User talk:Indiapuppet

Welcome!

Hello, Indiapuppet! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Satyajit Padhye has been reverted.
Your edit here to Satyajit Padhye was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/satyajit83) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:32, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramdas Padhye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ramdas Padhye, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Captain Calm (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing?

Hello Indiapuppet. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Indiapuppet. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Indiapuppet|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not directly or indirectly compensated for my edits, I am just trying to edit this page properly as it was deleted many times. If someone can edit it in better way it will serve as a source of information for others about Ramdas Padhye who is a ventriloquist and puppeteer from india.Indiapuppet (talk) 06:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ramdas Padhye, from its old location at User:Indiapuppet/Ramdas Padhye. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Jupitus Smart 15:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramdas Padhye (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.vpuppets.com/traditionalpupptyshow.php, https://www.vpuppets.com/aboutme.php. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Ramdas Padhye may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:07, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Indiapuppet/Ramdas Padhye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Indiapuppet/Ramdas Padhye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.vpuppets.com/aboutme.php and https://www.vpuppets.com/traditionalpupptyshow.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 17:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramdas Padhye (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramdas Padhye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ramdas Padhye, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Indiapuppet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Longhair\^talk 07:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indiapuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not directly or indirectly compensated for my edits, I am just trying to edit this page properly as it was deleted many times. If someone can edit it in better way it will serve as a source of information for others about Ramdas Padhye who is a ventriloquist and puppeteer from India. I am a fan of his work and when I searched wikipedia there was no mention of him. Hence I wrote the article by referrring various articles.The article is still in the development stage and I am unaware of wikipedia's policy about unambigious advertising. It would be great if someone can edit the article properly. I will adhere to all wikipedia policies and guidelines. I request you to please unblock my account. Indiapuppet (talk) 03:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say in this edit that you have known Mr. Padhye and his family for years, so you aren't just a fan. I wish you well in telling the world about puppeteers, but you won't be doing it on Wikipedia, at least right now. If you want to edit about something else in the short term, please tell what topics those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indiapuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have known Mr Padhye and his family for years means that, me and my family have been following there work over the years and know about their work. I do not know them personally at all. Neither I have met them. I am a fan of this rare art. It's my sincere request once again to please re-consider my request.I will write about Puppetry, Ventriloquism and other vaudeville arts as well as about different Indian arts and Indian personalities as they are the topics which I am interested in and know about. I will continue to improve other articles too about these subjects. I assure you that I will edit responsibly and adhere to all wikipedia guidelines. I once again request you to unblock me. Indiapuppet (talk) 11:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I, too, am not buying it. That makes three admins. You won't be unblocked to write about that. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Every single edit contributed by this account for the past 10 years has been to promote the Padhye family. There has not been one single edit outside of that topic. Furthermore, there are also two other accounts, Satyajit83 (talk · contribs) and Ilovemuppets (talk · contribs) who are editing in a similar fashion. I suspect you are a member of the Padhye family as permission has been provided to Wikipedia to use content from the website vpuppets by either yourself or these other associated accounts. Your editing pattern shows you are a little more than a fan and quite likely somebody with a vested interest in promoting this topic. Another administrator will be along shortly to review your unblock request. -- Longhair\^talk 04:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that every single edit has been about Padhye family. This is because I am an ardent fan. I edited the pages because there has not been any information about them on wikipedia. Mr Padhye has been doing this art for last 54 years and trying to spread this dying art. I do not have any vested interests in them. I am just trying to make the information available to general public. I will make sure that I will adhere to all wikipedia policies and guidelines. I once again request you to unblock the account. I am a fan of this rare art of Ventriloquism and Puppetry and I feel sad that today's kids are engrossed in their phones. Padhye and family have enriched my childhood and I feel future generations should know about this art and Mr Padhye's work and about this art Indiapuppet (talk) 04:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indiapuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Longhair,331dot,talk, I understand the reason for blocking me. I request you to please restore the pages of Ramdas Padhye and Satyajit Padhye as they are drafts and can be edited properly by someone else keeping wikipedia guidelines in mind. I have written those pages with lot of research and looking at different articles about them. I understand that they are not written in a neutral way. This is my sincere request to you. Please keep the article in the Draft section as some experienced editors can edit it properly. I will not edit those articles.I also assure you that I will adhere to all the wikipedia guidelines and request you to unblock me please.I will make productive contributions to wikipedia.Indiapuppet (talk) 02:35, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Drafts that are deleted for promotional content are not generally restored unless someone is going to work on them and bring them into line with Neutral Point of View policy. You apparently have a conflict of interest and hence will not be unblocked to edit the Padhye family articles. In your next unblock request, you should tell us what subjects you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 11:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indiapuppet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PhilKnight Longhair, I request you to please unblock me. I will never edit anything regarding Padhye family. My IP address is also blocked. I will contribute to wikipedia responsibly and will make sure that all my edits adhere to wikipedia policies. I will edit about performing arts and performing artistes in India. I request to restore the pages because other experienced editors will edit the pages of Ramdas Padhye and Satyajit Padhye and work on them and bring them into line with Neutral Point of View policy. The whole point of writing the article is to make it suitable for wikipedia page.I totally understand that they are not written properly and needs lots of work on it to make sure there is adherence to Neutral Point of View policy.I have collected all the references in both the pages. They just have to be rewritten properly or edit it and make it short. Since these pages are in draft section, experienced editors can work on it. I request to please restore the pages. Indiapuppet (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not going to accept an unblock request that includes a lengthy exhortation about why we should restore articles or drafts that were repeatedly deleted as either unambiguous promotion or copyright violations. It seems like this is your sole interest in editing here. If other experienced editors want to create articles about these subjects, they can do so in the normal way. Girth Summit _(blether) 10:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.