User talk:Pranav251216

February 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rowdy Rathore has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rowdy Rathore was changed by Pranav251216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863781 on 2018-02-13T04:29:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sapne Suhane Ladakpan Ke was changed by Pranav251216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881033 on 2018-02-13T04:36:57+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Pranav251216. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Meet Mukhi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:52, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pranav251216, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 11:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hi, when editing the edit source of an article there is a quick way to add web references: first add the url such as http://www.abc.com/review and add ref brackets like this < >with the word ref inserted between the brackets at the front of the url and add the brackets < > with the word /ref inserted between the brackets at the end of the url. Then go to the refill tool here add the article name, tick use base domain and untick dont use accessdates then press enter and the reference will be filled in. If you add lots of references you only need to use refill once to finish it, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 08:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kritika Sharma

Hello, Pranav can you please created an article about an Indian television actress name Kritika Sharma She worked on Colors show Thapki Pyar Ki as Tina/Thapi's Daughter in 2017 OK thank you,

2405:204:C68B:CF4E:0:0:1B65:C0A4 (talk) 04:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising only account, undisclosed COI, likely violation of WP:PAID.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 06:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not and will not indulge in disruptive editing. When did I do editing advertising?

Decline reason:

This is a duplicate. Please see below --Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't seem to break any wikipedia guidelines Pranav251216 (talk) 07:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:PROMO, WP:COI, WP:PAID, for starters. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wikipedia administrators please forgive me, I am not properly informed in which article I did edits that violates wikipedia policies. I am not hired by anyone, I am just 17 years old and yet to complete my studies. I promise that I will be very very careful and think twice before doing edits in the future.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, I cannot unlock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail what edits you will not make and what edits you will make. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely understand the reason for which I may have blocked. I will not make edits that affects neutral point of view. I will not violate WP:COI. Also I suspect that my account may be blocked because of another user in my IP range.

Decline reason:

You say what you won't do, but we also need to know what you will do if you are unblocked. As such, I must decline this request. This block also prevents you from registering another username from your IP, that is why the IP is blocked. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to contribute to wikipedia. I see typos in many articles. I will add citations to unsourced content. I completely understand will not violate WP:COI and WP:PAID Pranav251216 (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below, you will not be unblocked while you are abusing multiple accounts (see WP: Sock puppetry). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request comes right after I blocked the sock -- Guru3397 which continued the same behavior. If these frivolous and deceptive unblock requests continue then your talk page privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 15:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive me about the sock puppet. I totally agree that it was me. All I wanted was a second chance. I am really sorry for taking it through a sock puppet. I won't do disruptive editing. I am eager to do constructive edits and make Wikipedia a better place. Pranav251216 (talk) 15:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked on Wikipedia a few weeks ago. I made several unsuccessful unblock requests as I was unaware of reason for the block. I created a sock puppet called Guru3397. The sockpuppet was also blocked yesterday. I agree that I have made a big mistake. But please forgive me. I totally understand the wikipedia WP:COI and WP:PAID policies and will not violate them. I am not employed by anyone to edit on Wikipedia. I have also requested for deletion of my sock puppet. I want to make conservative edits to wikipedia like fixing typos, adding citations from reliable sources. I will also improve my articles by adding more references. Please give me a second chance.

Decline reason:

Continuing to sock while you are blocked shows this request is not genuine. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The socking continues -- Shogun2001. I'm revoking talk page access now. —SpacemanSpiff 15:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pranav251216 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21309 was submitted on Apr 23, 2018 03:06:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spotlight: Room Escape moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Spotlight: Room Escape, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Spotlight: Room Escape

Hello, Pranav251216. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spotlight: Room Escape".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 11:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]