User talk:Julie345

re: "Article banners"

I'm not sure if the issues have been fully resolved. The main concern is that the article still has a promotional undertone as well as some dubious sections. I'll discuss specifics on the article talk page. -Reconsider! 05:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Verifiable, yes. Objective, maybe not. I think the article is in a grey area where it is not an outright advertisement but at the same time it is not 100% objective, perhaps tainted by the intent of the writer(s). Questionable content include: "Consumers are able to try products and receive advice". What is the purpose of detailing such obvious practices? That, along with the section on the "Clubcard" section appears to be actively encouraging the reader to shop at "Priceline". Also, citing other articles as a reason to include particular sections is not really a valid argument because someone could just as easily remove the section under the same premise that I stated. Articles are not static, and are subject to change. It may not be disputed yet, but inaction does not necessarily imply a consensus. It is probably best to continue this discussion on the article talk page. We'll see what others have to say about the matter. -Reconsider! 04:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Julie345. You have new messages at Reconsider the static's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Reconsider | speak 13:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Api logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Api logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Reference test

This is the text that you are going to verify with a reference.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SecurePay.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Schenka (talk) 06:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SecurePay concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SecurePay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SecurePay

Hello Smallworldsocial. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "SecurePay".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SecurePay}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Madeline Sands.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madeline Sands.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

We hereby affirm that Small World Social is the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of image Madeline Sands. We uploaded it to Flickr here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/smallworldsocial/14050131111/.

The SquareSpace website is owned by our company, Small World Social. If you visit this website: http://www.smallworldsocial.com/, then click on Project, you will be taken to our SquareSpace website. We own every single image on that webpage.

This is my first time using Wikipedia, so I would appreciate your help in writing the correct copyright tags for the image. Thank you!

File permission problem with File:Priceline store.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Priceline store.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Priceline Pharmacist.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Priceline Pharmacist.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 05:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Google Glass may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• - An Overview [http://breastfeeding.smallworldsocial.com/ Breastfeeding.SmallWorldSocial.com] ]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your username

Hello. As you may have already noticed, I've answered your question at the articles for creation help desk. I understand that you want to comply with Wikipedia's policies, but I'm afraid your username does not.

Usernames that represent organizations are not allowed because they tend to be promotional and can imply that they are used by more than one person, which is not allowed. Accounts with such usernames are often blocked from editing. Please choose a username that represents yourself as an individual. You can simply create a new account (and perhaps note on your new user page that you've edited under this name), or you can request a change in username, which will transfer all your contributions from this account to a new name. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 03:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Small World Social was accepted

Small World Social, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lixxx235 (talk) 05:34, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madeline Sands (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Madeline Sands.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC World’s 1st Breastfeeding Support Project Using Google Glass was accepted

World’s 1st Breastfeeding Support Project Using Google Glass, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 21:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madeline Sands has been accepted

Madeline Sands, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Madeline Sands for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeline Sands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline Sands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial

The article Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure how the intersection of a piece of technology with a human biological function is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Hastuer, You may not view women's health as an important issue and one that is note worthy, however many other people do. Perhaps focus your attention on deleting other entries that arent as important to so many millions of women and their babies around the world.

Nomination of Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Glass Breastfeeding app trial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

There are a couple of articles where I think you've forgotten to declare your interest, eg. Australian Breastfeeding Association and Peter Wegner (Australian artist). Deb (talk) 09:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter Wegner (Australian artist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Peter Wegner (Australian artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/events/all/lai-art-forum-the-aesthetics-of-aging. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Priceline vitamin isle.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Priceline vitamin isle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo The Alannah and Madeline Foundation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo The Alannah and Madeline Foundation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Google Glass breastfeeding app trial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Google Glass breastfeeding app trial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Glass breastfeeding app trial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 06:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Priceline logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Priceline logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 18:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)