User talk:X!/Archives/1/2012
This is an archive of past discussions about User:X!. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
Request for Interview Regarding Wikipedia Bots
Greetings X!-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.
My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.
Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon
UOJComm (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Joseph Patrick Kennedy III
Hey, about two years ago, you deleted an article on Joseph Patrick Kennedy III due to lack of notability. I think the page should be restored now that Kennedy is exploring (and considered likely to embark upon) a run for Congress: [1] A Google search for "Kennedy III" yields 555,000 search results as well. I believe this is sufficient to establish notability, whereas it did not exist at the time the article was originally deleted. Therefore, a page for Kennedy should exist on this website. Thank you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 10:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
SoxBot request
I've spoken to you before about User:SoxBot removing the {{uncategorized}} tag from articles whose only categories are hidden maintenance categories that don't count toward whether an article is "categorized". To date, I've applied the workaround that if an article had hidden maintenance categories on it, I would apply the {{improve categories}} tag instead so that the article wouldn't get prematurely detagged — however, this has now resulted in a new situation which I need to bring to your attention.
If you review the edit history of The Chronicon of Ademar of Chabannes, you'll note that after a previous tangle with SoxBot I applied the {{improve categories}} tag. However, a different bot, User:Yobot, then came along and changed that tag to {{uncategorized}}, which is the queue the article really belonged in since its only category was hidden — but, naturally, SoxBot then came along and detagged the article again. Which means that not only did the page end up being incorrectly put back onto the uncategorized articles list again, but for bonus points SoxBot is now getting into edit wars with other bots.
I need to ask you again: if SoxBot cannot be properly programmed to distinguish hidden maintenance categories that don't count as categorization from real content categories, then would you please disable that task? This really needs to stop — if the bot can't do the task correctly, then we're better off not having it do the task at all. Bearcat (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Just noting that Bearcat has started adding {{nobots|bot=Soxbot}} to article pages. Assuming this continues, someone (other than Soxbot) will need to clean up that mess later. --Versageek 23:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- And a side-effect of that is confusion caused for uninvolved editors who find an incomprehensible addition to a simple stub. Consulting User:SoxBot doesn't give any explanation of what the bot does, which might illuminate why Bearcat is blocking it from that page. I'm just a simple stub-sorter, but from what I've read I endorse Bearcat's request that you fix the bot, and also request that you describe the bot's actions on its user page. Thanks. (Ah, on looking again, I think I've now understood that "SoxBot" is an umbrella name for the set of distinct-looking bots which are listed in that table... not obvious, please clarify). PamD 08:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note, it appears that the task in question has been disabled: see User:SoxBot/Run/Uncat. Anomie⚔ 17:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- And a side-effect of that is confusion caused for uninvolved editors who find an incomprehensible addition to a simple stub. Consulting User:SoxBot doesn't give any explanation of what the bot does, which might illuminate why Bearcat is blocking it from that page. I'm just a simple stub-sorter, but from what I've read I endorse Bearcat's request that you fix the bot, and also request that you describe the bot's actions on its user page. Thanks. (Ah, on looking again, I think I've now understood that "SoxBot" is an umbrella name for the set of distinct-looking bots which are listed in that table... not obvious, please clarify). PamD 08:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
bug report of tool "Article blamer"
I searched in Cold fusion for the text:
"These high temperature phases would last for two days or more and would repeat several times in any given experiment once they had occurred." submit link
and I got this error message:
- Warning: file_get_contents(/var/www/sitenotice): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/soxred93/public_html/sitenotice.php on line 7 Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'CURLError' with message 'cURL Error (28): Operation timed out after 30000 milliseconds with 1644736 out of 1959471 bytes received' in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php:171 Stack trace: #0 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Includes/Wiki.php(575): HTTP->get('http://en.wikip...', Array) #1 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(316): Wiki->apiQuery(Array) #2 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(306): Page->history(50, 'older', true, 442218875, false, true) #3 /home/soxred93/public_html/blame/index.php(88): Page->history(NULL, 'older', true) #4 {main} thrown in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php on line 171
In the second try I got:
- Warning: file_get_contents(/var/www/sitenotice): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/soxred93/public_html/sitenotice.php on line 7 Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'CURLError' with message 'cURL Error (28): Operation timed out after 30000 milliseconds with 2148520 out of 2236197 bytes received' in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php:171 Stack trace: #0 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Includes/Wiki.php(575): HTTP->get('http://en.wikip...', Array) #1 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(316): Wiki->apiQuery(Array) #2 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(304): Page->history(50, 'older', true, NULL, false, true) #3 /home/soxred93/public_html/blame/index.php(88): Page->history(NULL, 'older', true) #4 {main} thrown in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php on line 171
In the third try I got:
- Warning: file_get_contents(/var/www/sitenotice): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/soxred93/public_html/sitenotice.php on line 7 Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'CURLError' with message 'cURL Error (28): Operation timed out after 30000 milliseconds with 1812896 out of 1834512 bytes received' in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php:171 Stack trace: #0 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Includes/Wiki.php(575): HTTP->get('http://en.wikip...', Array) #1 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(316): Wiki->apiQuery(Array) #2 /home/soxred93/Peachy/Plugins/page.php(306): Page->history(50, 'older', true, 437009639, false, true) #3 /home/soxred93/public_html/blame/index.php(88): Page->history(NULL, 'older', true) #4 {main} thrown in /home/soxred93/Peachy/HTTP.php on line 171
Cold fusion is a long article with thousands of revisions. The tool seems to be hitting a hard-coded time limit while trying to process all the revisions.
Also, at the top of the page I get the message:
- Warning: file_get_contents(/var/www/sitenotice): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/soxred93/public_html/sitenotice.php on line 7
--Enric Naval (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1265 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
Spelling
Your toolserv page that counts all the articles created by a given user?
At the bottom of the page, it says "Trunctuated to 100 pages".
That should be "Truncated". DS (talk) 14:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
rangecontribs toolserver tool broken
Hi,
FYI, your rangecontribs toolserver tool is apparently down.
Cheers, Amalthea 16:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19