User talk:VedSharmaop

Professional Historian (I edit and give sanboxs)but it got rejected😭

Welcome

Hello VedSharmaop and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 04:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vikramaditya Empire (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vikramaditya Empire and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VedSharmaop! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Akhand Bharat have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Akhand Bharat was changed by VedSharmaop (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861522 on 2023-03-23T07:07:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Akhand Bharat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chandragupta Maurya, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sanātana Dharma. - Arjayay (talk) 15:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sanātana Dharma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting

Can you please view my article That I had done very much research for that. Article Name: विक्रमादित्य VedSharmaop (talk) 04:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of विक्रमादित्य

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on विक्रमादित्य requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~With regards, I followed The Username Policy (Message Me) (What I have done on Wikipedia) 05:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Wikipedia Team,I will view the rules. VedSharmaop (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

विक्रमादित्य moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, विक्रमादित्य, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vikramaditya Empire

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Vikramaditya Empire, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English

I don't think that describing your editing as "vandalism", as in some of the messages above, is accurate, but those messages have been prompted by genuine problems with your editing. Perhaps the most important problem is that your grasp of English is not really good enough for contributing to an English language encyclopaedia. I'm afraid much of what you posted is written in an attempt at writing English which is so poor as to make it difficult to make out what you are trying to say. I see that you have also contributed to Hindi Wikipedia, and perhaps you would be better off sticking to contributing there. JBW (talk) 09:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for appreciation.I write in poor speaking English in haste.Otherwise,My English is good I can't contribute to Hindi Wikipedia too because in Hindi Wikipedia I write in English also in that Sir.Hope you understand my problems towards the wrong and right. VedSharmaop (talk) 13:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit other users userpages

There are times when it's appropriate, but your edit definitely was not and you are too new to know when it might be ok. Doug Weller talk 12:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What have I done sir if you can explain,I try to solve that. VedSharmaop (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]