User talk:Poshpaddy
|
Dppowell (talk) 21:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
I noticed your edits to the article Newgrange. Wikipedia isn't a place to advertise your company or business, and any advertising content will be deleted. Thank you. Queenie Talk 21:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Tuam. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. dougweller (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit] Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Dublin worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. ww2censor (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
[edit]Hi. As other editors have noted before (above), Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Nor is it a collection of promotional links. Please don't add links to hotels, B&Bs and the like - as it represents SPAM. Persistent spamming may result in a block. Guliolopez (talk) 16:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
*.galway-ireland.ie
[edit]Hi. If you persist in adding links to this site (or any other site created by western-webs.com which you add purely for promotional reasons) then I will be moving for galway-ireland.ie (and any other western-webs.com websites) to be added to a spam blacklist. And will be requesting that you be blocked for abuse of editing privileges. Guliolopez (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Your edits in Westport, County Mayo
[edit]Hi Poshpaddy, please do not add promotional links and please do not add statements like "has hosted many prestigious events" without being able to back them up through references. Please understand that I had to revert these edits in this article. Cheers, AFBorchert (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 15:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
|
Hello! Poshpaddy,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Callanecc (talk) 08:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:46, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: iDonate (July 13)
[edit]Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate
[edit]
Hello Poshpaddy. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "iDonate".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/iDonate}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: IDonate (Ireland) has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
ThaddeusB (talk) 17:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of ICrowdFund
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ICrowdFund, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ICrowdFund
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ICrowdFund requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit] Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —Unforgettableid (talk) 02:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit] Hello, Poshpaddy. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Alan Coyne, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:51, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your advise and support. I am interested in contributing to Wikipedia as I now have the time on my hands to research the articles. I am still learning and appreciate any advise offered.
Poshpaddy Poshpaddy (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of TENDO (The Giving App)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on TENDO (The Giving App), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 06:40, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Persistent promotion
[edit]Hi. While I noted recently an implication that perhaps there was a question of "learning the ropes", I wanted to reinforce that it has been 6 years (almost to the day) since I first raised concerns about using Wikipedia to promote websites or projects by Western Webs. Previously it was a case of adding links to loosely associated articles (which intended to promote websites created by Western Webs - ie WP:LINKSPAM).
More recently I see that other editors have raised concerns about the creation of articles with which you might have a close association, or which might otherwise be somewhat "promotional" in nature - ie (WP:PROMO or SELF-PROMOTION)
While mature project contributors will strive to assume the best of intentions, one would frankly wonder whether - after six years - there is a fundamental disconnect in understanding (willful or otherwise) about what the Wikipedia project is about.
To be clear: Unless we are to consider what other options might be available, I would strongly recommend avoiding creating articles on subjects with which you have a close association and recommend considering whether your project contributions have the best intentions for Wikipedia in mind - or some other intention. (Because, to my eyes, the lee-way of AgF is all but gone here - and it seems pretty clear that there is an intent to use the project for promotional reasons - in a manner which is not appropriate.) Guliolopez (talk) 10:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- You might also want to read Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement for why editors will feel strongly about this type of thing. Guliolopez (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Gulio,
I have been registered with Wikipedia for a number of years, but have largely been inactive.
I have not added a page until recently.
I am familiar with Western Webs and have a keen interest in fundraising.
I will refrain from updating anything involving Western Webs.
I notice lots of areas in my community that could be improved on Wipipedia.
This is my motivation.
I apologise for wasting your time.
Thank you for your suggestions.
Kind regards, Poshpaddy (talk) 11:12, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Poshpaddy. RE "I am familiar with Western Webs". In honesty I think this is an understated declaration of interest. Pretty much every change would seem (in some way) to be related to sites or interests of Western Webs. Whether they are relatively small things (like adding promo links to an article on a local politician or restaurant listings for Westport), or relatively larger things (like creating entire pages on local interest subjects) invariably there's a "Built by Western Webs" style footer in the websites linked from the subject. To the extent that it's fairly clear that the core intent was promotional in nature. You are of course more than welcome to edit the project in a neutral and productive way (whether in the areas of fundraising or charity or whatever interests you). But, however "well meaning" it may be, you need to stop editing in the service of other interests - so I am happy to hear you say you will respect those core project tenets. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Gulio, I totally understand that I have over-stepped the mark in the past. I promise to be more neutral in my comments. I feel I have lot to offer with local content. I will review what I have already done and attempt to rectify.
Thank you for your patience.
Kind regards, Poshpaddy (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Action Tuam for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Action Tuam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Tuam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 19:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Continued discussion on one of the points raised in Afd
[edit]On the Action Tuam AfD you had indicated that "If key tenets of the project are not being followed a more welcoming approach might be to suggest the correct procedure". Again, apologies if some of the previous notes (elsewhere and on your talk page above) weren't as clear as they might have been. I had thought that I'd linked some of the best practice guidelines (and firmer rules) as they relate to these areas - but perhaps I could have been clearer.
While you are of course more than welcome to contribute content on the charity sector (which I note you have been doing and is obviously an area of interest to you), what you do need to be mindful of are the WP:PROMO and WP:COI guidelines. Absolutely the project will benefit from any expertise you have in the area. So, please do work away on creating or extending articles on the charity sector.
However, please do think about whether any new articles meet the notability guidelines. Or indeed whether it's appropriate to highlight any "close associations" that other editors might need to be aware of.
(Finally, while I've said this before, I want to stress that the community will take a very dim view of using Wikipedia to promote or link traffic to sites with which you have an interest. I think it has been pretty clear that the practice of adding links to existing articles for Restaurants.ie, galway-ireland.ie, seancanney.com and similar sites (all of which I would note were developed by Western Webs) is not appropriate under WP:LINKSPAM guidelines. I would also caution against a practice in which, once Western Webs completes a project for a customer, an associated "parallel" article is created in Wikipedia - where the link to the "new" website created by Western Webs seems to have some prominence (as has been the case for Action Tuam, Tuam Golf Club, and others). This falls under WP:ARTICLESPAM and is not normally something the community looks favorably upon.)
In general, if you're looking for any details on the "correct procedure", there are great resources available under the WP:FIVEPILLARS guidelines and HELP:GUIDE on core policies. Otherwise, if you have questions, you can drop a note on my talkpage. (Or indeed on the New contributors' help page).
All the best. Guliolopez (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Julio,
thank you for coming back to me.
I would like to think we could move on and maybe we both learned something from the discussion.
Just a few points :
- the links I added in the past to restaurants.ie and galway-ireland.ie are in the past. I learned some time back that this was not the right thing to do.
- Western Webs manage over 500 websites in the West of Ireland. From time to time there were projects that I felt were worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Action Tuam and Tuam Golf Club were two of those. I still feel strongly that both are noteworthy. Both are non-profits with no monetary gain for anyone, other that to document something on interest in the community that others may be interested in. That was my motivation.
- I have been a Wiki editor for some time (basic updates), but I have very limited experience in adding new pages. I have learned a lot from the recent articles about criteria for inclusion.
- Citations / references can be difficult as the credible press in Ireland are mostly subscription based. Plus, pre 2005 there were not many Irish websites cataloging news items.
- I thought a Stub was a skeleton page where others could add more detail and improve the page. I am still a bit vague on this.
- If you ever come to Ireland, I will buy you a Guinness.
Kind regards Poshpaddy (talk) 17:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- As Corcaigh mé (riarthóir faoi thionscadail eile le fada an lá). "Murphys" domsa dá bhrí :) Guliolopez (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Nice one Boy. Up the rebels. Drop me an email pcoyne@ebook.ie Poshpaddy (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Official Action Tuam Logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Official Action Tuam Logo.jpg, which you've attributed to Action Tuam. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Poshpaddy (June 19)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Poshpaddy/sandbox/Poshpaddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- You do know that you don't need permission to create your own userpage? Per WP:UPYES, you can just create this yourself. By adding the AfC template you were actually triggering a request for a Wikipedia "article" that covered you and your experience. In short, pages in the article namespace need to follow guidelines and be notable and whatnot. Pages that you create in your own user namespace can largely be as you wish for yourself. (Perhaps adding the AfC was an error? But you can add that content to User:Poshpaddy whenever you want yourself)? Guliolopez (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Thank you Gulio. I just wanted to have a User page to introduce myself and be totally anonymous. I though I was using the correct process. What do I do to correct this.? Poshpaddy (talk) 18:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Hi Gulio, when does the discussion on Action Tuam AfD conclude.? It is clear that those commenting see it as notable. It takes away from the article having a question mark hang over it. As a Cork man you are probably familiar with the Mallow sugar factory. The impact of the closure of the sugar factory in Tuam was huge and Action Tuam was by far the best thing that came out of it. Poshpaddy (talk) 08:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- See the relevant docs at WP:CLOSEAFD. An admin will review and close the discussion in due course. (Note that this will not be based on a "vote", but based on the arguments made relative to guidelines. As highlighted by one of the other discussion contributors, a closing admin may chose to give consideration to any discussion contributions affected by WP:SPA or similar issues. If you feel the discussion can be closed sooner, you could consider contacting an admin to close. Guliolopez (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Poshpaddy/sandbox/Poshpaddy
[edit]Hello, Poshpaddy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/Poshpaddy".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm talk 16:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Poshpaddy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Beechtree Park Logo 250.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned file, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Tendo Giving Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned file, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
The file File:ICrowdFund Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned file, no foreseeable use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Poshpaddy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Poshpaddy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IDonate (Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E-sign (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |