User talk:Chetsford/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Chetsford. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Chetsford, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Chetsford! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Grueneich
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jim Grueneich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella Velella Talk 19:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Speedy deletion declined: Angelo Pergolito
Hello Chetsford, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Angelo Pergolito, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: fouding a likely notable label indicates significance. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 18:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:American Revolutionary War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Revolutionary War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Hello Chetsford. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Louis "Lou B" Branchinelli. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Lil Johnny (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gwanggaeto the Great
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gwanggaeto the Great. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Arthur Rubinfeld
Hello,
Can you please let me know how we are not being neutral? We provided facts and links for every change to the Arthur Rubinfeld page. I am happy to make adjustments to meet requirements, but the page is incomplete as it is. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfulton (talk • contribs) 20:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wfulton - Content such as this -
- Rubinfeld is well known for his leading-edge, visionary work
- - while possibly appropriate for a press release or an infomercial, is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article.
- Also, external links in the body of the article violate WP:EXT.
- However, I might misunderstand. Can you clarify what you mean by "we?" Wikipedia does not permit shared accounts - see: WP:NOSHARING. Chetsford (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Ok, I can adjust the text. By "we" I meant the writer of the content and myself. They do not know how to make edits on Wikipedia so I am making the edits. But there is inaccurate information that could be damaging such as the acreditation in Architecture. Arthur is not maintaining this accreditation, so we can't keep that on the page no matter what. Thanks for the prompt feedback.
- Wfulton - thanks very much. If the accreditation does not have a source it should definitely be removed. However, may I ask how you know Rubinfeld is not maintaining his accreditation? Chetsford (talk) 20:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Chetsford - I know Arthur personally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfulton (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wfulton - per WP's policies on conflict of interest, specifically WP:EXTERNALREL, you should not be directly editing Rubinfeld's page, particularly as I assume the "writer of the content ... [who does] not know how to make edits on Wikipedia" is most likely Rubinfeld himself. Chetsford (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Chetsford - how do you actually get any content on this site. I am baffled about how knowing a person could create a conflict of interest. The writer is not Arthur Rubinfeld. But if you want, I am happy to have a third party do this, where this is no conflict of interest. I don't see how it would make much of a difference about who posts it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfulton (talk • contribs) 22:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wfulton, we get content on this site by writing, basically, summaries of what reliable sources tell us. That's really all there is to it. That you appear to have a COI was, I am guessing, surmised by the tone and content of what you put up here. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Drmies, If you have a page about a person that is clearly inaccurate, how does one go about getting the information corrected? It can't be entirely consensus based or else you would have nothing on the site to begin with. If some of the content is objectionable, I am happy to adjust the tone and content, but to roll everything back loses some key information about this individual. I really do want this to be a constructive experience, please tell me what to do to make it so. Wfulton (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wfulton - it's no problem, just that WP's policies regarding WP:EXTERNALREL generally exclude editing the pages of people with whom you have a personal relationship; according to your statement above you "know Arthur personally." While you may not be able to directly edit Rubinfeld's page, you can post suggestions - or even the full text - of the changes you'd like made on the article's Talk page. Another editor can then incorporate those changes into the article. Just remember, though, that everything in a WP:BLP has to be supported by WP:RS which, invariably, means documentary sources. Personal knowledge is usually not sufficient in an all-but anonymous Wiki, otherwise I could claim to be Barbara Sinatra and start editing Frank's article with declarations of my personal knowledge that he was secretly a Vietnamese woman who wore a disguise his entire life. Chetsford (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- If there is incorrect information, you go in and correct it. But you can't tell me that this was "correcting" inaccurate information--it was simply adding material to a resume. And adding this, "Rubinfeld is well known for his leading-edge, visionary work in the areas of retail design and architecture", well. Drmies (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Drmies and Chetsford, thank you for the feedback. Wfulton (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Middlebury, Connecticut
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Middlebury, Connecticut. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 08:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bibliography of Donald Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bibliography of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK
Hello! Your submission of Oxford Bibliographies Online at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 09:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Yale University endowment
Hello! Your submission of Yale University endowment at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mackensen (talk) 12:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Évian Conference
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Évian Conference. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Yale University endowment
On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yale University endowment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the legality of a 2016 plan to tax the Yale University endowment was questioned, in part due to a 1745 act of the Colony of Connecticut which granted the school tax-exempt status? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yale University endowment. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Yale University endowment), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Oxford Bibliographies Online
On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oxford Bibliographies Online, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Oxford Bibliographies Online has been called "an anti-Google"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oxford Bibliographies Online. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Oxford Bibliographies Online), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for HPA-23
On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article HPA-23, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the mid-1980s, some HIV patients pinned their hopes for survival on an experimental drug called HPA-23? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/HPA-23. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, HPA-23), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Military tiara) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Military tiara, Chetsford!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating all these interesting articles!
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 21:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words, Boleyn! Chetsford (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Chetsford. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |