User talk:Lasha-george

August 2018

In Wikipedia, verifiability is one of the cornerstones. You started to add unsourced (and likely incorrect) information to Tbilisi. When I undid the changes, you started edit-warring and failed to address the issue. You have already inserted this information three times and did not show any ability to communicate. If you continue, I will make sure that your account is blocked. Additionally, we do not wikify years.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I started an ANI topic about you Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Lasha-george: adding unsourced information and failure to communicate, please respond there.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Tornado chaser (talk) 20:46, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 04:29, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasha-george (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. First of all I want to express my respect for you, the reason of my blocking was caused by my actions concerning the establishment of Tbilisi. According to your information Tbilisi was established in 479 which is not true. The year is mentioned in Georgian Wikipedia as well, but in 379 Tbilisi was established as a fortress. (Moses Janashvili: "Tfilisi". page 6 and 8.): In the life of “Kartli” we read: “Persians came to Armenia and they destroyed everything there. They came to Kartli. The Persian leader built Tbilisi between gates as a fortess of Mtskheta” and also, “So, firstly Tbilisi was a village and then it was changesd into a fortess (in 379) and after that in Vakhtang Gorgasali times Tbilisi became a city.” According to the true source Tbilisi was established by Vakhtang Gorgasali in 455. ([http://dspace.nplg.gov.ge/bitstream/1234/191351/1/Konspeqti_Saqartvelos_Itoriidan.pdf Passage from the history of Georgia. I’m going to translate this passage accurately and insert it in here. Let’s see what will come out of this. (P.S. It is still very interesting where the year 479 comes from, the source is not mentioned in English Wikipedia.) I hope you will think over and unblock me:-).--Lasha-george (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This request has been open for two weeks and not been sufficiently convincing for an administrator to unblock. You are free to make another, more convincing request that addresses the reason for the block. 331dot (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to add sources and communicate. Both of these things are required. Are you capable of doing these things? If not, you won't get another chance. See WP:V and WP:COMMUNICATE. If you have any questions, go to WP:TEAHOUSE. ~Swarm~ {talk} 23:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I will note, I will definitely add sources later. I will also contact you if you will reduce the permanent block. Sincerely:--Lasha-george (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - The reason for my blockage was the editing of the Tbilisi page, which I considered to be the source in the year of its establishment (455 years). Currently the source is indicated on this page and this problem is corrected, which was the reason for my "life blockage" (There was no source that Tbilisi was founded in 479 (I wrote about this above).).--Lasha-george (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

appeal for pardon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasha-george (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to inform you that I sincerely regret the work of editing and editing articles. Now I have learned the rules and I am completely free to do so, I promise my previous commitments will never be repeated. I apologize and hope you have forgiveness.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

pardon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasha-george (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Maybe 3 months or 1 year... Infinitely? This is an injustice:-)

My request is to unblock me because I don't agree with the indefinite block. I assure you not to edit any texts without refering the sourse. I am a Georgian Wikipedia editor and the reason of my request is that only.--Lasha-george (talk) 15:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for my blockage was the editing of the Tbilisi page, which I considered to be the source in the year of its establishment (455 years). Currently the source is indicated on this page and this problem is corrected, which was the reason for my "life blockage" (There was no source that Tbilisi was founded in 479 (I wrote about this above).).--Lasha-george (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to User talk:Swarm while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Do not use an IP or create another username while blocked. If you want to notify an editor you can tag them in your post here. AdamF in MO (talk) 23:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can use learn about how to mention another editor at ping. I would suggest that you use it sparingly. Spamming the ping will result in having your talkpage access removed. I would also suggest that you reflect on why you were blocked. What you can do to prevent that in the future, and what how you would like to work in a collaborative way in the future. Read the guide to appealing blocks thoughtfully and you'll find a reasonable path back to full status. --AdamF in MO (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for a block reduction ... As for logging in without an IP address, it was done with the intention of writing to me directly for my blocker.--Lasha-george (talk) 06:53, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, just submit an acceptable unblock request. Exactly how to do this is explained here, just like Adam said. This block is not permanent, it just doesn't have an expiration date and requires you to submit an acceptable unblock request in order to be unblocked. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 03:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much. I will try my best to unblock it.--Lasha-george (talk) 10:04, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lasha-george (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. The reason for my blockage was the editing of the Tbilisi page, which I considered to be the source in the year of its establishment (455 years). Currently the source is indicated on this page and this problem is corrected, which was the reason for my "life blockage" (There was no source that Tbilisi was founded in 479 (I wrote about this above).), But I am aware of my misconduct, which was expressed in the source. This source's failure was the reason, which led to the corresponding result, blocking. Gratitude I would be grateful if block moments so far as the reason why dagviloce realize that was a mistake and it will not happen again. Lasha-george (talk) 12:52 pm, 12 June 2020, Friday (20 days ago) (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

PROCEDURAL DECLINE: new unblock request posted below. Please, do not make more than one open unblock request at the same time. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lasha-george (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason for my indefinite blocking was the reference on the Tbilisi wiki page, the date of the establishment of Tbilisi (AD 455) without a source (კონსპექტი საქართველოს ისტორიიდან შედგენილი ა. ქუთათელაძისგან. რვეული I. თბილისი, სტამბა წიგნების გამომცემელ ქართველთა ამხანაგობისა, 1900. გვერდი 38.). We further cited the source without logging in, as the indefinite block did not allow me to log in. Lasha-george (talk) 10:12 am, 24 June 2020, Wednesday (10 days ago) (UTC+2)

Accept reason:

Blocking admin is not answering, so I'll take this as a sing of approval. I am unblocking you under that understanding that you will not add unsourced content and that you will not be edit-warring. Vanjagenije (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lasha-george: The real reason behind your blocked is not the problem with the source, but the fact that you were WP:edit warring without willing to talk with other editors and resolve the issue. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and mutual communication is mandatory here. You were just reverting the Tbilisi article to your preferred version without any communication. That's the problem and you have to address that problem before we can unblock you. You have to explain us how you plan to change your behavior if unblocked. Swarm asked you a question (above) more than a year ago, but I still do not see the answer. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once again I apologize for the past mistake. There will be no vandalism on my part, I can tell you with absolute certainty, I give you my word. I would rather attribute my initial inexperience to not communicating with you. You wrote and I didn’t answer, it was a mistake and it won’t happen again. In case of any correction, I will definitely communicate on the review page. I would be very grateful if you could help me, and I will follow the rules of Wikipedia. Thank you so much Vanjagenije! I hope for further cooperation!--Lasha-george (talk) 07:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not mention WP:vandalism, I said the problem was WP:edit warring. Do you understand the difference? Do you understand what edit warring is? Vanjagenije (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes folks I meant Vanjagenije. When I was re-editing, but I had no communication with the editors who contributed to the refinement of the article (Editors engaged in a dispute should reach consensus or pursue dispute resolution rather than edit warring.). Thanks for the feedback.--Lasha-george (talk) 08:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm: Do you object unblocking? Vanjagenije (talk) 08:33, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Swarm:, @Vanjagenije: Thanks in advance for the support--Lasha-george (talk) 06:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not replying, Vanjagenije. No objections or further comments on my end. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 05:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of monarchs of Georgia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Argus and Haik. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Haos is Haik. See page: Togarmah, and pictures: Thargamos and his sons. The order of the figures from left to right is: Movakan, Bardos, Kartlos, Haos, Lekos, Thargamos, Caucas, Egros. An opening folio of the Georgian Chronicles. As for Argus (Arg): Referencess:

1. მ. გ. ჯანაშვილი „საქართველოს ისტორია უძველეს დროითგან 985 წლ. ქრ. შ.“. ტომი I. ა. შთამომავლობა ქართველების მეფეებისა. III ჩვენის ქრონოლოგიით. გვერდები: 379–381. ტფილისი, ელექტრონითმბეჭდავი ამხ. „შრომა“, მიხეილის პრ. № 65. 1906./ M. C. Janashvili “History of Georgia from ancient times 985 years. AD. ”. Volume I.a. Descendants of Georgian kings. III by our chronology. Pages: 379–381. Tbilisi (Georgia), electronically printed "Labor", Mikheil Pr. № 65. 1906;
2. See page: Phrixus, and His Offspring (Sons): Argus, Phrontis, Melas and Cytisorus. It is also in the history of Georgia mentioned by Mose Janashvili. I think the argument is solid and the reference to "disambiguation needed" should be deleted. Thanks for the feedback.--Lasha-george (talk) 06:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia ZA Annual General Meeting 2021

This is just to let you know that the Wikimedia ZA AGM will be taking place on 25 September 2021 See below for more details.

Time: Saturday, 25 September 2021, starts at 10:00 to 16:00. With intermission at 13:00
Location: held digitally online this link

December 2021

Hi Lasha-george! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Poet that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. SailingInABathTub (talk) 16:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok SailingInABathTub, thank you. If you mean Shota Rustaveli (Poet), I have only added a picture and it is also quite clear that he is one of the (if the greatest) greatest poets not only in the history of Georgia.--Lasha-george (talk) 16:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into History of Iberia or Georgia, that is All of Sakartvelo. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings with great respect. Thanks for the feedback and corrections. As for the sources, at the same time, the similar Georgian Wikipedia page also indicates the sources on the basis of which the page was created. Sources are also preserved in the National Library of Georgia.--Lasha-george (talk) 07:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Kandid Charkviani.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kandid Charkviani.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

კანდიდ ჩარკვიანი.--Lasha-george (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ImageTaggingBot Maybe you can help me to legally register the said file in Wikipedia.--Lasha-george (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aliosha_Mirtskhulava is also a picture of the National Library...--Lasha-george (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Lasha-george/sandbox

User:Lasha-george/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lasha-george/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lasha-george/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wesoree (Talk) 13:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And why should it be deleted, the reason? Can't it be saved anywhere?--Lasha-george (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have been working on my training page for quite some time and will it hurt anything if I leave it?--Lasha-george (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in the rules does it say that the user can delete the exercise. Why is this being discussed, is something wrong? This is a restriction of rights. With respect--Lasha-george (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lasha-george - Please make your statement in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lasha-george/sandbox. I have already made my statement that information in Georgian is a proper use of a sandbox. The place to make your statement is Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lasha-george/sandbox. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{NoACEMM}} Lasha-george (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Togarmah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heros.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Note is provided. Lasha-george (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irakli Bagration-Imeretinsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't really look for more info than that. I, as the author of the article, considered it necessary to write the text with reference to a scarce source, however, I think that the decision to remove the article should be made by other users, because I, as the author of the article, believe that the article should remain and be improved. Lasha-george (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Привет из ветви Давитишвили! статья хорошая. QartveliGenealogisti (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

English

All contributions to English Wikipedia should be in English, including edit summaries. It is not reasonable to expect editors of the English Wikipedia to be able to understand Georgian. JBW (talk) 16:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Of course, I only write articles in English, but the page in question is in the exercise box, which is my personal work as a user and is not public or distributed publicly. It is possible that in the future I would like to translate it into English. Lasha-george (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote my message above I had actually seen only the edit summaries, and not looked at the content of the page itself. No page on Wikipedia is an editor's private space, not even in userspace, and all editors should be able to see what is going on. JBW (talk) 20:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, viewing is not a problem.--Lasha-george (talk) 16:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]