Thanks for uploading File:SMCheadshot.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]
Hello, MattGagnon! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
Dear Matt, I am willing to help you, rather than as it seems to me the experts cast you off as oh this is all been done before, which of course it has but is a nightmare doing templates when you first start doing them. So if you have any trouble, I am not saying I can give you the answers, but I am certainly willing to help answer any troubles you have rather than jsut say "this has done before" without giving any guidance to where it has been done before.
I am not sure quite what you are trying to accomplish with this template so I cannot give any advice specifically on how to go about it. If you could tell me more what you are trying to do, why you want to implemnent this template (on what articles etc) then I could perhaps give you advice farther. As for general template construction advice, I advise get a large toothrbrush, insert between upper and lower teeth, if you have any, then grip hard and type fast.
There is a trick here for not displaying the fields you do not want. It is rather cunning and I will find it for you, the trick is not to blot the thing on the right hand side on the left hand side but to blot out the field itself on the left hand side. Give me a bit and I will try to find you an elegant example from my own code. I jsut wanted to reply quickly so you don't give up hope. Si Trew (talk) 00:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are my new personal hero, Simon. Thank you so much. MattGagnon (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Matt,
There is a trick here for not displaying the fields you do not want. It is rather cunning and I will find it for you, the trick is not to blot the thing on the right hand side on the left hand side but to blot out the field itself on the left hand side. Give me a bit and I will try to find you an elegant example from my own code. I jsut wanted to reply quickly so you don't give up hope. Si Trew (talk) 00:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
but then you add the variable my_offical_number_of_guns which may be empty if there are no official_number_of_guns, but does it is not that it is nonexistent, just empty. Often that does not matter, but if you do, you must circumlocute thus:
i.e. put the definition itself on the right hand side of the ifdef.
Does that make sense? Excuse any typos, I am on a Hungarian keyboard which is fine for most uses but all the special symbols are in strange (to me) places, and for added pleasure whenever I switch to another application it goes onto a British English keyboard, so I make even more typos than I usually do.
I THINK that makes sense... is there any way I could trouble you to maybe show me how that would work with what I built already? i.e. could you insert that code in there as an example to show me precisely how that would work there? I want to make sure I do it right and seeing it in practice would really be helpful. If not, don't worry about it - just would be nice to see. Thanks again so much. MattGagnon (talk) 01:41, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I can, but actually {{Infobox politician}} pretty much does what you want, which is why I asked why did you build it, what is it for? At the moment it seems like a problem seeking a solution. But the solution is anyway as was said in main, not to do all the table stuff, but to build on {{Infobox}} and customize it to your needs. I was assuming it was just some technicality of syntax you wanted, but if you just want to repeat the work others have honed already, go ahead but I am really unsure what your aims are, and without that, I cannot really help much. If you want Infobox Republican or Infobox Tea Party or Infobox Shirtlifter or Infobox CanadianTire or whatever you want, I am agnostic about that, I just am not sure what it is you are trying to achieve here, if you tell me that, then I can help you towards it. Si Trew (talk) 02:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I may have jumped the gun rather, when you said "for another media wiki site" I assumed you meant something under the WikiMedia umbrellas. Other Wikis work differently, since the MediaWiki software is kinda honed for Wikipedia in all its various languages. If it is for another site under WikiMedia, my advice is good, but if it is a totally different wiki, you are on your own and that won't help you, since the parser functions etc are built for WikiMedia sites, with customized versions of the bbasic Wiki server (Two cheers for the backroom boys who do all the server work!)
My sincere best wishes and I hope I have not led you astray Si Trew (talk) 09:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I said before, it is a template I'm trying to make for another media wiki site that is not Wikipedia, but that I wanted to learn how to do that not only for that, but just to understand how it is done so I could do that when I make future templates for Wikipedia itself, as I can imagine many different reasons I would want lines to appear/disappear depending on content. And the Infobox politician template is SO complex, with SO many sub-templates... I really just wanted to create a simple version of it for use on that other wikimedia project. Does that make sense? Not sure if I'm explaining it very well. MattGagnon (talk) 03:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I think I have the nub of your gist... you want an infobox where for example a whole section would not be displayed if none of the fields were present? That is fairly simple but longwinded:
{{#if|{{{myfirstsectionfield}}}{{{mysecondsectionfield}}}{{{mythirdsectionfield}}{{
::::<!-- the code for my section with mysectionfield, mysecondsectionfield, mythirdsectionfield -->
::::}} <!<-- that's the end of the #if --&>
The thing to remember is that the whole lot of templates work by string substitution, there is no great algebra behind it, literally the back end parser expands the fields and then decides if they are null (empty, or just spaces etc) or not null. So an "or" for example, as you see above, is just whack all the fields together with nothing between them, so that if ANY of them have any content the string will be non empty. I hope I am not patronising you by assuming that you know Boolean algebra from some other languages, but the Wikimedia language parser is very primitive, all it does is whenever you stick {{some field}}}</code> in, it replaces some field with the actual text, then reads the expression as a whole.
This can be quite important, since if the expanded text is quite long, it will be expanded seventeen times if it is used seventeen times in your template, before the parser gets a grip on it. i.e. in C (programming language) terms, you could consider that the C preprocessor expands it all before the #if even sees it. But for your purposes this is probably not too important since the size of the text in the infobox is relatively tiny.
Perhaps I should direct you to {{enum}}, a template collaboratively written by me and some other authors, which I think has this kinda bizarre syntax for this very reason (and also, as I presume is your desire, to hide its complexities, which are not much, from the contributor who just wants to use it).
What I had jumped to initially is that you wanted the template to change its behavior on the content of the page. Having re-read, I realise that is not what you meant. But to make sure: It is pretty much impossible to write a template that changes its behavior because of the content of the page (rather than because of the content of other templates), for a fairly simple reason: there is no parameter to the template that says "this is the content". Neither should there be, however tempting sometimes it seems ("Render these dates in British or American date order" being a fairly simple example, which is a nest of worms when one starts to think about it, so the Wikipedia community decides, I hope this is no insult, to think about it by not thinking about it, i.e. leave contributors' contributions alone, don't meddle with them).
I am not sure I am helping much but at least I am trying. I have gone through the same groans myself and I know that it is baffling at first, then suddenly one day it all makes sense. Not good sense, but sense. We are stuck with what we have, of course, unless we want to edit two million pages on EN:WP alone if we had the foible of changing syntax. Si Trew (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Template talk:Etymology would perhaps give you some clues to these rumblings, possibly beter than {{enum}}, which I span off from it to keep it relatively simple. is full of #ifs as that is its purpose, but the discussion at Ety's talk page gives a clue about people who know how to write a template but are not sure what to put into it, a fine example I think of good collaborative editing, and from the links in there I think you will be able to get your head around it. Or be totally bamboozled.
I have only been on Wikipedia two years, so I am no expert, and mostly just edit articles and translate them sometimes. (I still have to sort out Voguéo, for example, a complete pile of rubbish I have at [[User::SimonTrew/Vogéuo]], that is a hard one as it moves under your feet). There are far more experienced editors than I, but I hope coming as a relative newbie to doing this, I can at least realise the pain you are going through rather than saying Oh you just do this. Si Trew (talk) 10:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:MaineGovMap2010.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MaineGovMap2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard[edit]
U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:32, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting[edit]
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18[edit]
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March[edit]
Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston,Northampton,South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)
NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square
Dear Fellow Wikimedian,
New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.
Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter.
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England
As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:
We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time.
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians!
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Your input is requested at WikiProject Maine![edit]
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on!
There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others.
Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia.
Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again.
Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices.
Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings.
I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page!
We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on!
There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others.
Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia.
Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again.
Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices.
Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings.
I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page!
We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
Hello, MattGagnon. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of userequire disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
I am well aware of the policies regarding COI. I have no idea why you left this on my page, when the edit (fully transparent, under my own name) to the article you are referring to was a simple infobox addition of physical location and a logo file. I made no substantive edits to it at all, so there is no reason to give me an unprompted tutorial on a policy I have been aware of for years. MattGagnon (talk) 15:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!
Hello, MattGagnon. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
