User talk:Pbdesh01

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pbdesh01[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Pbdesh01 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I noticed that in this edit to Raghunath Anant Mashelkar, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe _talk 17:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references at all. The draft needs a lot of cleanup: The photo gallery is completely redundant, the infobox text has been formatted in blue to look like fake wikilinks, only real links are supposed to be blue text. The infobox also contains many non-notable names that must be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pbdesh01, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving drafts[edit]

Hi! I moved your article back into drafts. Please wait for approval before moving it into main space again! Thanks. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Pbdesh01. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 23:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help:CS1 errors[edit]

Please do not re-post an article at Help:CS1 errors, as that is one of the help pages. I have undone your edit. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Removing an AfD template (for any reason) as well as maintenance templates without resolving them is considered disruptive. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 15:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 17:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande, you may be blocked from editing. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 12:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Pradeep Bapusaheb Deshpande. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 13:30, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pradeep with childhood friends.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pradeep with childhood friends.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pradeep Family Photo.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pradeep Family Photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greek GROUP PHOTO.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Greek GROUP PHOTO.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MEDITATION PHOTO W PBD.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MEDITATION PHOTO W PBD.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krishna Madappa and Prof. Deshpande.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krishna Madappa and Prof. Deshpande.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Home where Pradeep Grew Up.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Home where Pradeep Grew Up.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PBDeshpande.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:PBDeshpande.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (t • c) 02:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:RTV CTV Lima Peru 21 10 2012.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RTV CTV Lima Peru 21 10 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coimbatore Workshop Photo.jpg[edit]

The file File:Coimbatore Workshop Photo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:HH Pope Francis Photo Signature.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:HH Pope Francis Photo Signature.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:52, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]