User talk:JForget/Archives 11

ITN

On 15 July, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item involving the article(s) Omar al-Bashir, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently updated or created article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BanyanTree 09:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Routes in Québec

Now i'll know. 142.217.43.200 (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Burning Up Tour

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Burning Up Tour. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 16:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome To The Darkside

Think this is speediable per WP:CSD#G6? I see no reason to drag it out for the full five days of an AfD — after all, if it's unanimous that the artist isn't notable, then in theory, it would also be unanimous that their album isn't notable either, right? Therefore, I would feel that this would fall under "non-controversial". Ten Pound Hammer Farfel and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps)} 02:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Block needed

Hi, I noticed you were currently active. Would you mind having a look at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/JeanLatore‎ and blocking the confirmed sock of a banned user, Moop Fan 17 (talk · contribs)? Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Y Done - blocked indefinitely --JForget 23:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, he was currently active so I didn't want to wait. Darkspots (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome--JForget 23:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah I was about to mention also that Jean Letore was a sock of Wiki brah but you've already fixed it. Thanks!--JForget 23:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I guess vandals hate me. Thanks! :) Okiefromokla ^questions? 00:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure no problem - he's booked for 24.--JForget 00:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, JForget for removing the crap from my user page.

Raj2004 (talk) 00:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Sure you're welcome Raj. --JForget 00:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Pierre Le Gardeur Railway Bridge

Is N.O.T. NOT the same thing as the Pierre Le Gardeur Bridge Unless the railway bridge is known by another name, I shall have to reverse this redirect.

See also List of crossings of the Rivière des Prairies. You created a lot of work here. Peter Horn 22:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Pierre Le Gardeur Bridge

Not so bad... Peter Horn 23:23, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding all of this, as for the railway bridge I wasn't completely sure about it's notability so that's I had redirected it to the Le Gardeur road bridge article at first. Maybe more info will be found on it as well as the De Gaulle Bridge. Eventually I would have to add articles on the three city of Gatineau bridges across the Gatineau River as well as they are deserving an article (especially the A-50 bridge).--JForget 23:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting vandalism on my user talk page. --John (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Question about a deleted article.

Hi, I had an article deleted but I was wondering if I could get a backed-up copy of it? You were the admin for the delete, I'm referencing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_military_controversies

Thanks for any info, Rhetth (talk) 22:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Rhetth (talk) 21:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Dibs

Hi, I'm unsure if [1] is vandalism, although it most likely is. I found that you have edited that article, so I've reported this to you. Thanks. --Tomaxer (talk) 22:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Seems Dibs exists as treats but it was nowhere near related to the subject of the article, so it was removed. Thanks!.--JForget 22:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in fighting vandalism

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I keep seeing your edits to pages and they're all good. You're swift and on the ball. Thanks. :) Banaticus (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Rock music WikiProject

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Rock music WikiProject. There's alot of Rock-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this project off the ground and a few Rock music pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Why have you blocked user:-The Great One-

he appoligised for the things he did, and they wernt even that bad, i mean if anyone should be banned its me ha ha ha ha ha.--[[

User:-The Great One-

Why did you unblock this editor? seresin ( ¡? ) 04:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

I've told him if more vandalism is coming from this user name, compromised account or not, there will be no more chances left, it will be a permanent block. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt on that case but it is his last chance otherwise it is over for this account. Hopefully after I gave him a 3 month-block (I know it took much longer to respond because he didn't used the unblock request template), he will learn that he needs to make sure his account is protected (and password is changed and now safe) from others using his computer and that he learned WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. --JForget 19:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Hm. I guess I just don't think edits like this or this merit second-chances, especially given the incivility in the unblock request. As a side note, what brought him to your attention again? Was it the comment above by Deathtopplintheir40s? seresin ( ¡? ) 05:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review Request

Hi -- I'm sorry if I'm not doing this exactly right, not a wiki expert. I was surprised to see that the Most_Great_Name page was deleted. The issue seems to have been a lack of English-language sources, but there is a publisher who is now producing translations of some famous Medieval texts that expressed the belief that these symbols represent the "Ismul Azam," the Greatest Name of God. This legitimately was a belief held by occultists throughout the Middle Ages. Here is one quote from Nineveh Shadrach's book *Love, Healing, Prosperity* pp. 83-84 (Shadrach, Nineveh. 2006. Love Healing Prosperity: Through the Occult Powers of the Alphabet. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Ishtar Publishing.):

It is considered the greatest name of the Divine and the seal of King Solomon... Research shows that they were applied and used in magic from early Jewish times and found on vases dating back to before the birth of Christ. They were used by the earliest Jewish occultists as a tool to raise and ascend their souls up to the Throne of God.

Then the series of symbols is shown on page 84 (you can see for yourself using the "search in this book" feature on amazon.com)

Yonderboy (talk) 21:32, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

In order to request a deletion review you can simply go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and follow the steps mentionned there so that a discussion will ensue. Although (considering it was a clear consensus since there were new users and sockpuppets in the discussion that does influence little or not in the outcome) first, it would be go to do the changes needed to correct this issue. I could send you a copy of the deleted article so you can make the changes and then do your deletion review request. --JForget 15:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Christian Bale

I had requested the page be protected, before you did, so I don't know if you wanna take care of the request? Ctjf83Talk 23:47, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Y Done--JForget 23:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Biden

Thank you! Finally someone with some intelligence on how to use citations. This is kind of important (to say the least) as this election and the VP could determine who wins. Thanks again.76.117.125.20 (talk) 01:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I've locked it until DNC convention will be over, by then we may have an official VP running-mate. I wouldn't be surprised it will be announced within the next 24 hours. --JForget 01:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually CNN just reported Obama will send out text messages tomorrow morning about who the pick is. Would you care to update the article with this information? Maybe the Barack Obama page should be updated. Thanks a bunch buddy. 76.117.125.20 (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about that, Obama is such a popular topic that within the minute it will be announced the page will be updated by someone, placed in the Portal:Current Events and perhaps it will be on the In the News section of the Main Page. --JForget 01:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, OK. I am new to wikipedia (rarely use it). Thanks for the info though as I am into politics (especially Democrats) so I definitely want to be able to wake up in the morning knowing who the VP is!  :) 76.117.125.20 (talk) 01:45, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

your protect is not working... there still going at it -71.232.179.236 (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Registered users (more then 1 week I think) can still edit the pages, it is only protected from anon (IP) or newly-registered users. We must wait until at least a couple of the media groups that confirms it or again the Obama/Democratic site. --JForget 01:53, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

now confirmed

I just got an email from the campaign saying it is Biden. So I am posting on the side of the road. Got to go before I get into an accident. Remember September 11, 2001 (talk) 01:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I undid your edit because I couldn't find a source to confirm that the email had already been sent out. No major news organization is reporting it as I would expect. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 01:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Couleur-FM.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Couleur-FM.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Lil labour day award

		The Original Barnstar
		For all you do, keep up the good work Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the award OTT.--JForget 14:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Mamou tornado death

You always beat me to updating that article by about 5 minutes, no matter what. You, sir, are a machine! -RunningOnBrains 14:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Probably it was by chance I've found it since I've been contributing a lot less outside of admin duties over the past couple of months. Euh could it be an indication of semi-retirement? Although good news I could still help during the mornings, early afternoons and weekends still for now but expect to see less of me for next tornado season unfortunately. --JForget 14:15, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

MedRevise.co.uk

Hey, I thought you might be interested in this, since you are medically active here on wikipedia. With a colleague I have set up a Medical Revision website, called MedRevise.co.uk. It is not trying to compete with Wikipedia, but trying to be something else useful, different and fun. If you are interested, please read our philosophy and just have a little look at our site. I would appreciate your feedback, and some contributions if you have the time. Thanks a lot! MedRevise (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Re. Gladiatus

Your recently reverted an IP edit on the article. I just wanted to inform you that the IP was actually helping Wikipedia by trying to provide readers with a warning. The real vandalism was incured by OnurRC. Please, it would be nice of you just to post a quick 'sorry' message on the IP page, as he/she may have taken it personally. While I'm here, I request you warn/temporarily ban the above mentioned user. Why? I told him before not to hide a mugging link on that page, and against my advice he went and did it again. More strict action needs to be taken. Regards, A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 16:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

By the way, are you going to do anything about OnurRC? You'll need to set an example to him, and show that unprodictive and vandalistic edits such as his ones to Gladiatus, are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Regards, A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 20:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of the article "Techniche"

Hi! I have just noticed that someone had placed a deletion tag on the article "Techniche" which now has been deleted. I don't think that he checked the history of the article before placing that tag. A deletion tag had been placed on it long time back and successfully defended[[2]]. It was given on the page that the event is held during this time of the year, so the persons responsible for the Wikipedia entry were not present to defend the deletion this time round.

But, I'm very sure that after going through the earlier deletion logs, someone can un-delete it because its Wikipedia's responsibility as the person responsible didn't go through the article history properly.

This is one more reason something better be done about it[[3]]. You can clearly notice that one red entry which has got deleted because one can't always be present to defend deletions on Wikipedia. I think its also the responsibility of the "deletion tagger" to go through the article history properly!

I didn't who to talk about this thing, so I am messaging you. Thanks for your help. --Sainik1 (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Can the old article be restored? Because then the organizers of the event can improve on the existing article and keep checking on it regularly for any spam. I'm informing User:Mangojuice, the administrator who nominated the article for deletion about the same. I'm very sure that I can defend the article for WP:V, if it arises, the only problem being that it might again happen while I'm away for exams. I have loads of notable evidence for the verifiability of any fact written about it on Wikipedia.

--Sainik1 (talk) 21:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I've sent userfied copies of the article to your user page so you can improve before returning to mainspace. If returned it might susceptible for deletion especially the spammed-version. See my reply on your talk page. JForget 14:56, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot man! I'll edit the article inserting externals links and other edits and get it uploaded as soon as possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sainik1 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Proofreading request

Hi. I was wondering if I could trouble you with a proofreading request on the article Walter-Patrice O'Leary. I created the article using as the primary source an entry from L'Encyclopédie de la Francophonie. However, I am not actually fluent in French, so while I can translate basic information, many of the nuances of the language are lost to me. I am asking you because I noticed that you are a member of WikiProject Quebec (the article is within the scope of the WikiProject) and have indicated that French is your native tongue. Would you take a look at the article? –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 23:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, thank you. :) I had encountered more trouble than usual translating the organisation names in this article (as opposed to, say, Émile-Dostaler O'Leary), so I wanted to have the article checked by another editor. Thanks again. Best, –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 00:05, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah some of them I don't know exactly the English signification or maybe they don't have an English version. Some of the media are pronouncing it in French as well. --JForget 00:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Logo erabliere.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo erabliere.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

	Happy Adminship	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing JForget/Archives 11 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! -- Chamal Talk ± 01:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

"Fluff"?

Any questions, concerns and other fluff...

I'm curious, and a bit disconcerted, that you consider questions and concerns to be "fluff." If they are, then what is "substantial"?

I'm also wondering why I've been blocked for "vandalism." I've been posting information that someone doesn't like, but if this is truly a user-created site, difference of opinion shouldn't be sufficient to block a member. It would never occur to me to report for vandalism, or ask to have blocked, the person who keeps removing what I've posted.

I am as far from a vandal as you will ever encounter, but I do reserve the right to edit a page if I think further information is germane to the subject, even if another reader doesn't agree with me. That is the meaning of "user-created," isn't it? I can keep posting, s/he can keep removing it, and we can go on thus forever, but why should I be accused of vandalism any more than the person who removes what I've written?

And for the administration of the site to block me for "vandalism" without a word to me or any opportunity for me to respond to whatever charges have been made is unconscionable and makes me wonder just how "wiki" this site really is.

Penguinlady (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I have not found any evidence of you being blocked under that username so as far as I know you have never being blocked. The edit you made yesterday was reverted as it was content about some rumors which were not supported by a source at all. Generally rumours, possibilities, controversies or claims must be supported by sources to avoid libel or WP:BLP violations. As for fluff I meant like congratulations, awards/barnstars, thanks messages, etc.--

JForget 22:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

When I went to the page in question and tried to edit, I got a screen saying I'd been blocked, and inside the box it said "vandalism."

I continue to make that edit because there is a substantial body of evidence in support of my statement, including letters written by the subject of the article. She has been dead for nearly 200 years, so libel isn't an issue. Extensive research that supports what I'm trying to post has been done by the author of one of the books cited at the bottom of that page.

Without my edit, a significant episode in the life of the subject of the article is never even mentioned, and the article is thereby incomplete and not useful to the reader. My edit doesn't claim it as fact, but as speculation heavily supported by scholarly research, and as such, deserves mention.

And again, despite the four tildes, my name appears here...

(Penguinlady (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC))

Well then the next time you add this content can you please provide a reliable source that supports this possibility so at least it can be verifiable? Thanks! --JForget 14:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo-carrefour.GIF)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo-carrefour.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Not too fast...

Sorry, this is a pet peeve. You reverted the vandal edit by Hackman199, but the version you reverted to was that left by Tonytraj in the previous five edits. I ask around but apparently there is no tool to make it any easier to find all the (prior) bad edits. I just worry the tools that exist make it too easy to go fast. Maybe go slower depending on the article? Like on Allah or Pope John Paul II‎, but Yam... zoom? Shenme (talk) 00:58, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, it is rare that more then one registered user do vandalism consecutively before reverts.

Pop-ups might be the best tool of all for that situation,. However I believe Huggle uses it but looking the contribs from Huggle reverters the tool is going way too fast with 50+ edits in less then 5 minutes in some cases compared to myself doing that much 4x slower. Good thing I don't use Huggle. With the IPs it's easier though. JForget 01:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Counter-vandalism Award

		CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page [4] --Flewis(talk) 02:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the award and also thanks for reporting about the threat as well. --JForget 02:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, there seems to be a mistake I haven't edited the Tom Warren article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.54.139 (talk) 06:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

List of Gujjars

Hi! I just ran into the List of Gujjars when going through candidates for speedy deletion. The tagged version was obviously a big mess, but as I looked through the deleted revisions I found one that I thought was worth keeping (although it obviously needs better sourcing). I noticed that all the afd-comments made after the big cleanup were along the line of "categories are better for organizing such information" which is contrary to what Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates says (categories and lists are allowed to coexist and overlap). Since you closed the AfD I'm interested to hear what you think. Have a good day/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 19:24, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

In the past well before being an admin I used to vote for a preference for the categories ahead of the lists, not sure if I remember if it was because of duplication or it was more easily maintainable via categories - although I think they were long lists - not sure though. This one is not a long list and should be easily maintainable and should also have a category especially since there are numerous occurrences of that. Though we can ask the community on WP:DRV to see what they think about it - but other then the need improve the lead and to add extra sources, it sounds okay.--JForget 21:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

If you are ok with the current version I see no reason to take it to DRV. I'll notify the appropriate wikiproject and see if they can help with sourcing. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 23:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep go ahead with those improvements. --JForget 17:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Ibn Bazzaz

I wanted to redirect "Ibn Bazzaz" to Ebn Bazzaz, and I realized that Ibn Bazzaz is salted (it had been speedy deleted 3 times based on A7). Please unlock it. I assume that the page you deleted had not cited Encyclopedia Iranica, but anyway, it doesn't make much sense to use A7 for speedy deletion of a page relating to someone who lived in 14th century AD. Alefbe (talk) 22:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Y Done No longer meets A7 for now. --JForget 20:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

How can i say this...

Thanks a lot, for getting that IP earlier, I Really dont know what they have against me... Just wanted to say Thanks. II MusLiM HyBRiD II 21:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The same one who vandalized my talk page as well. Well you're welcome and thanks Pharaoh for reverting the junk. --JForget 21:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocking 189.10.92.240

Thanks for blocking 189.10.92.240, who was adding spam links to www.anontalk.com. FYI, at least one other IP was making the same edits, recently. I don't have an easy way to give you the IP, but I thought you might like to know. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. It might be a zombie proxy, and if the case I might suspect Grawp on that one. I've seen this mass spamming of that site before by multiple zombie proxies--JForget 22:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Good, that's a relief, I was wondering how to handle the situation.

As a P.S., here's a quote from www.anontalk.com/FAQ: "Remotely similar concepts, such as the copycat "chans" or the Wikipedia "Reference Desk", suck more ass than I know how to put into written words and seemingly were designed by retarded monkeys."

Sigh. Piano non troppo (talk) 22:17, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

An Invite to join Canada Roads WikiProject

WikiProject Canada Roads
Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Canada Roads WikiProject! The Canada Roads WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Canadian Roads.
As you have shown an interest in Quebec Route 211 we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 03:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed your recent edits and thought you might want to become a member of the California State University WikiProject. We've recently revamped the project page and started a drive to improve California State University-related articles. We have a lot of articles under our project and would like assistance getting them to good article status. Hope you'll join us. Go STATE!

Summit Camp deleted?

After creating the article Summit Camp, I found that an article of that name had existed before and was deleted Dec. 30, 2007, as I saw [[5]], for lack of notability. Was this about the same Summit Camp?--Ratzer (talk) 10:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Undeletion of some D&D articles

Hi! I've recently been working on merging a bunch of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles together so that there aren't as many smaller, stub-length articles, and I was wondering if you could restore the edit histories of some more articles that were deleted so that I could merge the content. The articles in question are The Glutton and Gelf Darkhearth; they could both be redirected to Gnome deities. Thanks! -Drilnoth (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks! If I find any more similar articles that you deleted, is it okay for me to ask you? -Drilnoth (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Sure no problem, you're welcome.--JForget 15:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello, could you also restore Half-elf (Dungeons & Dragons) please? It was deleted by PROD, but the deleting admin appears to be inactive now. BOZ (talk) 14:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to have a look at it, because I think I can develop it further. If not, we can always redirect it. But yeah, full restore on this one if possible, please. :) BOZ (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Y Done JForget 17:18, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!  :) Looks like it needs some work... BOZ (talk) 18:34, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposing my project for creation

Hi, I have just finished my draft: User:IRP/ArticlesForCreation/Upper tropospheric cyclonic vortex. Do you think it should be created (moved into the main space)? Do you think it needs some work? If it needs work, will you tell me the areas that need it? -- IRP ☎ 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Is Upper tropospheric cyclonic vortex considered a stub? -- IRP ☎ 00:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you take your hypocrisy and shove it?

The three of you have accused me of "vandalism". Fine, that's your opinion, you can have it. But you cannot have your version of the facts Look at the comments that you three have left me:

When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Poughkeepsie (city), New York. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.

Your allegations are provably FALSE. I NEVER FUCKING ONCE MADE AN EDIT WITHOUT EXPLANATION OR SPECIFYING A REASON. What is more, I made this point twice, and you CONTINUED to ignore me.

Is it too much to ask that you follow your own fucking advice and leave edit summarys (not those automated things) and even more importantly, READ the edit summaries of those whom your accusing of vandalism?