User talk:Mondayudowong

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mondayudowong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Mondayudowong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "EyeBall Concept Group". The reason given for EyeBall Concept Group's block is: "".

Blocking administrator: ‪Cullen328‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: You should be able to edit now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mondayudowong (talk) 06:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Greg Selkoe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mondayudowong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for the useful resources. Mondayudowong (talk) 18:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XSET (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads too promotionally.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XSET and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XSET, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mondayudowong! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SK2242 (talk) 12:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dennis J. Selkoe has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dennis J. Selkoe. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, David Goodman. Thanks for reviewing the article and dropping a comment. Alright, I understand and will rework the article right away. Mondayudowong (talk) 07:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dennis J. Selkoe has been accepted

Dennis J. Selkoe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThatWasEpic (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources that cover this YouTuber's career in detail, not from own videos or news clips where they just refer to a video or two of theirs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ThatWasEpic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ThatWasEpic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:38, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ThatWasEpic has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ThatWasEpic. Thanks! Pahunkat (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThatWasEpic (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I see seven references from YouTube. Not only is YouTube not a reliable source, using it in this manner is considered WP:OR. I don't see any reliable sources that would allow this draft to meet WP:ANYBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ThatWasEpic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ThatWasEpic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XSET (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

No non-trivial changes made since last submission (many changes seem to have been reverted shortly before submission).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XSET and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XSET, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThatWasEpic (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyebeller was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ThatWasEpic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ThatWasEpic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyebeller 15:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airrack (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airrack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Airrack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 16:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XSET (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XSET and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:XSET, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sydney Talker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sydney Talker. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 17:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sydney Talker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sydney Talker. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sydney Talker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sydney Talker. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sydney Talker (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:ENT isn’t satisfied at the moment

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sydney Talker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sydney Talker, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Evading a block

What you are doing by registering a new account to perpetuate UPE is called block evasion, your earliest edits betray your identity as one quite familiar with the collaborative project. Now could you explain why you are recreating and trying to move to mainspace article's such as Draft:Sydney Talker which has been repeatedly created by blocked socks & also Draft:Dremo which coincidentally also has been created severally by now blocked socks This is a very convenient coincidence if you ask me. Celestina007 (talk) 01:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m going ahead to decline both articles at the AFC. Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Celestina. I appreciate your interest in my edits. However, you should know I joined Wikipedia for the first time 5 months ago. I don't know what words to use in defending myself as I see you think I registered a new account just to recreate deleted articles.

No, that is not true. I joined Wikipedia recently and as a Nigerian, I noticed a lot of notable Nigerians do not have Wikipedia pages that talk about them. I volunteered my time to researching and possibly making articles about them. Me recreating an already declined page is just a mere coincidence. Please ask me any questions so I can better explain myself, as I literally have no connections with the blocked socks being listed for Draft:Sydney Talker and Draft:Dremo. Mondayudowong (talk) 01:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please look deeper into this. I'm not familiar with the project and I definitely haven't had an account on Wikipedia before. I love the idea behind Wikipedia and I hope my identify isn't mistaken for that of a blocked user. Mondayudowong (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dremo (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

undefined

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dremo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dremo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dremo (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dremo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dremo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:CANVASS & WP:FORUMSHOP

what you are doing here, here, here, here & here is canvassing & forum shopping which does next to nothing to land credibility to your claims rather you are walking the thin line of disruptive editing which would invariably earn you a block. Celestina007 (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we learn new things about Wikipedia everyday. Thanks for letting me know. Mondayudowong (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Come on dude, we both know you aren’t learning “anything new” you already know not to canvass, so please just stop trying to act a NEWBIE and learn to follow the rules, it’s not Collatz Conjecture or The Riemann Hypothesis for crying out loud! just follow the rules! but if it is your wish to get an indef block on this account (I can make that wish come true) but if not please just follow the rules, if you are writing on a person you know, you state so, if you are going to accept financial rewards or have already received such, you just state so. If you have been indef blocked before in a previous account,(which I suspect strongly here) you should stop editing immediately and request for an unblock after 6 - 12 months with the previous account of yours. Just follow the rules! Celestina007 (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's honestly not what you think. I'm 19 years old and I work as a professional player on Call of Duty Mobile. I haven't had any experience before with Wikipedia until 5 months ago. I write once in a while and have been able to build up some skill as a writer. When I learnt anyone can write on Wikipedia, I decided to join. My only reason for joining is to be able to contribute to the community and maybe when I'm older, be one of the notable authors around here. I'm sorry I violated the rules you mentioned. I honestly had no idea. I just want to be able to do things right here and having my account blocked isn't gonna help me do that.Are we allowed to share our socials here? If we are, I can share with you my socials so you know I am who I say I am. Mondayudowong (talk) 17:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

lol just drop the act man, we both know that would be considered or at least would constitute outing & at this rate I’m no longer interested in this back and forth. Goodluck. Celestina007 (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please, can we not drop the issue just yet? I really feel the need to clear your doubt.But first, I honestly need to understand something. So, draft pages with the names, "Dremo" and "Sydney Talker" were once created but deleted in the past, right? The creators also violated the rules and had their accounts banned too. I need to know. Does this mean other users cannot recreate the pages after the subject acquires notability.Mondayudowong (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If users are allowed to recreate drafts, then why are you thinking I'm acting newbie and running a Sock Puppet account? I'm finding this to be very confusing. Mondayudowong (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course they can be created but not from an editor who has a shady history. Furthermore if you really want to the Dremo article to be created, you can always include their name in WP:RA & it would created. Celestina007 (talk) 18:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Celestina. I understand. Mondayudowong (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Almost 24hours past & you still haven’t requested for the Dremo article to be created. What happened? Oh well, you aren’t obliged to reply this message. Celestina007 (talk) 17:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mondayudowong. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: XSET (March 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not notable and far too new. Take a look at WP:TOOSOON.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:45, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sydney Talker

Hello, Mondayudowong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sydney Talker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dremo

Hello, Mondayudowong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dremo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XSET

Hello, Mondayudowong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XSET, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sydney Talker

Hello, Mondayudowong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sydney Talker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dremo

Hello, Mondayudowong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dremo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:55, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XSET

Hello, Mondayudowong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XSET".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 16:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XSET

Hello, Mondayudowong. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XSET".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ThatWasEpic

Hello, Mondayudowong. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ThatWasEpic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]