User talk:NatalieEmma.BYU

October 2022

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Leonora Cannon Taylor, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Materialscientist. I'm sorry! This is my first day of work, so I forgot to explain why on that edit. I looked at the source and there was nothing that says that Leonora Taylor was rebaptized. If you think I read the source wrong, please show me where on the source you found that information. I also noticed that all of my edits were removed. Can you please restore them? I spent a lot of time on them and added a new source.

Best,

Natalie Natalie.Reese.BYU (talk) 22:44, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Leonora cannon taylor portrait.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Leonora cannon taylor portrait.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835-1870

Hello! Your submission of A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835-1870 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nizil (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mormonism and polygamy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Binksternet. Thank you for reaching out to me. Could you please share an example of when I added commentary, my own point of view, or my own personal analysis to the Mormonism and polygamy article? I have been careful to not write anything without a source, but if I forgot to cite a sentence, I will fix it immediately. Please let me know. Thank you! NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 23:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The warning template I used puts standard boilerplate text on to your talk page. The problem I had with your editing activity was a non-neutral removal.

There are Mormons who practice polygamy. The fact that the church's official position doesn't support polygamy any more is not a good reason for removing the extensive section about it, with well-cited, essential information. You were whitewashing the issue, which is not neutral. Binksternet (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am sorry about that. I absolutely did not mean to whitewash polygamy. I simply removed the section because I think that the section fits better on the Sealing (Mormonism) page and none of the sources cited in the section mention polygamy (rather, they are about marriages, divorce, and re-marraige when a spouse dies). I do, however, understand how "Reasons for Polygamy" subsection applies to this page and I was in the process of adding the information from that section into a bigger subsection with other teachings of the Mormon church about polygamy. NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 00:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You removed "Some described polygamy as a form of slavery. Mormon women were seen as oppressed, abused, and trapped in polygamy. Sensational and often violent novels provided fictional stories about polygamy which fueled the public's dislike for the practice and Mormons." These were cited to a scholarly book.

You removed "One author notes that the geographic distance between Mormons and non-Mormons allowed anti-Mormons to make "wild and unfounded claims" about plural marriage. Another reason for the strong bias against polygamy was because of the political power that Mormons (especially polygamist Mormons) wielded in Utah and other places." These were cited to another scholarly book. These removals of yours were what I was looking at.

Regarding the section "Reasons for polygamy" which I unintentionally restored, I will revert myself and take it back out. The cited sources are primary ones, not suitable for analysis which requires WP:SECONDARY sources. Binksternet (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what happened. If I removed them, it was an accident that I was not aware of because I wrote and researched both of those sections and actually added them back in a few minutes ago when I saw they were no longer on the page. I have both of the books that I got that information from next to me right now. I am very sorry for the confusion. I certainly did not mean to remove them considering that I had recently written them. I'm really not sure how I unintentionally removed those sections. Thank you for making me aware of the removal. I appreciate it! NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 01:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP BYU Invite

BRIGHAM NEEDS YOU!

Hello, Brother Brigham here.

I couldn't help but notice that you've made some edits to articles about Brigham Young University and thought you might want to become a member of the BYU WikiProject. We're reviving the project and would love your help! To join simply add your name to the participant list and start working on something from the To-do list. If you need any help, don't hesitate to ask another project member.

See you soon!

Jmjosh90 06:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, NatalieEmma.BYU. Thank you for your work on Elfie Caroline Huntington. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article on a woman photographer. It was fascinating to learn about her. I added a section on some of the permanent collections that hold her work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! That is a great addition to the page. I am currently working on a page for Joseph Bagley. I am planning on publishing it tomorrow and will be sure to add the information about the permanent collections. Thanks again! NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw you nominated the article for DYK, I'm sure it will be approved and promoted, as the subject was a fascinating and courageous woman with an alternative life style for her time. Hurray for brave, creative women. It's nice to meet you here, and I look forward to seeing your other article creations. Happy editing! Netherzone (talk) 19:23, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thoroughly enjoyed learning about her and seeing her work! Thank you again for your help and kindness. It's nice to meet you as well.NatalieEmma.BYU (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870

On 25 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a book about Mormon polygamy claims that polygamy was an early form of feminism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835-1870. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Elfie Caroline Huntington

Hello! Your submission of Elfie Caroline Huntington at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Softlavender (talk) 02:49, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, NatalieEmma.BYU, and thanks for all the excellent work you have been doing on articles about women. It seems to me you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you are interested, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In any case, I look forward to more contributions on historical women. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elfie Caroline Huntington

On 15 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elfie Caroline Huntington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elfie Caroline Huntington (pictured) took photos of turn-of-the-century Utah's darker side such as drunks and fights, while her husband Joseph Daniel Bagley was a portrait photographer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elfie Caroline Huntington. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elfie Caroline Huntington), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

women in history

Thank you for quality articles about influential wome in history, beginning with Leonora Cannon Taylor, followed by Susa Young Gates and Elfie Caroline Huntington, for A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870, for collaboration, - Natalie Emma, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2859 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph Daniel Bagley

On 15 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Daniel Bagley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elfie Caroline Huntington (pictured) took photos of turn-of-the-century Utah's darker side such as drunks and fights, while her husband Joseph Daniel Bagley was a portrait photographer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elfie Caroline Huntington. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Daniel Bagley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A hearty thank you

I went to create A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women's Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870 and was pleasantly surprised to find an excellent article had been written since the last time I checked. Thank you for your work in expanding the coverage of LDS on the wiki. Do you have plans to make an article for Flake's The Politics of American Religious Identity: The Seating of Senator Reed Smoot or Reeve's Religion of a Different Color? Both are on my (overly long) page of articles to create but having seen your work at A House Full of Females I think you would do a rather excellent job. I also wouldn't be shy about expanding your editing beyond LDS topics, your work is of above average quality and any topic area would benefit from your efforts. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]