User talk:Pietje96
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Pietje96 has not edited Wikipedia since 4 October 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
The 'move' tab
[edit]Hi there! I've deleted the page listed above. Just to let you know, if you create an article with the wrong title, you can just move it to the right title, and don't leave a redirect behind. The 'move' tab is at the top of the page, near the 'edit' tab.
Welcome to Wikipedia by the way, and thanks for your efforts! If you have any questions, feel free to drop by my talk page and ask! Cheers! GedUK 10:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Pietje96 (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Re: Albrecht
[edit]Thanks very much for the encouragement and happy holidays. Albrecht (talk) 20:23, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Milhist!
[edit]
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
- The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Roger Davies talk 15:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
[edit]The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:15, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Images
[edit]Some of the images you listed here, I tagged to be move to the Commons and adjusted the licenses to {{PD-old}} from {{PD-author}}. I recommend uploading free images and other files to the Wikimedia Commons. I also tagged the images to moved to the Commons. Cheers, The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 21:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Action of 9 August 1780
[edit]Thanks for writing. I'm wondering if you've ever come across a (geographic) name for this engagement. I believe I've seen it as "Battle of Cape Santa Maria" after Cabo de Santa Maria (Cape Verde) — not, confusingly, the mainland Portuguese cape of the same name, which gave its name to a naval action of 1804. Any chance you could verify this? Albrecht (talk) 01:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Catalan People.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catalan People.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
[edit]The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]I'd like to draw your attention to Wikipedia's policy on edit warring, which you've been violating on both Trafalgar order of battle and casualties and Battle of Trafalgar. You need to be very careful about reverting other editors more than once; unless it's obvious vandalism, you're likely to be blocked if it continues. EyeSerenetalk 18:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Trafalgar order of battle and casualties#Gravina--Toddy1 (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Beware WP:3RR on Battle of Cape Finisterre (1805). Both you and our "friend" are likely to get blocked. (If I report him at WP:AN3, you will probably also get blocked.) Magic♪piano 18:32, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Anglo-French fleet at Bomarsund.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Anglo-French fleet at Bomarsund.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
[edit]The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Battle of San Juan (1625)
[edit]I read your article and it is very good. I removed the "main article" link which you added to the "Military history of Puerto Rico", because it gives the impression that the contents were borrowed or derived from your article and that is not so. Instead, I moved the link to your article to the "See also" section where it is supposed to go. The image which you uploaded of the Battle of San Juan is fantastic. Keep up the good work. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Coordinator elections have opened!
[edit]Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Fuerte Delfín
[edit]Tengo la info necesaria para redactar el artículo. En cuanto estés disponible, ya sabes--ElBufon (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Hola, creo que estás disponible, ¿no?--ElBufon (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
[edit]The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
[edit]The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
[edit]The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Asuntos varios
[edit]He visto que has retomado la actividad wikipédica. Cuando puedas ponte en contacto conmigo. ElBufon (talk) 13:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- A ver si un día de estos puedes ponerte en contacto conmigo para comentar algunos artículos. ¿Cuando te va bien? ElBufon (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- ¿Estás disponible? ElBufon (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC) Oye, estoy disponible hasta la 1:30 y tengo que comentarte algunas cosas. Si puedes...
- Buen trabajo con la Newfoundland Expedition. Si tienes un rato ya sabes. ElBufon (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
[edit]
|
|
|
July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy |
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. | |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
[edit]
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
File copyright problem with File:Lope de Hoces Saint Martin.JPG
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Lope de Hoces Saint Martin.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Acather96 (talk) 18:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Done, thanks for the information. Pietje96 (talk) 18:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
New articles
[edit]Greetings! You have done some nice articles recently and I hope you will continue that way :) I tried to edit them because they are in the wrong tense and have some grammatical mistakes but I myself don't have proficiency level in English and suggest that you ask an English speaker to review them. There were one or two sentences that I could not understand... Also, in the article Capture of Richard Hawkins I have added the English flagships in the infobox as a galleon, if that is wrong, you can correct it. Regards, --Gligan (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hey there! that's because the sources I read are usually written in first person, and as I often copy some things -doing it on my own way- i forget that i must use the third person view. Thanks for the encouragement, alright, you are free to do it, give me more details when you have a while off. Pietje96 (talk) 04:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Stop changing location to dates!
[edit]You are vandalising infoxboxes by changing them to dates. There have been discussions on pages to have these changed to locations rather than dates and you are messing them all up! Bruich (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2010 (GMT)
- You're the only one here that is vandalizing content, you have been doing it for months until you were banned for Continued block evasion and edit warring Pietje96 (talk) 16:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- As the creator of the infobox involved here, I have chosen to step in on this issue. I have made a statement at User:Bruichladdich1's talkpage and will watch there for further actions (although be advised that I will only be intermittently online over the next week). Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just a note, seen this edit and, while I agree with it, I want to make clear that I am not an admin, just a long-term user with a lot of experience in this area (I do know some admins I can ask to have a look though if you wish).--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- If you can ask them to take a look, it would help a lot to solve this problem. Thank you Pietje96 (talk) 17:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- Just a note, seen this edit and, while I agree with it, I want to make clear that I am not an admin, just a long-term user with a lot of experience in this area (I do know some admins I can ask to have a look though if you wish).--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- As the creator of the infobox involved here, I have chosen to step in on this issue. I have made a statement at User:Bruichladdich1's talkpage and will watch there for further actions (although be advised that I will only be intermittently online over the next week). Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
The Milhist election has started!
[edit]The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Pietje96, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Pietje96. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Newfoundland expedition
[edit] | On 3 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Newfoundland expedition, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
[edit]
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC) | |
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Tercios
[edit]Veo que te estás animando con el tema. Si quieres escribir algún artículo puedo recomendarte algunas obras. Ya me dirás. ElBufon (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Excelente trabajo con el socorro a Génova, muy buen artículo. Si estás disponible para charlar, avísame. ElBufon (talk) 11:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Buen trabajo con el sitio de Jülich. Creo haber encontrado un libro donde quizás se detalle los pormenores del asedio. Cuando quieras, ponte en contacto conmigo. ElBufon (talk) 10:55, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Oye, quiero hacerte algunas preguntas. ElBufon (talk) 12:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox battles of the Palatinate campaign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 16:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox battles of the Palatinate campaign
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox battles of the Palatinate campaign requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. cymru.lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 23:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks.Pietje96 (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
[edit]
| |||
Possibly unfree File:Sword in hand, the Spanish coastguard captain lunged at Captain Jenkins. by C.L. Doughty.JPG
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sword in hand, the Spanish coastguard captain lunged at Captain Jenkins. by C.L. Doughty.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 11:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Review of Relief of Genoa
[edit]Just to say that I've started the GAR of the Relief of Genoa. Let me know if the comments make sense. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
España en el Palatinado
[edit]Hola Pietje96. He estado leyendo el mensaje, y respecto de los dos aspectos planteo lo siguiente:
- Las diecisiete Provincias no están mostrando límites actuales, de hecho se puede apreciar que no aparece el obispado de Lieja. Sin embargo, no tiene mejor solución, el mapa mudo no ofrece posibilidades para mejores detalles, pero es que además el mapa del imperio es derivado de otro archivo svg que está realizado con Inkscape, y con la vectorización todavía se pierden más detalles.
- A pesar que la información es muy interesante, sin embargo, de forma conceptual el mapa no representa conquistas temporales en una guerra en curso, porque una cosa es el territorio y otra es el frente de guerra, sobre todo para el caso de España, que intervino en tantos frentes. La campaña del Palatinado es eso, una campaña militar, y esas fortificaciones tienen una existencia coyuntural y circunstancial en el marco de la guerra de los 30 años y en la guerra contra las Provincias Unidas.
- [1] In July 1630, the Spanish handed over most of their German forts, including Lingen, to the emperor and the Catholic League. Only Rheinberg, now thier chief stronghold on the Rhine, was retained. Also, forces were withdrwan from their garrisons in the Lower Palatinate.
- [2] Nevertheless, very soon after Olivares uttered these words, the Spanish garrison - to the amazement of the Dutch - marched out of Lingen, leaving ther fortress in the hands of imperialist troops. By late 1630, as Aytona reported to the king, the only Spanish garrison which remained on the right bank of the Rhine was that of Düsseldorf, capital of Berg and Residenz of the dukes of Jülich-Cleves. Pfaffenmütze was dismantled and abandoned by its Spanish garrison, in September 1630, not under pressure from the elector of Cologne but out of sheer strategic necessity.[...] [3] With the Dutch capture of Rheinberg and Orsoy, in the summer of 1633, the Spanish hegemony in north-west Germany was a thing of the past.
Incluso aunque esas fortificaciones no tuvieran que ver con una guerra, eso tampoco las convierte en enclaves. De hecho, la Monarquía española tenía guarniciones en otros territorios, como en Italia (Piacenza [4], Mónaco, Sabionetta, Corregio, [5] Niza o Villafranca [6]) y eso no las convierte en territorio español. De otra manera, sería como hacer un mapa de Estados Unidos con las bases de Irak o Afganistán. Un saludo. Trasamundo (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hola de nuevo. He estado comprobando ciertos comentarios, y en efecto hay que distinguir unos sitios de otros. Por un lado existieron una serie de guarniciones militares enfocadas no como afirmación de soberanía sino en un marco de una coyuntura bélica. De entre ellas, hay unos determinados puntos que por su importancia sí contaban con un gobierno, y éstos puntos sí pueden considerarse como enclaves, sólo he hallado tres: Rheinberg, Orosy y Wesel.[7][8][9] Por cierto, los Países Bajos no eran un reino, y por tanto, no tenían virreyes, y además esas plazas fueron perdidas hacia 1630 de manos de los holandeses, no de los franceses hacia 1670.
- Respecto de la Fosa Eugeniana, en absoluto veo que debe ser incluida dentro de las posesiones españolas. Su razón de ser es bélica, no para afirmar soberanía. Y no es un acontecimento aislado, porque de forma coetánea, los españoles aseguraron la ruta a Flandes con fortificaciones militares en la Valtelina. El principado de Piombino sería otro ejemplo de guarniciones militares, en este caso para controlar la ruta marítima Nápoles-Génova, ahora bien, hay una diferencia sustancial, que en 1621 el emperador otorgó el feudo del principado Piombino al rey de España. Además las líneas defensivas no fueron algo extraordinario, considerarlas como parte del país que las llevó a cabo nos daría cosas tan singulares como que la línea de Torres Vedras pertenecería al imperio británico o la línea Gustav al III Reich.
- Por otra parte, se da el hecho fundamental de las limitaciones técnicas de poder incluir tales enclaves, del mismo modo que no se puede colocar a Mazalquivir, o la misma Llivia. Sobre todo cuando tales presencias en el Palatinado no eran sui iuris, sino dependientes de los Países Bajos, donde ya es bastante complicado hacer unos mejores contornos con áreas más grandes y mejor definidas como Limburgo.
- En otro orden de cosas, una de las políticas de commons commons:Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view es que los mapas subidos a commons no deben cumplir necesariamente con las políticas de wikipedia, pero cuando esos mapas tienen que emplearse en las páginas de wikipedia sí deben cumplir las políticas de wikipedia. El mapa del imperio español al estar basado en referencias fiables, acorde a la política de WP:VER, no representa pretensiones de soberanía ni áreas de influencia, como se debatió en su momento, ya que la definición de esos términos, y el subsiguiente alcance territorial daba bastantes quebraderos de cabeza por continuas violaciones de la política de WP:NOR. Además, este mapa representa varias épocas distintas y a la vez, y no es equiparable a los que representan un periodo más concreto de tiempo.
- Asímismo, la redacción del artículo debe estar en consecuencia con la bibliografía del tema del artículo. ¿Realmente existe una atención tan detallada y semejante dentro de todo el contexto del imperio español?, yo creo que no. Si en general la bibliografía del imperio no presta atención detallada a este asunto, entonces el artículo debe obrar en consecuencia, eso no quiere decir que no se deba poner nada, sino no excederse. Otra cosa sería ubicarlos dentro del contexto de la guerra de Flandes o de la guerra de los treinta años, donde tendría pleno sentido, y con una serie de mapas más detallados describir las distintas fases de los conflictos, no sólo desde la influencia española, sino también desde todas las demás, de una forma acorde a WP:NPOV. Saludos. Trasamundo (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Un mapa de la guerra de los 30 años [10] del primer periodo no debe incluir únicamente las campañas españolas, sino también todas las demás en todo el imperio, no solo en el Palatinado; un mapa de los Países Bajos incluye los cambios territoriales del periodo [11][12]. Pero parece ser que lo que planteas es hacer un mapa de la campaña del Palatinado, para el artículo determinado, en tal caso no es únicamente indicar las fortalezas españolas, sino también las distintas campañas de los ejércitos y el reparto del poder en el Palatinado tras ser puesto el Elector Palatino tras el bando del Imperio, de lo contrario sería contrario a la política de no neutralidad. Saludos. Trasamundo (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
![[10]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Y_VW1n5Z54A/S2YEa2kGDNI/AAAAAAAAB_o/NdFBoVrNQVc/s1600-h/guerra30anos1.gif){kind=link}
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlanden_1621-1628.PNG){kind=link}
![[12]](http://monde.jigluhood.com/discussion/messages/3564880/The%20Dutch%20Reconquest%201590%20to%201607%20r.jpg){kind=link}
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Naming a victory
[edit]Hi, should we deduce from this image File:Placa del panteón.JPG that the Action of 9 August 1780 might be known in Spain as Combate de las Azores? Perhaps we ought to find a basis for a move, considering the engagement seems rather more substantial than the single-ship actions or skirmishes usually filed as "Action of Day Month Year." Albrecht (talk) 01:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Blockade
[edit]Dear pietje, you are right. I suppose, after all that it is a semantic argument that will make little difference to the article itself. It is, by the way, a good article as are a great many of your other contributions. All the best, Ian 14:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Battle of Muros.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Battle of Muros.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Re. [13]: excuse me, but how do you know? I'll be more than glad to retract that deletion discussion if we have clear evidence about the status of the painting, but you must be seeing something I'm not seeing there. – Right now I can't even verify there ever was a painter by the name of Mariano Badía. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
![[13]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Battle_of_Muros.jpg&diff=420977886&oldid=420975692){kind=link}
- Update: there seems to be one Mariano Badía Sanmartín (1901–1986) [14]. Is that the one you mean? In that case, it wouldn't of course be PD yet. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I'm honestly still a bit confused, because the picture you uploaded doesn't look like a colored engraving at all (more like a watercolor), but if the print catalog identifies it properly as a work of 1872, that's fine. Could you add the info to the image page, with a citation of the catalogue? Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Actually, on reflection, I think I now know why I had such a bad feeling about that image: it's actually wildly inaccurate, historically. Those ships look nothing like early 16th century ships. The hulls are much more like the galleons of almost a hundred years later, and even at that time, only very few of the very largest ships would have had two gun decks with this many cannons. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, good, if we agree on that, I can just delete it. Thanks for your response. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oh BTW, sorry I forgot to notify you, I've had to delete one more: this one, credited to an Osprey Publishing book and its illustrator, was evidently modern and as such copyrighted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Action of 23 October 1805
[edit]What is the complete source for "James, p. 362"? Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
nevermindPietje96 (talk) 20:39, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Claude de Forbin.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Claude de Forbin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Thomas Graves,1st Baron Graves.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Graves,1st Baron Graves.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:26, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you very much. Your words encourage me to keep doing my best. See ya.--Sir Ignel (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
[edit]
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year
[edit]Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:32, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:14, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Template:Campaignbox Falklands crisis has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cambalachero (talk) 17:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Military history coordinator election
[edit]The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:55, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
GA review in progress
[edit]You may not have noticed, but I've started your GA review at Talk:Charles Dashwood (Royal Navy officer)/GA1--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:53, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
[edit]The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
[edit]Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
[edit]On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Pietje96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
[edit]  
|
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
March Madness 2017
[edit]G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 00:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Revolutionary War. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pietje96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
[edit]As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
[edit]Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
[edit]G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Backlog Banzai
[edit]In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
[edit]G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
March Madness 2020
[edit]G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open
[edit]G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
[edit]G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
[edit]Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Plagiarism/copyright violations in Battle of Abrolhos
[edit]I notice you were the main author of the the article Battle of Abrolhos. Most of the text in the article was plagiarized verbatim from David Marley's Wars in the Americas (1998, 2008), which is not in public domain. I am inquiring if you are Marley or have been given a copyright release by the holder. If not, this article needs to be entirely rewritten to avoid deletion. Walrasiad (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Captain Sir Edward Hughes.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by File:Captain Sir Edward Hughes, circa 1720-94 RMG BHC2793.tiff.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 08:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:Jose de Mazarredo Salazar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by File:José de Mazarredo.jpg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 08:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
