User talk:Nl5836

question about Peter Navarro

Hi, you undid one of my changes over on the Trump cabinet page.[1] The reason I crossed him out, was because he has been named White House National Trade Council director, a new position. I don't think one person can head the CEA, and also head the new NTC, but I could be wrong? If you have info that Navarro is still in the running for CEA, please let me know. I'll leave it deleted in the meanwhile, since I don't know 100% what is happening. Thanks, 47.222.203.135 (talk) 00:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if nobody has mentioned it, you can send me a message by clicking User_talk:47.222.203.135, clicking edit, and then typing something. Wikipedia has all the latest 1999 technology, obviously :-) 47.222.203.135 (talk) 00:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

So far as I can tell, all the images you uploaded recently are copyright violations, and all the images you uploaded in the past have been deleted as copyright violations. You must stop violating Wikipedia policies regarding copyrighted images. If you do not, your editing privileges will be suspended or revoked. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary A. Blair

The article Gary A. Blair has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mahveotm (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary A. Blair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary A. Blair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary A. Blair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 17:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Garcia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Garcia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Garcia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Health and Welfare ‖ 17:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary A. Blair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 17:53, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gary A. Blair, you may be blocked from editing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:41, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Bob Garcia, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Bob Garcia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 21:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Clint P. Johnson

Hello, Nl5836,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Clint P. Johnson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clint P. Johnson .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Masiarcyzk, Sr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Masiarcyzk, Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Masiarcyzk, Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 05:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dennis Mulder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Mulder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Mulder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alvin Moore, Sr.

The article Alvin Moore, Sr. has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ochib (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with John Masiarcyzk, Sr.. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —Non-Dropframe _talk 20:33, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Bob Garcia, you may be blocked from editing. —Non-Dropframe _talk 20:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Clint P. Johnson. —Non-Dropframe _talk 20:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to John Masiarcyzk, Sr. has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Basilica of Mary, Queen of the Universe seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 17:33, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political appointments of Donald Trump

Hello Nl5836 on the Political appointments of Donald Trump under Independent Agencies can you please add Archivist of the United States National Archives and Records Administration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivist_of_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and_Records_Administration

And United States Postmaster General it's logo is the United States Postal Service logo https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Earthscent&action=edit&section=new

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postmaster_General

        Thanks so much!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby232332 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Aajdg.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Aajdg.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, especially when reverting

Please use edit summaries when you make edits. This is even more critical when reverting another editor's edit. It is considered highly impolite to not explain to not explain your reasoning when doing so, either through the edit summary or (preferably) through an edit summary and a note on the article talk page. Neutrality^talk 23:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leon Bunch Entertainers

Hello Nl5836,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Leon Bunch Entertainers for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alvin Moore, Sr.

Hello, Nl5836,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Alvin Moore, Sr. should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin Moore, Sr. .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nl5836. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Catholic Diocese of Orlando, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages All Souls and Corpus Christi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida) (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nl5836! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:All Souls Catholic Church (Sanford, Florida) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://allsoulssanford.org/history. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heidi Herzberg

The article Heidi Herzberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage of the subject in RS beyond mere mentions and articles establishing that they were elected to the position of mayor. Per WP:NPOLITICIAN, politicians below the state level are not considered automatically notable unless they also meet other notability guidelines, which this subject does not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]