User talk:Rowlan

Welcome to my official Talk Page! If you post something stupid like "Welcome, here are the five pillars of...blah blah blah" I'll probably delete it. Have the gumption (I was going to say, balls, but that might be offensive to women and men who have had heavy machinery accidents) to leave a real message. Oh yes, and please put a heading with your message...it makes it easier to navigate... Cheers,

Rowlan 15:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the Rugby Super League

Do you know if the Rugby Super League is semi-pro or completely ameture?--Snoopy753 16:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your help. I am new to the sport in the US despite the fact that I am a life long NYer. I have been watching for years (mostly international matches). This upcoming season I will be playing for the Village Lions RFC in NYC. Anyway, best of luck in the upcoming season.--Snoopy753 12:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==ello aright mate...Stuey here (of the RoyalBlue variety). Just dropped by to say hello. C'mon Waterloo!!!!! RoyalBlueStuey 09:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

G'day mate

G'day mate, realised you're a rugby fan, would you be interested in joining WikiProject AFL? Cheers, Rogerthat 00:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rowlan

Hi Rowlan. In response to your questions (I've numbered them in the same way):

Technically, O'Rothlain isn't a true anglicized name. It's the original Irish name, spelt in the style of Irish names in the English language (i.e. using an apostrophe after the O and not using diacritics - and as you probably know from your own research, pronounced "oh roh-len/oh rowlan" in Irish). Books and websites etc written in English on Irish genealogy (especially those originating outside of Ireland) often tend to avoid using Irish language diacritics on names, mostly for stylistic reasons. Compare the contemporary comedian Dara Ó Briain, who is usually credited as Dara O Briain or Dara O'Briain at gigs or on TV in Britain.
Irish names are usually very systematic, and from the name it is evident that Ó comes from the Irish Ua, meaning grandson or descendant. The word that follows Ó will go into the genitive, and to return a word of the sort that "Rothlain" is to the standard nominative, the i before the end is removed. I must admit that the translation might not be perfect, as I'm not sure whether Rothlan is just a name - it could be a title, occupation or something else. But the name does mean "grandson/descendant of [whatever Rothlan means]". I can't find "rothlan" in my Irish dictionaries, but I have found "Rothlán/Róithleán" (wheel!), and doing a bit of Googling, I'm finding that Ó Rothlain might not be the most correct Irish spelling - this link seems to give the name "Ó Rothláin", but whether it is the same name at all, I can't say. I could just be barking up the wrong tree! But at any rate, the name does mean "descendant of Rothlan/what 'rothlan' means". --Kwekubo 00:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - my main source for the information on "Ó" and "Rothlán" is Foclóir Gaeilge-Béarla (editor Niall Ó Dónaill) - An Gúm, 1977, Dublin.

Ó Rothláin

Sure! As you can imagine there are different dialects etc, but a good general pronunciation would be halfway in-between "oh RUH-lawn" and "oh RUH-loin". The "ruh" bit rhymes with duh. --Kwekubo (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Th" in Irish is the eclipsed version of the letter "t", and sounds like the English letter "h". For example, the word 'thug' sounds like 'hug'. As regards your name, the way I'd explain it is that "roláin" would sound a bit like "RULL-awn", whereas "rothláin" has a definite H sound in the middle. --Kwekubo (talk) 21:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom candidate userbox

Greetings. I've made a new userbox for arbcom candidates to show on their userpages so that visiters will know they're running.

{{User arbcom nom}}

If you'd like to place it on your userpage, feel free. Regards, – Quadell ^{(talk) (bounties)} 02:29, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irish User Boxes

Hi, Thanks for that. Dlyons493 Talk 20:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guinness logo.png

This image is fair use and therefor is not allowed ouside the article namespace.Geni 21:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union

I've noticed you editing a rugby union page and your user page says that you like rugby union. Recently a project has been set up to try to improve the quality of the rugby union articles in Wikipedia. If you are interested in joining follow the link. We currently have nine members.GordyB 14:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:ODriscollvbath.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ODriscollvbath.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -SCEhard T 22:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for citing a source, but now the photo needs a proper license. If you want to keep it on Wikipedia, you will need to make a fair use claim by placing the tag {{Fair use in}} and writing below why you think it qualifies for fair use. Am I a copyright nazi? Perhaps, but I love pictures when they're free. Violating copyrights compromises the integrity of Wikipedia. -SCEhard T 02:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland Templates

I've developed templates for those people who believe that (a) Northern Ireland should remain British, and for those who beleive that(b) Northern Ireland should merge with Eire. {{User Northern Ireland Unionist}} {{User United Ireland Republican}}. What do you think? Expatkiwi

Rugby Portal

Hi Rowlan, hope I didn't seem to snarky on the Green comment, good on you for taking the initiative and starting the portal. I'll try to contribute from time to time. See you round Lisiate 23:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:TANA UMAGA.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:TANA UMAGA.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Muchness 01:40, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NI User template

I thought it was mildly clever myself. But I thought I'd bring it in line with the other regions. The pic is still there to create another alternative NI user template though. --Mal 15:16, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

Cheers for doing the Fortnightly Collaboration page. I was hoping someone would pitch in with the Portal! Let's hope the Leaguer's catch up or Union might have a far better rep on Wiki.

-Rowlan 06:22, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I was looking at some of the rugby union articles and they are not up to par. If you have a look at {{Rugby06}}, their is quite a few articles that require writing up. --Hamedog^Talk|@ 06:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:RugbyPortal

Template:RugbyPortal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.--cj | talk 01:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having a little difficulty understanding this as I'm not too sure how the mechanics of the Portal work. AFAIK a template should only be used for something used more than once. I think there should be a way to duplicate the effects of the template without actually using a template.GordyB 16:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've copy / pasted the template code into the portal so that it looks exactly the same as before only it does not use the template. No reason not to delete it now unless you can think of another use for it.GordyB 16:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with GordyB. The portal looks fine without the template. I can't see how it would be useful anywhere else either so may as well delete it. Lisiate 22:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are a wanker. There is no need to delete this template. Rowlan 15:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps after revising our policies regarding personal attacks and civility, you may care to retract that comment.--cj | talk 06:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did I Respond???

You Have Frustrated me to an extent that would normally make me feel like making a personal attack on said offender, but after a careful reminding of policy, code, ethics, and standards I shall refrain from such childish lashings and state my case in simple, understandable, non-offensive terms: There is no need to delete this template.

Rowlan 17:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did nothing to aggravate you. And if you had paid due attention to the TfD you'd have noticed that there is indeed reason to delete this template; there was no need for one in the first place, hence subst then delete.--cj | talk 03:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with every one

i am probably gonna get a lot of bitchin because of this but, why is it that everyone freaks out over some one screwing around? this is not a very acurate source either. i have found major errors and i know other people who have as well. WHy do you all take this so seroiusly? Is this your life? Is this like your favorite thing to do? What is wrong with all of you?Dogblue 22:24, 29 March 2006 (UTC)dogblue[reply]

This is not the place for this type of discussion. And, we're all freakin' ourselves out cause this is a damn encyclopedia made for people to see, not a message board forum. Weirdy 02:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:UlsterRugbyBall.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UlsterRugbyBall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 14:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source you gave implies that image is not free. ed g2s • talk 19:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks! --evrik 16:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading:

I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 19:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Wellingtonmuseum.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wellingtonmuseum.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rights

"The secondary agenda was to have the term "Irish-American" available as an option in any form that required one to state his/her ethnic identity."

I am curious if this was successful. 75.3.4.54 06:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up

Please provide a link to where you obtained Image:Nhswwscrum.jpg. Just quoting "Flickr" is not enough. Also please do not upload copyright images of items for which a free alternative could easily be obtained, such as the rugby ball and the pint of Guinness, as this is not fair use. You are also not allowed to use fair use images in templates (WP:FUC). Thanks, ed g2s • talk 15:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

After notification from the copyright owner, I've deleted this image and Image:Leedstykestry.jpg. These were both originally licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - No Commercial Use - No Derivatives license, which is not the same as the Creative Commons Attribution license, and not a "free" license in that we can't create derivative works and we can't use it in commercial contexts. As such, it's not free per the Image use policy, and we can't use it.

Please be more careful with the licenses when uploading images in future. Shimgray | talk | 22:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Top 14

Sorry Rowlan, I know you would have put some time into them, and I'm not opposed to them at all, I just removed the template from Stade Francais, Biarritz and Toulouse as it wasnt complete and was showing up a lot of {{ }} etc gaps. The codes you used to create the kits are still in the history so they can be taken, but the template will need to be tweaked, and all teams should have them, not just three. But it is a good idea. Cvene64 14:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby League

Just wondering if you still are looking for a Rugby League ball picture. I can take a picture of my ball, however it is a bit worn in and has a big Cowboys logo across it, I can do that ASAP. If you are looking for a picture of a nice new Rugby League ball, give me a bit of time and I'll try and get that for you. Also out of interest, what are you using it for and if you support Rugby League. JRA WestyQld2 07:07, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

State of Origin 3 was a great game (being a Queensland supporter :-P)I'll try and get a picture for you as soon as I can. JRA WestyQld2 03:07, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I know someone who did get a picture of one, here is an official Steeden Rugby League ball --JRA WestyQld2 02:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rugby league ball.jpg

Wow looks amazing! I better put it on my watchlist and start contributing --JRA WestyQld2 09:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leedstykeslineout.jpg

Hi, I noticed you emailed the author of the above image and had him licence it under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. Unfortunatly this is not free enough for Wikipedia. The most simular licence that is suitable for use Wikipedia would be a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Licence. Could you see if the author will release the image under this licence please, otherwise the image will be deleted. Alexj2002 13:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The licence you selected from the list was "This image is licensed under the Creative Commons

Attribution ShareAlike License v. 2.5:". This is not the same as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike, which is what the image actually is. We can't use Non Commercial pictures on Wikipedia. Alexj2002 12:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:UlsterRugbyBall.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UlsterRugbyBall.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alexj2002 12:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Leedsrhinosscrum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leedsrhinosscrum.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alexj2002 14:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Irelandscall.png

Would you mind explaining two things to me:

Firstly how an image can be licenced as both GFDL and as being in the public domain.
Secondly how a still taken from a television broadcast can be licenced either of the above.

Alexj2002 10:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well technically I didn't delete it, an admin reviewed my suggestion it be deleted and agreed. On a more serious note, the image was as you state, an image from a television broadcast. This would mean it was not GFDL or Public Domain but copyrighted. As such we could only use it on Wikipedia if we could claim fair usage on it. Criteria number one that must be met to claim fair use is "No free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information.". Seems as a person at an Ireland game could take a photo of the anthems being played, and then licence it under a free licence, I believe that a free equivalent can be created and therefore the deleted image cannot be used under a claim of fair use. As a final point, I notice this is far from the first image you've uploaded that's been deleted, and from your message on my talk page ("It's a screen capture...what's it supposed to be liscenced under?") can I suggest you take a few moments to read through WP:UPIMAGE and WP:FU. Alexj2002 21:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints

It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 17:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TheRugbyForum

Hey O'Rothlain, You may not recognise my name but I'm also on TheRugbyForum as PeeJay. Didn't know you were a Wikipedian too :-D PeeJay 11:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Andrew_farrell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrew_farrell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 11:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive

For the 2007 Rugby World Cup WikiProject Rugby union is launching an Improvement Drive for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup.

We need your help! Here is what you can do:

Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
Promote the project and encourage others to join.

The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!

For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.

Shudde ^talk 05:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stlbombersrugbylogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stlbombersrugbylogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Wellingtonmuseum.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Wellingtonmuseum.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 17:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lirun.jpg for non-commercial use only

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Lirun.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Boivie (talk) 12:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Rugby Forum

A tag has been placed on The Rugby Forum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 01:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Rowlan!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sslogo05.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sslogo05.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Image:Waspsruck.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Waspsruck.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC) ==[reply]

14:52, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fatherchristmas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fatherchristmas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in you User Space

Hey there Rowlan, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Rowlan. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irish genealogy

Hi. Are the reference sections too long? Fergananim (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nope!Rowlan (talk) 17:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aironi rugby logo.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Aironi rugby logo.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got it straightened out now. Cheers. Rowlan (talk) 21:23, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:RoyalShrovetideFootballMob.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:RoyalShrovetideFootballMob.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Orphaned non-free image File:Emmanuel College Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuel College Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

USA

See here.

Request for consensus for editing Template:Catholicism

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Catholicism#Edit_request_on_7_December_2012 to edit the list of Doctors of the Church to add John of Avila and Hildegard of Bingen and do this by embedding Template:Churchdoctor. I am messaging you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rbs 6nations rugby.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rbs 6nations rugby.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some simple help maybe needed on the new papabili list

If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 08:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ok-christian-heritage-150.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Ok-christian-heritage-150.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Icthus

Christianity newsletter: New format, new focus

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Rowlan! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 13:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:2cool4school.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Swcu-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swcu-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Southwestern Christian University (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Southwestern Christian University (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan 20:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rowlan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ó Rothláin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rowland and Rowley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Rugby league

Portal:Rugby league, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Rugby league and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Rugby league during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 19:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Rugby union

Portal:Rugby union, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Rugby union and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Rugby union during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Army Rugby Union (emblem).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Army Rugby Union (emblem).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rowlan

The article Rowlan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this name or family is notable, fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Source 1 and 2 are mere mentions, source 3 is not about the name, and source 4 is a list of unremarkable immigrants. The one person listed here is not notable. No outside sources were found that indicate notability. Possibly created in a CoI/promotion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]