User talk:Windborne Rider/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Windborne Rider. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Happy New Year!

98Tigerius,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 08:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Wishing You a Prosperous and Happy New Year!

98Tigerius,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! — 🎉🎆 marchrain13 🎆🎉 (🔔 • 📝) 13:20, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Shop For Killers (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, about a future television series, is too soon and does not satisfy television notability. It should be resubmitted with appropriate reliable sources after the show airs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Shop For Killers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2024!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello 98Tigerius: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Shop For Killers poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Shop For Killers poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

13th Circle Chart Music Award

Digital Album of the Year is not a main award. Its criteria are based on sales of non-CD album format (SMC, Nemo, Poca, QR, NFC, etc.) It is somewhat equivalent to KiT Album of the Year. Duskmoon2005 (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

@Duskmoon2005 Alright thanks for the clarification of the said award. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 14:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

I think we can just use a bit of common sense here. Based on http://www.circlemusicawards.co.kr/eng/musicAward_award.php many other awards such as Retail Album of the Year, V Coloring of the Year, Social Hot Star of the Year, etc. are also not included as special awards but previous years pages treat them as such because they are not the Main awards.

Also, there is no logic behind Digital Album of the Year as the highest award (Daesang). The scope is even smaller compared to Artist of the Year - Album which criteria includes all album format.

Another point is according to http://www.circlemusicawards.co.kr/eng/history.php throughout their history Gaon Chart Music Award/Circle Chart Music Award only recognize Artist of the Year (Digital), Artist of the Year (Physical Album) & Rookie of the Year Duskmoon2005 (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello, 98Tigerius,

Why did you move Death's Game to a different page title and then move it right back? Article page moves should be thought through and not casually done. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi admin Liz, I apologize for what I did on Death's Game article. I already requested a speedy deletion for the redirect page. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 10:52, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Heart of Asia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Heart of Asia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Heart of Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gino March (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

List of South Korean Boy Bands Edit

Hi, I would like to discuss about my edits in the page.

The reason I put the groups in alphabetical order is because the girl group list page also does the same thing. And also, I think it will only make sense that if the other group was listed by alphabetical order then the groups in the main list should be arranged that way too.

Previously the girl group list was arranged in chronological order of their debuting too, but was changed by other user in alphabetical order, so I'm not sure why the same couldn't be apply to both pages.

Hooplasledge23 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hooplasledge23: The list should arrange in chronological order by their debut year as it's been like that since the creation. The girl group list should be reverted back. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 17:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you. :) Hooplasledge23 (talk) 17:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

@Hooplasledge23: I changed my mind, let's arrange the K-boy groups list in alphabetical order. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 17:49, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Designated Survivor: 60 Days, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Joon-hyuk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Jan 2024

Well Episode 823 doesn't have a source either so why didn't you remove that one? I can't really site a live show... but I will try and find one Taorenxuan (talk) 11:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Taorenxuan I already updated the list article. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 11:59, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

same Taorenxuan (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius same Taorenxuan (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius I just cited it then you remove it? You literally told me to add a citation Taorenxuan (talk) 12:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

@Taorenxuan it is an unreliable source per WP:KO/RS#UR. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 12:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

2005 UAAP Women's Volleyball

Hello, 98Tigerius,

Recently you moved this article and in the edit summary, you called it "page move vandalism". The editor who had moved the article to a different title had made many edits to this article already and, I assume, thought a different (but very similar) title was more suitable. Please do not call page moves or edits "vandalism" unless there is damage done to the article and its contents. Assume good faith of other editors, especially those who had been working on those articles that are being moved. I imagine that if I reverted a move you had done and called it "vandalism" you would not be pleased. So, don't just randomly pick one of the selected edit summaries because it's convenient and maybe write your own in that is more appropriate. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Noted that admin. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 02:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello 98Tigerius!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Recent images-related changes

Please don't knee jerk WP:POINT just because you're reverted on one article by someone whom just anyhow quote without technical knowledge, everyone will now and then experienced such things which is perfectly normal, but how you response is what is important instead. In addition, .png is preferred format for WP:NFCC images regardless of what WP:PIFU mentions which is an outdated article btw, just looks at its talk page. When dealing with NFCC images, we are obviously required to downsize the original image which when saved to .jpg/.jpeg compromise the quality as it uses lossy compression whereas .png uses lossless compression meaning the quality stays the same and not resulting in low quality blurry or distorted NFCC images. If you want read more about, this article by Adobe explains it perfectly. Thanks! — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 14:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Paper9oll, thanks for that great information. — 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 20:55, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Shop for Killers poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Shop for Killers poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Missing Crown Prince poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Missing Crown Prince poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Name is Loh Kiwan poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Name is Loh Kiwan poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonderful World (South Korean TV series) poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonderful World (South Korean TV series) poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Matter of principle - DUNE PART 2

I know very well that is how the book ends. But, how would, say, any old wiki editor prove that they've been to a premiere or advanced screening? Yeah, all lines up with the book, but as a matter of principle, how are DUNEFAN or whatnot, him obviously not being neutral, going to prove what he says is true? Not like the plot of "the film" is public knowledge. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit Revision

Hello, may I ask why my edit updating the web show episode number under Zhang Hao (singer) keeps getting reverted? Thank you for helping with the reference formatting. Cleokafka (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cleokafka, because the edits you made was in one revision so that's why all of it was reverted. Anyways, I updated the episode. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

I see, I'll avoid multiple changes in one edit in the future. Thank you! Cleokafka (talk) 23:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Message

Every sports league and club article has sport link in first sentence; why dont you try same with football or any other, see how fast will be reverted. I will notify more users to check your actions. Loptač01 (talk) 22:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Death's Game album cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Death's Game album cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Death's Game

Hello @98Tigerius! For the page Death's Game, can I ask why Yi Jae's reincarnation belongs under the main cast? Wheezythewave (talk) 01:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

@Wheezythewave: I modified it. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yura Yura (Unmei no Hana) has been accepted

Yura Yura (Unmei no Hana), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Heads up: Incorrect internal link

Hey mate~ I saw you added the comedian Nam Chang-hee to Queen of Tears last month with an internal link to their page, however the page that exists is for a scientist and not a comedian. Just wanted to mention a heads up as this is common since Korean names are so similiar. Have a good one! ₪RicknAsia₪ 07:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

@Rickinasia thanks for notifying me about it. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 07:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

JUNGKOOK GOLDEN ALBUM HUNGARIAN CHART

Hi, I suggested an edit for Jungkook's page, GOLDEN reached #1 on Hungarian physical album chart twice, I also included the source. But I still cannot see it on the page. Is there any problem with it? Thanks in advance. JKHungary (talk) 18:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@JKHungary: The one you provided is different from the one that was included in Jungkook's Golden album article, see it for yourself. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 19:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, because there are two album charts in Hungary. One is the combined chart, Jungkook's Golden album article contains that. But there is another official chart which is the Physical Album chart and he reached #1 twice on that chart. Just as I included the source. It is listed on the Hungarian Wikipedia page too for #1s on album chart.

https://slagerlistak.hu/album-top-40-slagerlista-fizikai-hanghordozok/2023/49

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Mahasz_Top_40_albumlist%C3%A1j%C3%A1nak_els%C5%91_helyezettjei_2020%E2%80%932029_k%C3%B6z%C3%B6tt

Pls check these. Thank you. JKHungary (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

@JKHungary: From what I understand the one to include in chart table is the one already in Golden album per MAHASZ#Charts and the one you want to include is not even in the criteria. Also see 5-Star (Stray Kids album), even though it charted no.1 for 7 times on Album Top 40 chart (physical media) it was not included on the chart table. If you still insist it, you can ask other editors on the Golden album talk page as their more experience about the charting system. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 02:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Music Bank 2023

Hey 98Tigerius, I don't know if you remember or but we had talked about nominating List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023) for FL status back in December. I believe that the list is now ready and can be nominated. If you would like to nominate it then go ahead else I am more than happy to help you out with that. Happy editing! -- EN-Jungwon 10:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I still remember. I'll start nominating it now. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed that you haven't transcluded the nomination on the main FLC page. Is there an issue with that? -- EN-Jungwon 08:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Oh I just followed what was instructed when I nominated it and I thought it will be automatically added there. I don't know why it is not transcluded. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 09:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I added it now. I forgot to read the last procedure of nomination. Thanks for reminding it. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 10:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

UAAP 86 Awardees

Hi, Von here. Just wanted to mention that I believe the awardees should have their full names as these are official awards, and it has been the precedent in the past pages of the tournament. Otherwise, consistency should be applied, and have the past pages updated to reflect this. Thanks Voncabriga (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Just to add, not having the full name or at least using the nickname mashes the awards seem informal. Some of the nicknames also weren’t mentioned or referenced in the page, and may cause some confusion as to who the awardees are to someone who doesn’t follow the tournament. Just my two cents. Voncabriga (talk) 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Done 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Just wanted to put that up for discussion and see from your point of view for the edits. I don’t mean to impose my side, will obviously lean more on what the standards are Voncabriga (talk) 08:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

I understand it but I still stand by my reasons on why I undid some of your edits earlier. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Yup that’s fair. Just wanted to understand the other side of it as well. I just lean more on consistency, and formality. Happy to be corrected, of course, if there’s some standards to it. Cheers! Voncabriga (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023)

Congratulations, 98Tigerius! The list you nominated, List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hierarchy (TV series) edit unconstructive?

Why did you revert this edit I made to the page of the TV series Hierarchy as "non-constructive"? I was doing simple copyediting because the previous sentence wasn't written correctly (it was missing a verb to tie everything up) and adding a citation because the text in the lede didn't seem to be restated with a citation in the body. I see no reason as to why my edit would be unconstructive—I wasn't vandalizing or adding unsourced info or anything. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Because there's nothing wrong with sentence but I already modified it and apologize if I offended you with the revert. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Women's Volleyball ranking for Olympics 2024

Greetings, I did the modifications to the score because since the first week of the VNL is over, the ranking has changed. That is why I modified it using this website: https://en.volleyballworld.com/volleyball/world-ranking/women. 166.62.170.41 (talk) 23:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

There's no need to changed it as that's the rank of the 24 teams that competed from last year's Olympic qualification tournaments. If you want to modified then do it in FIVB Senior World Rankings. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Re: Reversals of category changes

Hello, next time you see some issue with my category edits please just let me know so I can fix the issues myself, instead of engaging in mass reversals which only make edits more complicated for everyone. Thanks, Nemo 19:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

About SBS Seoul scheduling conflict from the recent K-drama edit

Seoul Broadcasting System are going to broadcast the upcoming 2024 Summer Olympics as stated on List of 2024 Summer Olympics broadcasters so far. Unsure if they're going to use the current K-drama time slot to aired the games, thus to have that mentions on Seoul Busters page. Not to be mentioned that France time zone was 7 hours late to Seoul time zone as well, thus it could affect their programming for this Summer according to the mentioned post. VernardoLau (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Then provide a reliable secondary source when you modified the content because the citation I provided didn't mentioned that and that's also the reason I reverted your edit as "likely factual error." 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:02, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

World men's volleyball championship

Greetings Tigerius. There was an error, a problem, on the page. I have posted links that support my claims about medal winners. The FIVB recognizes Russia as the successor to the medals of the Soviet Union. It is not stated anywhere in this table.

https://en.volleyballworld.com/volleyball/competitions/women-worldchampionship-2022/competition/history

Also, mr Larry Carrel say the same thing to our college, Muhamed (see a talk page)

https://ibb.co/Pwdjrsv

I hope that with your knowledge and your position, you will help me to keep the data correct. JohnWickChapter4 (talk) 14:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

If that's what you claim then why only in volleyball? What about the other sports that Soviet Union won? It should also credited to Russia but that's not the case. My suggestion is to open a discussion on WT:VBALL or better on WT:SPORTS to reach more experience editors. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 14:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Only in volleyball!? Sorry Tigerius, but you're so much wrong. I don't blame you if you aren't a sports fan. Let me explain: in every sport Russia is successor of medals, result and history of Soviet Union.

This is UEFA and FIFA (football organisation) source, not mine - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dttUk1lFPuw Also, you can see that on wiki EURO or World cup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_European_Championship This is ice hockey - https://www.iihf.com/en/medalists - Also, wiki respect that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IIHF_World_Championship_medalists This is in water polo (see page 15) - https://web.archive.org/web/20110627115633/http://www.fina.org/H2O/docs/events/worldleague2011/mediabook_men.pdf I got this proofe for all sports if u need. I have no reason to lie to you. Sorry if I'm boring, but I'm a sports fanatic who remembers all these events. Btw, the same situaction is with West Germany-Germany (Germany succesor), Yugoslavia-Serbia, Czehoslovakia-Czech.JohnWickChapter4 (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Read my edit summary (here) and no original research. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't understand whats the problem? I give to you all official source and you put me some history from your edit? Tigerius, you're wrong about this. So wrong JohnWickChapter4 (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Learn to read what the context Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I give you all the provided links. Anyways, I already reported to you to the administrators for vandalism. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 00:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

See MOS:CONFORMTITLE and Template:Infobox album

Template:Infobox album: "Do not remove fields from this list when the value is unknown; in that case the values should be left blank". Somebody still produced Suho's music. The parameter still applies even if you or "we" don't know who produced it. It still applies as there is still a producer, unlike say venue=, which should be removed because it's for live albums.

MOS:CONFORMTITLE tells us: "Titles of works that should be italicized receive this treatment inside another title. [...] This includes in a citation template as well as in running text." WP:CITEHOW gives examples of what is both a "special glyph" and "spelling"—e.g. we don't change something written "Hurts 2B Human" into "Hurts to Be Human" and a glyph is a special character, like a non-English character or an uncommon typographic mark. Formatting album titles in italics is standardizing quotations; it is not changing quoted material. Ss112 10:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for the clarification. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:00, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Soliciting your stand

Hi, 98Tigerius.

Thanks for supporting the move request for "FIVB Volleyball Women's Challenger Cup", "FIVB Volleyball Men's Challenger Cup", and related pages and then placing the discussion on these at the women's sports and volleyball WikiProjects.

But may I solicit your stand, too, on the similarly-reasoned move requests for main pages Asian Women's Volleyball Challenge Cup and Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Cup?

Thanks. Bagoto (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Soliciting/canvassing is considered inappropriate to gain consensus per WP:CAN. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 03:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh. Sorry about that. Thanks, good to know. Bagoto (talk) 04:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Volleyball at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification

Hey, I was just wondering what the reason is that the rankings are "frozen" at september 25th 2023 Sdobbe (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Because that's the ranking pre-VNL and per WP:NOTEVERYTHING: "..An article should not be a complete presentation of all possible details.." 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 14:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I feel like there is a difference between "a complete presentation of all possible details" and not updating a table of ever-shifting rankings for a period of nearly 9 months.

I am however not too familiar with the way things are done on Wikipedia, so if you could point me to some more info on how things like this are covered that would be appreciated Sdobbe (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Music Bank

I tend to watch the Music Bank livestreams on YouTube so that I can update the article as quickly as possible. That is how I learn about the winning artist and their score. All that being said, I do NOT know how to access the reliable print resource that usually comes out. If you do reply back, please contact my talk page. Thank you. Zach Mando Games (talk) 19:43, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

No Way Out: The Roulette on Wikidata

Hi 98Tigerius. Please remember to link a newly created article on Wikidata. A bot has just created a separate item for No Way Out: The Roulette, which duplicates the original item that already exists with links to the respective articles on Korean and Chinese Wikipedia. I have already proposed the deletion of the duplicated item and fixed the linkage, so it should be fine. Just a friendly reminder to double check whether articles exist on other language Wikipedias or on Wikidata, to avoid confusing the bot and ensure the article is not left isolated. Cheers! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 16:38, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Noted and thanks. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Could you teach me how to upload a non-free image as an album cover?

Hi 98Tigerius, I was looking at the edit history of "Hear Me Out (Exo song)" and saw the single cover you've uploaded on the infobox. If it's possible and if you have the time, could you please teach me how to do so? I've got plenty of articles that could use a digital single/album cover, but I'm unsure how to start and all that copyright stuff. Thanks in advance! Ghazlan-airplanes (talk) 10:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

When I was new to uploading files, I use this link and follow what the instructions. After I get use to uploading files, this link is now I'm using. I hope I help you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 11:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm currently looking at the wizard, so I start off by downloading the album cover from the internet and make it lower resolution from the original, before I fill in the Wizard? Ghazlan-airplanes (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that's right but you can upload the original file and a bot will tag it and will also resize it in a few days after it was uploaded. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Volleyball.

You are an administrator on an ego-trip. The rankings I updated are from the official FIVB men's Volleyball World Ranking page (https://en.volleyballworld.com/volleyball/world-ranking/men) which are updated after each match of the 2024 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League. You clearly haven't bothered to check the 2024 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League page, nor any of my update explanations. Italy, Slovenia, and Argentina have already qualified, as has Egypt (they have a reserved spot as the highest ranked team from Africa). Serbia nor Cuba can catch Argentina on points in the last three matches of the 2024 FIVB Men's Volleyball Nations League. The World Rankings are correct as of a few minutes ago. I have reported you for a needless editing war. I follow these competitions daily, you clearly do not, but you take the right to revert my edits just like that. Highly obnoxius and arrogant behavior. NoWikiNoLife (talk) 17:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

I already told you what my stance is on your talk page so I will not repeat it here and please mind your behavior as your last sentence is clearly a personal attack. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for Edit warring and refusing to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Not an appeal but I just want to say that I will reflect on my shortcomings. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 18:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, 98Tigerius. Yamla, in case 98Tigerius is interested in removing this section, I'd argue that no appeal has actually been made and removing the template would be compatible with WP:UP#CMT. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Admin ToBeFree, am I still blocked from editing? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

No – welcome back and feel free to remove these messages. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Ah, and regarding Talk:Volleyball at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification, in case you're still interested and didn't decide to disengage anyway, you may like to simply replace the currently-unansered 17:25 message by a new one. If you've lost interest in the matter, that's fine too. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sweet Tooth (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see Template:Episode table and Template:Episode table/part again, what you use is for "parts" only not for "seasons" like when a season is split into multiple parts. This is not the case for Sweet Tooth as Sweet Tooth only uses seasons according to Netflix. This Episode table is the common and standard practice on MOS:TV and WP:TV whether you like it or not. — YoungForever^(talk) 13:24, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum

Hello, 98Tigerius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Source

Hey, why did you remove the ref for the schedule? Kante4 (talk) 16:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Because the prose is different from the context of the source. Also it is not a practice to put a source there. Did you ever see any article with a source in preliminary section of any volleyball tournament related articles? None. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 16:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

I was just going by other sports where i saw/put it in. I see no harm in it or should it be moved somewhere else? Kante4 (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cha Eun-woo § Listing of "model" as a profession. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Pertaining to this topic, can you help to monitor the article as the disruptive editing by the IP and its registered account is still continuing. They just removed the {{Under discussion inline}} despite me adding a note beside. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@Paper9oll Reverted the edit and warned the user who removed the tag without explanation. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius Thanks a lot! I believe this behaviour won't stop, any idea what should be done, as I don't think that they have any intention in discussing also given that they simply outright removing the inline template and also the hidden note. I have previously reported the IP to AIV but no admin was willing to act on and the report expired, currently already retry again (which I believe will also expired) for the IP. However, given that the IP has been switching between the IP and its registered account, it also doesn't seem feasible to revert back-and-back till the registered account get level 4 warning. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@Paper9oll Given the reasons you provided, the only idea I can come up with is to monitor the page from time to time. I also requested to protect the page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

@98Tigerius I guess that's we can do in our capacity, thanks for the help 😊. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2024 PVL RC logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2024 PVL RC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Your reversions of my edits

Judging by your edit summaries, it seems that you objected to my edits solely because they had no edit summaries. Am I understanding that correctly? If so, then please consult WP:Reverting and WP:Revert only when necessary; specifically, the former states "Do not revert an otherwise good edit solely because an editor used a poor edit summary...", and the latter states "Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary." If you disagreed with the edits themselves, then please consult WP:SDNONE, which provides Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill as an article which merits the short description "none". — LucasBrown 22:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

SDNONE stated "..but some article titles are sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful, e.g., Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill."

I bolded the words "would not be helpful" so I guess you're the one who don't understand what SDNONE means and the provided article link don't have a sd. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

That article does in fact have a short description: the very first line of the source is "{{Short description|none}}". The very next sentence of WP:SDNONE after the one you quoted is "In those cases, {{Short description|none}} should be used to add the article to Category:Articles with short description." — LucasBrown 22:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for the confusion I'm restoring now your revisions. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 04:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum

Hello, 98Tigerius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Uinyeo Dae Jang Geum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:34, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

List of Netflix original programming

I already explained to you why I moved the reference – I moved it to the later premiere date to avoid broken references in the future when they are deleted when the show premieres. Why did you revert my edit again? – Nisf (talk) 12:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

There's nothing broken in the reference and as you've said it can be moved to the later date when second season premieres. And as what I put in my first revert summary – WP:AINT 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:00, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Greeting

Hi there I just wanted to say I’m a big admirer of your work on here and thought I might take the opportunity to express my being a fan of your work and wanted to ask u something 2.98.155.255 (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

That's interesting of you, but what do you want to ask? 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 10:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Say if there was a dispute over an actor being in a show would IMDb be good for proving someone was in a show once the show was out or would credits be better for prove sorry odd question 2.98.155.255 (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

No as IMDd is not a reliable source of information as per WP:IMDB whereas it can only be useful as a link in the "External link" section of a BLP article(s). 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 12:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

So I’m guessing credits then 2.98.155.255 (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Good talk really 2.98.155.255 (talk) 14:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

mip

Hey, i never saw it done anywhere and don't see the benefit of doing so. Time is given and people can see if it is going on. Kante4 (talk) 09:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Check the pdf i added for the combined ranking, it's a different one. Kante4 (talk) 21:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Alright I reverted it back. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 21:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the edit, livescore said game was over. Even when i tuned into the game it said over with the old result, so my bad. Kante4 (talk) 17:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

What livescore site? I suggest to go to Olympic site or click the report link on each match on tournament articles. Alternative is flashscore site. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Yup, it was flashscore. Changed now their aswell but when i watched the last two points it had the old result in with finished. Will double check next time. Kante4 (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Need help on Katseye Touch article

After I made the article without looking at the disambiguation. I moved it but it still isn't moved correctly. The article is Touch (KATSEYE song). Any help is appreciated. I just wanna move the song successfully both the article and talk page. This0k (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

You should make a request at WP:RM/TR and a page mover user or an admin will do the move. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 20:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I already made a request to move the article on WP:RM/TR. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 20:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:2024 AVC MU20 MVP.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:2024 AVC MU20 MVP.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Reversion of edits in Golden Hour Part.1

If its only about the "EP" why isnt this followed in other articles as well? Including ones from other groups. And the lead single "work" is a part of the "EP". Mikikooo (talk) 06:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Even though this policy is about deletion discussion, the logic applies and also read WP:OTHERCONTENT. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 07:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Not really but whatever Mikikooo (talk) 07:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Merge

Regarding your suggestion on my talk page [1]. I'm not sure why I did that merge in the first place. Second, feel free to do the merge yourself. I am not inclined to do so at this time. Also, I see that on the article talk there is consensus for the merge. Regards, ----Steve Quinn (talk) 23:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Alright thanks for clarification. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 15:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ARrC has been accepted

ARrC, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 02:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Extraordinary Attorney Woo

Hey @98Tigerius, our little feud on Extraordinary Attorney Woo is getting silly. Can you please explain what your issue is with my edits? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Revirvlkodlaku Read and comprehend what are the context of MOS:NOPIPE and WP:ELMIN. And oh by the way don't WP:ACCUSE me because just because I reverted, undid or whatever your edits are when in fact the links I provided above which is the same in my edit summaries are enough but you just WP:BLUDGEONING. Just a reminder you don't WP:OWN that page. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 17:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your Honor (2024 TV series)

The person who WP:3RR is you. You even didn't answer me. Is runime=62–66 minutes wrong or fake? If it's correct, why you keep delete it? I said "Maybe you can help me to get the url like 유어 아너 1회:javascript:fnViewDetail('MIAO70QESGL150000100','CV000000000059975276')" with good faith, but you just ignore and blame me 3RR. Because you didn't respond, so I assume you don't want to discuss, only care that you're the right one. Sa Young Sun (talk) 10:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

@Sa Young Sun This is your edit that I reverted then you undid my edit next is you edited it again by adding your preferred citation which never mention the runtime, so you really did a 3RR not me. I never said wrong or fake but the WP:SOURCE you provided fails WP:VERIFICATION. Also the series is still ongoing and it could maybe have shorter or longer minutes, I suggest you re-add back the exact runtime when the series ended. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

You can renew the runtime after the new episode released, just like renew the "No. of episodes", I don't think it would be a problem. You can check Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama#Television, I don't think it fails WP:VERIFICATION, but maybe it can be more perfect, and it's hard to put on 10 or 100 citations in runtime. You know the information is correct, then maybe you can help to fix it, better than deleted it and blame me 3RR.(keep two citations, not like the first two edited). I won't re-add back, because I don't want to be blame again for nonsense. Sa Young Sun (talk) 16:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Alas Pilipinas logo.png

Hello, see WP:NFC#UUI17. Just because the youth teams also use the same logo, doesn't mean that the logo can be used on their article, unless they use a seperate logo. See other youth teams on Wikipedia and you'll see that they don't use their logos either. For example England national under-21 football team and Philippines national under-23 football team. Jonteemil (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I understand it. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 11:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Boy (TV series) has been accepted

Good Boy (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stage Fighter (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission is too soon because the show has not yet aired. Please resubmit after the show airs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stage Fighter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 98Tigerius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Removing the hosts' flag? Seriously? Ghaij625 (talk) 13:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Don't message me here but on the article's talk page, I already ping you there. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 13:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeonjun has been accepted

Yeonjun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 01:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Xreadership

Hi, 98Tigerius. First of all, Congrats! I think you are the first to notice the new {{Xreadership}} template and try it out, before I even announce it at WP:VPR sometime in the next few days. At least, I saw the one you added to Talk:Exo; not sure if you tried others. I added a few dozen of them, as I am still in the data-gathering stage to see how it does in various situations. If you notice any bugs, weirdness, or just stuff that doesn't make sense, by all means feel free to add comments at the template Talk page. (There are a few things I already know about, so read the Talk page first; also, some of it is at Template talk:Xviews.)

I am curious about one thing, though (well, two things): how did you happen to notice the template, and to what extent did you rely on the Template doc page(s), and did you find them helpful? I am a stickler for getting the doc right, because I want to make it as easy as possible to use for the largest number of people who might be interested. I am still thinking about the {{Xreadership#How-to}}, and trying to streamline it and make it better/easier to use. I would really appreciate any criticism or suggestions on how to make the doc easier to understand, and more complete. What did you find difficult, or how could the doc be made better? Also, you are welcome to edit the doc yourself, if you have an idea what needs to be said. Thanks, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 09:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Just noticed there was some kind of problem with the display at Talk:Exo, and I saw you had tweaked the pageviews file manually a couple of times trying to get it right; in the end, I'm not sure what the problem was, but when I reloaded the pageviews file from the tool, the problem went away and it's displaying okay now.

One tip: if you are on a system where the Csv file type is associated with Excel, so that the pageviews file opens up in Excel before you can save it, that can get in the way, because Excel might be doing all sorts of stuff under the hood you don't know about (like flipping date styles), and you don't want any of that. I had to disassociate the Csv file time away from Excel and assign it to a text processor (non-Word processing, simple text-only processor) and now it works fine for me. If you are on a Windows machine, try downloading the free EditPad Lite, and assigning Csv filetype to it, and you'll have no more problems, if that was your issue. Mathglot (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mathglot I notice it when I saw you edited BTS talk page then see your contributions on how you do it and that's when I tried to put {{Xreadership}} on Exo talk page. Well, I really find the template helpful as it shows graph which is very easy to understand. About the doc, for me it is comprehensively detailed. Editing template is not yet my forte but yeah if there's something I spot or needs improvement I will tell you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:21, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 10:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Please can add popular award male baeksang for Kim soo hyun in page of drama

Please can add popular award male baeksang for Kim soo hyun in page of drama 45.244.134.151 (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm confused by what you want me to do and please note to provide a independent secondary reliable sources for your claims. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 19:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Yuta Nakamoto

Do you think proposing the following move for Yuta Nakamoto would be a lost cause? It would complete the name consistency project for NCT members.

The Yuta Nakamoto article gets about 15-20x more views than the other so is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. RachelTensions (talk) 20:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Indeed the Japanese male singer is a PRITOP and in my opinion he both pass WP:PT1 and WP:PT2. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 23:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I opened a move discussion at Talk:Yuta Nakamoto as this one involves multiple articles and has potential for controversy. RachelTensions (talk) 01:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I actually added an alternate proposal for moving to Yuta instead that I think might be better.

If you're alright with it (since you're the only vote) I could just scrap the whole original move request and re-post it with the new proposal RachelTensions (talk) 02:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Don't scrap it as per WP:REDACT. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 02:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

What about editing the request instead? Obviously couldn't change it without your consent as you've already voted, but maybe if you strike your vote? I dunno

Or is it best left as-is with moving over Yuta (singer)? RachelTensions (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I guess maybe Wikipedia:Mutual withdrawal RachelTensions (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Alright I permitted you as per MUTUAL. When you edit your rationale better to link this discussion so others will know. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 02:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, I resubmitted the revised nomination, feel free to participate if you're still interested. Sorry for the confusion. RachelTensions (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I will when others participates first as I feel like a WP:CANVASS is happening between us. I hope you're not offended by this. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 02:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

And thanks for teaching me about REDACT for future reference RachelTensions (talk) 02:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

No worries and yeah that guideline is really helpful. Cheers, 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 02:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Get a Guitar (song)

I assume I'm allowed to move a draft I've written from drafts to mainspace without going through AfC review, correct? Re: Draft:Get a Guitar (song) RachelTensions (talk) 04:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Correct as long as you meet the criteria for that specific article. But you can also submit it so an AfC reviewer or partipant(like me) can review and publish it on your behalf and also to log it as part of WikiProject AfC (and on my record). 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 04:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

If you want it on your record I can submit it to AfC as long as it won't need to sit in the backlog for 2 months or whatever it says at WP:AfC. Do I need to do anything special to send it to you for review or just tag it with {{subst:submit}}? RachelTensions (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Tag it with {{subst:submit}} with your username inside the template. When the redirect page is deleted, I'll accept and publish it right away. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 05:17, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Done, thanks! RachelTensions (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Memories (Riize song)

I have another article for you if you want it: Draft:Memories (Riize song) RachelTensions (talk) 04:35, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions You did great creating that draft. If you want I can submit it on your behalf. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I submitted it so you can have it for your stats; I believe the old redirect from the mainspace has already been cleared out to make way for the draft. RachelTensions (talk) 13:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Nvm looks like someone else got it RachelTensions (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Love 119

Draft:Love 119 is almost ready to go if you wanted to grab it for your AfC stats. I just need to add the charts & release history tables which I will do shortly.

I'll eventually get around to adding the live performances section too but formatting and finding sources for all the music shows can be a chore and my brain has had about enough of it this weekend. RachelTensions (talk) 09:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@RachelTensions Alright thanks for notifying me. I checked the draft and refs 23 and 27 are not in proper place. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 10:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Fixed, thanks RachelTensions (talk) 10:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I've tagged the article for AfC, and the original redirect in mainspace has been cleared out. RachelTensions (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Done publishing the draft to mainspace. Great job. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 03:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Riizing Day

Draft:Riizing Day is at AfC if you wanted to have a look. Thanks! RachelTensions (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your recent NOTBROKEN edits

Care to explain your recent (around 1~2 weeks) WP:NOTBROKEN high-speed WP:BOTLIKE edits using script in relation to which pointers on WP:DOFIXIT that you interpreted as encourages it? — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't have any explanation(s) for it but if what I did is wrong then feel free to point it out. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 07:48, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Erm okay ... I do find it concerning that such high-speed BOTLIKE edits using script to fix wikilinks that's NOTBROKEN against what is stated on DOFIXIT, as it floods the WP:WATCHLIST and concurrently triggers down a barrage of WP:Email notification. I've tried reading DOFIXIT multiple times and I couldn't find any pointers that encourages what your edits were doing like for example Infinite (group) or Mark (rapper) before I decided to query you. Also FYI, WATCHLIST and email notification flooding have previously been discussed intensively at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard, while you're not using a bot to perform such edits, the speed of such edits is not humanly possible hence is considered as BOTLIKE. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:21, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Alright I understand all of it and will be more careful for using the Move+ script. I forgot and didn't considered that we also received notifs from email. Thanks and happy editing, 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 08:53, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Talk Saxy

Draft:Talk Saxy is submitted at AfC if you're interested. RachelTensions (talk) 06:53, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh that's great. And I have a favor, please don't tag the redirect page with {{db-move}} so when I marked it as under review with AfC script it will tag {{db-afc-move}} instead. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 07:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

It's Okay to Not Be Okay

In Korea it's not a Netflix original. But in other territories it is. Anything with netflix banner is considered a netflix original. 122.55.235.127 (talk) 06:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Huh? That series is a tvN drama and Netflix is only the distributor. Where did you get that information? Can you provide an independent secondary reliable sources for your claims? Or else it is an original research. Do also note of WP:SYNTHESIS. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 06:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

It's excluive to Netflix outside Korea.

sourece: https://about.netflix.com/en/news/korean-romance-drama-its-okay-to-not-be-okay-to-premiere-on-netflix-in-june anything exclusive on Netflix outside Korea is considered a Netflix original in those territories that's why it has the banner while in netflix korea it doesn't have the banner since it releases on tvn and netflix for streaming. 122.55.235.127 (talk) 07:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

That's a press release and it is considered a primary source. So it is like all series that was or is currently or will be exclusive for streaming on Netflix are Netflix original? That's what original research is, and even the source you provided never mentioned what you're implying. Also, it is not produced by Netflix just like Squid Game, Sweet Home, and among others. And to end this, see WP:ELMIN. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 07:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

I guess it's fine not to put. But yes all series that's exclusive on Netflix are Netflix original. When I watch a kdrama in my territory it was credited as a netflix original series like Crash Landing on You. It wouldn't say that if you watch it in korea. 122.55.235.127 (talk) 08:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

I still disagree with you. Exclusive series are exclusive not original, do not make a synthesis out of it. Lastly, this is Wikipedia and we should abide by providing reliable source not just what you want to believe.

I'm disengaging from this discussion. Ciao, 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 08:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

First Collection

Just to avoid any further delay, I went ahead and moved First Collection. Hopefully, you don't consider this rude or anything; I wouldn't be offended if someone did similar to a draft I marked for review for similar technical reasons. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:11, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh thank you for that. The reason I haven't publish the draft is because I'm waiting for my former username to be changed to the current one I'm using now in the AFC Participants list and I didn't check that it already changed two hours ago. Happy editing. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 ^{[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺]} 16:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

File:2023 Men's CWC logo.png

I've declined your {{dbauthor}} request for File:2023 Men's CWC logo.png. The logo is in use in the article, and complies with the non-free content criteria. I don't see why it should be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Mr. Plankton

Hi @Windborne Rider, can you have a look at Draft:Mr. Plankton Aidillia (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:The Moment: A Minor

Draft:The Moment: A Minor is at AFC if you wanted to have a look. RachelTensions (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:I Like the Way (EP)

Draft:I Like the Way (EP) is at AFC if you're interested RachelTensions (talk) 02:06, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Done accepting and publishing the draft. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! RachelTensions (talk) 04:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@Windborne Rider Draft:The Moment: Bounce is ready to go as well RachelTensions (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

What is your opinion on splitting each of the tours off into a tour article rather than having them in the album article? Example Draft:List of Kim Woojin concert tours RachelTensions (talk) 16:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

That's better as it is notable enough to be a stand-alone list imo. Then link it in the body of each album articles. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 16:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

sent to afc RachelTensions (talk) 17:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Ref before punctuation

Hey, do you know of a script that will correct ref before punctuation errors? I'm really bad for accidentally doing that RachelTensions (talk) 02:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

You can use these two scripts but read its documentations: User:Rublov/refspace and User:TheJJJunk/ARA. See also this list of user scripts. I hope it helps. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:15, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Starring query

Hi Windborne Rider, may I know what is the reason that causes you to went out of the way to query on starring? There was already an existing informal convention status quo across 1,000+ South Korean television series articles for references that editors editing in such area already has mutual understanding on. I also don't see a dispute i.e. going against the status quo to trigger such an query hence rather curious and puzzled that you raise such query. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 07:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Well for me I don't even know that there such thing as "informal convention status quo" and why we always compare to WP:OTHERCONTENT? Also most K-drama onscreen credits nowadays are showing the ensemble cast not just the main actors e.g. Queen of Tears, Connection, Flex X Cop, and many others, and starring is not meant for main actors you know that. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 09:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't doubt that you really don't know that there isn't such a thing given that you have been editing for few years already to know that, the community (English Wikipedia) doesn't write/record down every single details into whichever guidelines but things are still moving as usual abet some exceptional cases often newbie questioning this and that causing a dispute however I don't see this query as one of the exceptional cases nor could I find any evidence on such. This statement "most K-drama onscreen credits nowadays are showing the ensemble cast not just the main actors" is also factually incorrect as it's not "nowadays" i.e. the 2023–2024 releases that you're referring to. However, I'm not sure what is your intention moving forward given that I can see that you've already updated the Infobox only on Queen of Tears or OTHERCONTENT if applicable and I also don't find the answer given at that discussion satisfactory as your initial query is clearly not addressed in full. I'm asking this question because you're trying to "fix" the Infobox and lead by clarifying however the answer to your clarification is clearly not addressed fully. For clarification, me asking for "your intention moving forward" doesn't means that you brute-force your way to more updating based on the incomplete/selective answering response given at that discussion. Is there any particular reason that the poster is not sufficient for a quick, easy, and no-paywall accessible WP:VERIFY? While I do expect that you would countered with WP:VERIFY was already met because the selective casts listed in the Infobox was already inline sourced in the body however this isn't my point given that this supposedly new and broken convention (if you intended to go ahead with that broken response) isn't quick and easily verificable given that it would require subscription access to do so hence rather than seeing it be an improvement, it's a hinder instead. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

The starring cast in poster only shows the two main actors' name, while official website and reliable sources stated five main actors, and onscreen credits showing the ensemble cast. This what I'm confused about that's why I followed the given answer to my query and also what is documented at {{Infobox television}} is somewhat similar. Both explanation and hidden note at starring param stated "broadcast/original credits". 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 11:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

My only concerned here is VERIFY while the onscreen credits is still verifiable however it requires cable or subscription access to do so which isn't ideal, I believe that check-and-balance verification is important to this project, restricting it to a sourcing that requires subscription access or in worst case a double subscription access (e.g., requiring VPN to change your country to another country that the series is supported in, just to watch the footage to verify the content added) is a hinder than an improvement to the existing method. I also don't believe that there should be a single person (likely just you based on my rationale in preceding) policing any SK television series article's content to be passed verification or failed verification, the current method is clearcut and easily verifiable if any content added is factually incorrect. I believe that we should stick to either the official poster or the official website, if the official poster mirrors the official website then either is fine. In addition, your statement "The starring cast in poster only shows the two main actors' name" pertaining to QOT is factually incorrect as this depends on which version of the poster, you're referring to. If you're referring to NFCC-copy upload here then yes it's two main actor's name, if you're referring to other version, then there are 3 to 5 actor's name included in the poster, in this case, I believe we should be referring to the official website and reliable sources instead, basically maintain the current "not broken, don't fix it" method. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Alright I understand and 100% agree about the last sentence, I will changed it back to five main actors. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks you for your kind understanding. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Project 7 and Draft:List of Project 7 contestants

Hi, can you help me fix Draft:Project 7 and Draft:List of Project 7 contestants please. I am planning to merge the existed project 7 article with the draft. Is that fine. HongLock (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Project 7 is now marked as under review, let's wait for an admin to delete the redirect page after that I will publish it then notify you. As for Draft:List of Project 7 contestants, you can move it yourself. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 19:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

(revert) Teaser poster of Love Your Enemy

why you revert? the previous one, the colour of it is not in proper. (look at the lips) Aidillia (talk) 14:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Oh I didn't notice, then revert it. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 15:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

List of Project 7 contestants

Can you help me with the List of Project 7 contestants please 149.68.7.121 (talk) 16:23, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

I will try to improve the list article. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:08, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2023 Men's CWC logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2023 Men's CWC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Seunghan

Hey, if you're interested, can you have a look at Draft:Seunghan and make adjustments as you see fit? I know it's probably got POV issues and I've been debating on how the sections should be structured. Thanks! RachelTensions (talk) 02:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

And do you think it's ready for mainspace? RachelTensions (talk) 06:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure but as per WP:BIO1E and WP:BLP1E, it is justified(?) to have a merit of an article. Try to ask some other more experience Wikipedian about your draft or you may submit it so other experience AfC reviewer will review it better. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 06:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, sent to afc. RachelTensions (talk) 06:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Regarding article Twelve

Let someone do it.. which article should be merge Aidillia^(talk) 13:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Anyone can merged articles as per WP:MERGE that's why I redirected Twelve (2025 TV series) "with an explanation" but you reverted it without one. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

To settle this, I suggest to WP:HISTMERGE Twelve (2025 TV series) to Twelve (TV series). 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

or also can merge Twelve (TV series) to Twelve (2025 TV series) the original one that already exist Aidillia^(talk) 13:31, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Huh? Twelve (TV series) is correct title so why it will to merge to the latter? Also when I created the redirect into an article you hastily moved Draft:Twelve (TV series) to Twelve (2025 TV series) and the "2025" in disambiguation in unnecessary. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

what i mean is after Twelve (TV series) merge to Twelve (2025 TV series), then can be moved it to the correct one Aidillia^(talk) 13:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

That's not how it should when article was already created. The latter should be merge to the former as per WP:MERGE and what I did earlier is correct. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Oh.. can i do that to you too in the future? Aidillia^(talk) 13:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Are you being serious? Twelve (2025 TV series) is already a duplicate of Twelve (TV series). Is that not clear to you? Do you understand the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia? 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

i'm so serious.. if you can do.. why i can't do? Aidillia^(talk) 13:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

We're not gonna settle this then ask other editors for their opinions regarding the article.

Edit: I already ask a more experience editor. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 13:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

All the content that i've made in draft is just like a garbage to u right? i promise to u, the moment the article is merged, this kind of situation will happen to you back many times. (keep this in mind) Whenever you create a draft, i will create the mainspace as soon as possible like you did to me today. Aidillia^(talk) 14:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

I am WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF to you so you should too as I see your reply as form of WP:PERSONALATTACK. Please bear in mind about WP:CONDUCT here in Wikipedia. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 15:09, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Why? i can't do like what you did to me today? i think there's no problem for me to be the same attitude like u? Aidillia^(talk) 15:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Aidillia For context, I was the "more experience editor requested by Windborne Rider to get involved; I have redirected Twelve (2025 TV series) to Twelve (TV series) as the latter was created in redirect form and in article form first as per the page history. I have also check through the revisions of both pages to rule out any form of "copying" as neither are close enough to deem as such hence any such comments made can be and/or will be considered as casting aspersions. Regardless, you are reminded to assume good faith and be civil as your latest sets of replies shows that you're determine to exhibit signs of disruptive editing and ownership of content moving forward, either which is an unacceptable behaviour and won't be tolerated. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

@Paper9oll Who don't get mad, i expand it one by one in draft! oh my god! it tooks me like 4 hour to find more information.. but this user, is that easy creating the mainspace and tag (in-use template) Aidillia^(talk) 15:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

i felt so much in regret now.. why i'm so slow.. why i don't just submit the draft straightly Aidillia^(talk) 13:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

List of Project 7 contestants

Hi I did the List of Project 7 contestants can you help me to improve the article I need help with Signal Song Test (Episode 2–3) and Position Matching (Episode 3–4) section to improve on please. HongLock (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wonderfools (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a future television series, and is too soon to satisfy television notability. Please resubmit after the show airs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wonderfools and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Windborne Rider! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Single's Inferno poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Single's Inferno poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 03:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

"Show Business (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Show Business (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 7 § Show Business (TV series) until a consensus is reached. Aidillia^(talk) 05:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

october 12 edit

hello! sorry about my mistakes on the edits i made on the wikipedia article for october 12. i have since submitted another edit that cites a source regarding the event that i added. if there are any more issues with my edit, then please let me know and ill solve them to the best of my ability. 38.145.131.90 (talk) 16:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

No need to apologize when you corrected it right away. You're doing great and keep it up. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 19:21, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Love Your Enemy poster.png

Why you need to upload a new version? the previous one is better? Aidillia^(talk) 01:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Are you don't like my upload? Aidillia^(talk) 01:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't know why you take my edit as offensive this past days when all I did is to contribute and make it better (like Miss Granny (TV series)) for the community of WP, and again always assume good faith when going here in my talk page or someone else as you've been showing again casting aspersions. Also do note that we have interest in some same topics here in WP and please comprehend what stated at WP:OWN and WP:NPA. Lastly, cite me a policies and guidelines that the edits I made is a violation. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 06:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Is it good faith? when i created a draft already, you created the mainspace? (happen 2x) (At the time i want to submit, that time you appear.) And please when i already uploaded something, don't upload or resize a new one. I hope this kind of thing will not happen again in the future. You need to respect my edits on draft/mainspace, so i can respect yours too. Aidillia^(talk) 06:28, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

See I told you to comprehend OWN but instead you deliberately admitting to it. You clearly showed that you don't understand what Wikipedia is. I'm disengaging here. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 06:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

You think i'm a robot need to clearly understand what Wikipedia and the rules is? I'm slowly learn to it. Aidillia^(talk) 06:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)