User talk:Jack Morales Garcia

Welcome!

Hello, Jack Morales Garcia! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2020

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 11:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 11:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

Hi, Ignore the first few edit summaries (I have no idea if they're correct or not) - Given these have been in the articles for 5-10 years you would need to go to each article and seek consensus for the removal of the nationality things first, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 11:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first of all, Oscar Isaac was born to a Cuban father and a Guatemalan mother, second a person's birthplace is not to be taken into the account but his nationality. The evolution till this hereby point have shaped the apparatus of the word 'nationality' to our notions but the correct terminology represents allegiance. And Oscar Isaac without any doubt has his fidelity with the U.S by the account if even we are to amplify on the descents we are to depict not one but the both. Cuban and Guatemalan, and showcase them as descents and don't affiliate birthplace with nationality. Don't confuse common with what's 'right'. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hey, JMG, you seem to be very interested in insisting you're correct on what constitutes "nationality" of article subjects. Wikipedia works on collaboration. Please stop reverting and start discussing. Also, I'm concerned about this edit summary in which you write, the reason why some people can't trust wikipedia is because, any feminist or kid just edit things to his perception. Can you explain what you're trying to get at here? Because to me it looks pretty uncivil. —valereee (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are hell-bent on this dual nationality thing. Well then add he is a dual citizenship in the biography column. But on the anecdote it'll go as German born Irish. That's the best you're going to get. I'd appreciate if we don't outstretch this. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And It does not look uncivil to me. I simply find feminists and obstinate people repulsive. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. [1] —valereee (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I wasn't the one you were disagreeing with about this at any article. I don't have any opinion on that content, only on whether an editor is editing constructively. —valereee (talk) 11:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your thoughts about feminists, including finding them repulsive, are entirely up to you. But keep it to yourself, or write about it in your blog or something — it's highly offensive to put such a statement about a group on Wikipedia. (And yes, your own talkpage is also a Wikipedia page.) If you speak like that again, I will block you from editing. Bishonen | tålk 15:14, 29 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Srich32977. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lauri Törni, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Per my edit summary, we can't say Thorne was a "German-American". There is no reliable sourcing that says so. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 04:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. I've given my points. Now you may state yours. If I don't revive any points from your end which are plausible. Then I will revert back. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's not quote how it works, Jack Morales Garcia. When your edits are contested and you post your reasoning to the article talk page, you can't just wait a couple of hours before reverting back, and it is not constructive to state from the outset that you "will revert back" unless you get "plausible" arguments. Allow the discussion at least several days, and remember that you, personally, might not agree with other editors' arguments, but if they are grounded in Wikipedia policy, and if they represent a consensus, then your proposed change is not going to happen. (I have no particular opinion on which nationality is more correct – it is a non-issue as far as I am concerned – but you'll need to be a bit more patient.) --bonadea contributions talk 10:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Block false alarm

Hi - I'm curious - where did you see the message saying that you'd been blocked/banned for three years? Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 18:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit: I apologize if removing the "unblock request" outright was not appropriate, but given the user was not blocked, did not want the open request category to be on this page incorrectly. It is strange. If there is a way to add it back without the category to keep the context of your question in line, please do so. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 18:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vaselineeeeeeee, I don't think you should have been the one to do that TBH, the user could have removed it themselves or it could have been procedurally declined by an admin. I'd be interested to understand where they saw that message though, since they are not currently blocked. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, if you want to add it back and decline it, feel free. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 18:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reviewed the sockpuppet investigation. A checkuser has confirmed that two other accounts were created by you. Using an alternative account to pretend to be a second person is a clear violation of our socking policy, so I have indefinitely blocked the other accounts, and blocked this account for two weeks. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:19, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Changing indentation to make it clear that I'm addressing this comment to JMG, not Vaselineeeeeeee GirthSummit _(blether) 18:34, 5 March 2021 (UTC) [reply]

I'm sorry. Simon Niclas Miller is my second account. Technically my cousin's. But Simsmacked isn't my account. I'd appreciate without being derogatory. What's the corroboration behind my connection with simsmacked. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what you mean by "Simsmacked", there's no such user here. But User:Simsmackerel was created three minutes after [User:Simon Niclas Miller]], used exactly once to edit war at Nicolo Rizzuto, and then you logged right back on to this account. You're lucky this is only a two week block; almost any other admin would have blocked you indefinitely for this behavior. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 23:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What? For what reason. It was a regular edit. With legitimate reasons. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 22:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nacionality of Andy García

Hola colega:

Te escribo en español porque en tu página de usuario dices que eres de Puerto Rico, así que supongo que entenderás lo que escribo.

Primeramente quería pedirte perdón por demorar tanto tiempo en responderte, es que he estado enfrentando problemas desde hace algún tiempo para acceder a mi cuenta de usuario.

Ante todo quisiera pedir perdón si incurrí en una violación de Wikipedia, solo pretendía corregir algo: es que Andy García es cubano-estadounidense, ya que él nació en Cuba. Yo solo pretendía mejorar el contenido de ese artículo. Pero en todo caso, si hice algo mal hecho estoy dispuesto a ser receptivo para mejorar la calidad de mis ediciones y que eso no vuelva a ocurrir.

Quisiera pedirte por favor que me respondas a este mensaje para saber por qué esa edición en el artículo de Andy Garcia es una violación (teniendo en cuenta que el contenido de mi edición era verídico). Si me respondieras, te lo agradeceré mucho. De antemano, muchas gracias.

(Quisiera pedirte, si no es molestia, que me respondieras en español en caso de que sepas hablarlo, ya que yo entiendo mejor ese idioma que el inglés) Aziyade Gil (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Mr. Garcia was born in Cuba. But his former nationality is not relevant to his actor status. The MOSCONTEXTBOI of Wikipedia's guidelines says. No mentions of 'former nationality' Or Place of Birth unless relevant. And it's not relevant. So we removed it. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 22:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andy García

Olvidé mencionarte que incluso en Wikipedia en otros idiomas se menciona a Andy Garcia como cubano-estadounidense. Por eso quise añadirlo a Wikipedia en Inglés.

Por cierto, perdona mi error ortográfico de la palabra "Nationality" en mi mensaje anterior. Aziyade Gil (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jack Morales Garcia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apparently I've been blocked due to me recalling actual guidelines such as MOSCONTEXTBOI. I didn't spoke of this earlier but I am now. As the MOSCONTEXTBOI states, former nationality or dual nationality is not to be brought up unless relevant to someone's notability. Fassbender represents his Irish side. For which he even stated he hates that the British awards called him British. And he has primary Irish traits. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've extended this block to indefinite. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jack Morales Garcia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have my block been accumulated to indefinite? I have clearly stated my reasons for changing was well within the guidelines. I believe that JpGordon is abusing his power without explaining why I have been banned. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. The block is appropriate and, despite your claim to the contrary, the block is explained, literally immediately above this unblock request. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry? That block was for 2 weeks. And I surpassed it. And then I got blocked for disruptive editing. Reasons for which I explained. And due to a glitch I made an account to only talk to a person regarding an issue. How is this sockpuppetry? Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 08:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jack Morales Garcia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sockpuppetry? That block was for 2 weeks. And I surpassed it. And then I got blocked for disruptive editing. Reasons for which I explained. And due to a glitch I made an account to only talk to a person regarding an issue. How is this sockpuppetry? Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is an easy decision to make. Not only is there technical evidence that you were abusing multiple accounts, and a history of disruption, your comment "And he has primary Irish traits" is reprehensible. I gladly decline this unblock request. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 11:49, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

C'mon. Please. Unblock me. I've learnt my lesson. Jack Morales Garcia (talk) 03:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]