User talk:Gsard
Welcome
[edit]
ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Gauge gravitation theory
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Gauge gravitation theory, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gauge gravitation theory. Thank you. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
How to verify copyright permission for article Gauge gravitation theory
[edit]Hello, Gsard.
With respect to your contribution of material to Gauge gravitation theory, it seems that passages of this article duplicate external sources. Judging by your username, it seems highly plausible that you are the original author and the copyright holder of these original works. If you are, in fact, G. Sardanashvily, it should be a relatively simple matter for you to verify permission for us to use this text. But since we do not currently have a method in place to verify the identity of account holders at account creation, we must verify such donations through external processes. The article has been blanked to allow time for that verification to proceed.
Given the history of publication, the simplest way for you to verify is probably to send an e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address associated with Moscow State University, which should be enough to identify you as the same author of this and this. Your e-mail should be sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Your e-mail needs to specify that we may re-use the material placed here under the terms of the GFDL. There is a boilerplate release form at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries which can be helpful, although it is a little complicated in that you are duplicating only portions of that text. Please provide a clear link to both of those websites in your e-mail and specify by name the article on Wikipedia in which the material is being used. Once your e-mail is received and processed by a member of the Communications Committee, the article's contents will be restored if your release is legally sufficient. Please make a note that you've done this on Talk:Gauge gravitation theory. You can compose a note or very simply paste the following on the talk page, brackets and all: {{OTRS pending}}
If you decide you don't wish to release the material under the terms of GFDL or you are not the copyright holder, as your name suggests, you are welcome to rewrite the text from scratch at this temporary page. As long as the material is otherwise compliant with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it will be used to replace the previous contents. Please leave a note at Talk:Gauge gravitation theory saying you have done so. This can be a fine way to address limited copyright concerns, and under ordinary circumstances I'd be happy to help out with revising the problematic passages myself, but I'm afraid that I simply do not have the background in the topic to begin to revise this material. :)
We apologize for the additional steps necessary, but as copyright is a matter of legal concern, we must ensure that we not only protect the rights of copyright holders, but also guard the Wikipedia project against inadvertent infringement.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to let me know at my talk page, and I will assist you with this in any way that I can. We also have a help desk which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers.
Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Initial context setting, style issues
[edit]The following is an absolutely wrong way to start a Wikipedia article:
-
- Noether identities characterize the degeneracy of a Lagrangian system.
This fails to tell the lay reader that it's not about psychoanlysis, metaphysics, theology, international finance, cellular biology, or any of a host of other subjects. I've edited it so that it says
-
- In mathematical physics, Noether identities characterize[...]
etc.
Note that I set the title phrase in bold, and that it required by Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
I also changed some "inline" TeX to non-TeX mathematical notation, because inline TeX often gets badly misaligned or appears four times as big as the surrounding text, etc. ("Displayed" TeX, however, looks good.) With non-TeX notation, variables should be italicized by digits and punctuation should not—that matches TeX style. Also, a space should precede and follow each binary operator (such as "+") and binary relation ("=", "<", etc.).
It would be a good idea to say who the eponym is:
-
- In mathematical physics, Noether identities, named after Emmy Noether, characterize[...]
etc. I didn't do that because I wasn't sure that was the right Noether.
- Things like this are codified in Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics). Michael Hardy (talk) 22:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Same thing again
[edit]- It should be emphasized from the beginning that graded manifolds are not supermanifolds though there is a certain correspondence between the graded manifolds and the De Witt supermanifolds.
When the above is the opening sentence in a Wikipedia article, then the reader can read all the way through the first sentence without finding out whether the topic is jet-engine mechanics, jurisprudence, chemistry, chess, French cooking, or morality. You need to at least inform the reader at the outset that mathematics is what it's about. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Gennadi Sardanashvily for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gennadi Sardanashvily is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gennadi Sardanashvily until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Fιnεmαnn (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
intro and context setting
[edit]"Let be an affine bundle" is the worst possible way to start a Wikipedia article. That's something you would write if you assumed the reader is a mathematician. Therefore it's wrong. You have to inform the lay reader at the outset that mathematics is what the article is about. The phrase above does nothing to attempt that. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
The article Metric-affine gravitation theory has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. neo (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metric-affine gravitation theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Curvature tensor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Connection (fibred manifold)
[edit]Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Gsard, thanks for creating Connection (fibred manifold)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, I have reviewed your page and added a tag(s). If you have issues or would like me to review it, please post to the page's talk page and then my talk page to come review. Thanks for your hard work so far.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dmitri Ivanenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Field theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Dmitri Ivanenko
[edit]Hello, Mr GSardanashvili!I've noticed you were a collaborator of Dmitri Ivanenko. I have encountered recently in the classical book (1951) Atomic Physics by Eduard Shpolsky a mention of Dmitry Ivanenko and Arseny Sokolov analysis on the issue of the radius of the electron. I therefore ask if you have access to the mentioned book Classical field theory by Ivanenko and Sokolov to add some details on wikipedia (to electron article). Thanks.--193.231.19.53 (talk) 15:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Gsard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Equivalence principle (geometric) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unrefernced claims. Unclear purpose. Not worth merging into Equivalence principle
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Equivalence principle (geometric) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equivalence principle (geometric) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.