User talk:Jonardondishant

This is Jonardondishant's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohanmala Gohain (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ArsenalGhanaPartey was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohanmala Gohain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohanmala Gohain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonardondishant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Mohanmala Gohain, you may be blocked from editing. CUPIDICAE💕 17:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's my fault now I have expressed all the things in other way and also gave reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonardondishant (talk • contribs)

First, you cannot remove the deletion discussion tag on the article while the discussion is taking place. If you want to join that discussion, follow the link to the deletion discussion page, read the guide there, and you can participate there. Second, you keep adding material copied from another source. You cannot do that. I've indicated this in reply to you on the article's talk page and in reply to you on my talk page. It doesn't matter that you attribute the other source, it is still a copyright violation. Please read Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources. In addition, you cannot just change a few words. That is called close-paraphrasing and is also not allowed: Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Singularity42 (talk) 17:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok sorry I didn't knew about It....you can do now whatever you want to do with that

Your edit to Sukhrungphaa has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Singularity42 (talk) 17:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, please stop copying-pasting content from copyrighted sources. It is theft of someone's intellectual property. It doesn't matter that you add a reference to it. If you stole actual physical property from someone and said "it's okay, here's who I stole it from", it would still be theft. You are creating a lot of work for other editors and administrators to clean up and remove these huge amounts of text you are completely lifting from the copyrighted sources. If you copy-and-paste a copyrighted work again - including changing the wording slightly so it is a close paraphrase - an administrator may have to remove your editing privileges. I can't say it more simply than that. Singularity42 (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First, avoid whole-sale copying and pasting of large amounts of text from copyrighted sources. Remember, this is an encyclopedia, not a secondary source, so you don't always need the level of detail from other sources. Second, draft it from scratch in your own words, and cite what you are relying on for that draft. Please read WP:FIXCLOSEPARA in detail before trying again. Ask another editor familiar with the subject for help if you are still not sure. Singularity42 (talk) 18:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ahom kingdom, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Chutia people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We'll try to resolve the matter by tomorrow. Jonardondishant (talk) 16:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Sukhrungphaa

I have reverted your recent edits on Rudra Singha's page. Please take some time to understand how Wikipedia works. It is a serious encyclopedia, not a blog. Please follow these links to familiarize yourselves.

WP:RS: you will need to provide reliable sources to back up what you write. You cannot write what you know, you can only write what others have written.
WP:CLOP: But you have to write it in your own words.
WP:CITE: Please take some time to learn how to cite sources.

Chaipau ( talk) 12:45, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Didn't I refer it in notes Then why don't you add those things....you know how to giver proper reference so do it....Tungkhungia buranji page 31 to 39.... This article is very short for this great king[reply]

Hi from a Ahom Prince

Hi, I am a Rajkonwar and saw you making changes to the Ahom pages and also zou added Mohanmala Gohain Wikipedia page and Phuleshwari and now Sri Srimat Rudra Singha Maharaja title. I want to talk to you. 1.186.118.168 (talk) 15:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes continue Jonardondishant (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the matter? Jonardondishant (talk) 15:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So this is my Wikipedia account. I want to know who are you? AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I cant disclose my identity my identity here Jonardondishant (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

are you ______ Jonardondishant (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And are you Mr. Abhinash Buragohain ? AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abinash AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No D.Konwar Jonardondishant (talk) 02:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You guessed me right. But I didn't recognise you. But, How do you know me, Mr. D. Konwar? AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 04:56, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen you in quora and yt.. I have talked to you in comment section Jonardondishant (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. DM me on Quora, gonna discuss about Ahom history. AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

messaging option is not there Jonardondishant (talk) 09:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have disabled it Jonardondishant (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Open my youtube channel and go to any of my video and comment. AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented...on your stock market video Jonardondishant (talk) 10:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But no comment is showing in the comment section, also I didn't receive any notification. Have you really commented? AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 11:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yup Jonardondishant (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I joined AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello AccurateInformation2004 (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jonardondishant (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom kingdom

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chaipau (talk) 05:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Jonardondishant and User:Ananya Taye reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk So what to do now?? Jonardondishant (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both of you overlooked WP:3RR. Wait for the decision at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slow edit-warring and WP:BRD

I noticed that you are involved in several editing disputed (eg, at Ahom kingdom, Sukaphaa) where you and other editors have repeatedly reverted each others edits without resolving the issue on the talkpage or using dispute resolution. This is disruptive. Please follow the bold-revert-discuss process instead. Note too that these articles are covered by the WP:ARBIPA-related discretionary sanction, as you've been informed earlier, and editors should take extra care to follow the best content and conduct practices. Abecedare (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Jonardondishant

Thank you for creating Battle of Alaboi.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jonardondishant (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom kingdom - 3RR

Your recent editing history at Ahom kingdom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been warned before. I shall be reporting you to the 3RR noticeboard.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Chaipau (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Ahom kingdom. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Phuleshwari has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 15:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Alaboi

I have reverted your edits in Battle of Alaboi because you have removed reliable sources and added unreliable sources or very old ones. Please prefer reliable sources which are more recent. Furthermore, you have used un-encyclopedic language. Wikipedia is not a narrative including dialogues as you have done here: "On receiving the king's command Lachit Borphukan simply said: The Rajputs have concentrated their force at Alaboi. It will be difficult for us to escape unscathed if we fling a stone into to revengeful nest of immature hornets. At the same time I cannot but obey the command of his Majesty." is not how encyclopedia are written.

I request you to go back and familiarize yourself with Help:Getting_started. If you are unable to raise the standard of the encyclopedia then you become disruptive, irrespective of your intentions.

Chaipau (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is Lachit borphukan and his time not reliable? Jonardondishant (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom-Mughal conflicts

I have reverted some of your edits in the article above. Please provide secondary sources for all your edits. Chaipau (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The ahoms by Arup kumar dutta- 170,198, 227 Jonardondishant (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sunyeophaa

Sudangphaa

I have reverted your revert because the year of Sudangphaa's birth is not not given in Guha. You cannot just subtract 15 from his ascension to get his birthyear. Please consult WP:SYNTH for clarification of this policy. Chaipau (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom kingdom

The subsection you added is an word-for-word copy from S L Baruah. This has been going on for too long. Chaipau (talk) 11:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree, better I take a break from wikipedia and read the wikipedian constitution. Jonardondishant (talk) 12:47, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Burhagohain

I have reverted your edits in Burhagohain since they lack citations. Place citations in the text not in edit summaries. You have been editing Wikipedia for some time now, and you should know the policies properly. Chaipau (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your edits again. Please look at Talk:Burhagohain.

But I am very concerned about your competence in editing an encyclopedia. It has been six months since you first made your first edit here on Wikipedia, and yet you have not learned how to cite reference properly. The latest example is this. You are making a citing a reference here with minimal information. {{cite book |title=Prachya-sasanavali |pages=177}} This displays your disdain for Wikipedia requirements. This too you have provided only after I pointed out (above) that you cannot provide citations in edit summaries. This, and your habit of uploading copyrighted material directly in the text on a number of occasions, even after it has been pointed out to you, is very concerning. This is disruptive. Chaipau (talk) 09:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Citing_sources to learn how to cite sources in Wikipedia. It is similar to the way you cite sources in academic papers, but if you are not familiar with academic writing, this will be a good place for you to start. Chaipau (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahom kingdom - Judicial Administration

I have warned you earlier not to include copyright material in Wikipedia article. I have now removed most of the section now because the text was directly copied from S L Barua's "Comprehensive History of Assam" p400, from the the first two paragraphs. The removed text are here. Please do not insert copyrighted material into Wikipedia. I think I have given you enough warning and the next time I notice copyrighted material, I shall report you. Chaipau (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau

I had written in my words and language as much as I can, if I am incapable of doing that thing, you do it by yourself for the sake of more information. Jonardondishant (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, if you are incapable of writing your own then you have to look at WP:CIR. You have also not been able to generate original images and have been using scanned or copy pasted maps, like this: File:Fortification_of_Guwahti_in_1670.png. Even if your edits are made in WP:GF, they still create problems and lower the reliability and quality of what Wikipedia is providing. This is left for other editors to clean up.

You should reconsider what and how you'd like to contribute to Wikipedia. If you find contributing text difficult, then you could consider providing very high resolution images, for instance, that are your own work unencumbered with other licensing issues. Just make sure they are not scanned. Chaipau (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau My only aim here is to expand and add detailed content here. I don't find contributing text difficult, I just write same thing written as on the source because it sound's more mature, and with images, you are questioning the reliability of my sources, but what about reliability for the pages like this Sunyatphaa, Suklamphaa, Suhung, Gobar Roja, Sujinphaa, Sudoiphaa, Suklingphaa,Chandrakanta Singha, Jogeswar Singha and Purandar Singha which all uses buranji and Gait's as their primary source. Jonardondishant (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is against Wikipedia policies to even close paraphrase sources, leave alone reproduce source texts verbatim, as you have done many times. You have not written the text in your own words, as you have claimed above contrarily. I have checked the text you have contributed in the section "Judicial administration" and found them to be identical, word for word, with the sentences that S L Barua had written. Word for word.

Look at this wiki-essay for a clear statement on close paraphrasing. The policy is WP:OWNWORDS. If you are unable to write in your own words, you should not contribute text to Wikipedia. However good intentioned your contributions are, they create a mess for others to clean up after. In effect, this becomes disruptive editing. That you have been unable to improve your contributions after months of repeated reminder, tells me that you have not understood the Wikipedia policy, neither in letter and nor in spirit. That you continue to violate Wikipedia policies tell me that competence is lacking. That is why I have asked you to try and contribute by other means.

All the pages you have contributed to, and mention above, are in the mess that you have created. They will all have to be cleaned. The images you have contributed to in Ahom kingdom are very low quality, hazy, and with multiple licensing issues. Chaipau (talk) 18:15, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I clearly understood till the first half, what do you mean by are in the mess that you have created, I have not made any major edits on all of those pages. are very low quality, hazy, and with multiple licensing issues That's the only images that I could get, also the images are of high historical value. Jonardondishant (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Joy dol

.htm here]. See also the copyvio detector.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 07:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[[reverted. Thank you. VickKiang (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I agree Jonardondishant (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 13:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{ in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 18:53, 8 October 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

{{ty, who followed through on my request for page protection. Thanks. Chaipau (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahom expedition of Kachari Kingdom

Hello, Jonardondishant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahom expedition of Kachari Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahom expedition of Kachari Kingdom

Hello, Jonardondishant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahom expedition of Kachari Kingdom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahom expedition of Jaintia and Kachari Kingdoms

Hello, Jonardondishant. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahom expedition of Jaintia and Kachari Kingdoms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahom expedition of Jaintia and Kachari Kingdoms

Hello, Jonardondishant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahom expedition of Jaintia and Kachari Kingdoms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mohanmala Gohain

Hello, Jonardondishant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mohanmala Gohain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]