Dump months

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A tall white rectangular sign with short phrases on it topped by a red sign reading "Showtime Cinemas". In the background is a gray sky; there is a light dusting of snow on the ground.
A marquee in January 2014 advertising an assortment of films typical for that time of year

The dump months is a term used in the film community for the two periods of the year when there are lowered commercial and critical expectations for new major-studio releases. Audiences during these periods are smaller than the rest of the year, so no tentpole movies are released. January[1] and February are usually most commonly cited as these, with August and September sometimes included.[2] Releases during those times primarily include films that would have been released at other times of year had they done better at test screenings, films with less prominent stars, genre films (particularly horror), movies that can't be easily marketed and films intended for a teenage audience, which has fewer options for entertainment outside the home.

Several factors combine to create the dump months, most of them circumstances particular to the United States and Canada, the primary market for most major releases. Both periods immediately follow the times of year in which the Hollywood studios concentrate films they expect to be the biggest critical and/or commercial successes, periods of increased spending on entertainment generally. While this often means that moviegoers have less disposable income afterwards, economics alone does not create the dump months. The weather and competition from other forms of mass entertainment, especially professional sports, also play a part; the winter dump months are further affected by the Academy Awards rules.

The dump months evolved over the course of the 20th century. Although during the studio era most major releases followed annual patterns similar to today's, several classics like The Kid, Shadow of a Doubt and The Treasure of the Sierra Madre were released during January. Since the decline of the studios, however, memorable films from the dump months have become rare exceptions. The most notable is The Silence of the Lambs, a well-reviewed box office smash released in late January 1991 that went on to win that year's Academy Award for Best Picture. Several years before that, Dirty Dancing and Fatal Attraction became hits following releases in August and September respectively.

Films released during the dump months have not always been consigned to cinematic oblivion. Some, like Tremors and Office Space, have become cult classics. Starting with Cloverfield, some 21st-century dump-months releases have managed to exceed $100 million on box office receipts. The similar success of low-budget horror films like The Devil Inside and Mama in the early 2010s has prompted studios to release films in that genre at times of the year other than Halloween and the dump months.

Etymology[edit]

The term "dump months" comes from the belief that studios use the time periods in question as a "dumping ground" for movies they are contractually obligated to release but believe to have limited commercial prospects at best.[3][4][5][6] "The first months of the year are known as the 'dump months' in Hollywood," wrote Vegas Seven critic Una LaMarche in early 2013. "It's a bleak stretch for cinephiles, traditionally packed with movies that studios dislike, and want to release with little fanfare."[7] Likewise, Paul Shirey at JoBlo.com dismisses September as "one of the most worthless months at the box office."[8]

The earliest known use of the term in print is a 2007 article in the British newspaper The Guardian, where critic Jonathan Bernstein wrote:

In the US, January is "dump month" at the movies. The films no studios believe in or care about—the stuff that doesn't get screened for critics, the stuff that barely gets promoted beyond blurbs from obscure websites and suspicious raves from local TV chefs and weathermen—suddenly become the sole choice available to regular filmgoers hungry for fresh fare.

A mere matter of days after American screens have been filled with the finest achievements of contemporary cinema (not to mention Dreamgirls) everything changes.[1]

Use of the term became more common in the early 2010s.[2][3][4]

Causes[edit]

While both dump-month periods immediately follow periods of greater movie attendance when event movies expected to be critical and/or commercial successes are released, and periods of greater consumer spending generally, there are also reasons specific to both periods that further dampen movie attendance to limit the expected box office returns to the extent that movies with strong potential will be scheduled for other times of year.

January–February[edit]

The main impediment to the release of highly anticipated or high-quality films in January and February is the calendar of the two major film awards, which overlap with those months. The winter weather also adds uncertainty to estimates of potential box office. Two holidays during the time provide some slight relief; however, they are offset by the distraction of Super Bowl weekend, which depresses spending on movies. The combined gross for all January releases 2002–2012 has averaged $387 million; for February it is $615 million. By comparison December, with its holiday releases, averages $1.2 billion.[2]

Spending is low to begin with since many consumers are cutting back and repaying debts incurred during the preceding holiday season, as well as having less free time.[9] "I've always assumed it's because that's when people aren't going to movies," offers Jeremy Kirk of Firstshowing.net, when asked to explain the dearth of good films in January, "because they are going back to work and school after the holidays." C. Robert Cargill of Ain't It Cool News agrees:

The only people who are going to see movies at that time are over the age of 35; who have savings accounts and weren't tapped out by Christmas. That's why Taken was such a hit and why Clint Eastwood movies tend to do so well in January. They are made for an audience that still has money. They release the Oscar bait movies, which play to that crowd, and then you just get this terrible sprinkling of crap.[10]

Box Office Mojo divides the movie year into five seasons. It defines the winter season as lasting from the first day after New Year's week or weekend ends through the Thursday before the first Friday in March. The site's data go back to 1982, and in every year the winter season has had the lowest box office grosses. The weakest winter was 1983, when The Entity's $13 million take led the way to a total of $93.4 million in domestic grosses for all movies released during that season. On the other end, 2012 had the strongest winter, at $1.24 billion, topped by Safe House, which took in $124 million.[11]

Awards calendar[edit]

At the end of the year comes the holiday movie season, when the studios release both tentpole movies, such as the latest installments in popular franchises that are expected to be highly successful and "Oscar bait" movies that are seen as likely to earn critical praise and, more importantly, nominations for major awards such as the Golden Globes and Oscars, the industry's most prestigious. Those nominations are then used to promote the film. But while the former nominations are announced in December with the awards themselves given in early January, the Academy Award nominations are announced after the Golden Globes, and the actual awards are not given until late February,[note 1] leaving most of the first two months of the year as Oscar season a period during which any Golden Globes received as well as Oscar nominations can be used to promote the film to audiences, while studios lobby Academy members to vote for their nominees.[12]

To be eligible for award consideration, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences requires that a film be shown in a theater in Los Angeles County, California, for at least seven consecutive days during which is advertised in print media.[13] Studios hoping to position a film for some nominations usually satisfy that minimum requirement, then ease them into wide release from then until the awards ceremony. The flexibility this marketing strategy requires means that screens be available, and studios limit their releases of new films during this time to that end. As critic Ty Burr explained in a 2013 New York Times Magazine article on the mediocrity of January films:

... [T]he studios choose to dump substandard products here because they know our attention is elsewhere, as January has evolved into a time to watch the Important Films that were released in December. If the end of the year marks a staging ground for the coming awards season — with various critics' groups, the Golden Globe nominations and the enigmatic body known as the National Board of Review serving as official starting guns—January is when most paying customers actually get to see those movies. January thus represents a convenient open playing field ...[2]

New films shown publicly anywhere for the first time after January 1 themselves are ineligible for Oscars until the following year, by which time they will likely have been forgotten by critics and voters.[12] The Silence of the Lambs, winner of the 1991 Academy Award for Best Picture, is a rare exception, as the only film in the post-studio era released in the first two months of its year to go on to win that Oscar.[14] Burr calls it "the grand exception to the January Movies Will Never Amount to Anything rule," and finds that only one other classic of the late 20th century, Dr. Strangelove, was a January release.[2]

Theaters will also still be running any holiday-season hits even if they hadn't been nominated for awards, further reducing the screens available for new movies. "Discerning adult audiences are catching up on the various ten-best lists and the general moviegoers are seeing the event films of December," Ray Subers, an editor at Box Office Mojo, told The Atlantic in 2012.[5]

For film critics and executives, and a few filmgoers, there is a break at the end of January in the form of the annual Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, which showcases independent films that are seeking distribution. Executives usually make deals to pick some up for later in the year, or sign the filmmakers, and critics get to write about some of the more interesting entries. "[Sundance] is basically the movie industry's version of Groundhog Day: the promise that something better is coming, and hopefully it stars Bill Murray," writes Burr.[2]

Winter weather[edit]

During January and February winter storms become more likely than they are in December. While they do not affect the entire U.S., the Northeast and Midwest are particularly prone to them, along with most neighboring areas of Canada. This includes many major metropolitan areas, and movie markets, in both countries.[12]

Several automobiles buried up to window height by snow that is still falling
A heavy snowstorm in February 2013 made it difficult for viewers in affected areas to see movies

When winter storms hit, bringing with them combinations of precipitation that making driving difficult and sometimes dangerous, moviegoers often prefer to stay home. Non-essential travel is officially discouraged, and in severe enough weather all non-emergency driving can be banned in some areas until the situation improves.[15] In anticipation of the February 2013 nor'easter, which struck on the month's first weekend, three large chains closed down many of their theaters in the Northeast.[16]

Industry analysts feared that the storm could seriously impact the box office prospects of two films opening that weekend, Identity Thief and Side Effects,[16] both of which were seen as having potential to do better than most winter movies.[17] While it afterwards appeared that the two films were not seriously affected, and did better than expected, with Identity Thief even winning the weekend, despite generally poor reviews and word of mouth, with $36 million in receipts, overall box office was down 45% from the same weekend the previous year. Side Effects finished a distant third with a quarter of Identity Thief's take.[15] The clearest sign of the storm's effect, according to Box Office Mojo, was the 35% drop in earnings for Silver Linings Playbook, then in wide release after several Oscar nominations.[18]

Holiday weekends and Super Bowl[edit]

While holiday weekends in the US generally increase film audiences and thus attract major releases throughout the year, the two that occur during these months—Martin Luther King Day in January and Presidents' Day in February–offer only a modest prospect for improvement. The most lucrative take by any movie on Martin Luther King Day weekend is $54.4 million by Avatar in 2010, a month after its release;[19] the best opening weekend was Ride Along four years later, taking in $41.5 million[20] ($48.6 million if the entire holiday weekend is counted[21]).

Presidents's Day benefits by its proximity to Valentine's Day (which, as it is always February 14, is often a weekday), which offers the studios enough chance of a payoff, usually from romantic comedies and other "chick flicks" marketed towards women as date movies. "I've had years where it's been six straight weeks of dreck until finally something halfway decent came out on Valentine's Day," says Cargill.[10] Valentine's Day, a 2010 romantic comedy with a large ensemble cast, took in $63.1 million on its opening weekend, the largest take for a President's Day weekend.[21][22]

Any boost movie grosses get from those two holidays, however, is offset by what typically comes between them. The Super Bowl, the annual championship game of the National Football League, has been in recent years[note 2] played on either the last Sunday of January or the first one of February. It is accompanied by heavy media attention and frequent gatherings all over the country to watch the game on television, accompanied with food and beverages purchased with money that might otherwise be spent on movie tickets. "Does the Super Bowl affect ticket sales?" asks Scott Gwin at Cinemablend. "The answer, of course, is yes. In fact, there's a decent chance Budweiser spends more on advertising that Sunday than America does in theaters."[23]

The most successful film to open during Super Bowl weekend is the 2008 concert film Hannah Montana & Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert, which took in $31.1 million, almost half the total it would earn during a released limited to just that weekend and the following week. In a close second is Dear John, grossing $30.5 million in 2010, for the strongest Super Bowl weekend opening for a conventional release.[24] Both films had strong appeal to female moviegoers, an audience more receptive to moviegoing on a weekend dominated by a sporting event.[10] The 2008 action film Taken, with $24.7 million on its opening weekend on its way to total receipts of over $100 million, is a distant third.[24]

August–September[edit]

The year's other dump period straddles summer and fall, and does not lend itself to being as clearly delineated as the winter dump months. In the past it was usually considered to include all of August and September, and in some years still may. But in years with many major summer movies, some may open on the first or second weekend of August to avoid competing with other such movies.[6] "As we enter the dog days of summer, we get the summer movie season dregs as well," wrote PopMatters editor Bill Gibron, anticipating August 2013. "Still, there's some stuff to look forward to."[25]

By the end of the summer seasonal jobs end, just as with the winter dump months, and younger moviegoers begin to return to school. Tuition payments, and retailers' back-to-school sales further cut into movie grosses.[9] "The prevailing wisdom is that people don't go to the movies in August; families are on vacation, kids are at camp, blah blah blah," Vulture complained as it pondered another potentially dreary month in 2008.[26]

It is the month's last two weekends that are more universally seen as the beginning of the late-summer dump months, when only forgettable films are likely to be released, with occasional exceptions like Dirty Dancing, which went on to make $63 million domestically from its release in late August 1987, and spawn several sequels and a franchise.[27]

At the end of August is the annual American celebration of Labor Day, the only holiday weekend during this period. Of all the year's holiday weekends it is reliably the weakest in terms of movie box office, with the top grosser for the weekend being the 2007 Rob Zombie-directed reimagining of Halloween, at $30.5 million. The Sixth Sense, then in its fourth week, is a close second after pulling in $29 million in 1999; in a distant second for opening weekends is yet another horror film, 2012's The Possession with $21.1 million.[28]

Once September begins, younger moviegoers are preoccupied with starting the school year and thus less likely to go to the movies on weeknights than they were in summertime.[29] As with the winter months, football also has an impact at the box office as not only NFL teams but college and high school teams resume play, all on weekends. "[W]e are left with a series of movies competing for box office scraps in a month when Hollywood assumes no one goes to the movies," says a Yahoo critic.[30][31]

Some September movies have triumphed critically and commercially. In 1987, Fatal Attraction which opened in wide release on September 18,[note 3] not only succeeded at the box office, staying in theaters through June of the next year[32] and garnering six Academy Award nominations including Best Picture.[33] Twelve years later, in 1999, the similarly successful American Beauty, which had been in limited release through September before going wide in October,[34] won that award and four others.[35]

September's counterpart to Sundance, the Toronto International Film Festival, is held at the end of the month, by which time it is officially autumn. The film community's attention is focused on the Canadian city. Critics gather to see potential Oscar contenders among the many independent films on the program and studio executives look to line up distribution deals with the same prize in mind. Some of the best are released within a week or so, ending the September dump period.[8][36]

In past years, October also was when more anticipated horror films reached screens, to capitalize on the approach of Halloween at the end of the month. However, this has begun to change due to the way franchises such as the Saw and Paranormal Activity films have been dominating that period, prompting distributors of other horror films to consider releasing them during the winter dump months instead. In 2012 Paramount enjoyed huge success with the unheralded The Devil Inside, released right after New Year's Day[37] despite a strongly negative critical and audience reaction; the next year Mama was received enthusiastically by critics and filmgoers when it came out on Martin Luther King Day weekend[38] after being rescheduled from the previous October to avoid going up against Sinister and Paranormal Activity 4. Only one major horror film, the third adaptation of Stephen King's Carrie, was released in October 2013, and it underperformed.[39][40]

Statistical analysis[edit]

The dump months' obstacles are reflected in their box office totals, particularly the success of movies opening during those months. January's strongest domestic opening weekend, ever, was the $41 million Ride Along took in in 2014. It is the lowest best opening weekend gross for any month.[note 4] Close behind is September's best, the $42.5 million that Hotel Transylvania took in following its 2012 release. February and August are fourth and sixth, respectively, with The Passion of the Christ at $83 million and Guardians of the Galaxy at $94 million respectively (the all-time champion is May, reflecting The Avengers' $207 million on its 2012 opening weekend).[9][41]

In January 2010, Metacritic editor Jason Dietz used statistical analysis to measure whether films released in that month were, as perceived, inferior. He compared the site's aggregate scores, based on critical and audience consensus, for films released in January, February, and March from 2000 to 2009. January averaged the fewest releases of the three, and the lowest average scores. Of the 88 films released in the first month of the year during that decade, only six earned above a 61 average on the site's scale of 0 to 100,[note 5] the lowest of any of the three winter months, even accounting for the increase in releases as the spring becomes closer.[12]

It did not seem to Dietz as if there was any relationship between critical praise and audience enthusiasm for January films. The best-rated, Disney's 2004 animated musical Teacher's Pet, was a commercial failure, as was 2001's The Pledge. Cloverfield, the third entry, was a success, and behind it Freedom Writers had ridden its good reviews to do some modest box office in 2007; however How She Move had flopped that same year.[12]

Conversely, some of the successful January releases did not meet with critical acclaim. Taken had been highly successful at the end of the month in 2009 despite reviews that ranged across the spectrum. And two weeks before its release, the universally panned comedy Paul Blart: Mall Cop had opened strong on its way to a total take over $150 million.[12]

Contemplating the offerings for January 2013, Adam Raymond at Vulture undertook a ranking of a quarter-century of Januarys based on scores at Rotten Tomatoes (RT), another review aggregator. He averaged the ratings for all films released in a particular January, with the best and worst scores noted. By this method the best and worst Januarys were both in the earliest years for which the site kept scores. "[T]his could be more a result of the fact that far fewer movies used to be released then, so it took less to sway the average," Raymond noted.[4]

The best January was also the first, 1987, whose 79% average was led by Woody Allen's acclaimed Radio Days. At 95%, it was also the best-rated January film during the survey period. That month's lowest-rated new release, Outrageous Fortune, still managed a 50% rating, better than the average for all but one of the other years.[4]

At the other end was January 1989, where the 26% achieved by Gleaming the Cube and the 0% awarded to DeepStar Six bracketed a 16% average. Five other January films joined it at the bottom of the scale.[4] It was recognized as a nadir among Januarys even at the time. In a contemporary essay in The New York Times after the month had concluded, an exasperated Janet Maslin presciently noted that "the January that has just ended really looks like one for the record books."[42]

Among the 21st-century Januarys, 2011 did the best at 39%, led by The Way Back's 75%. The worst was 2003, when Final Destination 2 led the pack to a 23% average with its score of 47%. Kangaroo Jack brought up the rear at 8%.[4]

Looking ahead to the movies of February 2014, Chris Kirk and Kim Thompson at Slate, argued that February's movies were statistically the worst of any month. Their evidence was the average RT ratings for all movies for each month between 2000 and 2013. February's averaged 45%, three points lower than January and September and four below August. February also had the worst month in the entire sample period, with the 2001 releases from that month coming in at 31%; 2010 and 2012 tied for the best February at 54%.[43]

No comparable analysis has ever been done on films released during the late-summer dump months. At the end of July 2008, Vulture again greeted the coming month with two posts on the drop in movie quality historically associated with the month, and its theories for what might explain that.[26] One was a history of the previous 15 Augusts, with movies released in each month subjectively rated as "halfway-decent" or "lousy".[44] It concluded that "the studios have put out 169 lousy movies in the past fifteen Augusts, and merely 26 halfway-decent ones. That's 11.2 movies per August that make you want to claw your eyes out."[26]

Most of the Augusts in the time period in question had one or two "halfway-decent" movies, with the other 9–11 movies discarded as "lousy". The exceptions were the consecutive years 1998–99. The former was regarded as the worst August, with no halfway-decent movies and all its releases (The Avengers, How Stella Got Her Groove Back and Halloween H20, among others) considered lousy. But in August 1999, there were five halfway-decent films: The Sixth Sense, The Thomas Crown Affair, The Iron Giant, Dick and Bowfinger.[44]

History[edit]

A black and white image of a young man with a mustache and a bowler hat peaking around from behind a brick corner with a police officer behind them
Charlie Chaplin in The Kid, a classic released in January 1921

According to Burr, from the earliest days of the studio system major releases had largely followed the same calendar modern audiences would recognize, clustered during spring, summer, and the end-of-year holidays. "Yet January was still in the mix," he observes. "Silent-era Charlie Chaplin hits like The Kid (1921) and The Circus (1928), the Garbo/John Gilbert melodrama Flesh and the Devil (1927) and Josef von Sternberg's Last Command (1928) all came out during the first month of the year."[2]

The best decade for January movies, Burr writes, may well have been the 1940s. It began with what he suggests was "the Greatest January of All Time". The Grapes of Wrath, His Girl Friday and The Shop Around the Corner, all considered classics, were released in January 1940. Later in the decade, other classic films would first reach screens during January, such as Sullivan's Travels, Shadow of a Doubt and The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.[2]

A few months after Treasure's release, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., holding that it was a violation of antitrust law for the studios to own theater chains as well. This has historically been seen as the beginning of the end of the studio system. Burr found that after it, with movies having less of a guaranteed box office since an adequate theatrical run could no longer be guaranteed, "release patterns began to clump more formally around big weekends, warmer weather and national holidays."[2]

In the mid-1970s, the studios discovered the summer blockbuster via the success of Jaws and Star Wars. In the following decade the rise of independent producers dedicated to quality such as Merchant Ivory and Harvey Weinstein made the October–December the year's other highlight. But those two concentrations left the post-holiday winter and late summer as the lows that followed the highs. By the 2010s, Burr said:

While the summer movie season begins earlier every year, all other aspects are now written in stone. Memorial Day through late July is for explosions, flying spandex men and CGI critters. Labor Day through the end of the year offers films that are good for you. February through April is what the studios make of it. August is death by ennui. And January is suicide.[2]

Similarly, The A.V. Club had noted at the same time, "over the past few decades, the American movie schedule has calcified to the point where movies are automatically pre-judged by release date: Summer is for blockbusters, November and December are for prestige-movie Oscar-bait, and January and February are when studios dump their discards, the movies they have low hopes for and want to disavow."[3]

In the early 1980s producer Daniel Melnick, whose Altered States was moved up a month into the 1980 Christmas season by the studio over his objections, complained about this in an interview.

I would rather go at a time when there are fewer people attending movies and offer them pictures they want to see, rather than to divide a larger audience with ten other desirable films ... [A]s an industry we have very often shown the instinct of lemmings. To find ourselves releasing movies basically twice a year and glutting the market is, I think, folly. I realize that historically Christmas and summer have had the highest attendance. But I think to some degree that's a self-fulfilling prophecy. We're all convinced that people go to the movies primarily at Christmas time, so we release our big pictures then ...[45]

By the end of the decade critics had taken notice as well. After January 1989, the month that Vulture would 24 years later find to be the movies' worst January ever, New York Times critic Janet Maslin had had enough:

My idea of movie hell is a place where the floors stick, the sound is half a second out of sync, the person behind me repeats every punchline to his companion and the only films to be seen are the kind that get released in January. It's well known that January films have a character that is, let us say, distinctive. That isn't to call them the year's worst—though many January films certainly have tendencies in that direction—but merely to point out how peculiar they can be. January is to film releasing roughly what the Bermuda Triangle is to navigation ... What is it that leads film distributors to regard January as just the right resting place for so many flukes, black sheep, wild cards and also-rans? Whatever it is, it seems to exert an irresistible pull.[42]

She allowed that recent years had allowed some good films, such as Radio Days and El Norte, to get attention they might note have in other months of the year. However, that January had had as one its major releases The January Man, a thriller that "had more than earned its title" despite not even being the worst the month had to offer. "When January 1989 is remembered—and, for all the wrong reasons, it will be—it will also be thought of as the launching pad for Deepstar Six, the first in a less-than-eagerly awaited cluster of films that will apparently take the horror genre underwater."[42]

Despite the critical and commercial success of The Silence of the Lambs in 1991, Burr qualified it as an exception that proved the rule. First, it had been released at the very end of January; and second, it had only gone into wide release two weeks later. "A proper January movie gets released to thousands of theaters at once—a studio’s way of gritting its teeth and ripping off the Band-Aid."[2]

In 2013, Don Fithian, president of the National Association of Theater Owners (NATO), criticized the dump months (among several other studio practices) at CinemaCon, the annual gathering of film exhibitors hosted by NATO. The theaters had come off a first quarter where receipts had been down 12% from the first quarter of 2012. He faulted the studios for their insufficiently diverse offerings in 2013 as compared to the first quarter of the year before, which he connected to the dump-months phenomenon:

Fortunately, the diversity of product will improve throughout the remainder of the year. And that brings me to the next important factor—choices for all seasons. Exhibitors operate movie theaters twelve months a year. We do very well during the summer and winter holidays. But any month can produce a $100 million movie. In 2012, distributors spread their movies over the calendar, and we had a record year.[29]

Responding later, in an indieWIRE panel discussion hosted by Anne Thompson, Universal Studios chairman Adam Fogelson agreed in principle with Fithian. "... [I]f you really examine the data, there are very few reasons other than historical behavior why almost any film can't work on almost any weekend. There are any number of things," he said. "The first weekend in January used to be a non-starter for people; we had this little horror movie White Noise that did business, and that has become a place where movies [like] that tend to operate."[46]

However, he called the belief among some exhibitors that the theaters' slump was attributable to a plethora of R-rated films saved for January, a criticism repeated by Fithian, "simplistic." The problem was the movies in question, not their rating.

If Django hadn't opened in December and opened in January it would have been a huge hit, if Ted had opened in January or February it would have been a huge hit. Identity Thief was a huge hit. It happens to be about the movies. People tend to if not forget minimize how complicated this is.[46]

Releasing strategies[edit]

Critics and movie fans have observed that studios and other distributors have leaned on particular types of movies, or particular genres, to get them through the dump months. Some of them overlap:

  • "Mediocre comedies", as Scott Meslow of The Atlantic puts it, referring to films like Tooth Fairy, Bride Wars and Hotel for Dogs, all of which had tepid critical receptions but did better than they might have at other times of year.[5] In the 2010s, these films have been doing even better, with Paul Blart: Mall Cop and Identity Thief both vaulting past unimpressed critics to gross over $100 million in consecutive years; the former is the all-time top-grossing January release.[47]
  • "Mediocre action movies". Meslow points to The Book of Eli and Underworld: Evolution as films that, like their comic counterparts, succeeded commercially due to their January release. In 2011, he adds, rescheduling The Green Hornet to January from its originally intended release the previous summer proved to be a very lucrative decision.[5]
  • Low-cost rereleases: In 2011, Meslow recounts, Disney rereleased The Lion King in 3-D to test whether its core audience would be amenable to the format. The experiment wound up becoming the highest-grossing September release ever.[48] It followed it up with Beauty and the Beast in 3-D, released the following January. George Lucas primed audiences for the Star Wars prequel trilogy by releasing the enhanced "Special Edition" of the original trilogy during the winter dump months, Meslow recalled.[5]
  • Low budgets, generally: Taken and Paul Blart's stars, Liam Neeson and Kevin James respectively, are not considered A-listers, bankable enough to open a major movie on the strength of their names alone. Therefore, Meslow writes, they work for lower salaries, which helps keep budgets low enough for the film to be profitable with a smaller potential audience amid minimal competition.[5]
  • Teen-oriented movies. Since teenagers are less interested in movies touted as potential Oscar winners than adults, Meslow reasons, "better to splinter the audience by focusing on the demographic with an excess of idle time in January." So, romantic films like She's All That, Save the Last Dance and A Walk to Remember have successfully opened in January. The low-budget parody films of Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, such as Date Movie and Meet the Spartans, have also done well with the teen market in the dump months despite strongly negative reception from critics and audiences.[5]

Not all films released in the dump months were originally intended for that period, however. "If a movie has the makings of a blockbuster and it's getting released in January or February, then it's fairly safe to assume that it sucks," wrote Una LaMarche in 2013 at Vegas Seven, pointing to the then-upcoming Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters, which indeed did poorly in the U.S., but better abroad. "If this flick were any good, it would be coming out in June."[7]

She also suspected that Broken City, another upcoming release that starred Russell Crowe, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Mark Wahlberg, had been consigned to a January release due to adverse reactions from test audiences, and correctly anticipated the failure of the ensemble comedy Movie 43 for the same reason.[7] For his part, Meslow points to Season of the Witch, a $40 million horror film starring Nicolas Cage which failed to recoup even that amount,[2] and Untraceable as emblematic of that kind of big-budget bust buried during dump months.[5] "The marketing plan for a film like this is often just a formal wake, the last stop before a film's reincarnation as generic product for the on-demand/DVD/streaming after-markets," says Burr in his Times Magazine piece.[2]

Others that were not originally intended for the dump months get shifted there anyway not because they are bad but because the studios cannot figure out how to market them or aren't sure they will succeed. C. Robert Cargill, a former critic for Ain't It Cool News who scripted the successful 2012 horror film Sinister, points to Chronicle, which had a surprisingly strong opening on Super Bowl weekend earlier that year. "Fox had no idea whether it was going to work or not."[10]

Similarly, LaMarche points to two other types of movies difficult to market to large audiences. "Winter can be a boon to little movies with niche audiences," she writes, pointing to Dustin Hoffman's directorial debut, Quartet, which received a limited U.S. release in January 2013, and Struck by Lightning, released at the same time. Movies that also blend genres or defy such categorization, such as the zombie–human Romeo and Juliet retelling, Warm Bodies, or the limited-release Charlie Sheen comedy A Glimpse Inside the Mind of Charles Swan III, are also ideal for their dump-months release time frame.[7]

Horror films[edit]

One genre regularly mentioned in connection with the dump months is horror. Once a staple of the periods, yet frequently limited to them, recent successes during the dump months have actually led studios to reevaluate this scheduling limitation and release horror movies at other times of the year.[39][40]

Gravestones on a cloudy and snowy day
Winter's dreariness may make audiences more amenable to horror films during that season's dump months

"Perhaps inspired by the cold, dark landscape, winter often sees an uptick in gore-porn flicks and creepy thrillers," writes LaMarche. "It seems this time of the year has become the 'other October.'" said Brian Salisbury of Hollywood.com at the end of February 2013. "So many studios releasing horror movies in January, and again quality is the exception and not the rule."[10]

Critically praised and commercially successful horror films such as 2008's Cloverfield, which had the best January opening weekend for six years until Ride Along,[49] and 2013's January champion Mama, have done well by the dump months. But other horror movies have still succeeded in the face of critical condemnation. "Ever since White Noise was a hit in 2005, that's what started it. If you look back at every first weekend, besides expanding titles, the only new release is usually one crappy horror movie," says Will Goss of Film.com.[10]

Seven years later, in 2012, The Devil Inside, a low-budget found footage horror film following in the steps of Cloverfield, opened the weekend after New Year's Day. Critics, for whom it had not been screened, reviewed it harshly when they did get to see it, and audiences reacted angrily to the film's abrupt ending, which directed them to a website for more information.[50] Yet, as Cargill notes:

For years, horror movies made $19-20 million in a January release. They would take the weekend and that would be it. But The Devil Inside proved that even in our worst dumping ground, you can appeal to a market that won't see movies, and in fact they’ll throw money at a terrible movie if it looks like it's good. I mean, $35 million is sick money for an opening weekend for a film that cost, what, $250,000?[10]

While the film actually cost four times that to make,[37] Cargill was closer to correct about its opening weekend take of $33.7 million, which ranks fifth for January.[49] The Devil Inside went on to make over $50 million domestically and almost that much abroad to break $100 million in total receipts.[37]

The success of both films outside of October, usually the month when studios released their quality horror films to capitalize on Halloween's approach, has actually led studios to rethink that approach and release horror films at other times of year. During the 2000s October, and the weekend before Halloween, had come to be dominated by the Saw and Paranormal Activity franchises. "You would never come up against them because you would be killed," recalls Rock Alvarez, producer of A Haunted House 2.[40]

For that reason, Mama was rescheduled from October 2012 to the following January. In October 2013, Paramount decided to delay the release of Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones from the weekend before Halloween to March 2014, and replaced it not with another horror offering but the comedy Johnny Knoxville, leaving the month with only one highly anticipated horror film, the third adaptation of Stephen King's Carrie.[40]

Tiffany Smith of Fandango.com's House of Screams says studios are finding holidays with horror associations elsewhere in the year, like Friday the 13th, regardless of season. Insidious: Chapter 2 had actually opened well on that weekend in September. "That weekend actually played as a bigger movie weekend than Halloween is this year," she told USA Today. In July, The Conjuring had also done well amidst the summer movies. "A lot of people are moving [horror movies] everywhere," said Mama producer Guillermo del Toro.[40]

Audience and critical responses[edit]

Some movie critics have called on the studios to change their release schedules and improve the quality of new films during the dump months. "What is to stop Hollywood from releasing some of their better fare during these 'off' months?" asks Paul Shirey in JoBlo.com. "Rather than saving them to win statues, why not put them out to reap some box office and fill an otherwise dead month with something worth seeing?"[8]

"I think we should simply declare the first month of the year a new-release-free zone," suggested Ty Burr in January 2013. "As a preliminary step toward regaining our trust, studios would have to rerelease their most underrated entertainments from the previous year for a second chance." He gave The Cabin in the Woods or Chronicle, itself a January release in 2012, as examples of such films. Failing that happening, he wrote that he was using home media to catch up on older films.[2]

Other critics have tried to look for worthwhile, overlooked films amid the dump-months releases. "There are diamonds—at the very least, Skittles—to be found in the rough," Vegas Seven's Una LaMarche assures moviegoers.[7] "Sometimes, audiences reject a throwaway-season movie without giving it a proper chance, or realizing they're passing on something better than the release date implies," says The Onion's A.V. Club. Their list of such films includes many that have since become cult classics, like the 1991 Kevin Bacon horror film Tremors, 1999's Office Space and Boiler Room from the following year, all released in late February. They also recommend the January 1993 release Matinee, starring John Goodman as legendary gimmick-using film producer William Castle, and The Pledge, a January 2001 film starring Jack Nicholson. "It is Sean Penn's best film as director, an uncompromising depiction of faith and devotion curdled into something monstrous."[3]

One critic, Matt Singer of indieWIRE said in January 2013 that he has "started to look at January with anticipation rather than dread. I've started to love January movies. And I've started to think that if the stereotype was ever true, it's really not anymore." Even the month's bad movies are bad in their own way:

A June bad movie has way too much money riding on it to be anything but mediocre and boring. With hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, a crummy June film is going to be test marketed and reshot and reedited to within an inch of its life. By the time it makes its way to you, if it's not working, anything interesting or unusual in it will have been focus-grouped into oblivion so the studio can protect their enormous investment.

A January bad movie, on the other hand, receives no such care (or meddling). Why throw good money after bad? Just cut your losses and let the thing really suck. And that's how you wind up with a movie like The Devil Inside, which is so intensely stupid it's almost brilliant—and entirely entertaining. To put it another way: in January, you get trainwrecks. In June, you get controlled demolitions ... In other words, with low financial risk comes the opportunity for high creative risk, an agreeable quality shared by many January releases.[51]

According to Singer, Cloverfield had begun reversing the trend of forgettable January movies. In more recent years he had been impressed by The Grey—"a serious meditation on how people find the will to live in the darkest of circumstances"—and Mama, "the sort of mature entertainment we all claim we want Hollywood to make more of."[51]

"While it's easy to complain about a stretch of so-so movies," wrote Matt Patches at Hollywood.com as 2012 began, "the twist is we should really be thanking the studios for catering to niche audiences all month." For most viewers, it's a chance to catch up on the major awards contenders released in December. "But the real opportunity of January is the chance to take a risk," he says. "As audiences should feel the impulse to try something new and out of their element, so should the movie studios." He points as well to Cloverfield as a gamble that succeeded. Smaller film distributors also take advantage of the dump months to bring little-seen but highly praised films like Kill List to wider audiences via home-media releases.[52]

Scott Mendelson at Forbes said in January 2014 that only critics "or those who happen to live in Los Angeles, New York, or other major cities" have reason to complain during the dump months. "For those who live in what is sometimes insultingly termed 'flyover' country, January is in fact a deluge of high quality movies. Thanks to a mix of new releases (which yes are often terrible), Oscar bait finally reaching true wide release, and some of the best films of the prior year that never made it to your town finally dropping on VOD or DVD, January is a bastion of cinematic riches." In that last category, he highly recommended the August 2013 release Short Term 12. 'For those who don't get to see the newest movies before everyone else, or perhaps don't need to cram in every new release the weekend they come out, January is among the best months for cinema."[53]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Until 2004 both the nomination announcement and awards ceremonies took place later (the latter in April in some years).
  2. ^ The first Super Bowl, which did not receive much media interest, was played in mid-January; by the late 1990s an expansion of the NFL's regular-season and playoff schedule had pushed it back to its present weekend.
  3. ^ It had been intended for a release earlier that year, but it was delayed due to the studio's decision to film a new ending.
  4. ^ Based on standard weekend totals. If the Martin Luther King Day holiday of Ride Along's opening weekend is included, its total gross is $48.6 million, more than Hotel Transylvania.
  5. ^ The scores given critical reviews are assigned by the website's staff, making them subjective.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Bernstein, Jonathan (January 8, 2007). "Why January is a good month to bury bad movies". The Guardian. Retrieved December 18, 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Burr, Ty (January 18, 2013). "'January Is Hollywood's Very Own Leper Colony'". New York Times Magazine. Retrieved December 19, 2013. 
  3. ^ a b c d Robinson, Tasha; rabin, Nathan; Tobias, Scott; Murray, Noel; Rizov, Vadim; Handlen, Zack; Dyess-Nugent, Phil; Semley, John (January 28, 2013). "Hollywood's trash, our treasure: 17 salvageable flops from the late-winter dumping ground". The A.V. Club. Retrieved December 19, 2013. "January and February are when studios dump their discards, the movies they have low hopes for and want to disavow." 
  4. ^ a b c d e f Raymond, Adam K. (January 7, 2013). "Just How Bad of a Movie Month Is January?". Vulture. Retrieved December 19, 2013. "For decades, studios have used the first month of the year as a dumping ground, either to even out their equilibrium from the past few months of releasing intelligent Oscar bait or to serve lovers of schlock who have been dying of crap starvation through said Oscar season." 
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h Meslow, Scott (January 13, 2012). "January: Dumping Ground for Terrible Movies Like 'Contraband'". The Atlantic. Retrieved December 19, 2013. "Unfortunately, Contraband is par for the course for January, which typically sees many of the year's worst movies unceremoniously dumped into cinemas." 
  6. ^ a b Shane, David. "Welcome Back, Dump Months". Dealflicks.com. Retrieved December 19, 2013. "The box office hopes and expectations are coming back down to earth now, with modestly budgeted and often long delayed films being dumped, as usual, in the final two weeks of August ..." 
  7. ^ a b c d e LaMarche, Una (January 3, 2012). "A Cinematic Dumpster Dive". Vegas Seven. Retrieved December 19, 2013. 
  8. ^ a b c Shirey, Paul (February 12, 2013). "C'mon Hollywood: Spread out your Oscar fare!". JoBlo.com. Retrieved December 20, 2013. 
  9. ^ a b c Legel, Laremy (January 9, 2013). "Why is January a Cinematic Dumping Ground?". Film.com. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Salisbury, Brian (February 23, 2013). "Why Oscar Season is Hollywood's Bad Movie Dumping Ground". Hollywood.com. Retrieved December 20, 2013. 
  11. ^ "Seasonal Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 22, 2013.  Click on the season names to view data for each season going back to 1982.
  12. ^ a b c d e f Dietz, Jason (January 5, 2010). "The Nightmare After Christmas: Are January Movies Really That Bad?". Metacritic. Retrieved December 19, 2013. 
  13. ^ "Rule 2: Eligibility". Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. 2013. Retrieved December 23, 2013. 
  14. ^ "Unseasonable prestige: 22 Best Picture winners released between January and July". The A.V. Club. July 22, 2013. Retrieved January 7, 2014. 
  15. ^ a b Finke, Nikki (February 9, 2013). "#1 'Identity Thief' Steals $36M Weekend (Bigger Than 'Bridesmaids'), #2 'Warm Bodies' $11.4M, #3 'Side Effects' $9.5M: Blizzard Didn't Blitz U.S. Box Office". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  16. ^ a b Acuna, Kirsten (February 8, 2013). "Winter Storm Nemo Is Already Wreaking Havoc On Hollywood". Business Insider. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  17. ^ "UPDATED: Winter Storm Nemo Fails To Stop 'Identity Thief' From Shattering Expectations". Boxoffice. February 9, 2013. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  18. ^ Subers, Ray (February 9, 2013). "Friday Report: Winter Storm Doesn't Stop 'Identity Thief'". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  19. ^ "Top 4-day Martin Luther King weekends, All Movies". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 20, 2013. 
  20. ^ "Top January opening weekends". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved March 12, 2014. 
  21. ^ a b "Top 4-day President's Day weekends, Opening Weekends". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 20, 2013. 
  22. ^ "Top 4-day President's Day weekends, All Movies". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 20, 2013. 
  23. ^ Gwin, Scott (February 5, 2012). "Weekend Box Office: Chronicle Works Its Powers Super Bowl Weekend". Cinemablend.com. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  24. ^ a b "Super Bowl Openings". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 22, 2013. 
  25. ^ Gibron, Bill (July 30, 2013). "The PopMatters Summer Movie Preview - August 2013". PopMatters. Retrieved December 24, 2013. 
  26. ^ a b c "The August Movie: A Theory of Awfulness". Vulture. July 31, 2008. Retrieved December 24, 2013. 
  27. ^ "Dirty Dancing". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved December 24, 2013. 
  28. ^ "Top 4-Day Labor Day Weekends, 1982–present". Retrieved December 24, 2013. 
  29. ^ a b Fithian, Don (April 16, 2013). "State of the Industry Address, 2013". Boxoffice. Retrieved January 1, 2014. 
  30. ^ Patrick, Sean (September 3, 2013). "September Box Office Preview". Yahoo.com. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  31. ^ Doskins, Marty (2003). "September Forecast". Box Office Prophets. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  32. ^ "Fatal Attraction summary". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  33. ^ "Fatal Attraction Academy Awards". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  34. ^ "American Beauty summary". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  35. ^ "American Beauty Academy Awards". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  36. ^ Cieply, Michael (August 31, 2009). "Oscar Race May Heat Up at Festival in Toronto". The New York Times. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  37. ^ a b c "Devil Inside summary". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  38. ^ "Mama summary". Box Office Mojo. 2013. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  39. ^ a b Barone, Matt (October 21, 2013). "Why Did Hollywood Give Up on Halloween This Year?". 
  40. ^ a b c d e Alexander, Bryan (October 1, 2013). "Who killed the Halloween horror movies?". USA Today. Retrieved December 25, 2013. 
  41. ^ "Top Opening Weekends by Month". Box Office Mojo. 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2014. 
  42. ^ a b c Maslin, Janet (February 5, 1989). "Film View: Is January the Cruelest Month?". The New York Times. Retrieved December 31, 2013. 
  43. ^ 1Kirk, Chris; Thompson (February 6, 2014). "Confirmed: February Movies Suck". Slate. Retrieved February 7, 2014. 
  44. ^ a b "The August Movie: A History". Vulture. July 31, 2008. Retrieved December 29, 2013. 
  45. ^ Goldman, William (1982). Adventures in the Screen Trade. Hachette Digital. p. 63. ISBN 9781455525461. Retrieved March 11, 2014. 
  46. ^ a b Thompson, Anne (April 26, 2013). "CinemaCon Heavyweight Panel Debates Windows, Social Media, State of Industry". indieWIRE. Retrieved January 1, 2014. 
  47. ^ "Top Grossers for January, Indexed by Total Gross". Box Office Mojo. 2014. Retrieved January 1, 2014. 
  48. ^ "Top Grossers for September, Indexed by Total Gross". Box Office Mojo. 2014. Retrieved January 1, 2014. 
  49. ^ a b "Top Opening Weekends by Month—January". Box Office Mojo. 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2014. 
  50. ^ Haglund, David (January 9, 2012). "Does The Devil Inside Have the Worst Ending in Movie History?". Slate. Retrieved January 3, 2014. 
  51. ^ a b Singer, Matt (January 23, 2013). "Why I Love Going to the Movies in January". indieWIRE. Retrieved January 5, 2014. 
  52. ^ Patches, Matt (January 4, 2012). "MindFood: Why January Is the Year's Best Month for Movies". Hollywood.com. Retrieved January 7, 2014. 
  53. ^ Mendelson, Scott (January 2, 2014). "January Is Only The Worst Month For Film If You're A Critic". Forbes. Retrieved January 7, 2014. 

External links[edit]