an honors thesis on the subject and I do not understand why I am unable to contribute to the page.

Thank you,—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ramsta3 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The article is still there as Cover tree - Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poser Article external link[edit]

I don't see adding the link to our site as advertising since we are the company that creates over 90% of the content that is published for Poser under the e Frontier name. With that in mind, I think that people might find our site (we sold our original URLs to e Frontier and started anew recently) interesting and useful due to our position with the parent company and that NO one who uses Poser doesn't use at LEAST one figure that we have made.

Notice I did not link to our store, only to our main site, I can change it to the forums if you would like.

Thanks for your time.

Sorry, I had put the link back up again, before I read your message....I thought that I had done it incorrectly last night.

--Rebekah--

I can't see that I have edited this article - merely posted a welcome message to you! That being said I agree with the comments made by other users about the external links - read the Wiki guidelines to clarify this. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking your advise[edit]

Dear Brookie, Greetings to you ! I had uploaded some image/s onto wikipedia not knowing anything about copyrights. For example, Bandar.jpg [9]. I now find the same picture published in the "Times of India", a daily newspaper here in India without my name. How do I make my images copyrighted - meaning that anyone publishing it need to invariably mention the author/photographer's name.

In this context, how do I revert copyright status of my images ? Kindly advise. Pradeep 18:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - on the above image you ahd released the copyright int he picture making it a free image - try using the {{gfdl}} tag as this would require you to be given credit but still allowing the pictures to be used on the Wiki Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 14:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brookie, I just realised that someone has intruded into Senate of Serampore College (University) and has tagged it. Kindly have a look. Thanks. Pradeep 19:08, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You All
[edit]

As you all know, some hacker cracked my password and I have been stripped of my admin powers. I can understand an admin. being blocked, but stripped of his powers without a fair hearing or consensus, I can't. I have stated that I changed my password and would like my powers back, however the chastizing going on in [[10]] has sadden me. It doesn't matter how many articles you have written, contributions you have made or how many years you have dedicated to making this project a credible one. A hacker, it seems has the power of making people consider you an untrustful person and turning some people in the community against you.

I have never abused of my powers and I have used Wikipedia as a medium to educate others. Yes, I have no regrets about having made so many contributions to the Pedia. I exhort all of my friends here to make sure that their passwords are strong ones so that you will not have to go through what I am going through.

I did promise some of my friends a couple of articles and as a good Marine I will keep my promise. To my friends here, Thank you for your friendship. Tony the Marine 00:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Lietauka[edit]

Just stopped by to ask, what is wrong with this article and why id yuo tag it for cleanup. It is referenced, categorised, written in decent English.--Lokyz 18:38, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The English is rather weak and stilted and the article really does need a clean up. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brookie. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Amelia.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Brookie/Pictures. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shucks! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 06:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comments at the article talk page. Cheers --Dweller 15:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an image in mind? A cartoon would be good.Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :)[edit]

.....For the smile - it made my day. It's so good that users can be nice to each other once in a while! Ryan Postlethwaite 18:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks from me too, dear Brookie! It is small but beautiful gestures of kindness that make this a brighter and better place, and it shows you're a beautiful person yourself. Keep up spreading the love! Love you, Phaedriel - 02:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finlandia Travel[edit]

Hi, I had just created a stub called Finlandia Travel, and you have deleted it before it was completed. Please let me know why, thanks. Mark

We don't do adverts - and so the article needs to establish notability - which it doesn't! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 15:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks. It wasn't intended as an advert, but as an extension of the Buses in doncaster category, and had more details than some of the entries already in that category. By notability I assume you mean longevity in the area? Anyway I'll leave it be I didn't realise the problems with looking like advertisements. MArk Mark man2 15:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kind attention: Proposed merger of Serampore College ......[edit]

Dear Brookie,

It's been long since I had access to computer. I see that someone is proposing merger of Serampore College with Senate of Serampore College (University). As we know, these are two different entities and merger is strongly opposed. However, you may have a look into it and advise the proponent of this merger accordingly. Thanking you in advance.Pradeep 18:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Posted a note Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:25, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brookie, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Traudle.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Brookie/Pictures. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stuff[edit]

Hi

Greetings!

Thank you so much for promptly responding to my request. I so much appreciate it. Incidentally, I have done major editing of the text on the Rampura Neemuch page. Just noticed that in the process somehow the lake picture (bada Talab) is lost -- it does not show up.

What could possibly be wrong? Pl. help me udnerstand and restore it, if possible.

Thanks, again....Raji

Somehow the pic' was removed from the page - I've added it back for you Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 17:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gone again... back again... gone again...[edit]

...back again! Hopefully day-to-day life will now be more stable... Thanks for your concern again! Cheers, CLW 18:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

MP3[edit]

how does an MP3 player work?

No idea - sorry? --Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 18:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moi[edit]

Why is not possible to write new pages, about new people in wikipedia? What is the purpuse of a encyclopedia if not full information? I didnt wrote anything wrong and this wasn't the only addition that I've made. I thought administrators are different from robots. If I cant have a page where to test and play... a page about myself, which I am a real man, I see no reason in helping or sustaining in any way this community. And don't be wrong , without me , for sure is not complete encyclopedia. :)

Valentin Paul Constantinescu User:Valugi

Hey there, Valugi. Could I have you consider relocating what you've got written at Valentin Paul Constantinescu to your User Page instead? It's some interesting stuff, but the encyclopedia's not the appropriate place for it. Thanks. Metalrobot 18:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)"


Quite Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CC-SIG-MASTER_copy.jpg[edit]

Sorted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Active user verification[edit]

Hello, Brookie. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:WPNN, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on WP:WPNN. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Diez2 23:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar[edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I'm awarding you this Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar for a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked! Wikidudeman (talk) 04:56, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey - thanks for this! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Roosevelt[edit]

The biog on Elliot Roosevelt lists him as a bombardier during WWII, but also lists him as flying a P-38. Be aware that the P-38 was a fighter plane, not a bomber. The article is further contradictory in that there was some criticism of Roosevelt's rise to Brigadier General when previously only pilots were so elevated. So the question is was he a bombardier or a fighter pilot? If solely a bombardier, the reference to the P-38 should be eliminated. Carroll01 21:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What blog? Why would I know? Sorry can't help Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:42, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Brookie, I stated b-i-o-g, not blog! Biography of Elliot Roosevelt. It contains unfortunate contraditions of his WWII service. Carroll01 21:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still know nothing about him and so still can't help - sorry. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of GNS[edit]

Hey I was wondering why my page was deleted? The title was GNS. I copied the source code into a text file so it's ok, I just want to make sure it wont be deleted again. Whoever deleted it said it was a hoax, NOT true, GNS even has a website. www.team-gns.net, although the information on the website is vague, what I have in this article is true and from many sources, personal and media.

I am going to put it back up, please let me know what I can do to make sure it doesn't get taken down again for such reasons. I thank you so much.

- Jon—Preceding unsigned comment added by JonVega7 (talkcontribs)

If was deleted before it is likely to be again Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Atkinson.jpg[edit]

The source is clearly given! Have removed the tag. 07:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

hello[edit]

Hello! --Sébastien Leblanc ( Talk | E-mail ) 07:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion[edit]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


More "do-gooders..." Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 05:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BibaMiniskirt.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BibaMiniskirt.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 17:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mike_1.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mike_1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  But|seriously|folks  07:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mike_1.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mike_1.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  But|seriously|folks  07:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:R&T.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:R&T.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Jstrong83[edit]

Hello Brookie:

I recently posted an article, Katten Muchin Rosenman, to Wikipedia and it was deleted because the content was cited as promotional material. I would like to revise the posting, however I do not have a copy. Can you supply me with the deleted article?

Thanks for your help!

(Jstrong83 16:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)) [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Traudle.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Traudle.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 20:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Help![edit]

I cant recall my exact username, to login. I thought it was briefcase119 or briefcase119@hotmail.com. I tried that and got a warning message to a username I never heard of before. see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:169.139.120.2&redirect=no

I dont recall ever adding anything about claudication. I might have added a comment somewhere about Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) but that is as close to that subject as I could have discussed. Is it possible someone hacked my identity? Please advise.

169.139.120.2 16:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)briefcase119[reply]

No idea - sorry: try the Admin Noticeboard - someone tecky'll be able to help Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 11:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My page for FD Harper was deleted. He is a writer whose first novel is to be released in the winter and writes for various publications, including the Cincinnati Enquirer. He is publishing a literary magazine due in Sept (I think.) I didn't write much about him and maybe that's why it was deleted, I am putting together a more concise bio -- am I wasting my time, or will it get in? He is an important writer and is influential to many writers here in the midwest. He should be in Wikipedia.

I would suggest that you work the article re-write up in a private sandbox page (I can create one for you if needed) and then ask someone who has experience in the relevant field to review it to see if it established notability and if it does then re-post it - with an explanation on the talk page. What had been created before was so short as to be almost a non-piece! Hope this helps. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bonzo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bonzo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell babelfish 02:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale was clearly on both the talk page and the article page - so I have removed the tag as being inappropriate. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've unfortunately had to replace it. A rationale must speak to one individual use of one individual image, and must address why that particular use passes the fair use requirements. That one isn't a rationale, just an assertion. A rationale states why it's appropriate, not that it's appropriate. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:28, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like semantics to me! Am not bothered if it goes Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Peate's explanation[edit]

The Ashes article has him saying, "I had no confidence in Mr Studd, sir, so thought I had better do my best." I believe that you were the one who provided this quote, so I'm requesting a source for it. The original version, apparently provided by W.G. in Cricket (1891), has been paraphrased far too often. Cheers, Robertson-Glasgow 11:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was me - I'll need to give that some thought - it was a while ago. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:11, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Robertson-Glasgow 19:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say Hi ![edit]

Dear Brookie ! Hi and greeting to you from India ! How are you ? Pradeep 10:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very well thanks you - and you? I have recently merged my business and less able to waste time on the Wiki! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 16:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BNI[edit]

Not sure if this is where I'm supposed to contact you??? If there is a better way, please feel free to let me know.

You made a change recently that someone brought to my attention. You changed the name Business Network International to Business NetworkS International.

Our company name is legally BNI - however Wikipedia keeps saving it to the spelled out name of Business Network International. Although we'd prefer our legal name - if you want the spelled out name, it would be good to have it accurate. Would you mind changing it back please???

Thanks.

Dr. Ivan Misner Founder BNI —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misner (talkcontribs) 14:55, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted and redirected the other page there as well. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 10:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mhardee.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mhardee.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Marston Trussell edits[edit]

Hi Brookie At 07:15 on the 23 April 2007 you added a piece in Wikipedia about Marston Trussell and the manor house being run as a brothel.

Can you let me know where you got this info from?

Thanks

Simon Smith (Smudger 67)

About 20 years it was all in the Sunday papers and there was quite a scandal as I recall. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 12:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you are still active[edit]

You welcomed we when a created my earlier alternate account. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:53, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on user's page Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 16:10, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protected titles[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you were trying to protect the title of AlpInvest Partners, so I deleted the page again (CSD G6) and added it to the protected titles page. Since {{deletedpage}} was TfD'd, we should be using the protected title cascade-protect solution now. There are instructions on the page at WP:PT, and if you need any further help just give me a call. Cheers, Nihiltres(t.l) 15:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. The way that it works is that the protected page lists are cascade-full-protected, so any page transcluded into them is automatically protected from editing, even though its nonexistence may prevent it from being directly protected. The {{protected title}} template transcludes the empty page in a nice orderly way so that the list doesn't get messy. This is generally better than {{deletedpage}} was, because it means links to the page are red, the history is hidden, and all the usual advantages of deletion. :) Nihiltres(t.l) 15:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A few weeks away from Admin' duties and everything changes! Thanks Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 15:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've deleted this as db-spam; I've just caught the guy's talk page on which he points out similar pages which have been considered for AfD have not got there, although his hangon was late. Just thought you might want to take a look at it. --Rodhullandemu 16:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 15:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Back again...[edit]

On account of my alleged nun obsession, I joined a nunnery. But I got found out eventually, so I'm back here now and hope to remain here this time... :) CLW 10:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now you've been de-frocked (again) - good to see you back with your mop. Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 15:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article, and duuuhhhh.....[edit]

Dear Brookie - Hi, hope you are well. I did some guiding at London Open House weekend (sorry! should have told you about it...ah well, next time) and am now writing another article, on Robert Lewis Roumieu.

There are actually TWO Roumieus, so I did a disambig page. Have messed up by failing to include the word "disambiguation" in its title. Therefore the hatnote on the article doesn't work.

Would you kindly

I will ask you another question later.

Sorted! Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 09:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and bw --FClef (talk) 11:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]