A Primer for Newcomers Welcome

Maxime Vernier, welcome to Wikipedia!

I noticed nobody had said hi yet...so...Hi!

If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following theEdit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.

You might like some of these links and tips:

some General guidance.
Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board
Ask questions at the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Help desk.
Use the Show preview button
Provide an Edit summary
Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
Take a look at Consensus of standards
Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing, -- ```Buster Seven Talk 19:08, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maxime Vernier

Hi, I saw that you're doing a lot of good work with the List of S&P 400 companies page. Thanks so much! Stu ^(aeiou) 16:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arch Capital Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arch Capital Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Archnewlogo11.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Archnewlogo11.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stockrow

Hi. You seem pretty committed to adding links to stockrow to WP.

Hello, I'm Jytdog. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

Please consider reading the material on the mainpage of WP:WikiProject Companies and then asking folks who are part of that project at the associated Talk page how they feel about adding stock listings to a Newco listing site across many WP articles, as you have been doing. That is the normal process for making the kind of broad additions you have been doing. Jytdog (talk) 11:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jytdog. I have created a new section there as you suggested. Maxime Vernier (talk) 11:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Archnewlogo11.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Archnewlogo11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of S&P 600 companies (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Adding just another entry does not address fundamental issue

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of S&P 600 companies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maxime Vernier, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Maxime Vernier. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Payments

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Payments, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.globalpaymentsinc.com/en/unitedkingdom/about-us/about-us. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with BNY Mellon?

Hello! I noticed you are interested in editing finance-related articles. Would you mind taking a look at an edit request I've made on the BNY Mellon Talk page? They're very small updates, but I am avoiding making the edits myself because I have a financial COI (I'm monitoring the article on behalf of BNY Mellon). I'd appreciate any assistance you can provide, but no worries if this doesn't appeal to you. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 21:22, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing GICS Sub-Industry from S&P 400 list

Maxime,

Is there a reason why you are removing the sub-industry on several entries for the List of S&P 400 companies page? I would think we should try to find the sub-industry when available. An example would be Jones Lang LaSalle where the sub-industry should remain Real Estate Services under the Real Estate sector. Ksu6500 (talk) 02:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do agree with you. When I did this, it was to correct the sector and since I did not know the Sub-industry I left it blank. My source for S&P 400 companies is the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and on their website they only mention the sector but not the sub-industry. Maxime Vernier (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did find the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) holdings spreadsheet on the iShares website. It did contain some useful information including being able to sort by name within sector. This did help to confirm we have all of the current holdings and the correct sector for each holding. It can be difficult to find the GICS sub-industry especially for holdings that have been on the index for many years. I try to use the GICS sub-industry on the S&P press release when changes are made to the index. Sometimes I have had to resort to Morningstar.com for information esp. on the Real Estate sector. I have made a bunch of edits recently so I hope they have been helpful and accurate. Ksu6500 (talk) 03:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating quality content about businesses, like Envision Healthcare. Our community is not very good at identifying and documenting commerical organizations that are notable. Keep up the good work, adding content to the projects! Sadads (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar

	The Hard Worker's Barnstar
	For your extensive work to keep the information on stock market indices up-to-date. Thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request: BNY Mellon

Hi Maxime Vernier, you helped a former colleague of mine with their edit request at BNY Mellon toward the end of last year. I'm wondering if you'd have time to review this request for a few routine edits? Some requested updates under Leadership and Company culture have already been made, but I'm still seeking editors to review and implement updates to the introduction, Operations, Investment services, Recognition, and Company culture. I have a WP:COI as I am posting suggested edits for BNY Mellon as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Thanks in advance, Danilo Two (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I have updated the number of employees. Maxime Vernier (talk) 17:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maxime Vernier. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DJIA changes

Do you have a source for your recent changes, such as [1]? I don't see any news stories that Berkshire, Facebook, or Amazon are being added to the DJIA. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, thanks for undoing my incorrect edits. Maxime Vernier (talk) 18:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your focus on financial articles. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

First welcomed (by me) in late 2013 but not active 'till the end of 2016. Not a lot of edits (3000) but displays active participation in improving the encyclopedia. Good work at List of S&P 400 companies. Maxime has a keen interest in editing finance related articles and creating quality content about businesses, like Envision Healthcare, one of the four articles she has created. The WP community can always benefit by identifying and documenting commercial organizations that are notable. She has received praise for her extensive work at keeping the Stock Market indices up to date. ―Buster7 ☎ 21:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Stock Market Indices

Maxime Vernier

Editor of the Week
for the week beginning July 1, 2018

An active participant in improving the encyclopedia with a keen interest in finance related articles and creating quality content about businesses. The WP community benefits by identifying and documenting commercial organizations that are notable. Keeps the Stock Market indices up to date.

Recognized for

List of S&P 400 companies

Notable work

Envision Healthcare

Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 02:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Buster, I have updated my page Maxime Vernier (talk) 06:25, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russell 2000

Hi Maxine - I noticed you've been adding Russell 2000 to company infoboxes. I'm wondering how sustainable this info is for 2000 articles? How frequently does the list change (daily, weekly, quarterly, etc?), and are you somehow alerted when the list changes? Should this info go on the talk page, if you are unable to edit any more and others want to help keep the info from becoming outdated? Also, why did you choose to do the Russell 2000, and not the easier to maintain 1000? Any particular significance to the 2000? Cheers. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tim, lots of questions. I might be interested at some point to create a bot to make it sustainable. On the Russell Indexes page we say the indexes are rebalanced annually in June but IPOs are added quaterly. My primary source of information is the composition of the ETFs that track these indices. I have done DJIA, DJTA, DJUA, S&P 100, S&P 500, S&P 400, S&P 600, Russell 1000 and now I am on the Russell 2000 (from big capitalizations to small capitalizations somewhat). Maxime Vernier (talk) 15:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got your work cut out for you. You'd think Russell would have an RSS feed or something similar to make this easier. Perhaps they might provide you with one? After all, every article you edit is promoting their brand now (and I don't mean that in a snarky way). I'll ping their communications director and see what he thinks. How do you find the ETFs? I'm not a finance guy. Can you provide a link that I can put on the various Russell talk pages, to assist future editors? TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:29, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tim, it is true that I do not have a notification mechanism. For the Russell 2000 for example I go to the website of the iShares Russell 2000, there you can download an Excel file with the composition: https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239710/ishares-russell-2000-etf Maxime Vernier (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just found out from Russell Investments that they are no longer running the Russell indexes - it's FTSE/Russel, owned by the London Stock Exchange Group. Accordingly, I changed a couple of external links in the Russell 1000 Index article. Still waiting to hear now from FTSE/Russell about notification. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maxime Vernier. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry from a Public Relations Representative for Cantel on Assessing Wikipedia Article

Hello Maxime Vernier,

My name is Saralynn and I am a Public Relations professional at GCI Health, an agency specializing in healthcare. We’re reaching out on behalf of our clients at Cantel to potentially update outdated information found on the Cantel Wikipedia page.

We’re reaching out to you because we know Wikipedia users depend on active, qualified editors for accurate and supported articles. We felt that given your previous efforts editing Wikipedia pages on Envision Healthcare you might be interested in reviewing this page through the lens of updating older information.

To further disclose our position, we are aware that per Wikipedia’s guidelines, neither the company nor the company’s representatives can make direct edits to Wikipedia pages. Respecting these rules, our priority is ensuring that the Wiki has the most up-to-date information – we’re reaching out in the hopes you may be able to assess the current state of the page against publicly available information on Cantel to make accurate and appropriate updates.

Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions.

Best regards, SLK2019 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Saralynn, best would be to make a list of specific information you want to be updated in the talk page of the article so that me or other contributors can update and track progress Maxime Vernier (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maxime Vernier,

Thank you for your response! I know per Wikipedia’s guidelines that neither the company nor any of the company’s representatives can make direct edits to Wikipedia pages. As a result, the Cantel Medical Corporation page currently features a few areas with outdated information and we would recommend reviewing the latest information on Cantel’s Investor Relations website and the “About” section of Cantel’s website to identify a few key areas that could be made more up-to-date and accurate.

Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions or if we can provide more specificity.

Best regards,

SLK2019 (talk)

Upland Software

Hello Maxime, I've noticed your work on adding indices to infoboxes, and so thought you would have the appropriate subject knowledge to look at a draft page for Upland Software, which is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Upland_Software

It is traded as NASDAQ: UPLD and is part of the Russell 2000 Index Component, and has been included in analysts coverage although the page itself is coming up against "notability". Perhaps you could see if the page could be improved, or where to find independent, significant, coverage that seems should exist for a company in the Russell 2000 Index? This page seems similar to other companies in content, tone, and references so I'm a bit lost on where to go from here. Seems like this has potential to be useful as an encyclopedia entry as no other resources of consolidated information seems to exist for the company.

(and I have been paid to help work on this page, and did disclose, so please don't feel obligated to look into this if that's an issue)

Thank you for your time,

Regards,

Naadobea1776 (talk) 18:21, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.

I should note I found additional sources for a "further reading" section, added them there so it's not a huge amount of links in the content of the article, in case that's helpful.

Naadobea1776 (talk) 18:23, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Best would be to detail on the talk page what you did specifically to address the issues mentioned in your two rejections. I would trim the article (lose the acquisitions) and focus on 3 main sources as suggested also read or reread the page on notability guidelines. Good luck, I have had also new articles deleted in the past. Maxime Vernier (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice. I'll proceed as you suggest. Good point on the talk page, I didn't think of that and only mentioned in the comments. I am taking the rejection as a learning experience and also how to improve towards what Wikipedia expects from pages, I want to learn on how to better follow culture and guidelines so thank you for taking the time to respond so I can learn from this! Regards, Naadobea1776 (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for assistance with public company article

Hello Maxime Vernier. I am employed by a communications firm, and I have been working since May 2019 to improve a draft of an article for a client, Resideo, a public company operating in the smart-home technologies marketplace. In response to feedback from Wikipedia reviewers on previous drafts, I have made improvements on sourcing and, I believe, I have removed all promotional language that may have been biased. I researched other company pages created as a result of spin offs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Corporate_spin-offs) and used them as inspiration for the Resideo article structure. Before I resubmit this for approval, I would appreciate any feedback from you that would further improve the article or any comments you have on the subject's notability. I understand I am working in a conflict of interest/paid editing situation, which is why I am asking for your help. Here is a link to review it in the draft space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Resideo Nellie04 (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nellie, I would add an infobox. It seems there is no link to the official web site of the company. 20:03, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. That's a great suggestion, and I will work on adding one. Nellie04 (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added an infobox...first time that I've made one of these, so a great learning opportunity. I do need some guidance on adding the company logo. Is that something you could help me with? I've uploaded the company's logo here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Resideo_logo.png but I'm having difficulties addressing the Licensing section. Many thanks. Nellie04 (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your first infobox, it looks good. I had the same problem than you when I created the article about Arch Capital Group with its logo. It got removed and someone else uploaded a Wikipedia-friendly version to replace my version. Sorry for not being able to help with logos, my first try was not successful either. Maxime Vernier (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Dove

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎ 14:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, Happy Holidays to you and yours, Buster7 Maxime Vernier (talk) 22:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]