User talk:Nellyhan
Welcome!
|
Nellyhan, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Nellyhan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC) |
I see nothing wrong with the sources. Please discuss in talk:Ahn Sahng-hong. See WP:BRD. You can open a ticket in WP:BLPN to get administrator eyes on this if you wish. Jim1138 (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
3O
[edit]Hi Nellyhan. I've added the 3O in the article's talkpage that you've requested. ----- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mischief7 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your 3O Mischief7. -Nellyhan (talk) 06:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Misuse of 3O. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 18:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Please explain how you came to choose user:Mischief7 for a third opinion. Keep in mind that if you do not answer, or do not tell the truth, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Floquenbeam. I've replied. Thanks. -Nellyhan (talk) 06:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Birch (bishop) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- '''Bishop Peter Birch''' HDip, MA, was the [[Catholic]] [[Bishop]] of ppOssory]] from 1964 to 1981. Born on September 4, 1911 in Jenkinstown in Co. Kilkenny to a farming family,
- family, he was educated at [[St. Kieran's College]], [[Kilkenny]] and ppSt. Patrick's College]], Maynooth where he was ordained in 1937,<ref>[http://www.kilkennypeople.ie/news/kilkenny-news/a-
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nellyhan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis - 2¢ 22:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC) |
I've extended this block to one month. I am certain that you are the same person as User:Mischief7, and you pretended to be the same person in a discussion to add artificial weight to your claims (which brazenly included accusing another editor of socking). That is dishonest. When this block expires, you are welcome to edit again, but confine yourself to one account. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Nellyhan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi Floquenbeam. I am NOT Mischief7. I never pretended or did anything to add artificial weight to my claims. What's your problem? Do you own this place? I notice that Sam Sailor deleted everything what I've stated in the Administrator's board. Does he also own this place? I have stated that I created Vanessaliam long time ago. And I haven't used this ID to edit the article that Jim1138 stated about. I mentioned that I couldn't sign in so I created Willsturn and Maintain1 to edit. I haven't done anything. I just edited, deleted the unreliable information. I have stated out my reasons, then Sam Sailor reverted without mentioning why he reverted. I reverted because he stated no reasons why he reverted my edit. He just said "restored tons of materials." Then suddenly Jim1138 appears and reverts my edit, adding more references and information without stating his reasons. I asked him why he added without stating his reasons, and he said that he edited a year ago. If you check the history of the article Ahn_Sahng-hong, you see that Jim1138 never edited this article before. We can see who is using multiple IDs for their own benefit. I asked him why he lied that he edited this article a year ago, and he didn't reply but just got me blocked. I don't understand why you are just listening to him and not my opinion. I have asked Mischief7 because that User was one of the persons that I welcomed before using my ID Vanessaliam. I wanted someone who was not related to this article. Please listen to both opinions and views and don't use your authority without even confirming properly. -Nellyhan (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In your above unblock request you explain that you have created 3 accounts, which are Vanessaliam, Willsturn, and Maintain1. However, given they have edited the same articles, this is considered sock puppetry, and in this context, I am declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 08:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nellyhan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
So you think Sam Sailor or Jim1138 are reasonable to revert and add references without stating any reasons and lie about editing "a year ago"? Nellyhan (talk) 10:03 am, Today (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.