User talk:Williambane91

Welcome!

Hello Williambane91! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Chongkian (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002) (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Williambane91! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User warning

Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Ian Fisher. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i believe the subject i was writing about deserves an article, according to Romanian articles he is a well known actor. I don't understand it was hijacking? I'm new to Wikipedia and dont understand what that is, even though I read the links? Did I not create a new page for Ian fisher (actor)

Thank you Williambane91 (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the mistake I did - I did not have the headline as Ian fisher (actor) ? Please give advise I'm very interested in doing things correctly and respect all wikipedias rules. I'm most interested in doing famous singers and actors Wikipedia, and would like to do it the right way! So how do I make the correct page for Ian fisher (actor)

Thank you for your help, it's much appreciated 🙏🏻 Williambane91 (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see evidence that this is notable either per WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The book is used for educational use in Danish high schools. Therefore the book is subject of instruction at two or more schools!

https://www.folkeskolen.dk/paedagogik-undervisning/opdragelse-og-dannelse-filosofisk-set/1809800

https://www.information.dk/kultur/anmeldelse/2021/12/hannah-arendt-advarer-imod-goere-boern-helte-hoejere-sags-tjeneste

https://www.thiemersmagasin.dk/products/hannah-arendt-og-paedagogikken-9788771243741

Williambane91 (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, in that case add to the draft adequate sources corroborating that. Drafts are only reviewed based on the evidence included there. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and advise! Much appreciated 🙏🏻 Williambane91 (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002)

Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book)

Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathrine Kohl (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathrine Kohl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jacob the Baker (film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacob the Baker (film). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathrine Kohl (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCREATIVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathrine Kohl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Curb Safe Charmer. I hope this message finds you well. I recently received a notice that the Wikipedia article for Kathrine Kohl was declined based on not meeting the notability criteria. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles, and I would like to respectfully express my disagreement with this decision.

The Wikipedia notability guidelines state that notability is determined by what reliable sources say about a subject. It is essential that the subject has been significantly "noted" in independent, reputable sources that are known for their fact-checking and oversight. I believe that the provided sources in the article sufficiently establish Kathrine Kohl's notability.

The article now includes additional citations from independent sources such as BT and Jyllandsposten that are some of the biggest newspapers in Denmark. The news articles,

highlight Kathrine Kohl's achievements and contributions to the fields of acting and modeling. These sources have a reputation for fact-checking and are independent of the subject, ensuring that the information presented is reliable and unbiased.

Furthermore, I have added more links within the article to relevant sources and articles that further emphasize Kathrine Kohl's notability. These links provide readers with easy access to additional information, enhancing the article's comprehensiveness.

The article also provides substantial information about Kathrine Kohl's early life, career, and notable works, all of which are supported by verifiable and independent sources.

Her contributions to the entertainment industry, along with her recognition and involvement in notable projects such as Jacob the Baker, further underscore her notability.

I kindly request a reevaluation of the article based on the reliable sources, verifiable content, and added links provided. I believe that Kathrine Kohl meets the criteria for notability as outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. If there are specific concerns or suggestions for improvement, I am more than willing to address them to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards. Williambane91 (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob the Baker (film) (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob the Baker (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation

I'm currently working on editing Wikipedia articles related to a famous Danish person, and I'd like to ensure that the sources I'm adding adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. The sources I'm using are from reputable Danish newspapers. However, I want to make sure I'm citing them correctly and providing the necessary information for verification. Could someone with experience in Wikipedia editing assist me in properly formatting and citing these sources in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines? I want to ensure that the articles meet the highest standards and can be published without any issues.

The Wikipedia notability guidelines state that notability is determined by what reliable sources say about a subject. It is essential that the subject has been significantly "noted" in independent, reputable sources that are known for their fact-checking and oversight. I believe that the provided sources in the article sufficiently establish Kathrine Kohl's notability.

The page now includes additional citations from independent sources such as BT and Jyllandsposten that are some of the biggest newspapers in Denmark. The news articles, highlight Kathrine Kohl's achievements and contributions to the fields of acting and modeling. These sources have a reputation for fact-checking and are independent of the subject, ensuring that the information presented is reliable and unbiased.

Furthermore, I have added more links within the article to relevant sources and articles that further emphasize Kathrine Kohl's notability.

Thank you in advance for your help! Williambane91 (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page creation.

I noticed that my recent Wikipedia article on [kathrine Kohl] was rejected due to concerns about their notability. I respectfully disagree with this decision and have taken steps to provide additional sources and evidence of her notability. I have updated the article with references from reputable sources and believe that [kathrine kohl] meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. These sources include jyllandsposten, BT .

Help adding these sources correct https://italiancomedyfestival.com/kathrine-kohl/

https://www.guldogure.dk/assets/dus2016_5.pdf

I want to make sure I'm citing them correctly and providing the necessary information for verification. Could someone with experience in Wikipedia editing assist me in properly formatting and citing these sources in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines? I want to ensure that the articles meet the highest standards and can be published without any issues. Williambane91 (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Williambane91 The draft was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning in the draft submission process- that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means a draft may be resubmitted, as you already have. Please name the specific notability criteria this person meets. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm turning off these {{help}} templates. If you want help understanding the review criteria, ask at the WP:AFCHD. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply I appreciate all the help and guidance from talented wiki members as you.

"Kathrine Kohl meets the notability criteria on Wikipedia based on the following:

1. **Significant Coverage in Reliable Sources**: Kathrine Kohl has received significant coverage in reputable Danish newspapers such as [BT, JP, gulogure, Italian comedy festival]. These sources provide in-depth coverage of her work as a model, actress, and film producer.

2. **International Recognition**: She is recognized internationally as a sought-after photo model, which is supported by her participation in major advertising campaigns in the USA alongside prominent figures such as Gal Gadot and Denise Richards. She has been the cover model several times for gulogure

Notable Film Roles: Jacob the Baker, distributed by CAA showcasing her versatility as an actress. Senior Entourage, Pindsvin og tigerbalsam, where her performance received critical acclaim for her portraying a girl with diabetes.

Television Appearances: In addition to her film work, Kathrine has made memorable appearances on television. She appeared in music videos by famous artist ToManyLeftHands- trouble - commercial with Brian Austin green- OROGOLD - music video the blue van - Devine - , OROGOLD with Gal gadot

These aspects collectively establish her notability as a multi-talented individual with a noteworthy career in the fields of modeling, acting and film production

Williambane91 (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am still not seeing WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE being met. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002)

Hello, Williambane91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pindsvin og tigerbalsam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Williambane91, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Williambane91,

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it is much better to bring them to the Teahouse. You post a question on your own talk page, no one will see it because few editors have this page on their Watchlists. It's better to bring your questions to a forum where there are editors who are waiting to address any problems that come up for new editors. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob the Baker (film)

Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob the Baker (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kathrine Kohl

Hello, Williambane91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kathrine Kohl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]