User talk:Michri michri

Michri michri, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Michri michri! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help delete template (expand). Thanks you. Limpae (talk) 08:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limpae, I can't understand anything. I am opening the page you mentioned for the first time. Please clarify what you want.--Michri michri (talk) 08:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Personal life section. Limpae (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limpae, done, but why have you told me to do it? I can't remember if we two made any edit earlier in collaboration.--Michri michri (talk) 08:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want it to be better. Limpae (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Limpae, I see, but how did you know my username? I mean, how have you tagged me? Anyway, I have removed the blank section. It really needed to be done.

Michri michri, they are an LTA: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiyenslna. I suggest you ignore them. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robby.is.on, thank you for your assertion. In the meantime, I have issued a warning message to Limpae and informed a veteran editor about him.--Michri michri (talk) 12:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. That's good. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your comments

Hello newcomer, I want to once again welcome you to wikipedia! :-)

May I remind you to always sign your comments? You made an unsigned comment and then when a bot signed your comment you (probably accidentally) removed the signature. Signing comments is easy. All you do is type ~~~~ at the end of your comment.VR _talk 06:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, VR. Actually I generally sign my comment but as I was editing then in mobile screen, I was finding some problems while signing. Generally, I edit from my desktop. And yes, I removed the signature by bot accidententaly. Michri michri (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 10:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSCHOOLS

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:05, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_advice#OS for more guidance. RickH86 (talk) 20:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadashib (Fictional Character) (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. In particular, please read MOS:CURLY and correct your edits accordingly. David Biddulph (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Biddulph, please tell me the particular edit you are speaking of? Otherwise, the matter remains ungraspable to me.Michri michri (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a number in Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character), for example four or more in Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character)#Background. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Actually I was thinking about edits made in published articles. Btw, as the report left by the reviewer in the draft states, the draft violates plaigarism issues. Now, it is not possible for me single-handedly to rewrite keeping the content same. I'll be glad if you, David Biddulph kindly help me in this contextMichri michri (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadashib (Fictional Character) (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sadashib (Fictional Character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 17:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilorv Please mention what kind of improvement the draft needs. Michri michri (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring to earlier version

Regarding your edit summary in this edit, if you enable Twinkle by going to Preferences/Gadgets, there'll be a "restore version" link on diff pages and old revisions. (see photo here). You can restore older versions without having to undo each change. hemantha (brief) 07:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you hemantha, I thought I was ineligible for having the access of the option. Michri michri (talk) 09:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern over Mohammed Shami GA nom

Hi there, I was looking over various GA noms and noticed that there have been recent disputes involving you and a couple of other editors. Ongoing edit wars are an immediate fail under the GA criteria I would just advise you to make sure that any disputes are resolved to avoid this possibility, especially as the people you disagreed with are the ones you have asked to assist with any potential review. Cheers! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

REDMAN 2019, I will try my best, then let the chips fall where they may. I'm a novice to Wiki, morover being a learner, I hardly get scope to edit in Wiki, also this is my first GA nom. Anyway, I will remove the sentence where I wanted help from them. You just tell me what I can do if they keep on to edit-war and make the page unstable. If you can give me some advice, please do so. Gracias.Michri michri (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himadri Kishore Dasgupta (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Himadri Kishore Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Himadri Kishore Dasgupta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 06:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Himadri Kishore Dasgupta (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all references from YouTube, Goodreads, and commercial websites selling his books. Any links to websites that offer free downloads of his books must also be removed (those are presumably copyright violating websites that should not be linked anywhere on Wikipedia.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Himadri Kishore Dasgupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Himadri Kishore Dasgupta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Square Thing

Good afternoon, User:Michri michri. I am Dilip, the editor who wrote [1] this post. My address has changed in last seven days because of storm we had and power lost. I have read your comments at the BST page and at the teahouse page. I have been reading Wikipedia policies and found WP:ENGAGE. BST has ignored our posts and so has failed to discuss the issues as he is required to do by this policy supplement. I was in touch with an administrator called User:Nthep before I posted to BST and had [2] this discussion with the administrator.

I am not confident of taking this to the ANI page. You call that a hornet's nest and I can see why. I am thinking of alerting wikiprojects India, Bengal and IPL. If anyone with experience of site will take this to IPL and make a case, we could then join in. What do you think?

I have also seen [3] BST does not like crore being mentioned. Why, I wonder? Even when the IPL auction is done in crore and sourced to 'Hindu' newspaper, he removes crore and substitutes Australian dollars which 'Hindu' does not mention at all! Before I wrote to Nthep, someone suggested finding old BST edits to show he has always been so arrogant and rude. I went back three years. See what you think of these, all done in a few days and just a sample only, especially the one at Delhi Capitals in 2019: [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

It is not just his rudeness and obvious prejudice that is the problem. It is also his actions because he does not add to articles. He is always taking things out that he doesn't like, even if it has source citations. Editors here are supposed to build the encyclopedia but he is doing opposite.

I may not be here much at all after this weekend. I am a doctor and finally had Covid after two years. I am better now and returning to work Monday. I hope you are well and you look after yourself. 92.31.3.96 (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

92.31.3.96 you are really a 'দেবদূত' to me. May you recover soon and be in the pink of your health and mind. You are much other than the general anonymous users who edit infrequently. So you may log in and create an account in Wikipedia.

Yes, I think rather than taking the issue to ANI page, where I'm not familiar and which is an abysmal delve to me, it can better be taken to project page of IPL or Cricket, where I, myself am a member. You have already raised a no. of issues related to BST, even I myself have experienced most of the issues in the article Mohammed Shami where he converted crores into USD and removed a large chunk of stuff with the least replacement. Also he does n't like Cricinfo site and try to prove the superiority of https://cricketarchive.com/ and https://www.cricket.com.au/ over it.

At the Teahouse, I was told that one can can be blocked only if he or she does not look to build an encyclopedia here. We can trap BST in the charge of breaching the norm.

One thing I can't make out why BST has vacated his talk page. Anyway, let him do whatever he likes. Now, let me see and take part in the discussion [12]. Please tell me what our next plan will be. Shall I report all these in ANI or in the Wiki project of Cricket or IPL? Sorry for responding late. ধন্যবাদ. আমরা ভারতীয়, আমরা বাঙালি.

Michri michri (talk) 09:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, Michri michri, this is Dilip and I hope you are well. I am sorry to be unavailable yesterday and sorry again for another new address but two more power cuts. Not weather this time, it is sunny and fine here. Though very cold.

I do not think our administrator can act alone in case like this. Unilaterally they said. I wrote to administrator for advice and did not expect them to act. So that is fair enough. I believe we must go to WP:ANI because I have given the BST comment to people I know including white British friends and all say it is racist. In England now there is Take The Knee and widespread condemnation of racism. And then it is here on Wikipedia, a marvellous site, being dragged into gutter by experienced editor who is I think English.

I am not expert in workings of Wikipedia. It is complicated. I think we should alert the IPL, India and Bengal projects as people there are directly impacted by insults. There is also I have found WP:BLM for Black Lives Matter and to combat racism.

Recent actions by BST can be explained as you have said to administrator. I think WP:ENGAGE failure indicates something and I am glad I have found that though administrator does advise me it is not a policy.

Problem for me now is time because I return to work tomorrow morning. I was back yesterday for briefing and catch up and tests after Covid. I will have very little time for this after today. And because I have little time I prefer to not begin an account here but thanking you for the invitation. I will write to projects now as next step and give them links.

আপনাকে আমার অনেক অনেক শুভেচ্ছা.

79.73.31.28 (talk) 11:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

আমায় দয়া করি আপনি বলবেন না, আপনার মতো দেবতুল্য মানুষের নিকট আমি সামান্যমাত্র,বয়সে তো বটেই। উইকিপিডিয়ার এই অচেনা দুর্গে আপনি আমার একমাত্র পরিজনসম।

Anyway, had I have the chance of writing entirely in Bengali, I would have done that but not doing so to make aware the other users aware of our discussion. Yes, I think we have wasted enough time in discussing the issue with the administrator. Even a little naive child can make out that this is a crystal clear example of racism. Now, the time has come. Just tell me whether the issue will be reported both at ANI and Cricketer project simultaneously or one after another? And who will post the issue first, me or you?-Michri michri (talk) 13:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am thinking it might best be coming from you as a member of site with established account. I have often seen that people using IP addresses are treated with suspicion. But I will most certainly join with you. I have written to each of projects BLM, India and Bengal to seek more advice. Sorry, but I must go now as I have visitors but will return soon today. 79.73.31.28 (talk) 13:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'll add the stuff in the Cricket Project Page. Michri michri (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Dilip, some unknown yet unwanted problem is occuring while trying to add the content to the [13]. Please revert my edits there and add the stuff. Please.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 16:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Michri michri. Thank you. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 20:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 22:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michri michri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not given any time of responding in the probe. I was encouraged to edit in Wikipedia by my teacher. I am really feeling hapless. The similarities of my edit with the other already blocked user may be a co-incidence. Considering the no of users currently active in Wikipedia, such kind of co-incidence may occur. So please unblock me and allow me to take part in the ANI discussion with Dr. Dilip. Thank you Michri michri (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soutut. Yamla (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michri michri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will me be unblocked or shall I create a new account and carry on doing sock puppetry? If the request is denied, I'll perhaps chose the second option. And AssociateAffiliate my dear, how dare you call me a 'CLOWN'? Mind your language. Be careful and look before you leap. OK, my dear?

Decline reason:

Since you are going to continue to engage in sockpuppetry, there is nothing else to discuss here. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Michri michri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, really sorry for my previous unblock request. I acknowledge that the kind of abuse I have done while editing is really unforgivable, but if not unblocked, please make the block a definite one, with the time period mentioned. Indefinite (read infinite) block is really unbearale. Sory again. Request reviewer, please make my block definite. I have made out my guilt and promise that I will not do this kind of abuse again. Michri michri (talk) 09:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You mean no way of getting unblocked from this account? Am I too foolish to make repeated unblock requests from my previous account which I really want to forget as the account is filled with some silly chats, rather than creating a new and fresh one? Michri michri (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]