User talk:ChamithN/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15 ← Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

TAFI List of articles purge, part II

  • Hello ChamithN:
A discussion is occurring at the TAFI talk page regarding the removal of entries from the project's List of articles page. Your input is welcome at the discussion.
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2015)

Berries for sale at a farmers' market
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Berry

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Farmhouse • Igloo

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

U.S. GDP estimates

The new estimates I put are in the same cited source, please check next time Orelbon (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry didn't see you undid your revert Orelbon (talk) 20:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

@Orelbon: This is exactly what happened to me. I didn't think twice before reverting you and you didn't check before posting this. We are even now. -- Chamith (talk) 20:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Interstellar probe

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Interstellar probe. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion nomination of Mersalaayitten

Hello ChamithN. Speedy deletion work is important and I do appreciate the effort. I would just ask that you please review the criteria carefully because accuracy is also important. On that issue, I have declined your speedy deletion nomination of Mersalaayitten as lacking context under CSD A1. That criterion did not apply because it is only for articles where you literally cannot identify the subject of the article from its text. While the article was quite short, what it was about was plain. You also tagged it under CSD A7, which did not apply because the article was about a song, and A7 only applies to articles on real persons or groups, individual animals, organizations, web content and organized events.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

@Fuhghettaboutit: Thank you for your explanation. I admit that I was hasty with the addition of speedy deletion tag, where I didn't even take time to realize what the article is really about. It just seemed obvious to me that subject doesn't meet WP:GNG. Nevertheless, I'll be cautious next time when tagging for speedy deletion. -- Chamith (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Sure. I would suggest a prod tag instead.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
I nominated it for deletion at AFD instead. -- Chamith (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2015)

Three plates of soufflés
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Soufflé

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Berry • Farmhouse

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:Attention deficit disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Attention deficit disorder. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

MTL Blog Inc

Hello ChaminthN

I am not sure what exactly needs to be clarified on the MTL Blog Inc page. For example, what is the difference between MTL Blog Inc and the Thrillist Media Group page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrillist_Media_Group

I appreciate any constructive feedback you can offer! Also, how can I input photos into the article? There are screenshots from CBC news that fit well into a section of the article that I found online.

Regards,

Matt — Preceding unsigned comment added by MattOhMTL (talk • contribs) 16:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

@MattOhMTL: Hi Matt, the difference between them is that Thrillist Media Group article provides several links to secondary and reliable sources and meets the criteria of general notability guideline. However, MTL Blog Inc article provides no links to external sources. Therefore it's difficult verify the accuracy of cited content. Citing reliable sources is crucial when it comes to verifiability policy of Wikipedia. Right now, most of the sources you cited can't be verified and seem to be Self-published sources. Thus it could cause a conflict of interest. In order to contest the deletion process the article must meet general notability criteria of Wikipedia. You may removed the PROD (proposed deletion tag) template if you could improve the article and address the issues I just pointed out. And also when writing an article you should avoid puffery at any cost. Always maintain a neutral point of view. Cheers! -- Chamith (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Follow this guideline to input photos to an article. In order to add photos an article you have to upload those photos to Wikimedia servers first. Before doing so you have to make sure that your images fall into one of these categories. -- Chamith (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello ChamithN,

Okay I understand now, more third party sources. I originally confused the official websites as sources that could be used for verification. I will look into revising the article. Thanks for the clarifications.

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.67.24 (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


Hello ChamithN,

I have added sources and clarified much of the page. Does it meet the Wikipedia standards now? Also, I looked into uploading images, and it says I must have done 10 edits to be able to upload photos. I am not entirely sure how or where to upload the photos to be able to retrieve them for linking into the article (since I have about 2 photos to upload that are relevant). The articles on how to upload the photos are more confusing since there are so many options and wikilanguage. Could you please clarify the process?

Thank you again,

MattOhMTL (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi again MattOhMTL, while most of your citations are valid the way you cited them is incorrect. You actually posted them as external links, not inline citations. For example if you want to cite the article [http://www.trademarkia.com/narcity-86475444.html] you have to place them between <ref></ref> tags. So you citation should be like this, <ref>[http://www.trademarkia.com/narcity-86475444.html]</ref>. Also, don't cite Facebook as a source as it isn't considered a reliable source. You have to link to the precise article (don't link to the homepage) where it explicitly mentions the cited content. For now I'll remove the proposed deletion tag and move your article to a draft space as you are working on it. Best, -- Chamith (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
And by the way, you can refer to Thrillist Media Group to get an idea about how a start-class Wikipedia article should be. -- Chamith (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


Hello ChamithN,

Perfect, I appreciate it!

Thanks again,

MattOhMTL (talk) 13:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2015)

Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Historic house

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Soufflé • Berry

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:Type 054A frigate

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Type 054A frigate. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2015)

A Old Colony Mennonite family observing the practice of plain dress
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Plain dress

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Historic house • Soufflé

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

What is the value of using “ ” in edits?

Hi there. Okay, I understand that nbsp is a non-breaking space. But that is a raw HTML entity, correct? Why do some editors create edits with nbsp in them such as edits here? Thanks in advance for the clarification. --SpyMagician (talk) 04:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

As you might you already know it's actually done by a script called User:Cameltrader/Advisor which automatically suggests improvements to the formatting. WP:ADVISOR#Features mentions "if an mdash or ndash is preceded by a space, it had better be a non-breaking one". This is mainly because WP:MOSNUM#Non-breaking spaces recommends to use non-breaking spaces to prevent causing linebreaks in some situations. However, If &ndash; wasn't preceded by a space then the script won't try to modify it because, as there aren't any whitespaces it's unlikely to cause linebreaks. So as you can see there was a space before the &ndash; here which made the script suggest a non-breaking space rather than a whitespace+&ndash;. This is however, not a rule, but rather a formatting method to improve article layout. I hope you'll get my explanation. Cheers! -- Chamith (talk) 05:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lists of mathematicians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lists of mathematicians. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech Ambassador Invite

W T A You are invited to participate in WikiProject Tech Ambassadors, a project dedicated to promoting the Tech Ambassadors Program here on Wikipedia.
If you would like to join, visit the members page. You might also consider subscribing to the mailing list. samtar(leave me a message) 22:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2015)

Two high divers in mid-air
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

High diving

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Plain dress • Historic house

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Namaste

You have an interesting caption to your photo. What made you write it? --AmritasyaPutraT 03:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

@AmritasyaPutra: Greetings AmritasyaPutra. When I was participating in a discussion somebody accused me of having Dunning–Kruger effect. He implied that I've made my userpage look like I'm some kind of expert. So, I thought my Bitstrips photo was the reason behind his comment and added a caption accordingly. Regards, -- Chamith (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3

Greetings, all! We hope that everyone had a nice summer.

Saturday saw the end of Round 2. Things went relatively smoothly this month. The top 2 from 4 pools, plus the top participant (the wildcard, or "9th place") of all remaining competitors, moved onto Round 3. We had one withdrawal early in Round 2, so he was replaced by the next-highest scorer from Round 1. Round 2's highest scorer was Pool D's Tomandjerry211, who earned an impressive 366 points; he also reviewed the most articles (19). Close behind was Zwerg Nase, also in Pool D, at 297 points and 16 articles. The wildcard slot went to Good888. Congrats to all!

Round 3 will have 9 competitors in 3 pools. The key to moving forward was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates, as it has been in every round up to now. For example, 2 competitors only needed to review 2 articles each to win in their pools, and each article were either from the pink nomination box (20 points) or had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). The GA Cup continues to be a success in many ways, even with fewer competitors this time. For some reason, the competitors in the 2015 GA Cup have reviewed fewer articles in Round 2, which has made the judges scratch their head in confusion. We've speculated many reasons for that: the summer months and vacations, our competitors are saving their strength for the final rounds, or they all live in the Pacific Northwest and the heavy wildfire smoke has affected their thinking. Whatever the reason, Round 2 competitors reviewed almost 100 articles, which is a significant impact in the task of reviewing articles for GA status. We've considered that the lower participation this competition is due to timing, so we intend to discuss the best time frame for future GA Cups.

For Round 3, participants have been placed randomly in 3 pools of 3 contestants each; the top editor in each pool will progress, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users. Round 3 will start on September 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on September 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.

Good luck to the remaining contestants, and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6 and Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Microsoft may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • = {{unbulleted list|[[John W. Thompson]] (Chairman)|[[Satya Nadella]] (CEO)|[[Bill Gates]] (founder, technology advisor|Brad Smith (President)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://news.microsoft.com/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2015)

Ice hockey is an example of a team sport. Pictured is an 1893 ice hockey match at Victoria Rink, Montreal.
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Team sport

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Costume • Musical composition

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2015)

Costumed performers from the 2006 Bristol Renaissance Faire
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Costume

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Musical composition • Personal finance

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Scotland Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Philadelphia Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

  1. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
  2. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
  4. Somerset Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
  5. Washington, D.C. West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
  6. Somerset Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
  7. United States Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
  8. England Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Garbage picking article renaming

You previously opposed a merger of the garbage picking article. Well, now someone wants to rename the article "dumpster diving" which I feel is not a good idea as it's not inclusive of the various situations discussed in the article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Garbage_picking#Requested_move_31_August_2015 He already did the renaming once without any consensus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Garbage_picking#Garbage_Picking_to_Dumpster_Diving_Move.2Frename_should_be_reverted. I thought you might not have seen the requested move and might wish to have your say one way or another. Thanks. Centerone (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

DirectX

Please don't remove the "Graphics card that support DirectX 9 needed to support Aero". Instead of reverting my edit, i guess edit the page and leave some important notes, such as "Graphics card that support DirectX 9 needed to support Aero". Thank you. -- Akmaie Ajam (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Akmaie Ajam (talk) 09:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

@Akmaie Ajam: I'm sorry but it needs to be reverted, mostly because it's poorly written. As far as I know there's nothing called "Graphics card that support DirectX 9 needed to support Aero". If you could provide a reliable source to backup your claims I'm willing to discuss about this further. And please refrain from providing opinion pieces. I've explained about this in detail on your talk page.--Chamith (talk) 09:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
@ChamithN: Sorry, i could not provide best edits because i don't know what to do :(. -- Akmaie Ajam (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
It's ok Akmaie Ajam. I appreciate your concern to improve Wikipedia. Speaking of my reversion, 4.09.00.0900 (RC4) is a version of DirectX. So saying Graphics card that support DirectX 9 needed to support Aero" contradicts the meaning as it's not a graphics card, but a version. I hope you understand why I reverted your edit and not get hurt by it. And, any addition could be challenged if a reliable source is not cited. Which is another reason why I had to remove your content addition. If you need any help in editing feel free to ask on my talk page. Best -- Chamith (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I guess try a sandbox if you want to experiement. -- Akmaie Ajam (talk) 17:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
@Akmaie Ajam: If you are suggesting that you should use your sandbox then I'd say "absolutely yes". Moreover, you can ask another editor to fix typos, grammar mistakes you made in your sandbox project. Collaboration can go a long way here on Wikipedia. You could also place {{help me}} on your talk page if you want to request from other editors. -- Chamith (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Datamation

You must be very young, not to know that DATAMATION was the first publication in the Information Age. Dbprell (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dbprell: Haha. I read the article to see whether it's sufficiently related. I'm surprise why the article didn't say so. -- Chamith (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
It says "Datamation.com, became one of the first online-only magazines". As it wasn't sourced, I couldn't rely on that piece of information. And next time please use edit summary to explain your edits. Best, -- Chamith (talk) 01:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Ok, I found a source here. I'll re-add it to Information Age. Thank you for your vigilance. -- Chamith (talk) 01:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Operation Onymous

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Operation Onymous. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2015)

Transection of a human head
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Head

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: High diving • Plain dress

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridge to Terabithia ending scene.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridge to Terabithia ending scene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Sfan00 IMG You can speedy delete it. I'm positive that it wont be used again. -- Chamith (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IQ and Global Inequality

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:IQ and Global Inequality. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2015)

"Boy on white horse" by Theodor Kittelsen
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Scottish mythology

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Head • High diving

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Untitled section

re:"I noticed that you made a change to an article, USB, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed . . ." here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:24.96.210.230

I DID include a reference, a reference to the SAME site, stackexchange, that the defective reference (no url) for the claim pointed to. So if it is legitimate for the claim, it is legitimate for the indication that the claim is disputed. The page I cite (with link INCLUDED, unlike the ref for the claim I'm indicating is disputed) contains additional references. I specifically included that one because it is the SAME site, so to claim one reference is reliable and the other is not is illogical.

I haven't revisited that article and I don't know it this is still relevant. I decided to bring it up because I'm beginning to think there is a problematic general pattern with wikipedia mods to support the status quo rejecting improvements on grounds that apply even more strongly to what the improvements replace.

As if to say "Existing crap is ok. New stuff has to be gold. Crap-replacement must be done with gold. Replacing crap with brass may be an improvement but it can't be allowed because it is contrary to Holy Policy." You might think about passing this observation on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.210.230 (talk) 02:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Stack Exchange is not considered a reliable source as it contains user generated content, just like Wikipedia. See WP:RSOPINION for more details. If you can cite a reliable source, you are welcome to restore your content addition. -- Chamith (talk) 02:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Nevertheless you were right about USB having citations from Stack Exchange. So, for now, I think it's fair enough to restore your content. I'll tag it as an unreliable source. -- Chamith (talk) 02:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Phineas Gage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Phineas Gage. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Climate change denial

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Climate change denial. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2015)

Personal finance – an example image of personal budget planning software
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Personal finance

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Scottish mythology • Head

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:Self-creation cosmology

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Self-creation cosmology. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2015)

Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Musical composition

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Personal finance • Scottish mythology

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:PlayStation 4 system software

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:PlayStation 4 system software. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for Guideline, your guideline is very useful to how fix dead links in wiki pages. Sure, I will follow as per your great words. Once again thanks! Matthews david (talk) 13:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

Discussion at Talk:Taylor Swift#Singer-songwriter

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Taylor Swift#Singer-songwriter. Thanks. Calidum 01:12, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Discussion at User_talk:Matthews_david

Now i change my user introduction content as per your suggestion with wikipedia terms and condition thanks for your guideline. (Matthews david (talk) 08:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC))

Your GA nomination of Modern Family

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Modern Family you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 08:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Modern Family

The article Modern Family you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Modern Family for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

Please comment on Talk:C/1980 E1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:C/1980 E1. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2015)

Models promoting Zombieland at San Diego Comic-con. A zombie comedy is a horror comedy subgenre that involves zombies.
Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Comedy horror

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Team sport • Costume

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gravity Falls, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Broadcast section

I undid one of your edits [1] as I think you are reading WP:TVINTL a bit too strictly with respect to what should be in a broadcast section. Originally people put tables of every single foreign broadcast and that was strongly discouraged. Writing the info in prose with emphasis on English language broadcasts was encouraged, presumption being those were noteworthy for an article on the show. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah I concur. I forgot to take into account that it simply encourages editors to do so. Thank you for your explanation. -- Chamith (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:OpenIndiana

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:OpenIndiana. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2015)

Hello, ChamithN.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Allegra Versace

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Comedy horror • Team sport

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:Domestic violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domestic violence. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ChamithN/Archive_22&oldid=1045670503"