User talk:Clarinetguy097
Welcome
[edit]
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 30 October
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Joey Bustos page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Please leave a reminder on my talk page about the Boohbah article. 70.27.31.53 (talk) 13:50, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for keeping the reference. 70.27.31.53 (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Katarzyna Mycka (December 23)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katarzyna Mycka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
PAGE) 22:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Clarinetguy097,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
I understand
[edit]Hi, i'm Συντάκτης, I understand the comment you posted on my talk page. The article I edited that you were talking about Hello was a mistake. I always will take correction no matter who it comes from and I will try to make useful edits in the future on Wikipedia. I hope you can make useful edits too. Συντάκτης (talk) 02:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Συντάκτης: I'm afraid I'm sensing otherwise, since two editors have brought up the issue of having an administrator topicon on your userpage, but you've been dismissive both times. It's valuable to take the advice of other editors as you're starting off. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but i don't understand what your saying. Συντάκτης (talk) 04:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Συντάκτης: You added the administrator icon ({{administrator}}) to your userpage, which indicates that you are an administrator (which you are not). Twice you've been informed that you should not do so, but you restored the administrator icon (and dismissed my message to you as not useful). ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry but i don't understand what your saying. Συντάκτης (talk) 04:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]Draft:Katarzyna Mycka concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Katarzyna Mycka, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Katarzyna Mycka
[edit]Hello, Clarinetguy097. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Katarzyna Mycka".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Katarzyna Mycka}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Noonie Bao has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
333-blue 05:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reference errors on 7 June
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of hop varieties page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]seems like you're a fan of Lionel Messi, because i saw your article about messi
Emenike Ndubuisi (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kitten, but it's not "my" article. I just made a very small edit to it. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Clarinetguy097. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Use Twinkle!
[edit]Hi, you can simply tag an article or warn an editor for vandalism using the Twinkle app. You can enable it via "Gadget" menu in Preferences; lots of options to choose from depending on what issue is raised. It'll definitely decrease the burden of doing mundane tasks such as going back and forth the WP:WARNVAND just to paste those templates in an uncooperative editor's talk page. Give it a shot! :) Bluesphere 11:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Clarinetguy097. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
WMSTL17
[edit]Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 17 | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at the Cortex Innovation Community in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Clarinetguy097. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Clarinetguy097. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your question about private
[edit]What I meant with private is that some sayings or writings are completely for the responsibility of the "auctor". And sometimes he/she is not able to "explain any further".
145.129.136.48 (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- I think I see what you mean. Since the best practice is to keep conversations in one place, I'll respond to your original comment on Talk:Shifting cultivation. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 21:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Alex Morgan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Something as simple as "punctuation goes before references" would have made the edit more clear. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Keeping the Fnords!
[edit]Hi Clarinetguy097, I've been editing to keep the fnords on that page because fnords need to be contained and that page is the best place to do it. By eliminating fnords you may be inadvertently (or intentionally) releasing them into the wild, where they can do real harm. How long have you been a member of the illuminati? Pauljbenedict (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- This, plus your comments on Talk:Fnord, makes me think you're not being serious. Your fnord joke is getting old, so it's really time to back off. (P.S. I don't have political control over enough land to join the Illuminati, but if it counts for anything, I've been told I'm a "smart-looking person" several times.) Clarinetguy097 (talk) 23:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm definitely kidding. :) I appreciate your efforts to keep Wikipedia clear of noise, but having random fnords on that page is what a fnord is. So, for a reader, it's the experience of "discovering" a fnord mixed in with regular text. I feel that having examples of the phenomena on that page illustrate what the page is there to describe, and so is appropriate text. Back off on the Fnords? Never :) Take it easy! Pauljbenedict (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, this is a deadly serious website. I was about to look up some policies to explain why you were wrong, but it suddenly occurred to me that if they don't want fnords here, then what if adding fnords here is doing harm and is tanamount to releasing them into the wild? Maybe we could better contain them on wiki sites that don't take themselves so seriously. (Like you said, I am just a passenger, so sorry if that was just a load of bulldada.) Clarinetguy097 (talk) 16:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm definitely kidding. :) I appreciate your efforts to keep Wikipedia clear of noise, but having random fnords on that page is what a fnord is. So, for a reader, it's the experience of "discovering" a fnord mixed in with regular text. I feel that having examples of the phenomena on that page illustrate what the page is there to describe, and so is appropriate text. Back off on the Fnords? Never :) Take it easy! Pauljbenedict (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Clarinetguy097, I noticed you issued a SYNTH challenge to a sentence or two on the Fnord page. This was a new concept for me, so I read through the definition of SYNTH, and ask that you consider SYNTH is not obvious and review all the references made in that paragraph, as these are not my conclusions, they are deeply supported by the history of the matter. Especially review this reference Download The True Story of the Internet - Browser Wars which clearly lays out the history of Microsoft's monopolistic efforts to dominate the fledgling internet through suppressing open source software and illegally acting against a direct competitor in Netscape Navigator. My assertion in this paragraph is that the free and open-source Fnord! web server was affected by the same monopolistic atmosphere that sealed the fate of Netscape Navigator. Pauljbenedict (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Hi, could you weigh in on this article about St. Louisan up for deletion,Cara Spencer. Thanks Clearance Wood (talk) 18:15, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Jinsha Site
[edit]Hi! I have been working on article called Jinsha site that you helped in 2018! I am doing this as part of my university course. Currently, I am working on the format, citation as well as enhancing my writing style! Any suggestions would be lovely. Thank you.--Anninarose (talk) 01:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- I just looked over it quickly and made a small fix, but I could look it over more thoroughly soon. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
New message from ExclusiveEditor
[edit]You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 15:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Midnights, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ippantekina (talk) 06:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- What do policies and guidelines have to do with this? False titles are literally not a matter of guidelines. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)