User talk:Samweithe4

Welcome!

Hello, Samweithe4, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia. If you need assistance, check out the Getting Help section below or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please always fill in the edit summary field to describe your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Cordially, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Wikipedia's five pillars • A tutorial • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments • Help desk • Teahouse • Help directory Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources • Topic notability What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • List of guidelines • Three-revert rule • Copyrights Image use policy • Policy for non-free content • Deletion policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Conflict of interest • Sock puppetry

Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation The perfect article • Peer review • Featured content
The community
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Build consensus • Resolve disputes • No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump • Signpost • IRC channels
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages • Portals Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts Awards that registered contributors can achieve and award

The Reason Why I Keep Reverting Your Edits

Please understand that I am reverting your edits at Orthoceras because your edits are contradicted by the text, which specifically states that most other species of the genus have been moved to other genera, and that the genus is restricted to Ordovician-aged strata, only.--Mr Fink (talk) 01:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Crichtonsaurus"

Clearly my last message didn't get through to you so I'll do it again. The aim of Wikipedia is provide a summary of current knowledge. The current state of knowledge is that "Crichtonpelta bohlini" is a nomen dubium that is not sufficiently differentiable from other ankylosaurs. Drop it. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Orthoceras, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop trying to shoehorn the claim that Orthoceras is found throughout the world, and that it lasted until the Triassic UNLESS you have a wp:reliable source that overrides the Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gavialis pachyrhynchus

Unsourced.Xx236 (talk) 09:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antarctoboenus (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Antarctoboenus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Samweithe4, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

new articles focusing of giraffa (genus)

i made new articles (Giraffa pygmaea, Giraffa stillei Giraffa priscilla and Giraffa sivalensis, i hope you can enjoy reading those articles!

Your draft article, Draft:Antarctoboenus

Hello, Samweithe4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Antarctoboenus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:59, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Censorship of Instagram

Hi, I'm Caorongjin. Samweithe4, thanks for creating Censorship of Instagram!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It seems as though this page's contents would be better in Instagram than here as a separate page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Caorongjin (talk) 20:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Censorship of Pinterest

Hi, I'm Caorongjin. Samweithe4, thanks for creating Censorship of Pinterest!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It seems as though this page's contents would be better in Pinterest than here as a separate page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Caorongjin (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Censorship of Pinterest

Hello, Samweithe4. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Censorship of Pinterest, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 15:33, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rodeo Stampede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodeo Stampede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodeo Stampede until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2Joules (talk) 07:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rodeo Stampede. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.