Jump to content

User talk:Quetzal1964

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schizopygopsis potanini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minjiang River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ancerythroculter indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pagemover

[edit]

Hey Quetzal, I see you requesting monotypic genus swaps at WP:RM/TR a lot. Over 300 times, to be precise. You might want to consider requesting the page mover permission at WP:PERM so you can do these yourself. Best, Toadspike [Talk] 21:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oxudercinae has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Oxudercinae has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Balistapus has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Balistapus has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chromobotia has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Chromobotia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parazacco has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Parazacco has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

  • Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Suggestion:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Page mover granted

[edit]

Hello, Quetzal1964. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bengala barb

[edit]

Hi Quetzal1964,

Now that you have PageMover, please could you move Bengala bard to the right spelling, without leaving a redirect?

Thanks, Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, well spotted! Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Author

[edit]

Hey Quetzal, The article you made, Scomberoidinae has the wrong author, Gill is not the real author, rather it is Jordan & Gilbert 1883 as per Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes. Reference https://www.calacademy.org/scientists/catalog-of-fishes-classification/ Codonified (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Codonified And?
Yes it looks like that. I am not going to be precious about you correcting it. This article was created over 4 years ago, so I cannot recall the reason, if any, that this error occurred. Quetzal1964 (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

or any other errors you find by me, I am sure there are a few! Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bro its not that, I came to you because I wanted some more sources other than eschemeyers, you see my friend, I really have a hard time finding references, thats why I came to you so that you could help me. :) Codonified (talk) 09:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Codonified Okay, Eschmeyer's (ECoF) is the source the Wikipedia:FISHES project follows for taxonomy at and below the level of order (although that is recent, not the case when I made the error described above). The names ECoF give for authors is based on Family-group names of Recent fishes by Van der Laan, Eschmeyer & Fricke (VDLEF)
http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03E154FD-F167-4667-842B-5F515A58C8DE which you can access from the ECoF website (https://www.calacademy.org/scientists/catalog-of-fishes-family-group-names). When I erroneously attributed the name you mention to Gill, this paper was the source I probably misread. FishBase bases its taxonomy on ECoF and WoRMS seems to base its on FishBase. I went back to the original papare cited by VDLEF, here https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/944650. However, according to VDLEF then name Jordan & Gilbert gave it was Scombroidinae and Gill corrected the spelling to Scomberoidinae. I think I mistakenly thought Gill's correction should see him attributed with the naming of this taxon.Quetzal1964 (talk) 10:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks bro for giving me the context, I can now edit🤠 Codonified (talk) 20:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Starfish Barnstar
For your contributions to Biology❤️ Codonified (talk) 20:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

[edit]

Women in Red March 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing,
    and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks

Moving the needle:[1]

  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)
  • 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Humaniki".

Help please

[edit]

Hello Quetzal, could you please help me out by adding the synonyms of Beauveria bassiana, you see, I have a hard time following up what the reference(external link) is saying. Codonified (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Codonified I am more familiar with Zoological naming rather than Botanical (Mycology follows Botanical). However, the oldest name is Botrytis bassiana Bals.-Criv. from 1835. Giuseppe Gabriel Balsamo-Crivelli is the species authority. Unlike Zoology, the naming system used for plants and fungi add the name of the author of the new name after that of the original author, so Spicaria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. which means that Jean Paul Vuillemin placed this species in the genus Spicaria. So Balsamo-Crivelli is the author of the first name, the basionym, and Vuillemin moved this species into a different genus. In Zoological names this would not be used, the European greenfinch was named Loxia chloris by Linnaeus but is now in the genus Chloris, so it is now wriiten as Chloris chloris (Linnaeus, 1758) but if it was a fungus or plant the name would be, as far as I understand it, Chloris chloris (Linn.) Cuv. Where a new basionym is used, such as Sporotrichum densum Link, this means that Johann Heinrich Friedrich Link proposed this name, thinking he was describing a new species, Alfred Mathieu Giard then proposed that this species be moved to the genus Isaria, with the name written as Isaria densa (Link) Giard.
Species fungorum list this as "Isaria densa (Link) Giard, C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 113: 270 (1891)" This tells you that Giard published his new name in Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des sciences in 1891.
Hope this helps. Quetzal1964 (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, but honestly I think had botanical naming followed the same rules as zoological naming, it would be more simple to understand, but that's just my opinion.
Anyways, well wishes and good day to you.😀 Codonified (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

[edit]

The European Destubathon

[edit]

You are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub, though longer expansions also welcome. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I remember you were the greatest contributor to the African Destubathon and one of the people who made it so worthwhile! Your work for it was amazing! No interest in European wildlife for the month Quetzal? There's 65 prizes and one for each country, winning some of the less popular countries I'd have thought would be easy! I want to run one for Asia/Oceania and Latin America sometime too! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An extremely belated barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Carcinology Barnstar
For your creation of articles such as Charybdis hellerii, Zosimus aeneus, and Parhippolyte back in 2017. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:49, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yellowspotted sawtail

[edit]

Hi there, when you have time, could you take a look at Yellowspotted sawtail? Some text you added includes the phrase "The deep body firs just over twice into the standard length..." I think there's a typo there, but I can't figure out what. Any ideas? Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 02:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jessicapierce There is a "r" instead of a "t", so it was intended to read The deep body fits just over twice into the standard length. I have reworded it. Quetzal1964 (talk) 07:45, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

[edit]

Women in Red April 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2025, Vol 11, Issue 4, Nos. 326, 327, 335, 336


Online events:

Announcements (Events facilitated by others):

Tip of the month:

  • When creating biographies, don't forget to use Template:DEFAULTSORT.
    Accessible from "Wiki markup" at the foot of the page being edited,
    it allows categories to be listed under the subject's family name rather than their first or given name.

Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)

  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,057,083, 412,857 women)
  • 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women)

Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period!

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 13:20, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling mistakes

[edit]

Please chuck your articles into Google Docs/ChatGPT/other spellchekers before posting them. EulersNumberIsGreat (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EulersNumberIsGreat Thank you for your unrequested advice! I refer you to the first paragraph of my User Page.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]

You created two sections named "Taxonomy. --Altenmann >talk 18:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Altenmann Thanks for pointing that out. I have corrected it. Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Booted warbler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iduna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2025, Vol 11, Issue 5, Nos. 326, 327, 337, 338


Online events:

Announcements (events facilitated by others):

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,269 articles during this period!
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,061,363; 414,126 women)
  • 24 Mar 2025: 20.070% (2,057,083 bios; 412,857 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Those of you who experience harassment while trying to create or improve articles about women
    are welcome to bring your problems to our attention on the Women in Red talk page.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:22, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you didn't win that 4th place prize in April, you certainly deserved it! If you feel like participating in this World one as an editathon, the articles will be fed into the 50,000 Challenge anyway! We have 280 articles in only one day! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 04:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dr. Blofeld Thanks for the invite I will pass this time, I have other wiki personal projects I want to get on with. Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:42, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2025, Vol 11, Issue 6, Nos. 326, 327, 339, 340


Online events:

Announcements:

  • Who are the most overlooked and interesting Women in Red? We've no idea,
    but we're putting together our list of the 100 most interesting ex-Women in Red.
    We are creating the list to celebrate 10 years of Women in Red and we hope to present it at Wikimania.
    We are ignoring the obvious, so do you have a name or subject we should consider?
    Can you suggest a DYK style hook?
    If you are shy about editing that page, you are welcome to add ideas and comments on the talk page.
  • The World Destubathon, 16 June - 13 July, 2025

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,492 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 21 Apr 2025: 20.090% (2,061,363 bios; 414,126 women)

Tip of the month:

  • Every language Wikipedia has its own policies regarding notability and reliable sources.
    Before translating an article from one language Wikipedia into English Wikipedia, research
    the subject and verify that the translated article will meet English Wikipedia's policy requirements.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Maximillian Holly

[edit]

You have created a page for Maximillian Holly which is a redirect to a Wikispecies page which does not exist. Please either add content to the Wikipedia bio or create a Wikispecies bio for Holly. Otherwise, seek to have Holly's Wikipedia bio deleted. Oronsay (talk) 20:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further searching reveals a Wikispecies bio in the name Maximilian Holly, which spells his name with both one and two ls. Oronsay (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should be sorted now. Quetzal1964 (talk) 23:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]

CS1 error on Myleus planquettei

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Myleus planquettei, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Destubathon runs until the 16th of July

[edit]

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:53, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]