Jump to content

User talk:Joshbanana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Loudology, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
no sources?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Loudology! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
He has 30 million followers on TikTok. I would like to know how you find that “not sufficiently notable”
you also said something about sources? I added multiple links, so what do you mean by sources? Joshbanana (talk) 21:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm TotallyJimmyFallon. An edit that you recently made to Stephen "tWitch" Boss seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TotallyJimmyFallon (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization Talk 02:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m confused as to how it was vandalism? Joshbanana (talk) 02:16, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused Joshbanana (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with your nonsense at Columbine High School massacre, your most recent edit appears to have been purely disruptive, as Virginia Tech is not even a high school. I think you have received ample warnings about your editing at this point. If you continue with these disruptive edits, you will be blocked from editing. - Adolphus79 (talk) 00:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I did not realize that it said high school. I enjoy editing Wikipedia, to make it a better place for people to read, and my intent is not to vandalize. Joshbanana (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Suicide. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would love for you to explain. How it was vandalism. I did absolutely nothing incorrect. I added a link to a crisis line and I edited the photo. Joshbanana (talk) 02:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a place for homilies on suicide. Please do not use Wikipedia as a soapbox, however well-meant. Acroterion (talk) 02:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do believe a mistake was made Joshbanana (talk) 02:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not an advise service, and current image is relevant, a road digger is not. Moons of Io (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize. I will refrain from adding such information. I still don’t understand what was wrong with the picture I added the last one may be relevant, but it’s quite disturbing and dark. Joshbanana (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the article is suicide — a disturbing and dark subject. General Ization Talk 02:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just thought it would make a little bit of sense to add a bit of light into a dark room Joshbanana (talk) 02:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you find such articles unduly disturb you personally, you should refrain from reading them, not edit them in an attempt to "lighten" their mood. General Ization Talk 02:31, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thank you. I also have one request. May you lock my user talk page so only I and administrators can edit it Joshbanana (talk) 02:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, your attempt to add a "public service announcement" at the end of the article was clearly well-intentioned, but consider that you would not find one in a printed encyclopedia under the heading of suicide — nor should you add such announcements here "in the voice of the encyclopedia". I do not have the ability to lock your Talk page to prevent other editors from contacting you here, nor would that be constructive — that is the purpose of this page. General Ization Talk 02:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know how to add those little interesting facts or stickers to your profile? I noticed you had them and I was wondering if I would be able to add them as well Joshbanana (talk) 02:46, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:USERBOX. General Ization Talk 02:49, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, we will not protect your userpage like that. Administrators are not the only people who would need to talk to you.
May I suggest that you consider editing articles that don't involve dark topics like suicide or mass shootings? Acroterion (talk) 02:48, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I only edited the suicide page because I found it was quite dark. Mainly because of the reason I had suffered from depression and didn’t like the “theme” of it Joshbanana (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As well intentioned as your editing may be, please note that Wikipedia is not censored. - Adolphus79 (talk) 03:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (May 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (May 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (May 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Pointless re-submit wasting everyone's time - unsourced, no indication of notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (May 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:ANYBIO, lacks any sources or references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia and YouTube are not acceptable or reliable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Joshbanana! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:38, Saturday, July 1, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (July 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No refs mean will not be approved

[edit]

No independent refs mean will not be approved. His social media and website do not qualify. David notMD (talk) 02:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Benji Krol has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Benji Krol. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
sorry! its just that i was emailing with krol's manager and i wanted it to be perfect. Joshbanana (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haha!

[edit]

@311dot “i was gonna say by becoming a police officer. Lol you made me laugh and made my day. Joshbanana (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

psst, hey

[edit]

just a heads up. people have commented about you deleting logs and afc comments, with the general message being "do not do those specific actions", so i'm gonna do a potentially bad thing and restore some of them a few seconds after i'm done sending this messagee cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • whispers*
okay thank you Joshbanana (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benji Krol (August 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Hammersoft was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has gone on long enough. 10 rejections, and still no reliable, secondary sources. This is done. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hammersoft (talk) 22:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benji Krol

[edit]

With respect, you just aren't getting it. Wikipedia depends on reliable, secondary sources to support prose in an article. This draft has been rejected/declined more than 10 times now. Enough is enough. You are clearly not understanding how to write an article. Further, articles are supposed to be written in a neutral tone, not with gushing, over the top praise for this person. This reads like something you would find in an advertising brochure, not an encyclopedia. This draft isn't even slightly close to being ready for an article. STOP doing this. PLEASE carefully read Help:Your first article. If you still aren't understanding, then ask for help as you have previously at Wikipedia:Teahouse. But, don't make a few minor changes to this draft again and resubmit it for acceptance into the encyclopedia. You are wasting people's time doing this. Enough. PLEASE enough. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further to Hammersoft's comments - references such as YouTube, TikTok and Twitter are not acceptable or reliable sources. Also the references provided need to specifically relate to Krol not general explanations as to why social media sites are popular. In its current state it clearly fails to address the requirements of WP:ANYBIO and actually reads like a vanity item / self promotion. Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
considering a previous comment in this talk page about speaking with benji's manager, it's possible that there's a coi involved. i think. i'm not entirely sure that counts as coi, but it's pretty likely that it makes neutrality a bit harder to keep cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 12:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think so. I only contacted her to ask for an image I’m allowed to use. Joshbanana (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back

[edit]

did a lot of research. hope to start editing again soon. Joshbanana (talk) 05:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CiaPan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Götaland theory have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CiaPan (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The change you made Special:Diff/1178364862 isn't likely to help readers of English Wikipedia, as most of them can't read Swedish. As a rule, Wikipedia articles is each language link to other relevant articles in the same language Wikipedia. If an article does not exist yet, the link is red. If you think information about Pehr Tham is necessary, please start (or request) a new article about the person. --CiaPan (talk) 14:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Knitsey. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Hammersoft that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 17:20, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Benji Krol for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benji Krol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benji Krol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Joshbanana. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Benji Krol, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Svampesky (talk) 19:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per this comment, where you said: its just that i was emailing with krol's manager and i wanted it to be perfect., what is the extent of your relationship with Benji Krol and/or his manager? Svampesky (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t have one. I asked for a photo, and they gave me one. Joshbanana (talk) 19:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried to find contact information for Benji Krol's management, and an email for his management isn't publicly available anywhere. @Joshbanana: how did you get this email? Svampesky (talk) 20:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you check his website or tiktok.? Joshbanana (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI on Benji Krol

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Joshbanana. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:17, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt? Dont patronize me. Joshbanana (talk) 20:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joshbanana&oldid=1239355908"