User talk:Ryan shell/Archive 2

Hi Ryan!

I noticed you helping out with some of the gastropod articles, and wanted to thank you... because the gastropods are such a huge group, we need all the help we can get! If you have some interest in that particular area, I wanted to say:

I've noticed your edits on pages relating to Gastropods; perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Gastropods?
If you would like more information, please visit the project page or the project talk page.

Either way, thanks again for your help, and all good wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 21:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem, but I will bear you in mind if there is something specific we need help with that you could do. I am sure we will come up with something... Thanks so much for offering! Best, Invertzoo (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! OK, almost immediately I find something that needs correcting that I don't know how to do... so... maybe you can explain to me how to do it? If you type "Mactra" into the search slot, you get Mactra corollina which should read Mactra corallina, and you also get Mactra acquilateralis, which should read Mactra aequilateralis. Many thanks. Invertzoo (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ryan, peace to you too. I should explain that the great advantage of the Latin names, the scientific names of species, is that they are >exactly< the same in any language anywhere in the world. So "corollina" is just a plain old spelling mistake, and so is "acquilateralis". It is true that M. corallina is a synonym of M. stultorum, but still we needed a correctly spelled version of it in the search function, so thanks for putting that in there. And the same is true of M. aquilateralis rather than the misspelled "M. acquilateralis", we need the correctly spelled version to be shown in the search function. The incorrectly spelled ones should at the most be simply automatic redirects rather than being listed as if they were a real spelling, at least that is how it seems to me? I don't know if that can be fixed by us or whether an admin needs to do it. Invertzoo (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About public domain paleontology books

Hello Ryan, you are member of project Paleontology. If you will find any paleontological public domain book which is available on-line, with images of gastropods, just let me to know and I will crop, retouche and upload them. Thank you for your cooperation. --Snek01 (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Added a heading for Snek's post. Invertzoo (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About speedy deleting the wrongly-spelled versions in the search function

Yes I do think that sounds like a good idea. Can you tell me how you add that speedy delete tag? I mean how do you find the page to add the tag to? I think perhaps I knew once and have forgotten. Invertzoo (talk) 03:25, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About a brand new article that appears to be 100% bogus

Hi Ryan, Would you do me a favor and check out Comic x? I appears to be completely bogus. A google search finds no such thing as "Roast Beef Publishing Ltd" or any of the other key words. If it is a piece of vandalism it needs to be deleted. Thanks, Invertzoo (talk) 23:47, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy happy joy joy for Ryan

Invertzoo (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate the Winter Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec08}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks for the tips Mr. Ryan

I really appreciate the useful guides to Wikipedia you've given to me since im just a begginner and your the 1st one to talk in my user discussion page! ^^ +10 points! Have a merry Christmas and a happy New Year.

Gintong Liwanag Ng Araw (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typhlops diardii

Hi Ryan, Sorry to have reverted your last edit to the Typhlops diardii article, but this is a common format that's used for the entire series. I've tried to explain my rationale for it here. Like I say, I started out following WP:LEAD, but that method soon struck me as being so inefficient and inelegant for this particular task, that I just couldn't see myself writing and formatting hundreds of articles like that. It's unfortunate that it's sometimes only regarded as a weird departure from WP:LEAD, but luckily it does seem to be gaining some acceptance. --Jwinius (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Diamond darter

On January 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Diamond darter, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flat needlefish

On March 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Flat needlefish, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 06:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smells like old fish

You're right, it should be. I tagged a couple that way, then couldn't think of the wordl.:( If you find others, feel free to change 'em. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 02:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Thanks for the advice on my talk page! I don't have much time to edit Wikipedia but I'll be sure to take a look at Translations. I think they might also have a request list for articles to be trans-Wikied at WikiProject Japan. silverneko (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil

I didn't mean to make the article about the ruling military junta, but about the historic period during the dictatorship, and for the name, I followed the title of the wikipedia article in Portuguese (Ditadura militar no Brasil). The articles I merged (1960s and 1970s in Brazil) were already predominantly on this topic, and besides, they both need some serious work to have them make sense.--Le Petit Modificateur Laborieux (talk) 19:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We could… recreate these two pages, leaving in all the details not directly related to the dictatorship era itself. What do you think?--Le Petit Modificateur Laborieux (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Houndfish

On April 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Houndfish, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing Advice

Hi Ryan,

Long time, no talkies. I just thought i'd let you know (if you didn't already know) about citation templates located here Wikipedia:Citation templates. I noticed you use quite a few long winded references, and i find they tend to look better when using these templates. Quite often additional information such as ISBNs etc can be found by simply googling the title of the book or journal and put into the template. Another advantage is that it standardizes your references, which is necessary if you ever want to take an article to Good Article status. Another thing - you don't necessarily need to put a reference after each sentence. If you have several sentences which are attributable to the one source, put the ref after all of those sentences. It tends to keep the page a bit neater.

By no means am i saying you need to use them or do anything i say, just thought i'd share! Also, do you know about google books and scholar? They are great tools for finding free information. Keep up the good fish work, and good to see you working on beloniformes - quite a few red links there!

Cheers, Kare Kare (talk) 05:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add Taxobox for Emperor tetra

Just wanted to let you know. I added a taxobox to the Emperor tetra page and moved it to its scientific name and redirected the old page. I'm kinda new to editing wiki, I think I joined maybe a week ago, but I alreay have two articles. If you wouldn't mind checking them out they are Long-nosed Loach and Violet Goby. Violet Gobies are kinda a hobby of mine and I was so dissapoited to find out wikipedia didnt have an article on them at all that I promptly joined, made an article, and posted it. Drew R. Smith (talk) 10:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mirrorwing flyingfish

On May 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mirrorwing flyingfish, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 16:43, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Atlantic flyingfish

Hello! Your submission of Atlantic flyingfish at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 06:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Atlantic flyingfish

On June 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Atlantic flyingfish, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Giants 27 14:35, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Balao halfbeak

On July 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Balao halfbeak, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 07:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC) 08:49, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Northern sennet

On July 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Northern sennet, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

{{User0|Candlewicke 17:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK question

I posted a question about your DYK suggestion regarding the article Southern sennet. Please review the comments underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Binksternet (talk) 01:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Southern sennet

On July 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Southern sennet, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Guachanche barracuda

On August 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Guachanche barracuda, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

WP:DYK 02:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ryan, with regards to this article, our OTRS system got an email suggesting that the weight you have given may be a typographical error. The relevant sentence is "Guachanche barracuda can grow up to 200 cm in length.[3] They can also weigh up to 1.75 kg." The emailer contends that these measurements would make it the skinniest fish in the world, thinner than a snake, and that you possibly meant 175 kg.

I confess to having no knowledge on the subject and no access to the reference used, so if you could enlighten me so that I can reply, that would be fantastic!

Regards,
Daniel (talk) 09:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Boga (fish)

Hello! Your submission of Boga (fish) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smartse (talk) 22:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Boga (fish)

On August 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Boga (fish), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

NW (Talk) 17:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Emmelichthyops atlanticus

On September 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Emmelichthyops atlanticus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 23:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Atka mackerel

On September 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Atka mackerel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 13:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet, two of 'em! Ryan shell (talk) 19:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Spottail pinfish

On October 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spottail pinfish, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 21:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Western Atlantic seabream

On October 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Western Atlantic seabream, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 07:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saucereye porgy

On November 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saucereye porgy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Please?

Hello, Ryan shell. You have new messages at Hopiakuta's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 22:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

< http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=user_talk:hopiakuta&diff=330251670&oldid=330250062 >.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 15:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK - Jolthead porgy

Hello! Your submission of Jolthead porgy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sasata (talk) 03:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jolthead porgy

On January 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jolthead porgy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, Ryan shell/Archive 2! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pluma porgy

On February 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pluma porgy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Ryan shell, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ryan shell. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Littlehead porgy

On May 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Littlehead porgy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 22:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andy Maddocks

The article Andy Maddocks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

significant coverage not found in reliable sources. Fails WP:NMUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Joshua Scott (formerly LiberalFascist) 04:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

Hello Ryan shell, Wilhelmina Will has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Greetings, Ryan shell! I hope you have a good day! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Maddocks

Thanks for adding the sources to the Andy Maddocks article. I withdraw any objections I had. Cheers –Joshua Scott 21:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Knobbed porgy

On July 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Knobbed porgy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Acteosaurus

On 15 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Acteosaurus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Shantungosuchus

On 20 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shantungosuchus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pleurosternon DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Pleurosternon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Schwede 66 17:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that I've put another comment under your nomination, as there are problems with your review. Schwede 66 18:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pleurosternon

On 2 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pleurosternon, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, together with Platychelys, Pleurosternon is one of the few fossil genera with characteristics of both modern turtle suborders? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 06:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rimasuchus

On 12 February 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rimasuchus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the extinct crocodile Rimasuchus often preyed on large mammals, including early humans? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hyla arboricola cellty

About this. You can't find records of it because user:Rymity21 made it up. Pretty much every page this user has dealt with involves making false claims on status (e.g. changing IUCN species ratings) and adding fake species or subspecies. Many were reverted by other users and as evident on his talk page several of his fake species articles have been deleted. In the pages where it remained I have now deleted the fake information, but the fake subspecies "Hyla arboricola cellty" and the fake species "Giant leaf tree frog (Agalychnis Gigus [sic])" remain. For now I added the hoax template to these two pages, but only because I don't have the time right now to familiarize myself better with the Speedy delete rules. 62.107.220.109 (talk) 22:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Ryan shell! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Tzaganosuchus

On 9 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tzaganosuchus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tzaganosuchus fossils were first discovered during a joint paleontological expedition by the Soviet Union and Mongolia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tzaganosuchus.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)