User talk:Xenon54/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Xenon54. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
Your userpage's grammar
A sentence on your userpage reads "Ironically, I hate English class, but I'm told that a very good writer and a self-proclaimed Grammar Nazi." If I'm not mistaken, that sentence makes no sense, and you probably meant to write "I'm" after "that". Just thought I'd let you know. Mario777Zelda (talk) 03:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- You're exactly right. How ironic! Thanks. Xenon54 / talk / 12:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
How'd you do that?
Hi, Xenon. I was intrigued by your Completely SVG'ified comment at File:West_german_tv_penetration.svg. Did you create a new map from scratch or were you able somehow to adapt the existing map (note: I'm asking from a position of near-total ignorance). I'm interested in SVG'ifying some of the PD range maps from http://plants.usda.gov/ and don't know where to start. Simply converting PNGs to SVGs in Inkscape (example) yields only so-so maps with jagged contours etc. If you could point me to something like an SVG tutorial that could get me on the road to better-quality SVGs like File:West_german_tv_penetration.svg, I'd appreciate it. Cheers! --Rrburke(talk) 17:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- It is a completely new map. I took a template map, "clipped" to the region that I wanted, and "eyeballed" it, using the freehand tool in Inkscape to draw in the black areas. It's not perfect, but since TV reception can vary, I figure it's close enough. I grabbed a template map of West Germany from Commons to use as the background. Why West Germany? Because East Germany would be grey, keeping in line with the colour scheme of the original map. I don't remember where exactly I got the template map, but Commons:Category:Maps is a good place to start looking. Most countries have blank template maps in there somewhere for you to use.
- A good way to convert PNGs to SVGs in Inkscape is to import the PNG and hit "Object -> Trace Bitmap" (I think). Under "Create a group of paths", click "Colours", then untick "Smooth" and tick "Remove background". Once that's done, select all and ungroup everything, then save it as an SVG. Simply opening a PNG and saving an SVG is like putting lipstick on a pig - it's not really a true SVG. Using the method I described, each colour is a path, which is then broken into smaller paths by ungrouping, allowing for easy editing.
- As for your maps, I assume they would be simply a map of the US with different areas coloured in to indicate where various plants live. That would involve finding a blank US map from Commons (which shouldn't be too difficult), and then filling in the different states with a colour. I think a good template map will have each state as a different object, so all you would have to do is click on the state and pick a colour. Unfortunately, I only have knowledge of basic functions of Inkscape, as so far I've mostly drawn line maps in external programs, using Inkscape to put on the finishing touches. So I'm not too familiar with all the different tools and such that you might need. I suggest taking a look at the official documentation - there's tutorials to read and even a book to buy if you're so inclined.
- Cheers, and good luck! Xenon54 / talk / 20:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for the pointers! --Rrburke(talk) 22:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Thank you for your kind words
I have just read what you wrote in my editor review. I was pleasantly surprised that (a) I got a review posted there so quickly (compared to some others who have waited months), and (b) that it was so positive! I am about to go away for a week, so it's a nice way to leave Wikipedia.
Thank you once again! -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 21:21, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Phantomsteve has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Your kind comments made me feel good, so I want to spread the WikiLove!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
- Mmm...cookie. Thanks! Have fun on your holiday. Xenon54 / talk / 21:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
HD
Why was this? I thought the editor was only saying that he'd found what he was looking for. I noticed you used rollback, so did you revert it as vandalism? ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 13:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- I must have accidentally clicked "rollback" while checking my watchlist. Xenon54 / talk / 13:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- No worries then :D I was wondering if I had missed anything. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 13:23, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Sorry
I didn't see the talkback message above, so I didn't know if you were watching.Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 15:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- No problem: that was my fault. I hid it in the collapsible box by mistake. Xenon54 / talk / 15:36, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Al Jazeera Sports
Hi, Al Jazeera Sports is a sattelite TV and unfortunately Iranian state law says that satellite TVs are banned. Al Jazeera is an arab channel for the Arabic people. it is available via satellite in Iran but TRT (and some others from that list) is available too. in this case you must add Iran in TRT country list !!! Iranian national TV (IRIB) always broadcast important football tournaments (WC/Confed cup/Euro/Asia Cup/UCL). but they always signs the contract in the last days because they want to pay less as possible! Al Jazeera is the rightsholder for middle east but only for the Arab countries ! --Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've added Iran into the list with IRIB as the broadcaster. I guess everything's correct now...?
- A particular country is not listed with another country's broadcaster just because the other broadcaster is terrestrially available in parts of the first country. So unless TRT purchases the rights for Iran, they would not be listed as Iran's broadcaster. Only in the case where the other broadcaster purchases the rights for the country (e.g. Switzerland's SRG has the rights for Liechtenstein) is the country listed with the other broadcaster. Xenon54 / talk / 15:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- thanks, yes I know it. I just used an example. I don't know how a sattelite TV can purchases the rights for Iran when satellite TVs are banned here. many people have it but it is still officially banned ! I think this is just a mistake --Mohsen1248 (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Nicely done!
I just read your response to someone's question about their image upload on the help desk. Instead of just telling them they did it wrong, you included all the right help page links. And as an added bonus, you encouraged them to come back if they had more questions. By taking that last commendable step, you've probably brightened the day of that user and made yourself more than generally helpful. I hereby award you a WikiThanks flower for your efforts. Please remain helpful. :) Mgm|(talk) 09:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Mgm! I just don't like to leave someone hanging, especially in a complicated situation like that. Don't worry, I have no plans to become unhelpful anytime soon. =P Xenon54 / talk / 20:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Thanks!
Thanks for your answer to my question on the "Help Page" about finding articles by two assessment ratings. Appreciate the suggestion, I will try it out. Happy New Year. (I don't know your real identity Batman). --Mdukas (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Always happy to help. Happy 2010 to you as well. Xenon54 / talk / 03:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. your suggestion works like a charm. Thx! --Mdukas (talk) 04:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Astray help desk post
Regarding [1], the help desk often get posts from somebody who apparently read an article (often above official sites in Google) and thought we are the subject, for example a university. {{Astray}} is the usual response. Do you have reason to think something else happened in this case? PrimeHunter (talk) 18:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I am aware of {{Astray}} and was about to use it (as much as I dislike canned responses), but I decided to look at the IP's contribs in a hurry and saw what I thought was "2 January". I figured that the IP had edited previously, knew what Wikipedia was, and thus was just being disruptive. As my edit summary pointed out, I didn't think anyone could edit Wikipedia and then turn around and ask an Astray question. Turns out the edit in question was actually on "2 December" - it's likely the edit was made by another person. What a stupid I am! I have seen too many similar questions on the Reference desk: a user asks an inappropriate question, then I tell them the question is inappropriate; it turns out the user is known to be disruptive, and protocol is to remove the question. Hence, the knee-jerk response to this question. My apologies. Xenon54 / talk / 21:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK. I have restored the post and added {{Astray}}. The IP is French so I can believe the poor English. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
my edits
I have looked around, and don't see what I can do to improve articles.Accdude92 (talk to me!) 20:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Have you looked at the Community portal, or joined a WikiProject in a topic that interests you yet? Xenon54 / talk / 22:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
My warning
Ok, so I get a warning for posting inappropriate links, when others are posting about nudity and cussing and getting away with with it? I thought it was ok in the sandbox? I thought that was where you could post anything? Others post nonsense stuff, and get away with it!Accdude92 (talk to me!) 17:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- The core policies and guidelines of Wikipedia apply everywhere, even in the sandbox - the only exception is the userspace, where the guidelines (but not the policies) may be applied a bit less stringently. This includes the guideline on external links. The only difference between spamming a link in the sandbox and spamming a link in an article is that the sandbox is cleared twice a day.
- Remember also that Wikipedia is not censored. There is no explicit ban of swearing on talk pages (i.e. it's not listed at WP:TPNO), although it may be frowned upon depending on the situation. There is also no moratorium on pictures that some users would consider offensive, so long as they are used in a constructive manner.
- Regardless...if you quit spamming the link, I'll get off your case about it. Keep it on your userpage. Xenon54 / talk / 20:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi :) You had shown some interest in the article so I thought you might want to know that I am done with translating. I also wanted to ask you, if you would like to proofread, but of course you don't have to. Regards.-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done I am always happy to proofread. The article was pretty good. There weren't any major errors, just a few German terms (e.g. Spanisch, Italien, socioeconomisch) and conventions (i.e. 2,4), a couple of mispellings, and a few cases of weasel words - terms such as "many scientists" that are ambiguous. Xenon54 / talk / 18:28, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for proofreading. May I ask you something?
- Not all German ethnic minorities have been covered in the article. The German Wikipedia has a "Baustein" (don't know the English word), that is put in the lead-section and says "Some important facts are not covered by the article. Please help by providing facts on..." Is there a Baustein like this in case of the English Wikipedia.
- Im am not pleased with the first sentence of the article, which goes "Academic achievement among different groups in Germany is a topic many German scientists[who?] are interested in." Could you think of a better one?
- Thank you :)-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Completely literally translated, "Baustein" means "building stone"; make things a little looser and we get either "brick" or "component". Either way it most likely refers to a template. I do not recall seeing such a template as you describe before. You could ask at the helpdesk, if you remember the name of the template on German Wikipedia, even better, as it will help them help you. I'll get back to you on the introduction sentence. Xenon54 / talk / 23:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, for the lead sentence: the one thing you should aim for is to get rid of the weasel phrase "many scientists" and to effectively sum up the article as concisely as possible. I suggest "Differences in academic achievement among different ethnic groups in Germany is a topic that has drawn the interest of the German academic and scientific communities." You keep the general tone of the original sentence but get rid of the weasel term. After this you might want to write a few sentences summarizing the key points of the article. See Wikipedia:Lead section for more pointers in this area. Xenon54 / talk / 01:25, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will use that sentence and I will aks about the template on the helpdesk. Thanks again for proofreading :) -- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! Please don't hesitate to contact me again if you need proofreading or help with translation. Xenon54 / talk / 19:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh... well... if you really mean it that way, I could need some proofreading of Gymnasium (Germany) :) Unless you said only to be polite. I have to tell you that we people living in Germany are not polite. It's actually one of the first things we learn in English class: "If you talk to an American or an Englishman like you would talk to a German person, he will consider it rude". So if someone says something just to be polite, we often don't get it.-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 13:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh... and another think. In the article about the Gymnasium it is explained that students nearly never to multiple choice tests, but write essays instead. I thought it would be a good idea, to present one or two sample essay questions to the reader. Would you agree with that? I found some sample questions in a so called Lektüreschlüssel (a book that prepares students to answer the essay question they might have to answer in a written exam). Some are very typical to my mind, but unfortunately I found myself unable to translate the most typical. "Inwiefern kann man Werther antizivilisatorische Tendenz auf das Werk des französichen Philosophen Jean-Jaques Rosseau zurückführen? Ziehen Sie Rosseaus Abhandlung "Hat die Wiederherstellung Der Wissenschaften und Künste zur Verfeinerung der Sitten beigetragen" (1750) und/oder seine Roman "Emile oder Über die Erziehung" zu Rate." and ""Als Werther Lotte aus den Gesängen Ossians vorliest, beginnt er die Lesung mit der Anrufung des "Sterns der dämmernden Nacht", es handelt sich um den Abendstern, also um die Venus. Venus ist die Liebesgöttin. Warum beginnt Werther die Lektüre mit der Anrufung dieser Göttin?". I think those questions are very very typical, because they ask a student to remember what he learned years ago in another class. So that is why I would really like to include them.
- Also there is a question that might be asked in an oral exam: "Im Werther gibt es keine moralische Instanz, die das Verhalten des Protagonisten moralisch beurteilt. Übernehmen sie diese Aufgabe und verteidigen Sie/verurteilen Sie Werther vor einem Plenum.". Again I found myself unable to translate that.-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- First one: "To what extent can you trace Werther's anti-civilizationist tendencies back to the work of French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rosseau? Draw upon Rosseau's essay Discourse on the Arts and Sciences (1750) and/or his novel Émile: or, on Education for advice." Xenon54 / talk / 23:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Second one: "As Werther reads from the songs of "Ossian", he begins the reading with an invocation of the 'Star of the dusky night'. It is about the evening star, that is to say Venus. Venus is the [Roman] goddess of love. Why does Werther begin his lecture with the invocation of this goddess?"
- And the third one: "In Werther there is no moral authority to judge the protagonist's behaivour. Accept this task and defend or condemn Werther before a plenum."
- All of these, of course, refer to Goethe's Werther. I have italicised the instances where the use of "Werther" refers to the book; the unitalicised ones are referring to the character. Xenon54 / talk / 01:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. I would have never been able to translate this. I have included it into the article and hope that makes sense. I think written exams in Britain and the US differ from the ones we know in Germany. So I thought it would makes sense to include some of our typical essay questions. Would you also think that makes sense?
- I chose the Lektüreschlüssel of Werther for two reasons. First of all i already have it, so I did not have to buy it. But that should not be my main reason, the main reason why I did choose it, is that i assume that most Americans/British will not be familiar with most German poets, but I assume that Goethe is one of the most famous German poets and the Werther is one of his most famous works. So I hoped people reading the article might be familiar with the novel.-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 14:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think including the sample questions improves the understanding of one reading the article much more than a general paragraph could. I am certainly acquainted with Goethe and his most important works, but it would be helpful to include a link to the articles on him and Werther in case there is a reader who is not familiar with them. Xenon54 / talk / 20:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- You're very welcome! Please don't hesitate to contact me again if you need proofreading or help with translation. Xenon54 / talk / 19:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will use that sentence and I will aks about the template on the helpdesk. Thanks again for proofreading :) -- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for proofreading. May I ask you something?
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Could you help me again?
Hello, You helped me so kindly translating something a time ago... and I wanted to aks you *blush* if you could help me translate something again?-- Greatgreenwhale (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Das wirklich überraschende Resultat der Analysen ist […] der […] deutlich zu erkennende Befund, dass die sekundären sozialen Ungleichheiten unter den 15-jährigen ohne Migrationshintergrund nicht geringer, sondern tendenziell größer als für die Gesamtkohorte ausfallen. Es kann also keine Rede davon sein, dass die Probleme der sozialen Verteilungsgerechtigkeit im engeren Sinne eine Nebenfolge der Zuwanderung sozial schwacher Bevölkerungskreise seien. […] ein ähnliches Resultat haben zum ersten mal Lehmann, Peek und Gänsefuß (1997) aus der Hamburger Untersuchung zur Lernausgangslage berichtet. Dies heißt, […], dass das Ost-West-Gefälle […] bei einer Betrachtung ausschließlich von Jugendlichen ohne Migrationshintergrund noch steiler ausfällt.
That would be very nice, but of course you do not have to.--Greatgreenwhale (talk) 12:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- The really astonishing result of the analysis is...the...clear indication that the secondary social inequalities among 15-year-olds without a migration background are not less; instead, they vary and tend to be larger than the total population. Therefore, there can be no question that the problem of social inequality, in the strictest sense, is a side-effect of the immigration of vulnerable social groups...a similar result was reported for the first time by Lehmann, Peek and Gänsefuß (1997) from the Hamburg study of educational starting position and learning development. This means...that the East-West gap...is even steeper when solely considering young people without a migration background.
- There's only one thing I'm not quite sure of: I think I translated "Lernausgangslage" too literally, although I don't know if there's a better phrase than "educational starting position". I'm always happy to help...don't feel bad! ;) Xenon54 / talk / 20:53, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Proper fair use template
Thanks for the advice at the Help Desk. I've uploaded the image; it's the black-and-white photo at St. Patrick's Catholic Church (St. Patrick, Ohio). Nyttend (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
April 2010 USRD newsletter
Volume 3, Issue 1 • April 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
How did you figure the language out?
Someone on the Help Desk posted in some Arabic-looking language, and you sent them to ka, whatever that is. How does one figure out what language they're seeing?Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Prior knowledge. I can recognize Georgian script (but not read it, of course) because I have seen it before and it is, as far as I know, distinct from every other writing system in this world. Another trick I sometimes use -- for example, to distinguish between the languages written using the Cyrillic alphabet -- is to use Google Translate's "auto-detect" function. Even if Google Translate cannot translate the language it will usually be able to tell you what it is. Xenon54 (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thnaks. I'll use that if I ever see something like that again.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Road signs
I LoL'd!. On the subject of roadsigns, not sure whether you are a gearhead, but on a recent episode of Top Gear (available on BBC America), one of the hosts did a road test with Margaret Calvert who was one of the two-person team that completely redesigned the British road sign system with the advent of "high speed" motorways in the early 60s - interesting stuff to a complete layman like me! – ukexpat (talk) 21:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to hear you liked my post. Although I'm a fan of various motorsports events, I can't claim to be a gearhead, but I suppose I can claim to be a roadgeek. I think if you showed me the insides of a broken car and asked me to fix it I would end up setting something important on fire -- but at least I'd be able to tell you how to get to the nearest service station! As for the Top Gear episode, it does sound fascinating. I haven't had much of a reason to watch BBC America since the Flying Circus moved to IFC, but I'll certainly keep my eyes peeled to see if it comes up soon. Thanks for the tip. Xenon54 (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous editors at AfD
I noticed you started an AfD discussion recently on behalf of an anonymous user and thought I'd ask your opinion on anons at AfD. Do you think it would be appropriate to develop some standard method of, or perhaps some guidelines for anonymous users wanting to take a page to AfD? This isn't the first and wont be the last time an anon wants to list an article for deletion. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 01:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Having listed pages for anonymous users at least twice in the past, I agree a standard procedure is needed. I have been considering making a proposal for some time but have never actually "gone through with it". My thought is a page similar to AFC, but a little bit simpler -- just one simple page, titled "X for deletion/Anonymous nominations", where an anonymous user can leave their rationale and a clerk will come along and properly nominate it, of course making it clear that it was the anonymous user's original idea. I also thought of creating a category "Wikipedians willing to nominate pages for deletion on the behalf of anonymous users", but somehow this does not seem as efficient. Xenon54 (talk) 02:03, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- What's to say we couldn't have both? I was pretty much thinking along the lines of that same process with an AFC type page though. As for actually proposing this, if you ever do get around to it be sure to give me a shout ;). I'd make the proposal myself but apart from not being entirely sure where to actually propose this I'm sure you could actually get a proposal across much more efficiently than I could. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 02:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Barnstar
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
It was good in theory but the community didn't want it. I award you this barnstar as
a thank you for the work you put into the "Facility for anonymous users at AfD" proposal. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 00:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Xenon54 (talk) 00:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Think you'll find ITV1 is also broadcast in Scotland, contrary to the flags you added to the above page. Thanks. 91.85.181.14 (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WXTR
I think we reverted on top of each other. When you reverted me, I was reverting myself (which didn't take). I tuned the station in (I am in the DC area) and all I am hearing is Spanish baseball broadcasts (Nats, I do believe), so I can't independently confirm that myself. Yeah, that would be OR, but it would be something. But I was reverting myself. So, no worries. Apparently some bad information was given to DCRTV. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Don't worry about it. I think this "Sam" fellow might have been hearing the wrong station or something. On Radio-Locator there are only two other stations on 730 with a "Nostalgia" format, and neither use the slogan "Non-Stop Classic Hits". In fact, the only station I could find that uses that slogan is a British station (coincidentally?) called Xtra AM, although that station hasn't been on the air since 1998, and when it was it did not broadcast on 730 kHz. It certainly wouldn't be the first time DCRTV has been given incorrect information. Xenon54 (talk) 00:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- True...I could see WXTR using the "Xtra" name. Back when WPRS-FM was WXTR-FM, they were "Xtra 104", so it would be a pick-up of an old name, but I am just not hearing it. They do still broadcast online (just not when I checked due to a Nats game), so you or I could confirm it if they really were on a new format. I figure one of the radio information newsletters like Radio-Info will print something or else The Washington Post. I will keep my ear to the grindstone and see if I hear anything on the radio or other places. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Summer 2010 USRD newsletter
Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?