User talk:Codepro

Welcome!

Hello, Codepro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Also, in the future please try to tag your uploaded images along with your explanation, it would be very helpful and if images are left untagged they may be deleted. Thanks and good luck! P.S. I already tagged the Red Star line image you just uploaded (it may be copywrited so its always better to err on the safe side). Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Red_star_line_0.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Red_star_line_0.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 03:14, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Red_star_line_13.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Red_star_line_13.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star Line images

I fixed them all up, you don't need to do anything with them now. But you can buy me a drink the next time I'm in town. :-) Stan 14:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Hey I deleted all of your pictures from the Red Star Line article, thier simply were too many and it was starting to become intrusive on the article, I thought about saving some but I didn't know which ones you wanted to save, you can go back and add in a couple pictures if you like but try not to go overboard. Deathawk 22:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fort Mackinac cannon firing.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fort Mackinac cannon firing.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Fort Mackinac cannon lighting.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fort Mackinac cannon lighting.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dark tower box cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dark tower box cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dark tower assembled2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dark tower assembled2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:USPS mail flow through national infrastructure.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:USPS mail flow through national infrastructure.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:PFC Marcel Baldinger USMC.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PFC Marcel Baldinger USMC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Maurice Baldinger

Speedy deletion nomination of Marcel Maurice Baldinger

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Marcel Maurice Baldinger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Looper5920 (talk) 10:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grosse Pointe North logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grosse Pointe North logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a beer for you

		A beer on me!
		for your help with AMD APU Aunva6 (talk) 06:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Your recent editing history at Cobo Center shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:54, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This, and you don't notify the article... - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 17:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Hello, Codepro. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Wanted to notify you that I have again attempted to file a dispute resolution request here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Cobo_Center

I considered filing for help from an editor to get some help entering the reference and citation material you request, but the Wiki information instructed me that because of the neutrality noticeboard discussion, this was the only next step. If I requested incorrectly again, I will try again, as I would like to get this resolved in good faith. In the mean time, please consider helping me correct the reference and citation material, and removing your warnings at the top of the page. Thanks. --MaryKlida (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Wikipedia:Neutral point_of_view/Noticeboard#Cobo_Center".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:

It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.

What this noticeboard is not:

It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.

Things to remember:

Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 17:06, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a discussion on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard pertaining to your recent editions to the Cobo Center page. You can access the discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Cobo_Center

--MaryKlida (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please Enter your comments on the Dispute Resolution discussion involving your Cobo Center additions

Codepro, you are the last person to enter comments. Please consider joining the attempt to resolve this dispute. Many thanks. Here is the page link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Cobo_Center --MaryKlida (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Leadership Computing Challenge allocations

The article List of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Leadership Computing Challenge allocations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A long table, lots and lots of categories, but no explanation whatsoever of what this page is? The Advanced Scientific etc. doesn't have an article nor an explanation here (not under the full name nor as ALCC), although this problem was indicated 2 1/2 years ago. If you can't even explain what an article is about, and the three (presumably primary) sources all fail, then we have no way of determining its notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Leadership Computing Challenge allocations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Leadership Computing Challenge allocations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Advanced Scientific Computing Research Leadership Computing Challenge allocations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. clpo13_(talk) 01:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support of high performance computing coverage!

The Supercomputer Fan Award

Hello Codepro, it's uncertain whether we'll be able to save that list of computing research projects from deletion. Remembering that we need to crawl and walk before we can fly, and that there are many people here whose knowledge and interests are essentially limiting them to filling out popular culture topics like movies and anime characters, would you consider turning your talents to some basic education? The Grand Challenges page could certainly use some help ... Djembayz (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:PFC Marcel Baldinger USMC.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PFC Marcel Baldinger USMC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Codepro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	thanks for your help at AMD APU -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 03:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]