Jump to content

User talk:Mayra SA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Mayra SA, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 21:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The three-revert rule

Many people know that if someone reverts an article more than three times in 24 hours (3RR), they may be blocked to prevent edit warring. But did you know that:

  • Although reverts on different articles do not count towards the limit, different reverts on the same article do count. So if you revert Paragraph A twice and Paragraph B twice in 24 hours, you have made four reverts and may be blocked.
  • If you revert three times, wait for 24 hours and start reverting again, you may be blocked for 'gaming' the rule. The three-revert rule is an electric fence, not an entitlement.
  • Although you cannot be blocked for repeatedly reverting vandalism, many Wikipedians mistake edits for vandalism when they are not. For example, edits that do not respect the neutral point of view policy are not vandalism.

The easiest way to avoid being blocked for reverting is to revert as little as possible and discuss with your fellow editors instead. Some editors limit themselves to one or no reverts a day. Select categories on Wikipedia are limited to 1RR (one revert rule). Those articles will have an edit notice to apprise you of their special status. For 1RR you may only revert one edit in the entire category per 24-hours.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

A page you started (Spinomatrix) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Spinomatrix, Mayra SA!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I merged info regarding the sole species, per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. Also, for stub articles, remember to place a relevant stub template to categorize it, e.g. {{monogenea-stub}} for many of your contributions.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Lessepsian migration[edit]

Please add your information about Barracuda parasites to Lessepsian migration. Thank you and welcome! Quetzal1964 (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delane C. Kritsky (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mayra SA! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kritsky) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Kritsky, Mayra SA!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work! I've made a few copy-edits and tweaks to the article; in particular, I renamed it to Kritsky, which is the current title, due to the fact that this is the actual genus name and there's no reason to disambiguate with a parenthetical title. Also, you don't need to put the species authority in the taxobox when it's right below in the binomial, I've changed this now; I've also fixed a few minor spacing issues as seen in this edit. Thanks for creating this!

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 13:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


good work ![edit]

You have been doing consistently very reliable work, and, as an administrator, I have therefore given you the "autopatrolled" user right. The only difference is makes is that your new articles will no longer be marked in the list of new articles that need review, which lets us new page patrollers concentrate on the ones that might be problems. DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mayra SA. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Humbertium covidum[edit]

On 5 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Humbertium covidum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the flatworm Humbertium covidum (pictured), named after the COVID-19 pandemic, was classified in a study written mostly during the initial lockdown? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Humbertium covidum. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Humbertium covidum), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just for the record: 14,576 views, i.e. 607.3/ hour.
Hook update
Your hook reached 14,576 views (607.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]