Jump to content

User talk:Heimstern/archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics" News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts 
Dispatches: History of the featured article process Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:SCHOOL

Did you completely miss the "This is a proposal under creation" tag? That's funny because you removed it when adding the failed template. More than one editor believes this guideline to still be a work in progress. I notice you've had no input to the discussion or the guideline itself? That was only from my checking a couple of pages of history. The only edit I see is your reverting mine? Did someone call you? I'll assume good faith, but I'd just like to know how you arrived there please?--Sting Buzz Me... 00:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I've monitored that discussion for quite some time. I watchlisted it because I was discussing matters of school districts there. No, I was not called. I find it abundantly clear that the current guideline (as well as the most recent other version) have not met consensus, so it makes no sense for the current version to be tagged as proposed (if we started anew, maybe, but not the current one). I don't plan to revert again, since I honestly don't care that much, but it does seem time to step away from the horse, since the current disagreement among participants likely makes it impossible to attain consensus. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash

You have previously participated in discussions on use of English in currency names at Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Numismatics/Style. If you care, please discuss a resolution of related titleing issue at Talk:Chinese wén. — AjaxSmack 01:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.

Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 31 28 July 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimania 2008 wrap-up WikiWorld: "Terry Gross" 
News and notes: Unblocked in China Dispatches: Find reliable sources online 
WikiProject Report: Military history Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 32 9 August 2008 About the Signpost

Anthrax suspect reportedly edit-warred on Wikipedia WikiWorld: "Fall Out Boy" 
Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, July WikiProject Report: WikiProject New York State routes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 33 11 August 2008 About the Signpost

Study: Wikipedia's growth may indicate unlimited potential Board of Trustees fills Nominating Committee for new members 
Greenspun illustration project moves to first phase WikiWorld: "George Stroumboulopoulos" 
News and notes: Wikipedian dies Dispatches: Reviewing free images 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 34 18 August 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Help wanted 
WikiWorld: "Cashew" Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that.

I'm sorry I added a template to your comment. [1] Coppertwig (talk) 01:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, don't worry. I probably let myself get too worked up about it. I don't really understand why I hate those templates so much, but I do, for whatever reason. Go figure. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 35 25 August 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "George P. Burdell" News and notes: Arbitrator resigns, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Interview with Mav 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 36 8 September 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimedia UK disbands, but may form again WikiWorld: "Helicopter parent" 
News and notes: Wikipedian dies, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured topics Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, August 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 37 15 September 2008 About the Signpost

Wikiquote checkuser found to be sockpuppeteer WikiWorld: "Ubbi dubbi" 
News and notes: Wikis Takes Manhattan, milestones Dispatches: Interview with Ruhrfisch, master of Peer review 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Tonight, we dine at RFPP

You're right, there are way too many lame 300 quotes. But I enjoy them oh so much! :P Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, works for me. Cheers! Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hello Heimstern. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg 01:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Toxic topics

I meant to include other areas of real-world contention like science/pseudoscience, evolution/creationism, etc. Whenever the stakes "out there" are emotionally high, the behavior on Wikipedia becomes poisonous. Certainly, nationalism is one of those, but religion (directly and indirectly) is just as volatile. — Coren (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Cool beans. Thank you for your answer. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 01:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

September-October-November archive

This is an archive of issues that were not sent to subscribers in late 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 38 22 September 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
WikiWorld: "Dr. Seuss" Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewing non-free images Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 39 29 September 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimedia UK v2.0 elects first board WikiWorld: "Cursive" 
News and notes: Arbitrator resigns, milestones Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 40 6 October 2008 About the Signpost

Dispatches: Interview with Matthewedwards, Featured list director Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 41 13 October 2008 About the Signpost

Experimental request for adminship ends in failure News and notes: New hires, milestones 
Dispatches: The latest on featured articles Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
News and notes: The Price is Right, milestones Dispatches: Halloween Main Page contest generates new article content 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens: Over $500,000 raised in first week ArbCom elections: Nominations open 
Book review: How Wikipedia Works MediaWiki search engine improved 
Four Board resolutions, including financials, approved News and notes: Vietnamese Wiki Day 
Dispatches: Historic election proves groundbreaking on the Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost

Lawsuit briefly shuts down Wikipedia.de GFDL 1.3 released, will allow Wikimedia migration to Creative Commons license 
Wikimedia Events Roundup News and notes: Fundraiser, List Summary Service, milestones 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

My ArbCom candidacy

Hi:

I'm sorry I made such a poor job of replying to your question. I have had a filthy cold and a high temperature, since Friday last, and it has cramped my style somewhat, especially when faced with 250+ questions/sub-questions.

What I have done is to completely re-write my reply developing earlier points, expanding others, and turning it (I hope) into coherent narrative. Many thanks for your time, --ROGER DAVIES talk 03:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, lemme re-read, then. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
OK, looks better now; going to have to keep studying your candidacy. Also, am quite sympathetic to your problems, as I've got a bit of a sniffle, myself. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. --ROGER DAVIES talk 08:23, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
I've also added a kind of portmanteau answer on BLP. You may or may not agree with it: that's less important to you I suspect than having a window onto the way my mind works. --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. It seems like, at the very least, you're thinking through the serious issues we face with the necessary rigour. What with the weekend upon me, I'm hoping to do some research on some of the candidates I don't know as well (though that will have to be balanced with final exams. And not the taking of them, but rather the setting of them!) Heimstern Läufer (talk) 01:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
All right. I've done a more thorough reading of your contribs and answers to questions. Now comes the part where I ruminate on it. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 12:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering whether my replies have improved to the point where you might reconsider your oppose? The full gory background is to the really crap ones is here :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 12:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't look to me like you really need me to reconsider, you know... But sure, I'll have a look. Oh, and by the way, I think you put five tildes, not four, since your name's missing in that comment up there. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
It's more to satisfy myself that I'm on the right track than anything else. And thanks for indulging me on this. I do appreciate it. --ROGER DAVIES talk 12:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I wouldn't really suggest making my vote an indicator of right-wrong trackèdness. ;-) Anyway, I'm having a hard time deciding what to do right now, honestly, and I'm having a really hard time placing why. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Just drop it then :) I'm sure there'll be plenty of other opportunities for a bonfire of the vanities :) Thank you for your calm and courteous responses throughout. --ROGER DAVIES talk 12:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
No. I've decided to strike. You may want to check my comments on my subpage. Please accept my premature congratulations/condolences on your excellent results. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 13:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
That was unexpected! Thanbk you very much (and I loved the edit summary). --ROGER DAVIES talk 16:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I've roughed up your questions

My answers are simply a brain dump of my experiences and thoughts based on what I have seen and experienced. I've seen a bit of nationalistic editing; I've not seen much civility that would consider actionable. Hopefully you can see where I am going; I'll review and revise them in an hour, but if you have questions about them .. feel free to ask as I will be around. John Vandenberg (chat) 11:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Lemme see what I can do before bed. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 12:09, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Guangzhou Metro

A passage of Tianhe Coach Terminal Station is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianhe_Coach_Terminal_Station. I cannot provide the images of the stations at this moment, because I haven't travelled most of the stations currently. Ricky@36 (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, that's why I was considering trying to provide some more. I'll see what I can get soon; perhaps it'll help the project out. Have a good day! Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
I will continue my work in writing Guangzhou Metro stations then. Ricky@36 (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Excellent. :-) Heimstern Läufer (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment on my own dang talk page

Back during the infamous omnibus case, some people made comments on this remark by our fearless leader. They suggested that the meme he references had, in fact, already taken hold, and that Jimbo was a bit behind on the times. I couldn't have possibly argued against anything they said then, and even less now. At that time, at least it was largely neglect that made the community resent the ArbCom. Now it's not so much inaction as maddening action that's causing the community not only to resent the ArbCom, but to begin to use civil disobedience against it. A house divided against itself cannot stand, and ArbCom is exacerbating the already vast divides in our community (in fact, if there is any good to be said about their recent behaviour, it's that they've helped the community have one common cause: opposition to the committee. Sometimes it seems these days like the arbs want some sort of strike or revolt from the community.) I have no solution to this problem, as arbitrator recall doesn't exist (and I admit I'm afraid of how that would go down if it did). I'm certainly hoping, yea, begging that the new arbs will turn out to be better than most of the current gang, but I'm hardly sure that will be enough. I'm also far from convinced Jimbo's intervention is likely to solve this problem. I can hope for better to come, but I don't see it coming. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 10:11, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Kalanithi Maran

I have redirected an article made by you ,Kalanithi Maran to Kalanidhi Maran. I think both the subjects are same and there is no need to 2 articles. Comments ? Revert if I am wrong-- Tinu Cherian - 05:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, you may want to mention this to Kaveryk (talk · contribs) instead. I actually created that article as a redirect; he/she then changed into the duplicate article. Hope that clears things up. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 09:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Oops. I am sorry for the confusion. I was going through Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/New_articles one by one which showed your name as creator only.My bad :| Sorry for the mistake. Have a gr8 day :) -- Tinu Cherian - 09:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
No prob. All is well. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Redirect

"Could you please explain why you created Jeff Moita as a redirect to Omnipotence?" - You

Because it made sense to me. I worship Jeff Moita and I wanted all his followers to find Omnipotence when they searched Jeff Moita, the creator. Thank you. Fortyniners9999 (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it doesn't work that way. But as that was over two years ago, I reckon we can just forget the whole thing. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, well it does work that way. And I reckon I am going to bring this up a lot and not forget it. Jeff's followers are angry with what happened. A lot of them were put on suicide watch because you did that. See what you do? Fortyniners9999 (talk) 08:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah. You're probably right. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Yea, I know, so can I finally create the Jeff Moita article then? Fortyniners9999 (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Making of rs map (and 3rr)

Hello. I'm curious of what to do with the map? The map is validated, UN based, but some users (like Onyxig) have some POV issues to it. --Čeha (razgovor) 14:19, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Map is not UN based validated. It's self made, right? Tarnishes the entity just as much as map of attrocities done on Serbs by Mulsims-Croats in Federation would tarnish the Federation right? There are some good UN sources for all the sad unfortunate and sick things that happened by everyone all over the country. Doesn't justify you making a map for it, and on top making it for only one entity instead of whole country, Bosnia. As for the POV you are obviously not a Serb and your intentions are obvious for posting this on a single (other war side) entity.Onyxig (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
My quick question for you Heimstern, is how would one go about marking this nonsense for potential deletion. With the reasons mentioned above. Where would one do that? Fair use image section? I have nothing against Ceha, and really didnt want to get into anything with him, but i'm sick of going back and forth with this map. Onyxig (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Sources are UN based. Example, this is from International Human Rights Law Institute (IHRLI) documentation centre; [2].
As for other side and its crimes I offered multiply times to make another map showing that(as can be seen here [3] and here [4]), but noone answered my calls.--Čeha (razgovor) 20:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Again, I'd like to ask, what should I do with the map? Map is fine, sources are valid, but some users (like Onyxig) are agaist it... Do someone has the right to hide some data just because it does suit him ?--Čeha (razgovor) 21:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Map is stupid because source is bad. Almost all sources from bosnia during the war have things that are not certain. For example, bosniak government estimations on people killed were considered an accurate source. Well whoops, recent independent investigations show that the actual number is one third of what they said. All reports DURING the war are not accurate, because of the huge influence of propaganda. Therefore it is best to look at reports AFTER the war, not before the war was finished. One flaw in ceha's source is that it says that there was a muslim run camp in serb territory - that's preposterous. (LAz17 (talk) 01:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)).
Exactly Laz17. In adition Ceha, you don't need to offer to make the map. You see how much we are arguing about it, and how often you've been asked why you dont show all sides, so another map would make more sense, and if you didnt get that message before, here it si plain and simple. Obviously that's what we would all agree on as long as sources are not biased, and the map is posted under Bosnia to show everyone's involvement. ThanksOnyxig (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Both of you need to seek consensus for your case. Try dispute resolution. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip Heimstern. Onyxig (talk) 02:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Laz, you something wrong. There is no report of a muslim led camp in the serbian teritory (you can check it on image discussion page)... As I previously said there where territories which changed hands and in wich both sides had war camps. That is the reason why is better to make 2 maps. Thans for the tip Heimstern.--Čeha (razgovor) 13:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Look at your own data. Bijelina is clearly marked with a bosniak led camp... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk%3AMaking_of_rs.gif&diff=264753206&oldid=264601188 sorry, but this stupid thing is what you posted and is not surprising considering that the source is bad. (LAz17 (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)).
Sorry, you talked about Banja Luka here [5].
As for Bijeljina, that could be an error in view table, if you look more closely on the data about Bijeljina [6] you can see that there is no mention of Bosniak run camp there ... --Čeha (razgovor) 17:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Guys, could you please take this dispute elsewhere? It doesn't belong on my talk page, and I don't particularly like getting the orange new messages bar for messages having nothing to do with me. Thanks. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost

Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I think I know of a good page.

Hey Heimstern. I'm Coach z's cool from the HRWiki. I thought of a page that you guys don't have yet. I'd make it myself but I don't know anything about it. It's something called Peppermint Park. I don't know if this was a TV show or what, but here's a link to a clip. I didn't guess there was something like a Request a page page so I'll just post it here. Later! 24.151.249.53 (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey. Do you have a reason why this Peppermint Park would be notable? Remember that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Since you say you actually don't know anything about it, I'd think it might be hard for you to demonstrate its notability, and if you can't demonstrate its notability, it'll just end up getting deleted from Wikipedia. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)