Koxinga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Zheng Chenggong
鄭成功
Born August 1624 (1624-08)
Hirado, Japan
Died June 23, 1662 (1662-06-24) (aged 37)
Tainan, Taiwan
Other names Fukumatsu,[1] Teiseiko,[2] Zheng Sen (鄭森), Koxinga, Coxinga, Cocksinja[1]
Occupation Military leader
Title Guoxingye (國姓爺), Prince of Yanping (延平)[3]
Successor Zheng Jing (鄭經)
Spouse Dong Cuiying[4]
Children Zheng Jing, Zheng Xi
Parents Zheng Zhilong (Father), Tagawa (Mother)
Relatives Tagawa Shichizaemon (Half-Brother), Zheng Cai (鄭彩) (Cousin),[5] Zheng Hongkui (鄭鴻逵) (Uncle),[6] Zheng Keshuang (鄭克塽) (Grandson), Zheng Kezang (鄭克臧) (Grandson)[7]

Koxinga (simplified Chinese: 国姓爷; traditional Chinese: 國姓爺; pinyin: Guóxìngyé; Wade–Giles: Kuo-hsing-yeh; Pe̍h-ōe-jī: Kok-sèng-iâ/Kok-sìⁿ-iâ; literally "Lord with the Imperial Surname") is the customary Western spelling[8] of the popular appellation of Zheng Chenggong (simplified Chinese: 郑成功; traditional Chinese: 鄭成功; pinyin: Zhèng Chénggōng; Wade–Giles: Cheng Ch'eng-kung; Pe̍h-oē-jī: Tēⁿ Sêng-kong; Pha̍k-fa-sṳ: Tshàng Sṳ̀n-Kûng; Foochow Romanized: Dâng Sìng-gŭng), a military leader who was born in 1624 in Hirado, Japan to Zheng Zhilong, a Chinese merchant/pirate, and his Japanese wife and died in 1662 on the island of Formosa (Taiwan).

A Ming loyalist and the arch commander of the Ming troops on the maritime front for the later monarchs of the withering dynasty, Koxinga devoted the last 16 years of his life to resisting the conquest of China by the Manchus of Qing Dynasty. Upon defeating the forces of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) on Formosa in his last campaign in 1661–1662, Koxinga took over the island in order to support his grand campaign against the Manchu-ruled Qing Dynasty. After Koxinga's death, however, his son and successor, Zheng Jing (鄭經), gradually became the ruler of an independent Kingdom of Tungning, the first Chinese state to rule the island.

Contents

[edit] Early years

In 1624, Koxinga, whose name at birth was Zheng Sen, was born in Hirado, Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan to Zheng Zhilong, a Chinese merchant and pirate, and a Japanese woman whose surname was Tagawa, and whose given name has been lost to posterity.[9] He was raised there until the age of seven and then moved to Nan'an county in Quanzhou in Fujian province of China.

In 1638, Koxinga became a Xiucai (a successful candidate) in the imperial examination and became one of the twelve Linshansheng (廩膳生) of Nan'an. In 1641, Koxinga married the niece of Dong Yangxian, an official who was a Jinshi from Hui'an. In 1644, Koxinga studied at the Imperial Nanking University, where he met and became a student of the scholar Qian Qianyi.[10]

In 1644, Beijing fell to rebels led by Li Zicheng and the Chongzhen Emperor hanged himself on a tree at modern-day Jingshan Park in Beijing. Manchu armies aided by Wu Sangui's forces defeated the rebels and took the city. The Ming remnant forces retreated to Nanjing where the Prince Fu ascended to the throne as the Hongguang Emperor. The next year, the Manchu armies led by Dodo advanced south and conquered Yangzhou and Nanjing while the Ming leader defending Yangzhou, Shi Kefa, was killed. The Hongguang Emperor was captured and executed.

[edit] Longwu Emperor's reign

In 1645, Prince Tang was installed on the throne as the Longwu Emperor with support from Zheng Zhilong and his family.[11] The Longwu Emperor established his court in Fuzhou, which was controlled by the Zhengs. In the later part of the year, another Ming Prince Lu proclaimed himself as Regent (監國) in Shaoxing and established his own court there. Although Prince Lu and Longwu's regimes stemmed from the same dynasty, both of them pursued different goals.

It was due to the natural defences of Fujian and the military resources of the Zheng family, that the emperor was able to remain safe for some time.[12] The Longwu Emperor granted Zheng Zhilong's son, Zheng Sen, a new personal name, "Chenggong" (success), and the title of Guoxingye ("Lord of the Imperial Surname"; Koxinga).[12]

In 1646, Koxinga first led the Ming armies to resist the Manchurian invaders and won the favour of the Longwu Emperor. The Longwu Emperor's reign in Fuzhou was brief, as Zheng Zhilong refused to support his plans for a counter-offensive against the rapidly-expanding forces of the newly-established Qing Dynasty by the Manchus. Zheng Zhilong ordered the defending general of Xianxia Pass (仙霞關), Shi Fu (a.k.a. Shi Tianfu, a relative of Shi Lang), to retreat to Fuzhou even when Qing armies approached Fujian. As such, the Qing army faced little resistance when it conquered the north of the pass. In September 1646, Qing armies broke through inadequately defended mountain passes and entered Fujian. Zheng Zhilong retreated to his coastal fortress and the Longwu Emperor faced the Qing armies alone. Longwu's forces were destroyed and he was captured and died shortly afterwards.[13]

[edit] Zheng Zhilong's surrender and the death of Tagawa

The Qing forces sent envoys to meet Zheng Zhilong secretly and they offered to appoint him as the governor of both Fujian and Guangdong provinces if he would surrender to Qing. Zheng Zhilong agreed and ignored the objections of his family, surrendering himself to the Qing forces in Fuzhou on 21 November 1646.[14] Koxinga and his uncles were left as the successors to the leadership of Zheng Zhilong's military forces. Koxinga operated outside Xiamen and recruited many to join his cause in a few months. He used the superiority of his naval forces to launch amphibious raids on Manchu-occupied territory in Fujian and he managed to take Tong'an in Quanzhou prefecture in early 1647. However, Koxinga's forces lacked the ability to defend the newly-occupied territory.[15]

Following the fall of Tong'an to Zheng, the Manchus launched a counterattack in the spring of 1647, during which they stormed the Zheng family's hometown of Anping. Koxinga's mother, Lady Tagawa, had come from Japan in 1645 to join her family in Fujian (Koxinga's younger brother, Tagawa Shichizaemon, remained in Japan).[16] She did not follow her husband to surrender to the Qing Dynasty. She was caught by Manchu forces in Anping and committed suicide after refusal to submit to the enemy, according to traditional accounts.[17]

[edit] Resisting the Qing Dynasty

Zheng Chenggong statue in Xiamen, Fujian, China

By 1650, Koxinga was strong enough to establish himself as the head of the Zheng family.[17] He pledged allegiance to the only remaining claimant to the throne of the Ming Dynasty, the Yongli Emperor. The Yongli Emperor was fleeing from the Manchus in south-western China with a motley court and hastily assembled army at the time. Despite one fruitless attempt, Koxinga was unable to do anything to aid the last Ming emperor.[17] Instead, he decided to concentrate on securing his own position on the southeast coast.

Koxinga enjoyed a series of military successes in 1651 and 1652 that increased the Qing government's anxiety over the threat he posed.[18] The fight carried out massacre in Zhangzhou.[19] Zheng Zhilong wrote a letter to his son from Beijing, presumably at the request of the Shunzhi Emperor and the Qing government, urging his son to negotiate with the Manchurians. The long series of negotiations between Koxinga and the Qing Dynasty lasted until November 1654. The Qing government appointed Prince Jidu (son of Jirgalang) to lead an attack on Koxinga's territory after the failed negotiations.[20]

On 9 May 1656, Jidu's armies attacked Jinmen, an island near Xiamen that Koxinga had been using to train his troops. Partly as a result of a major storm, the Manchus were defeated and they lost most of their fleet in the battle.[21] Koxinga had sent one of his naval commanders to capture Zhoushan island prior to Jidu's attack,[22] and now that the Manchus were temporarily without an effective naval force in the Fujian area, Koxinga was free to send a huge army to Zhoushan, which he intended to use as a base to capture Nanjing.

[edit] Koxinga on Taiwan

Image in Koxinga Temple in Tainan
Extent of territory held by Koxinga

In 1661, Koxinga led his troops on a landing at Lu'ermen to attack the Dutch colonists in Taiwan. On 1 February 1662, the Dutch Governor of Taiwan, Frederik Coyett, surrendered Fort Zeelandia to Koxinga. During the siege, Koxinga's life was saved by a certain Hans Jurgen Radis of Stockaert, a Dutch defector who strongly advised him against visiting the overrun ramparts, which he knew would be blown up by the retreating Dutch forces.[23] In the peace treaty, Koxinga was styled "Lord Teibingh Tsiante Teysiancon Koxin" [4]. This effectively ended 38 years of Dutch rule on Taiwan. Koxinga then devoted himself to transforming Taiwan into a military base for loyalists who wanted to restore the Ming Dynasty.

[edit] Koxinga on the Philippines

In 1662, Koxinga's forces raided several towns on the Philippines and demanded tribute from the Spanish colonial government, threatening to attack Manila if his demands were not met. The Spanish refused to pay the tribute and reinforced the garrisons around Manila, but the planned attack never took place due to Koxnga's sudden death in that year after expelling the Dutch on Taiwan.[24]

Koxinga's threat to invade the Philippines and expel the Spanish resulted in the Spanish failure to conquer the Islamic Moro people in Mindanao. The threat of Chinese invasion forced the Spanish to stop their conquest of the Moros and withdraw their garrisons to Manila. Koxinga's death resulted in the invasion being cancelled.[25] The Spanish retreated occured in 1663. Zamboanga and Mindanao became devoid of Spanish soldiers after the Chinese threat against Manila.[26] The Chinese threat effectively destroyed the Spanish plan to conquer and colonize the Moros in Zamboanga.[27] Governor Bobadilla was the one who conducted the evacuation. Mindanao was just about to be colonized by Christians before Koxinga's planned conquest of the Phillines destroyed the entire Spanish plan to conquer Mindanao. Iligan and Zamboanga were given up by the Spanish.[28]

Througouht 1656, 1657, 1660, and 1662, the Moros attacked and pillaged towns on Spanish controlled islands, sailing around the area in order to raid. THey defeated Spanish attempts to take the fort of Sultan Kudarat.[29] The Spanish had been on the verge of victory over the Moros, before Koxinga's threat and the subsequent Chinese rebellion against the Spanish resulted in the Spanish forces fleeing from the battle with the Moros to defend Manila against the Chinese. The Spanish Governor General Sebastian Hurtado de Corcuera had defeated the Moro Sultan Kudarat and built forts in Moro territory in Zamboanga, reversing previous Moro successes. The people of Manila were celebrating the victories of the Spanish. Koxinga's threat to the Spanish led to Spanish troops in Moro land being withdrawn by Governor Sebastian Manrique de Lara. After this, the Moros essentially had a free rein to attack the Spanish.[30] Zamboanga became devoid of Spanish as they fled to Luzon to defend against the threatened invasion.[31]

The Spanish and the Moros had signed the Jolo treaty to stop hostilities decades before renewed Spanish Moro hostilities during Koxinga's planned invasion.

Despite the Jolo treaty, the Jolo dato, Salicala. and a dato from Borneo ravaged the Visayan coast. The force of the latter was defeated by Monforte near Masbate, and Salicala returned to Jolo. Monforte destroyed several towns and 300 boats in Borneo. In 1655 trouble again broke out between Corralat and the Spanish forces, the Moros sacking numerous towns in the Calamianes and one town near Zamboanga. In 1656 a fleet dispatched by De Sara, the new captaingeneral, burned Corralat's town and some Moro towns in Sibuguey Bay, destroying also a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. The Moros at the same time were ravaging the coasts of Mindoro and Marinduque, and succeeded also in repulsing the attack on the fort at Corralat, forcing the Spaniards to return to Sabonilla and Zamboanga. In 1657 Salicala scoured the Philippine seas, capturing over 1,000 native prisoners, entering the Bay of Manila during the raid. In 1660 Moros from Jolo and Tawi-Tawi, taking advantage of an insurrection in Luzon, raided the costs of Bohol, Leyte, and Mindoro.

In 1662 a Chinese rebellion embarrassed the Spaniards, and at this time several datos from the Jolo and Tawi-Tawi islands sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. Following these inroads, Bobadilla, governor of Zamboanga, was ordered to evacuate that station, which was done in January, 1663.

For the next half century Moro raids on the Mindanao and Visayan settlements marked each year, and many fights were chronicled between the fleets of praus and the Spanish fleet known as the "Armada de los Pintados," The Jesuits had endeavored in 1666 and 1672 to have the fort of Zamboanga rebuilt, but it was not until 1712 that the Spanish King ordered its reestablishment, and even then the project was not realized until 1718,[32]

The Moros declared a Jihad against the Spanish and Filipino Christians, to defend themselves against the Spanish invaders who tried to take over Moro territory. The Moros retaliated with major pillaging campaigns and enslaved Filipino Christians after totally razing their villages. Several Moro Sultans led these Jihads. They defeated Spanish attempts to conquer Mindanao. The Spanish had use their massive numbers to force the Moros to withdraw.[33]

The Spanish built a fort called Real Fuerza de San Jose in Zamboanga under Captain Juan de Chavez in 1635 who led a Christian Spanish Filipino army. Construction started on June 23 of that year.[34]

While Governor-General Lara was in office another Chinese invasion threatened. A Mongol chieftain named Koxinga, who had been driven forth from his own country by the Tartars, was the leader of it. When the Tartars overran China, about the middle of the seventeenth century, Koxinga and many of his followers refused to submit. They went to Formosa, drove out the Dutch people, and settled there. Later Koxinga laid a plan to take the Philippine Islands and set up his kingdom there.

Koxinga's chief adviser was an Italian friar named Riccio. This friar he had appointed a high mandarin, or nobleman. He now sent him to Manila, dressed in the garb of his office, to demand tribute from the Philippine government.

Naturally this demand caused amaze and alarm in Manila. The Spaniards were aghast at the idea of a Catholic priest demanding tribute from a Catholic country, in the name of a heathen ruler. Later the authorities at Rome called the friar to account for his conduct. At this time, however, the Spanish were at a loss how to act. They did not dare send the priestmandarin away, nor could they give him any answer. They therefore kept him waiting in Manila while they made up their minds what to do.

As was usual, when trouble arose, the government thought that the Chinese in Manila were plotting to take the city. They felt sure that these men would be ready to help Koxinga when he came, so everything was made ready for another attack upon the Chinese in Luzon.

All government troops, both Spanish and native, were collected at Manila. So great was the fear, that three important forts were torn down, and the soldiers stationed there were brought to Luzon. Only the fort at Caraga, Mindanao, was left standing. This one they did not dare to give up; the soldiers there were all that kept the Moros from destroying the settlements on that coast.

A massacre of the Chinese by the Spanish and Filipinos followed during the rebellion. About 5,000 Chinese remained in Manila after the rebellion and massacre.

After peace was made, Riccio was allowed to go back to Formosa, to tell Koxinga what had been done. He found the chieftain getting ready to come to Manila with an army to take the country, and Riccio told him what had happened.

Koxinga's rage was great when he heard his mandarin's story. He planned to go at once to the islands to punish this wicked cruelty to his countrymen. He fell ill, however, and died of fever before he could start. Thus Manila escaped the fate that must almost surely have fallen upon the city if the Chinese chief and his great army had reached the bay.

The foolish attack upon the Chinese took so many Spanish soldiers from the southern islands that the Moros now had free swing along the coasts of Mindanao and the Visayas.[35]

Exalted by his success against European arms, Koxinga resolved upon the conquest of the Philippines. He summoned to his service the Italian Dominican missionary, Ricci, who had been living in the province of Fukien, and in the spring of 1662 dispatched him as an ambassador to the governor of the Philippines to demand the submission of the archipelago.

Manila was thrown into a terrible panic by this demand, and indeed no such danger had threatened the Spanish in the Philippines since the invasion of Limahong. The Chinese conqueror had an innumerable army, and his armament, stores, and navy had been greatly augmented by the surrender of the Dutch.

After Koxinga's ultimatum, the Spanish proceeded to order all Chinese to leave the Philippines. The Chinese suspected that the Spanish planned to massacre them, so the Chinese rebelled and assaulted Manila to fight the Spanish and Filipinos. The Chinese either died in battle or escaping by frail boats, joined the Chinese colonists on Formosa. The Spanish razed their own Churches and convents in Manila to prevent Chinese from taking shelter in them.[36]

"During this period the raids of the Moros continued. These pirates did much damage. This led to efforts on the part of Spain to conquer these warlike people, which resulted in the conquest of Jolo and the establishment of a stronghold at Zamboanga. In 1662 Koxinga, a Chinese pirate, demanded the surrender of Manila. This danger was so great that the Spaniards concentrated all their efforts to resist the threatened invasions and abandoned some of their strongholds in the south. The Chinese in Manila were suspected of feeing in the plot. They assaulted Manila but many were slain and the remainder left the city. The threatened invasion never was carried out for Koxinga died. The effects of the events cited above left Spanish prestige at a low ebb. Manila was no longer the principal commercial centre of the East and never again recovered that position. The century that followed from 1663-1762 has been described as one of obscurity for the Philippines."[37][38]

"Another event of importance during the seventeenth century resulted from the overthrow of the Ming Dynasty in China by the Manchus. During the change of power and consequent disorders there, a Chinese adventurer, Koxinga, raised a pirate army in south China and drove the Dutch out of Formosa. He then sent an ambassador to Manila demanding the surrender of the Islands to him. The colony was weak and unprepared for defense, and consequently terrified. There were twenty-five thousand Chinese living in Pari-an, north of the Pasig River, in Manila. Fearful lest these Chinese cooperate in the designs of Koxinga, they were all ordered to leave the Islands. Unable to do so at once, and fearful of massacre, they arose in rebellion and assaulted the city of Manila. The result was a terrible massacre, which cost the lives of twenty-two thousand of the Chinese; the remaining three thousand built frail boats and fled to Formosa. The death of Koxinga occurred before his expedition reached the Philippines."[39]

Koxinga's threat to Spain effectively destroyed the Spanish plan to colonize and conquer Molo territory in Mindanao. It was only in 1718 when they came back to the fort which they evacuated. Mindanao was all Moro after the Spanish left.[40][41] The Sulu Sultanate was also saved due to Koxinga, the Span ish had left La Caldera Fort.[42]

In 1662 a Chinese rebellion embarrassed the Spaniards, and at this time several datos from the Jolo and Tawi-Tawi islands sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. Following these iuroads, Bobadilla, governor of Zamboanga, was ordered to evacuate that station, which was done in January, 1663.[43] [44]

For three centuries, intermittent attempts were made by the Spaniards to destroy the homes of tihe Moro pirates, who. almost without exception, raided the Spanish colonies throughout the Philippine Islands, south of Luzon, and even occasionally on that island. Many reverses and some successes were met with by the Spanish expeditions against the JoJo ami Mindanao Moros. The names of some of the Spanish Captains-General who figured in these conflicts, and of the Moro chiefs, would convey no significance to those English-speaking people who have not, during the last six or seven years, participated in Moro campaigns. In 1637 Corcuero inaugurated a new conquest of Jolo and of Mindanao. His force consisted of 76b Europeans. He made a landing at Jolo. The following year, he landed at Zamboanga and oroceeded past Cattobats up the Rio Grande against the Datto Corralat and the Da*tos of Buhayen and Basilan. The following year, Corcuero and Almonte built a fort at Sabonflla, now called Malabang, on Plana Bay. Purine 1639, Spanish soldiers and priests, under the warlike Recoleto friar, Augustin de San Pedro, led a party of 560 against the Lanao Moros, where Camps Vicars and Keithley now stand. In 1642. Generals Corcuero and Almonte made peace with Corralat, but piratical depredations by the Moros continued; Chinese rebellions embarrassed the Spaniards, who evacuated manv places, and many fights were chronicled between the Moro fleets of Praus and the Spanish fleets.[45]

[edit] Riccio

Securely established in his stronghold, he invited the Chinese to take refuge in his island and oppose the Tartar's rule. Therefore the Emperor ordered that no man should inhabit China within four leagues of the coast, except in those provinces which were undoubtedly loyal to the new Government. The coast was consequently laid bare; vessels, houses, plantations, and everything useful to man, were destroyed in order to cut off effectually all communications with lands beyond the Tartar Empire. The Chinese from the coast, who for generations had earned a living by fishing, etc., crowded into the interior, and their misery was indescribable.

Koxinga, unable to communicate with the mainland of the Empire, turned his attention to the conquest of Formosa Island, at the time in the possession of the Dutch. According to Dutch accounts the European settlers numbered about 600, with a garrison of 2,200. The Dutch artillery, stores, and merchandise were valued at P.8,000,000, and the Chinese, who attacked them under Koxinga, were about 100,000 strong. The settlement surrendered to the invaders' superior numbers, and Koxinga established himself as King of the Island. Koxinga had become acquainted with an Italian Dominican missionary named Vittorio Riccio, whom he created a Mandarin, and sent him as Ambassador to the Governor of the Philippines. Riccio therefore arrived in Manila in 1662, the bearer of Koxinga's despatches calling upon the Governor to pay tribute, under threat of the Colony being attacked by Koxinga if his demand were refused.


The position of Riccio as a European friar and Ambassador of a Mongol adventurer was as awkward as it was novel. He was received with great honour in Manila, where he disembarked, and rode to the Government House in the full uniform of a Chinese envoy, through lines of troops drawn up to salute him as he passed. At the same time, letters from Formosa had also been received by the Chinese in Manila, and the Government at once accused them of conniving at rebellion. All available forces were concentrated in the capital; and to increase the garrison the Governor published a decree, dated May 6, 1662, ordering the demolition of the forts of Zamboanga, Yligan (Mindanao Is.), Calamianes and Ternate1 (Moluccas).

The only provincial fort preserved was that of Surigao (then called Caraga), consequently in the south the Mahometans became complete masters on land and at sea for half a year.

The troops in Manila numbered 100 cavalry and 8,000 infantry. Fortifications were raised, and redoubts were constructed in which to secrete the Treasury funds. When all the armament was in readiness, the Spaniards incited the Chinese to rebel, in order to afford a pretext for their massacre.

Two junk masters were seized, and the Chinese population was menaced; therefore they prepared for their own defence, and then opened the affray, for which the Government was secretly longing, by killing a Spaniard in the market-place. Suddenly artillery fire was opened on the Parian, and many of the peaceful Chinese traders, in their terror, hanged themselves; many were drowned in the attempt to reach the canoes in which to get away to sea; some few did safely arrive in Formosa Island and joined Koxinga's camp, whilst others took to the mountains. Some 8,000 to 9,000 Chinese remained quiet, but ready for any event, when they were suddenly attacked by Spaniards and natives. The confusion was general, and the Chinese seemed to be gaining ground; therefore the Governor sent the Ambassador Riccio and a certain Fray Joseph de Madrid to parley with them. The Chinese accepted the terms offered by Riccio, who returned to the Governor, leaving Fray Joseph with the rebels; but when Riccio went back with a general pardon and a promise to restore the two junk masters, he found that they had beheaded the priest. A general carnage of the Mongols followed, and Juan de la Concepcion says2 that the original intention of the Spaniards was to kill every Chinaman, but that they desisted in new of the inconvenience which would have ensued from the want of tradesmen and mechanics. Therefore they made a virtue of a necessity,

1 From this date the Molucca Islands were definitely evacuated and abandoned by the Spaniards, although as many men and as much material and money had been employed in garrisons and conveyance of subsidies there as in the whole Philippine Colony up to that period.

'"Hist. Gen. de Philipinas," by Juan de la Concepcion, Vol. VII., p. 48, published at Manila, 1788.

and graciously pardoned in the name of His Catholic Majesty all who laid down their arms.

Riccio returned to Formosa Island, and found Koxinga preparing for warfare against the Philippines, but before he could carry out his intentions he died of fever. The chiefs successor, of a less bellicose spirit, sent Riccio a second time to Manila, and a treaty was agreed to, re-establishing commercial relations with the Chinese. Shortly after Koxinga's decease a rebellion was raised in Formosa; and the Island, falling at length into the hands of a Tartar party, became annexed to China under the new dynasty. Then Riccio was called upon to relate the part he had taken in Koxinga's affairs, and he was heard in council. Some present were in favour of invading the Philippines in great force because of the cruel and unwarranted general massacre of the Chinese in cold blood; but Riccio took pains to show how powerful Spain was, and how justified was the action of the Spaniards, as a measure of precaution, in view of the threatened invasion of Koxinga. The Chinese party was appeased, but had the Tartars cared to take up the cause of their conquered subjects, the fate of the Philippines would have been doubtful.[46]

Koxinga's son did not take up the task of invading the Philippines after Koxinga's death.[47]

[edit] Death

Koxinga died of malaria at the age of 37. There were speculations that he died in a sudden fit of madness when his officers refused to carry out his orders to execute his son Zheng Jing. Zheng Jing had an affair with his wet nurse and conceived a child with her.[48] Zheng Jing succeeded his father as the King of Tungning.

[edit] Family Relationships

Koxinga’s short but eventful career was characterised by family tension and conflicting loyalties. The title of 國姓爺 guoxingye (‘Lord of the Imperial Surname’) was one that Koxinga himself used during his lifetime to emphasise his status as an adopted son of the deposed imperial house, and hence it was also a declaration of ongoing support to the Ming dynasty.[49] Despite his deliberate self-identification as the noble, loyal vassal of a vanquished master, however, Koxinga’s actual relationship with his adoptive father, the Longwu Emperor, lasted only twelve months or so, beginning from September 1645 and ending in the death of the Longwu Emperor in the following year.[50] Although many secondary sources claim that the two men shared a ‘close bond of affection’, there is an absence of any reliable contemporary evidence regarding Koxinga’s relationship with the Longwu Emperor.[51]

In contrast, Koxinga’s father, Zheng Zhilong, left his Japanese wife not long after the birth of his son;[52] Koxinga would be a boy of seven when he finally joined his father on the Chinese coast.[53] It seems that Zheng Zhilong recognised his son’s talent and encouraged him in his studies and the pursuit of a career as a scholar-official, which would legitimise the power that the Zheng family had acquired using sometimes questionable means.[54] Zheng Zhilong’s defection to the Qing must have seemed opportunistic and in stark contrast to Koxinga’s continued loyalty to the Ming. But it is difficult to deny that in refusing to submit to the Qing, Koxinga was risking the life of his father, and that the subsequent death of Zheng Zhilong could only be justified by claiming loyalty to the Ming.[55] It has even been suggested that Koxinga’s fury at the incestuous relationship between his son, Zheng Jing, and a younger son’s wet nurse was due to the fact that strict Confucian morality had played such a crucial role in justifying his lack of filial behaviour.[56]

The one possible exception to this may have been his relationship with his mother, which has generally been described as being extremely affectionate, particularly in Chinese and Japanese sources.[57] Their time together, however, was apparently very short - despite frequent entreaties from Zheng Zhilong for her to join him in China,[58] Koxinga’s mother would only be reunited with her son sometime in 1645, and a year later she would be killed when the Qing took Xiamen.[59]

[edit] Concubine

During the Siege of Fort Zeelandia Koxinga took the Dutch missionary Antonius Hambroek's teenage daughter as a concubine, after having him executed[60][61][62] and Dutch women were sold to Chinese soldiers to become their wives, the daily journal of the Dutch fort recorded that "the best were preserved for the use of the commanders, and then sold to the common soldiers. Happy was she that fell to the lot of an unmarried man, being thereby freed from vexations by the Chinese women, who are very jealous of their husbands."[63] In 1684 some of these Dutch wives were still captives of the Chinese.[64]

"The daughter of the Rev. A. Hambroek, a very sweet and pleasing maiden, Koxinga took to be one of his concubines, and she had, consequently, been placed in his harem. All the remaining Dutch women were kept under guard in Castle Provintia."[65][66][67]

"Contemporary records unite in singling out the case of Rev. Antonius Hambroek, who was sent by Koxinga into the castle, under a flag of truce, to propose terms of surrender, and told to back these up with threats of most terrible vengeance. Mr. Hambroek was forced to leave his wife and two children (one of them described as a sweet and comely maiden of eighteen) in the invader's camp as pledges, which sufficiently proved that any failure of his undertaking would be a most ominous signal for those poor defenceless ones...Koxinga received his answer sternly, and without further delay issued an order for the massacre of all Dutch captives, and of every native who persisted in the profession of Christianity; Hambroek himself was put to death by decapitation, and the before-mentioned daughter compelled to become a member of his murderer's harem."[68][69]

"But nothing more is needed to settle the question under discussion than a reference to what took place between this chieftain and the Rev. Mr. Hambroek. The latter was sent into Castle Zeelandia to advise his countrymen against a continuance of the struggle, but he rather exhorted them to hold on, and then took his life in his hand with the message to Koxinga that the besieged would on no account allow the subject of surrender to be mentioned, although they were quite prepared to make every honourable attempt to meet the wishes of His Highness; which reply so enraged Koxinga that he soon after ordered Hambroek to be beheaded. Meanwhile the daughter of this brave Christian martyr, who is described as having been a very sweet and pleasing maiden, was chosen by Koxinga himself and made a member of his harem."[70][71]

"Many of these wretched people, including the dauntless Hambroek and some of the women and children, were beheaded. Some, more unhappy still, were crucified. One of Mr. Hambroek 's daughters Koxinga took into his own harem, while the remainder of the women were divided amongst his officers."[72]

[edit] Descendants

The cutlass of Koxinga, the pirate king who conquered Formosa, was sold by one of his descendants in 1879 and brought $1,500.[73]

[edit] Modern day legacy and influences

Statue of Koxinga in Fort Zeelandia, Anping, Tainan, Taiwan

Koxinga is worshipped as a god in coastal China especially Fujian and Taiwan and by overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia. There is a temple dedicated to Koxinga and his mother in Tainan City, Taiwan. The National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, one of the most prestigious universities in Taiwan, is named after him. Koxinga is still revered for expelling the Dutch from Taiwan.[74]

Koxinga's army also brought the Qinxi fraternal brotherhood into Taiwan, of which some of his army were members of the organization. In the present day, the Qinxi currently exists in Taiwan. The Hongmen are associated with them.[75]

The play The Battles of Coxinga (Kokusen'ya Kassen, 国姓爺合戦; formerly 國姓爺合戰) was written by Chikamatsu Monzaemon in Japan in the 18th century, first performed in Kyoto. A 2001 film titled The Sino-Dutch War 1661 (鄭成功 1661) starred Vincent Zhao as Koxinga.[76] The film was renamed Kokusenya Kassen (国姓爺合戦) after the aforementioned play and released in Japan in 2002.

In politics, Koxinga is an interesting figure because several opposing political forces have invoked him as a hero. For this reason, historical narratives regarding Koxinga frequently differ in explaining his motives and affiliation.[citation needed]

Koxinga is considered a national hero in Mainland China because he drove the Dutch away from Taiwan and established ethnically Chinese rule over the island.[citation needed]

Koxinga is considered a pirate in the Philippines because of his banditry and raids on Philippine soil.

During the Japanese control of Taiwan, Koxinga was honored as a bridge between Taiwan and Japan for his maternal linkage to Japan.[citation needed]

The Chinese Nationalist Party regarded Koxinga as a patriot who retreated to Taiwan and used it as a base to launch counterattacks against the Qing Dynasty of mainland China. As such, the Nationalists have frequently compared Koxinga to their leader Chiang Kai-shek.[citation needed]

Supporters of Taiwan independence have held mixed feelings toward Koxinga. Recent Taiwanese independence supporters have presented him in a positive light, portraying him as a native Taiwanese hero seeking to keep Taiwan independent from a mainland Chinese government.[citation needed]

Koxinga is one of the 32 historical figures who appear as special characters in the video game Romance of the Three Kingdoms XI by Koei. He is addressed as "Zheng Chenggong" in the game.

In modern times, Koxinga is regarded as a hero in the People's Republic of China, Taiwan, and Japan for various reasons.

[edit] Memorial institutions

[edit] See also

[edit] References and notes

  1. ^ a b Keene, The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu's Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance, 45.
  2. ^ Paske-Smith, Western Barbarians in Japan and Formosa in Tokugawa Days, 1603 - 1868, p. 83.
  3. ^ Carioti, Patrizia. “The Zhengs' Maritime Power in the International Context of the 17th Century Far East Seas: The Rise of a 'Centralised Piratical Organisation' and Its Gradual Development into an Informal 'State'”. Ming Qing Yanjiu (1996): p. 52.
  4. ^ John E. Wills and Donald Keene both agree that Zheng's wife's surname was "Dong" (董), John E. Wills, Jr., Pepper, Guns and Parleys: The Dutch East India Company and China 1622–1681 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974), 28, and Donald Keene, The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu's Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance, (London: Taylor's Foreign Press, 1950), 46. Jonathan Clements, however, claims her name was "Deng Cuiying", Jonathan Clements, Coxinga and the Fall of the Ming Dynasty (Phoenix Mill: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2004), 92. Chang et al., The English Factory in Taiwan, 1670–1685, Taipei: National Taiwan University, 1995. p. 740 introduces her as "Tung Ts'ui-ying", which would be "Dong Cuiying" in Hanyu Pinyin.
  5. ^ Struve, Southern Ming, p. 88.
  6. ^ Struve, Southern Ming, p. 77
  7. ^ Hung Chien-chao. “Taiwan Under the Cheng Family, 1662–1683: Sinicization After Dutch Rule.” Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University. p. 265
  8. ^ Koxinga's Shrine
  9. ^ Ralph Croizier, Koxinga and Chinese Nationalism: History, Myth, and the Hero (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977), 11, and Donald Keene, The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu's Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance, (London: Taylor's Foreign Press, 1950), 45. Tonio Andrade writes her name as "Tagawa Matsu" (田川松), but he provides no source for this. Tonio Andrade, How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han Colonization in the Seventeenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), Chapter 10, paragraph 7. [1]
  10. ^ Croizier, Koxinga and Chinese Nationalism: History, Myth, and the Hero, p. 12, and Carioti, "The Zhengs' Maritime Power in the International Context of the 17th Century Far East Seas: The Rise of a 'Centralised Piratical Organisation' and Its Gradual Development into an Informal 'State'", p. 41, n. 29.
  11. ^ Frederick Mote & Denis Twitchett, editors, The Cambridge History of China, Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 658–660.
  12. ^ a b Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 87-88.
  13. ^ Frederick Mote & Denis Twitchett, editors, The Cambridge History of China, Volume 7, The Ming Dynasty, 1368–1644, Part 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 675-676.
  14. ^ Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 98.
  15. ^ Tonio Andrade, How Taiwan Became Chinese: Dutch, Spanish, and Han Colonization in the Seventeenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), Chapter 10, paragraph 12. [2]
  16. ^ Donald Keene, The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu's Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance, (London: Taylor's Foreign Press, 1950), 46.
  17. ^ a b c Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 116.
  18. ^ Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 159.
  19. ^ 郑成功的十大罪过,漳州大屠杀73万人
  20. ^ Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 160–166.
  21. ^ Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 181.
  22. ^ Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming 1644–1662 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984), 182.
  23. ^ Rev. WM. Campbell: "Formosa under the Dutch. Described from contemporary Records with Explanatory Notes and a Bibliography of the Island", originally published by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd. London 1903, republished by SMC Publishing Inc. 1992, ISBN 957-638-083-9, p. 452
  24. ^ Borao, José Eugenio (2010). The Spanish experience in Taiwan, 1626-1642: the Baroque ending of a Renaissance endeavor. Hong Kong University Press. pp. 199. ISBN 9622090834. 
  25. ^ Daniel George Edward Hall (1981). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=22-HTtjPFKHj0QH2hqEQ&ct=result&id=FrFGAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros+southeast+asia&q=koxinga [Original from the University of Michigan] A history of South-East Asia] (4, illustrated ed.). Macmillan. p. 278. ISBN 0333241630. http://books.google.com/books?ei=22-HTtjPFKHj0QH2hqEQ&ct=result&id=FrFGAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros+southeast+asia&q=koxinga [Original from the University of Michigan]. Retrieved 29 September 2011. "Moro depredations and enabled the Spaniards to take the offensive against the Moro baes at Jolo and on Lake Lanao in northern Mindanao. Neither side, however, could win an outright victory, and when the Chinese leader Koxinga, having ousted the Dutch from Formosa in 1 661, went on to threaten Manila in the following year, Zamboanga was evacuated by the Spaniards and" 
  26. ^ Nasser A. Marohomsalic (2001). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=dAPYTq7NC8nYgAeV3vCKDw&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=12+CONFLICT+OF+SUCCESSION+AND+RIVALRY+The+withdrawal+of+Spanish+forces+in+Zamboanga+and+other+outposts+in+Mindanao+for+Manila+in+1+663+to+meet+the+threat+of+a+Chinese+attack+by+Koxinga+left+Mindanao+all+to+the+Moros%2C+to+the+internal&q=withdrawal+outposts [the University of Michigan] Aristocrats of the Malay race: a history of the bangsa Moro in the Philippines]. N.A. Marohomsalic. p. 58. http://books.google.com/books?ei=dAPYTq7NC8nYgAeV3vCKDw&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=12+CONFLICT+OF+SUCCESSION+AND+RIVALRY+The+withdrawal+of+Spanish+forces+in+Zamboanga+and+other+outposts+in+Mindanao+for+Manila+in+1+663+to+meet+the+threat+of+a+Chinese+attack+by+Koxinga+left+Mindanao+all+to+the+Moros%2C+to+the+internal&q=withdrawal+outposts [the University of Michigan]. "1 12 CONFLICT OF SUCCESSION AND RIVALRY The withdrawal of Spanish forces in Zamboanga and other outposts in Mindanao for Manila in 1 663 to meet the threat of a Chinese attack by Koxinga left Mindanao all to the Moros, to the internal dissensions among the ranks of its covetous nobility who harbored every ambition to royal paramountcy" 
  27. ^ Nasser A. Marohomsalic (2001). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=dAPYTq7NC8nYgAeV3vCKDw&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=12+CONFLICT+OF+SUCCESSION+AND+RIVALRY+The+withdrawal+of+Spanish+forces+in+Zamboanga+and+other+outposts+in+Mindanao+for+Manila+in+1+663+to+meet+the+threat+of+a+Chinese+attack+by+Koxinga+left+Mindanao+all+to+the+Moros%2C+to+the+internal&q=koxinga+occupy [the University of Michigan] Aristocrats of the Malay race: a history of the bangsa Moro in the Philippines]. N.A. Marohomsalic. p. 195. http://books.google.com/books?ei=dAPYTq7NC8nYgAeV3vCKDw&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=12+CONFLICT+OF+SUCCESSION+AND+RIVALRY+The+withdrawal+of+Spanish+forces+in+Zamboanga+and+other+outposts+in+Mindanao+for+Manila+in+1+663+to+meet+the+threat+of+a+Chinese+attack+by+Koxinga+left+Mindanao+all+to+the+Moros%2C+to+the+internal&q=koxinga+occupy [the University of Michigan]. "and the speedy colonization of Moroland. Spain abandoned Zamboanga in 1663 to reinforce Manila against the threat of Chinese Koxinga, and they returned in 1718 to occupy again the settlement. In 1720-1721, Iranun and M'ranao Moros numbering 3000 warriors led by the King of Butig stormed and laid siege to the Fort for five months but the Fort stood its defenses. A saga of their race, the event is recorded and preserved in the salsila of the M'ranaos by their lyricists, and it is sang and recited in rhapsody during important occasions." 
  28. ^ Dansalan Research Center (1979). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=rbpwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=koxinga+threatened+manila [the University of Michigan] Dansalan quarterly, Volumes 1-4]. Dansalan Research Center, Dansalan Junior College. p. 180. http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=rbpwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=koxinga+threatened+manila [the University of Michigan]. "The Christian occupation of the north coast of Mindanao was just being consolidated when, in 1662, a new threat to the whole Philippine enterpise brought the labors to a halt. Koxinga, the Chinese war-lord who had taken over Formosa, threatened Manila, and Governor Bobadilla sent out orders calling in all the Spanish forces in Mindanao, including those of lligan and Zamboanga, to defend the capital.38 This ... and furtive expeditions of our Jesuits," who were prevented from doing more by the "bloody piracies of the Moros" 
  29. ^ Nasser A. Marohomsalic (2001). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=mgfYTrfKKeXV0QHokr3IDQ&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=Kudarat%27s+fort+stood+and+repulsed+Spanish+offensive+even+while+the+Moros+were+raiding+the+coasts+of+Mindoro+and+Marinduque&q=fort+stood+repulsed [the University of Michigan] Aristocrats of the Malay race: a history of the bangsa Moro in the Philippines]. N.A. Marohomsalic. p. 58. http://books.google.com/books?ei=mgfYTrfKKeXV0QHokr3IDQ&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=Kudarat%27s+fort+stood+and+repulsed+Spanish+offensive+even+while+the+Moros+were+raiding+the+coasts+of+Mindoro+and+Marinduque&q=fort+stood+repulsed [the University of Michigan]. "The Spaniards retaliated the following year, 1656, burning Kudarat's town and some Moro towns in Sibugay Bay and destroying a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. Kudarat's fort stood and repulsed Spanish offensive even while the Moros were raiding the coasts of Mindoro and Marinduque. Datu Salicula scoured the Philippine seas, entering Manila Bay in 1657 and capturing over 1000 natives. In 1660, Jolo and Tawi-Tawi Moros raided the coasts of Bohol, Leyte and Mindoro and, in 1662, sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. 1 12 CONFLICT OF SUCCESSION AND RIVALRY The withdrawal of Spanish forces in Zamboanga and" 
  30. ^ José S. Arcilla (1991). [http://books.google.com/books?id=6PhwAAAAMAAJ&q=koxinga+moros&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA [the University of Michigan] Rizal and the emergence of the Philippine nation] (revised ed.). Office of Research and Publications, Ateneo de Manila University. p. 98. ISBN 971550020X. http://books.google.com/books?id=6PhwAAAAMAAJ&q=koxinga+moros&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA [the University of Michigan]. "In 1635, Sebastian Hurtado de Corcuera arrived as the new Governor General of the Philippines. He was a soldier, and he decided to look into the Moro problem. He personally led a military expedition to the Pulangi in 1637 and successfully took Sultan Kudarat's fort at ...In 1639, he sent troops to overrun the area around Laka Lanao, erecting a fort near Iligan, the northern entrance to the Maranao country. It was a dramatic revanche. In three short years, this veteran of the Spanish wars turned the tables on the Moros. A festive Manila accorded him a jubilant triumph on his return from the campaigns. Boys soon fell to playing Espanoles and Magindanaos, with a Corcuera, wooden sword in air, leading the charge against the defiant ranks of a Kudarat. It was from such games (at least it seems so) that the traditional moro-moro developed into an early traditional moro-moro developed into an early art form in the Philippines. Such triumphs did not last. Governor Sebastian Manrique de Lara (1635-1663) recalled the Spanish garrisons in the south. What happened? In May 1662, Chen Cheng-kung (hispanized into Koxinga) delivered a dire warning to the Governor that, having captured Formosa Island, he was now ready to take the Philippines, unless the Spaniards paid the tribute he demanded. Manrique just as boastfully refused to honor the threat, but he decided to bolster the defenses of the colony. He recalled all the southern forces, leaving the outposts at Caraga and Zamboanga bereft of men. The Sulus and Magindanaos lost no time and resumed their hostile operations. As it turned out, Koxinga never made good on his threat. He died. But the garrisons were not restored. And so, emboldened, the Moros resumed their raids. They sailed the Philippine seas freely, reaching as far north as Cagayan" 
  31. ^ [http://books.google.com/books?id=vWLRxJEU49EC&pg=PA900&dq=zamboanga+chinese&hl=en&ei=ktq5TtT2HM-YhQfgkqSYBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20chinese&f=false [] Middle East and Africa]. Taylor & Francis. 1996. p. 900. ISBN 1884964044. http://books.google.com/books?id=vWLRxJEU49EC&pg=PA900&dq=zamboanga+chinese&hl=en&ei=ktq5TtT2HM-YhQfgkqSYBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20chinese&f=false []. "In order to protect their share in the China trade, the Spanish came to Zamboanga in 1635. ... In 1663 Manila, the Spanish capital, was under threat from a Chinese attack, and all Spanish resources in Zamboanga were withdrawn to Luzon...With the American arrival in the Philippines in 1898, many aspects of life in Zamboanga and its neighboring regions changed...Muslims began to be outnumbered by Christian immigrants; today the Muslim population of Mindanao and Sulu accounts for only 23 percent of the region's total. Luzon" 
  32. ^ United States. War Dept (1903). [http://books.google.com/books?id=g8FMAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [Princeton University] Annual report of the Secretary of War, Part 3]. WASHINGTON: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.. p. 381. http://books.google.com/books?id=g8FMAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [Princeton University]. "---- Despite the Jolo treaty, the Jolo dato, Salicala. and a dato from Borneo ravaged the Visayan coast. The force of the latter was defeated by Monforte near Masbate, and Salicala returned to Jolo. Monforte destroyed several towns and 300 boats in Borneo. In 1655 trouble again broke out between Corralat and the Spanish forces, the Moros sacking numerous towns in the Calamianes and one town near Zamboanga. In 1656 a fleet dispatched by De Sara, the new captaingeneral, burned Corralat's town and some Moro towns in Sibuguey Bay, destroying also a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. The Moros at the same time were ravaging the coasts of Mindoro and Marinduque, and succeeded also in repulsing the attack on the fort at Corralat, forcing the Spaniards to return to Sabonilla and Zamboanga. In 1657 Salicala scoured the Philippine seas, capturing over 1,000 native prisoners, entering the Bay of Manila during the raid. In 1660 Moros from Jolo and Tawi-Tawi, taking advantage of an insurrection in Luzon, raided the costs of Bohol, Leyte, and Mindoro. In 1662 a Chinese rebellion embarrassed the Spaniards, and at this time several datos from the Jolo and Tawi-Tawi islands sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. Following these inroads, Bobadilla, governor of Zamboanga, was ordered to evacuate that station, which was done in January, 1663. For the next half century Moro raids on the Mindanao and Visayan settlements marked each year, and many fights were chronicled between the fleets of praus and the Spanish fleet known as the "Armada de los Pintados," The Jesuits had endeavored in 1666 and 1672 to have the fort of Zamboanga rebuilt, but it was not until 1712 that the Spanish King ordered its reestablishment, and even then the project was not realized until 1718, in which year the present fort, with four bastions, was built and the city walls protected. The place was defended by 61 pieces of artillery. The reestablishment of the Zamboanga station caused great discontent among the Moros. It was besieged for two months in 1720 and 1721 by 5,000 Moros under the dato of Butig. The resistance, directed by the governor, Amorrea, was successful, and the siege abandoned, the Moros turning their efforts to raids on Mindoro and the Calamianes, where great damage was done." 
  33. ^ Ongsotto, Et Al. [http://books.google.com/books?id=ITLRpPrrcykC&pg=PA112&dq=zamboanga+spaniards&hl=en&ei=j9q5TuaSEsnQhAemm5i5Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20spaniards&f=false [] Philippine History Module-based Learning I' 2002 Ed.]. Rex Bookstore, Inc.. p. 112. ISBN 971233449X. http://books.google.com/books?id=ITLRpPrrcykC&pg=PA112&dq=zamboanga+spaniards&hl=en&ei=j9q5TuaSEsnQhAemm5i5Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20spaniards&f=false []. "Muslim Raids in the Visayas The series of invasions waged by the Spaniards was countered with the Filipino Muslim war called jihad. The Filipino Muslim's wrath was struck not only upon the Spaniards but also on their brother Filipino Christians. They attacked the Christian settlements in the islands of Cebu, Negros, and Panay. Houses and churches were destroyed, villages flattened down to the ground , with many lives lost. The Christian Filipinos who had been captured were sold. Among the Muslim leaders who waged the most deadly counterattacks were Sultans Sali and Salonga. From mid- 1599 to the 1600's, the two Muslim leaders carried out the jihad. Among the victims of the Muslim attacks was Captain Garcia de Sierra, the Spanish alcalde mayor of Panay. Although he was killed in the battle, the Spaniards succeeded in preserving their colonized territories in the Visayas. 4. Zamboanga Spanish conquests in Mindanao were intensified in 1602, 1627, 1628- 1629 but all failed due to the all-out resistance, particularly in Jolo. Because of the suicidal offensives of the Muslim Filipinos, the Spaniards branded them as juramentados...On February 2, 1637 Governor-General Hurtado de Corcuera sent a military expedition to Mindanao. From Rio Grande de Mindanao, the Spanish fleet attacked Lamitan (near Lanao) ruled by Sultan Kudarat, the most influential sultan warrior in the Moro land. Due to the overwhelming number of Spanish forces, Kudarat had to retreat to Lanao." 
  34. ^ Alexander Spoehr (1973). [http://books.google.com/books?id=nxwjAAAAMAAJ&q=zamboanga+spaniards&dq=zamboanga+spaniards&hl=en&ei=j9q5TuaSEsnQhAemm5i5Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAw [the University of Michigan]Issue 1 of Ethnology monographs Zamboanga and Sulu: an archaeological approach to ethnic diversity]. Dept. of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh. p. 37. http://books.google.com/books?id=nxwjAAAAMAAJ&q=zamboanga+spaniards&dq=zamboanga+spaniards&hl=en&ei=j9q5TuaSEsnQhAemm5i5Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAw [the University of Michigan]Issue 1 of Ethnology monographs. "Construction of the Fort In 1635 Captain Juan de Chavez landed at Zamboanga with 300 Spaniards and 1000 Visayans to commence building the fort. He was accompanied by Pedro Gutierez, who had established the Jesuit mission at Dapitan to the north in Mindanao and by Melchior de Vera, an experienced Jesuit engineer and military architect. The fort was built under de Vera's direction and the cornerstone laid on June 23 , 1635. Accounts are incomplete as to the actual length of time required to build the fort (cf. Diaz-Trechuelo 1959: 363). It was named Real Fuerza de San Jose" 
  35. ^ Adeline Knapp (1902). [http://books.google.com/books?id=LkwAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA84&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University] The story of the Philippines for use in the schools of the Philippine Islands]. Volume 11 of The world and its people Volume 1930 of Harvard social studies textbooks preservation microfilm project. Silver, Burdett and Co.. p. 84. http://books.google.com/books?id=LkwAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA84&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University]. "While Governor-General Lara was in office another Chinese invasion threatened. A Mongol chieftain named Koxinga, who had been driven forth from his own country by the Tartars, was the leader of it. When the Tartars overran China, about the middle of the seventeenth century, Koxinga and many of his followers refused to submit. They went to Formosa, drove out the Dutch people, and settled there. Later Koxinga laid a plan to take the Philippine Islands and set up his kingdom there. Koxinga's chief adviser was an Italian friar named Riccio. This friar he had appointed a high mandarin, or nobleman. He now sent him to Manila, dressed in the garb of his office, to demand tribute from the Philippine government. Naturally this demand caused amaze and alarm in Manila. The Spaniards were aghast at the idea of a Catholic priest demanding tribute from a Catholic country, in the name of a heathen ruler. Later the authorities at Rome called the friar to account for his conduct. At this time, however, the Spanish were at a loss how to act. They did not dare send the priestmandarin away, nor could they give him any answer. They therefore kept him waiting in Manila while they made up their minds what to do. As was usual, when trouble arose, the government thought that the Chinese in Manila were plotting to take the city. They felt sure that these men would be ready to help Koxinga when he came, so everything was made ready for another attack upon the Chinese in Luzon. All government troops, both Spanish and native, were collected at Manila. So great was the fear, that three important forts were torn down, and the soldiers stationed there were brought to Luzon. Only the fort at Caraga, Mindanao, was left standing. This one they did not dare to give up; the soldiers there were all that kept the Moros from destroying the settlements on that coast. When the Chinese saw the Spaniards making ready for war, they knew from past experience that it meant trouble for them. As usual, therefore, they began the trouble themselves. They attacked the Spanish, and the latter at once began fighting the Chinese wherever they found them. This time the Spanish meant to kill every Chinaman in the country. They hunted out all who hid, and cut them down. Not one whom they caught was spared. Not one of all in the islands would have been spared if the country could have gotten along without them. Some one remembered, however, before it was too late, that if all the Chinese were killed there would be no one left to carry on the small trades of the country. Because bootmakers and tailors and small shopkeepers were needed, therefore about 5,000 Chinamen were spared, and these were permitted to remain in Manila. , After peace was made, Riccio was allowed to go back to Formosa, to tell Koxinga what had been done. He found the chieftain getting ready to come to Manila with an army to take the country, and Riccio told him what had happened. Koxinga's rage was great when he heard his mandarin's story. He planned to go at once to the islands to punish this wicked cruelty to his countrymen. He fell ill, however, and died of fever before he could start. Thus Manila escaped the fate that must almost surely have fallen upon the city if the Chinese chief and his great army had reached the bay. The foolish attack upon the Chinese took so many Spanish soldiers from the southern islands that the Moros now had free swing along the coasts of Mindanao and the Visayas. Other troubles came up in Manila, and soon evil and sorrow were as active and as real as though the islands had never been cleansed by book and ceremony. Not even these can stay the results of cruelty and evil in men's lives." 
  36. ^ David Prescott Barrows (1905). [http://books.google.com/books?id=n8MYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA210&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University] A history of the Philippines ...]. Amer. Bk. Co.. p. 210. http://books.google.com/books?id=n8MYAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA210&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University]. "His son was the notorious Kue-Sing, or Koxinga, who for years resisted the armies of the Manchus, and maintained an independent power over the coasts of Fukien and Chekiang. About 1660 the forces of the Manchus became too formidable for him to longer resist them upon the mainland, and Koxinga determined upon the capture of Formosa and the transference of his kingdom to that island. For thirty-eight years this island had been dominated by the Dutch, whose fortresses commanded the channel of the Pescadores. The colony was regarded as an important one by the Dutch colonial government at Batavia. The city of Tai-wan, on the west coast, was a considerable center of trade. It was strongly protected by the fortress of Zealand, and had a garrison of twentytwo hundred Dutch soldiers. After months of fighting, Koxinga, with an overpowering force of Chinese, compelled the surrender of the Hollanders and the beautiful island passed into his power. A Threatened Invasion of the Philippines-—Exalted by his success against European arms, Koxinga resolved upon the conquest of the Philippines. He summoned to his service the Italian Dominican missionary, Ricci, who had been living in the province of Fukien, and in the spring of 1662 dispatched him as an ambassador to the governor of the Philippines to demand the submission of the archipelago. Manila was thrown into a terrible panic by this demand, and indeed no such danger had threatened the Spanish in the Philippines since the invasion of Limahong. The Chinese conqueror had an innumerable army, and his armament, stores, and navy had been greatly augmented by the surrender of the Dutch. The Spaniards, however, were united on resistance. The governor, Don Sabiano Manrique de Lara, returned a defiant answer to Koxinga, and the most radical measures were adopted to place the colony in a state of defense. All Chinese were ordered immediately to leave the Islands. Fearful of massacre, these wretched people again broke out in rebellion, and assaulted the city. Many were slain, and other bands wandered off into the mountains, where they perished at the hands of the natives. Others, escaping by frail boats, joined the Chinese colonists on Formosa. Churches and convents in the suburbs of Manila, which might afford shelter to the assailant, were razed to the ground. More than all this, the Moluccas were forsaken, never again to be recovered by Spaniards; and the presidios of Zamboanga and Cuyo, which served as a kind of bridle on the Moros of Jolo and Mindanao, were abandoned. All Spanish troops were concentrated in Manila, fortifications were rebuilt, and the population waited anxiously for the attack. But the blow never fell. Before Ricci arrived at Tai-wan, Koxinga was dead, and the peril of Chinese invasion had passed. Effects of These Events. — But the Philippines had suffered irretrievable loss. Spanish prestige was gone. Manila was no longer, as she had been at the commencement of the century, the capital of the East. Spanish sovereignty was again confined to Luzon and the Bisayas. The Chinese trade, on which rested the economic prosperity of Manila, had once again been ruined. For a hundred years the history of the Philippines is a dull monotony, quite unrelieved by any heroic activity or the presence of noble character.1" 
  37. ^ [http://books.google.com/books?id=vasrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA752&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University] The Encyclopedia Americana: a library of universal knowledge, Volume 21]. ALBANY, NEW YORK: Encyclopedia Americana Corp.. 1919. p. 752. http://books.google.com/books?id=vasrAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA752&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University]. "The conflict between the Dutch and Spanish for possession of the East ended in the loss to Spain of most of the possessions to the south in the hands of the Dutch, although efforts of the latter to gain possession of the Philippines were without success. In 1640 Portugal freed herself from Spain and Spain lost the remainder of her possessions to the south. During this period the raids of the Moros continued. These pirates did much damage. This led to efforts on the part of Spain to conquer these warlike people, which resulted in the conquest of Jolo and the establishment of a stronghold at Zamboanga. In 1662 Koxinga, a Chinese pirate, demanded the surrender of Manila. This danger was so great that the Spaniards concentrated all their efforts to resist the threatened invasions and abandoned some of their strongholds in the south. The Chinese in Manila were suspected of ibeing in the plot. They assaulted Manila but many were slain and the remainder left the city. The threatened invasion never was carried out for Koxinga died. The effects of the events cited above left Spanish prestige at a low ebb. Manila was no longer the principal commercial centre of the East and never again recovered that position. The century that followed from 1663-1762 has been described as one of obscurity for the Philippines. It was filled with conflicts between the civil and Church authorities. Corruption and violence went unrebuked. Efforts made by Spain to correct the abuses were for the most part without success. One of the courageous governors was killed by Church authorities. Commerce between South America and the Philippines was forbidden and that with Mexico greatly restricted for the benefit of the merchants of Spain. This economic policy nearly paralyzed trade. Moro piracy again became active. In 1762 the English captured Manila, but made no attempt to extend their conquest. By the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the Philippines were restored to Spain." 
  38. ^ 1919 The Encyclopedia Americana Corporation (1919). [http://books.google.com/books?id=7XiMf0xc_WQC&pg=PA752&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University] the encyclopedia americana]. ALBANY, NEW YORK. p. 752. http://books.google.com/books?id=7XiMf0xc_WQC&pg=PA752&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20moros&f=false [Harvard University]. "The conflict between the Dutch and Spanish for possession of the East ended in the loss to Spain of most of the possessions to the south in the hands of the Dutch, although efforts of the latter to gain possession of the Philippines were without success. In 1640 Portugal freed herself from Spain and Spain lost the remainder of her possessions to the south. During this period the raids of the Moros continued. These pirates did much damage. This led to efforts on the part of Spain to conquer these warlike people, which resulted in the conquest of Jolo and the establishment of a stronghold at Zamboanga. In 1662 Koxinga, a Chinese pirate, demanded the surrender of Manila. This danger was so great that the Spaniards concentrated all their efforts to resist the threatened invasions and abandoned some of their strongholds in the south. The Chinese in Manila were suspected of feeing in the plot. They assaulted Manila but many were slain and the remainder left the city. The threatened invasion never was carried out for Koxinga died. The effects of the events cited above left Spanish prestige at a low ebb. Manila was no longer the principal commercial centre of the East and never again recovered that position. The century that followed from 1663-1762 has been described as one of obscurity for the Philippines. It was filled with conflicts between the civil and Church authorities. Corruption and violence went unrebuked. Efforts made by Spain to correct the abuses were for the most part without success. One of the courageous governors was killed by Church authorities. Commerce between South America and the Philippines was forbidden and that with Mexico greatly restricted for the benefit of the merchants of Spain. This economic policy nearly paralyzed trade. Moro piracy again became active. In 1762 the English captured Manila, but made no attempt to extend their conquest. By the Treaty of Paris in 1763, the Philippines were restored to Spain." 
  39. ^ Charles Whitman Briggs (1913). [http://books.google.com/books?id=yic3AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA61&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of Michigan] The progressing Philippines :]. PHILADELPHIA: The Griffith & Rowland press. p. 61. http://books.google.com/books?id=yic3AAAAMAAJ&pg=PA61&dq=koxinga+moros&hl=en&ei=jtq5Tq-0M8rIhAe-oc29Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of Michigan]. "Another event of importance during the seventeenth century resulted from the overthrow of the Ming Dynasty in China by the Manchus. During the change of power and consequent disorders there, a Chinese adventurer, Koxinga, raised a pirate army in south China and drove the Dutch out of Formosa. He then sent an ambassador to Manila demanding the surrender of the Islands to him. The colony was weak and unprepared for defense, and consequently terrified. There were twenty-five thousand Chinese living in Pari-an, north of the Pasig River, in Manila. Fearful lest these Chinese cooperate in the designs of Koxinga, they were all ordered to leave the Islands. Unable to do so at once, and fearful of massacre, they arose in rebellion and assaulted the city of Manila. The result was a terrible massacre, which cost the lives of twenty-two thousand of the Chinese; the remaining three thousand built frail boats and fled to Formosa. The death of Koxinga occurred before his expedition reached the Philippines." 
  40. ^ Nasser A. Marohomsalic (2001). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=threat+koxinga+moroland [the University of Michigan] Aristocrats of the Malay race: a history of the bangsa Moro in the Philippines]. N.A. Marohomsalic. p. 195. http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=threat+koxinga+moroland [the University of Michigan]. "In 1597, Spain built a fort at La Caldera (now Recodo, Zamboanga City) and abandoned it later. They reoc- cupied the city in 1635 and built therein the Nuestra Senor del Pilar Fort with support flotilla to check Moro sorties to Visayas and Luzon and effect speedy colonization of Moroland. Spain abandoned Zamboanga in 1663 to reinforce Manila against the threat of Chinese Koxinga, and they returned in 1718 to occupy again the settlement. In 1720-1721, Iranun and M'ranao Moros numbering 3000 warriors led by the King of Butig stormed and laid siege to the Fort for five months but the Fort stood its defenses. A saga of their race, the event is recorded and preserved in the" 
  41. ^ Nasser A. Marohomsalic (2001). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=threat+koxinga+chinese+attack+withdrawal [the University of Michigan] Aristocrats of the Malay race: a history of the bangsa Moro in the Philippines]. N.A. Marohomsalic. p. 58. http://books.google.com/books?ei=tuq9TuDaGuP00gH5mrzBBA&ct=result&id=s3ZwAAAAMAAJ&dq=koxinga+moros&q=threat+koxinga+chinese+attack+withdrawal [the University of Michigan]. "The Spaniards retaliated the following year, 1656, burning Kudarat's town and some Moro towns in Sibugay Bay and destryoying a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. Kudarat's fort stood and repulsed Spanish offensive even while the Moros were raiding the coasts of Mindoro and Marinduque. Datu Salicula scoured the Philippine seas, entering Manila Bay in 1657 and capturing over 1000 natives. In 1660, Jolo and Tawi-Tawi Moros raided the coasts of Bohol, Leyte and Mindoro and, in 1662, sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. 1 12 CONFLICT OF SUCCESSION AND RIVALRY The withdrawal of Spanish forces in Zamboanga and other outposts in Mindanao for Manila in 1 663 to meet the threat of a Chinese attack by Koxinga left Mindanao all to the Moros, to the internal dissensions among the ranks of its covetous nobility who harbored every ambition to royal paramountcy." 
  42. ^ Joo-Jock Lim, Vani Shanmugaratnam, ed. (1984). [http://books.google.com/books?ei=VHraTsjRCeLb0QHPscSIDg&ct=result&id=3ld5AAAAIAAJ&dq=which+culminated+in+the+construction+Fort+Pillar+in+Zamboanga+%28La+Caldera%29%3B+4.+The+efforts+to+subjugate+Mindanao+and+Sulu+from+1635+to+1663+when+the+Spanish+garrison+at+the+La+Caldera+was+abandoned+on+account+of+Koxinga%27s+threat+in&q=koxinga%27s+threat [the University of California] Armed separatism in Southeast Asia]. Regional Strategic Studies Programme, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. p. 171. ISBN 9971902516. http://books.google.com/books?ei=VHraTsjRCeLb0QHPscSIDg&ct=result&id=3ld5AAAAIAAJ&dq=which+culminated+in+the+construction+Fort+Pillar+in+Zamboanga+%28La+Caldera%29%3B+4.+The+efforts+to+subjugate+Mindanao+and+Sulu+from+1635+to+1663+when+the+Spanish+garrison+at+the+La+Caldera+was+abandoned+on+account+of+Koxinga%27s+threat+in&q=koxinga%27s+threat [the University of California]. "which culminated in the construction Fort Pillar in Zamboanga (La Caldera); 4. The efforts to subjugate Mindanao and Sulu from 1635 to 1663 when the Spanish garrison at the La Caldera was abandoned on account of Koxinga's threat in Luzon" 
  43. ^ United States. War Dept (1903). [http://books.google.com/books?id=wAgSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false [Harvard University] Annual reports of the secretary of war, Volume 3]. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. p. 381. http://books.google.com/books?id=wAgSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false [Harvard University]. "spite the Jolo treaty, the Jolo dato, Salicala, and a dato from Borneo ravaged the Visayan coast. The force of the latter was defeated by Monforte near Masbate, and Salicala returned to Jolo. Monforte destroyed several towns and 300 boats in Borneo. In 1655 trouble again broke out between Corralat and the Spanish forces, the Moros sacking numerous towns in the Calamianes and one town near Zamboanga. In 1656 a fleet dispatched by De Sara, the new captaingeneral, burned Corralat's town and some Moro towns in Sibuguey Bay, destroying also a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. The Moros at the same time were ravaging the coasts of Mindoro and Marinduque, and succeeded also in repulsing the attack on the fort at Corralat, forcing the Spaniards to return to Sabonilla and Zamboanga. In 1657 Salicala scoured the Philippine seas, capturing over 1,000 native prisoners, entering the Bay of Manila during the raid. In 1660 Moros from Jolo and Tawi-Tawi, takmg advantage of an insurrection in Luzon, raided the costs of Bohol, Leyte, and Mindoro. In 1662 a Chinese rebellion embarrassed the Spaniards, and at this time several datos from the Jolo and Tawi-Tawi islands sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. Following these inroads, Bobadilla, governor of Zamboanga, was ordered to evacuate that station, which was done in January, 1663. For the next half century Moro raids on the Mindanao and Visayan settlements marked each year, and many fights were chronicled between the fleets of praus and the Spanish fleet known as the "Armada de los Pintados," 
  44. ^ United States. War Dept (1903). [http://books.google.com/books?id=zSTcdx5Y-PQC&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of Michigan] Annual reports ...., Volume 3]. WASHINGTON: Government Printing Office. p. 381. http://books.google.com/books?id=zSTcdx5Y-PQC&pg=PA381&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of Michigan]. "Despite the Jolo treaty, the Jolo dato, Salicala. and a dato from Borneo ravaged the Visayan coast. The force of the latter was defeated by Monforte near Masbate, and Salicala returned to Jolo. Monforte destroyed several towns and 300 boats in Borneo. In 1655 trouble again broke out between Corralat and the Spanish forces, the Moros sacking numerous towns in the Calamianes and one town near Zamboanga. In 1656 a fleet dispatched by De Sara, the new captaingeneral, burned Corralat's town and some Moro towns in Sibugney Bay, destroying also a Dutch fleet allied with the Moros. The Moros at the same time were ravaging the coasts of Mindoro and Marindnque, and succeeded also in repulsing the attack on the fort at Corralat, forcing the Spaniards to return to Sabonilla and Zamboanga. In 1657 Salicala scoured the Philippine seas, capturing over 1,000 native prisoners, entering the Bay of Manila during the raid. In 1660 Moros from Jolo and Tawi-Tawi, taking advantage of an insurrection in Luzon, raided the costs of Bohol, Leyte, and Mindoro. In 1662 a Chinese rebellion embarrassed the Spaniards, and at this time several datos from the Jolo and Tawi-Tawi islands sacked and burned a great many towns in the Visayas. Following these iuroads, Bobadilla, governor of Zamboanga, was ordered to evacuate that station, which was done in January, 1663. For the next half century Moro raids on the Mindanao and Visayan settlements marked each year, and many fights were chronicled between the fleets of praus and the Spanish fleet known as the "Armada de los Pintados,"" 
  45. ^ [http://books.google.com/books?id=6hAwAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA2-PA19&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20chinese%20rebellions&f=false [the New York Public Library] The Spirit of '76: devoted to the principles, incidents, and men of '76 and colonial times, Volumes 10-12]. Spirit of '76 Publishing Co.. 1903. p. 19. http://books.google.com/books?id=6hAwAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA2-PA19&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=zamboanga%20chinese%20rebellions&f=false [the New York Public Library]. "For three centuries, intermittent attempts were made by the Spaniards to destroy the homes of tihe Moro pirates, who. almost without exception, raided the Spanish colonies throughout the Philippine Islands, south of Luzon, and even occasionally on that island. Many reverses and some successes were met with by the Spanish expeditions against the JoJo ami Mindanao Moros. The names of some of the Spanish Captains-General who figured in these conflicts, and of the Moro chiefs, would convey no significance to those English-speaking people who have not, during the last six or seven years, participated in Moro campaigns. In 1637 Corcuero inaugurated a new conquest of Jolo and of Mindanao. His force consisted of 76b Europeans. He made a landing at Jolo. The following year, he landed at Zamboanga and oroceeded past Cattobats up the Rio Grande against the Datto Corralat and the Da*tos of Buhayen and Basilan. The following year, Corcuero and Almonte built a fort at Sabonflla, now called Malabang, on Plana Bay. Purine 1639, Spanish soldiers and priests, under the warlike Recoleto friar, Augustin de San Pedro, led a party of 560 against the Lanao Moros, where Camps Vicars and Keithley now stand. In 1642. Generals Corcuero and Almonte made peace with Corralat, but piratical depredations by the Moros continued; Chinese rebellions embarrassed the Spaniards, who evacuated manv places, and many fights were chronicled between the Moro fleets of Praus and the Spanish fleets. The priests egged on the Spanish, and the Spanish King re-established, and then abandoned, many stations in Mindoro, Basilon, Mindanao ami Jolo. Treaties were made and unmade. Expeditions intended to be punitive were undertaken. The Tawi-Tavvi Moros nearly captured Zamboanga. Engagements were constant with varying success until 1737. King Philip V. of Spain, pestered the Sultans of Jolo and Tomantaca (Mindanao) about not being Christians, but expeditions were as frequent as baptisms." 
  46. ^ John Foreman (F.R.G.S.) (1906). [http://books.google.com/books?id=W2crAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA77&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q&f=false [Harvard University] The Philippine Islands: a political, geographical, ethnographical, social and commercial history of the Philippine Archipelago, embracing the whole period of Spanish rule, with an account of the succeeding American insular government] (3 ed.). London and Aylesbury: Kelly and Walsh. p. 77. http://books.google.com/books?id=W2crAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA77&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q&f=false [Harvard University]. "In 1626, at the close of the Governorship of Fernando de Silva, a Spanish Colony was founded on Formosa Island, but no supplies were sent to it, and consequently in 1642 it surrendered to the Dutch, who held it for 20 years, until they were driven out by the Chinese adventurer Koxinga. And thus for over a century and a half the strife continued, until the Dutch concentrated their attention on the development of their Eastern Colonies, which the power of Spain, growing more and more effete, was incompetent to impede.
      • •**»
    In the middle of the 17th century the Tartars invaded China and overthrew the Min Dynasty—at that time represented by the Chinese Emperor Yunglic. He was succeeded on the throne by the Tartar Emperor Kungchi, to whose arbitrary power nearly all the Chinese Empire had submitted. Amongst the few Mongol chiefs who held out against Ta-Tsing dominion was a certain Mandarin known by the name of Koxinga, who retired to the Island of Kinmuen, where he asserted his independence and defied his nation's conqueror. Securely established in his stronghold, he invited the Chinese to take refuge in his island and oppose the Tartar's rule. Therefore the Emperor ordered that no man should inhabit China within four leagues of the coast, except in those provinces which were undoubtedly loyal to the new Government. The coast was consequently laid bare; vessels, houses, plantations, and everything useful to man, were destroyed in order to cut off effectually all communications with lands beyond the Tartar Empire. The Chinese from the coast, who for generations had earned a living by fishing, etc., crowded into the interior, and their misery was indescribable. Koxinga, unable to communicate with the mainland of the Empire, turned his attention to the conquest of Formosa Island, at the time in the possession of the Dutch. According to Dutch accounts the European settlers numbered about 600, with a garrison of 2,200. The Dutch artillery, stores, and merchandise were valued at P.8,000,000, and the Chinese, who attacked them under Koxinga, were about 100,000 strong. The settlement surrendered to the invaders' superior numbers, and Koxinga established himself as King of the Island. Koxinga had become acquainted with an Italian Dominican missionary named Vittorio Riccio, whom he created a Mandarin, and sent him as Ambassador to the Governor of the Philippines. Riccio therefore arrived in Manila in 1662, the bearer of Koxinga's despatches calling upon the Governor to pay tribute, under threat of the Colony being attacked by Koxinga if his demand were refused. The position of Riccio as a European friar and Ambassador of a Mongol adventurer was as awkward as it was novel. He was received with great honour in Manila, where he disembarked, and rode to the Government House in the full uniform of a Chinese envoy, through lines of troops drawn up to salute him as he passed. At the same time, letters from Formosa had also been received by the Chinese in Manila, and the Government at once accused them of conniving at rebellion. All available forces were concentrated in the capital; and to increase the garrison the Governor published a decree, dated May 6, 1662, ordering the demolition of the forts of Zamboanga, Yligan (Mindanao Is.), Calamianes and Ternate1 (Moluccas). The only provincial fort preserved was that of Surigao (then called Caraga), consequently in the south the Mahometans became complete masters on land and at sea for half a year. The troops in Manila numbered 100 cavalry and 8,000 infantry. Fortifications were raised, and redoubts were constructed in which to secrete the Treasury funds. When all the armament was in readiness, the Spaniards incited the Chinese to rebel, in order to afford a pretext for their massacre. Two junk masters were seized, and the Chinese population was menaced; therefore they prepared for their own defence, and then opened the affray, for which the Government was secretly longing, by killing a Spaniard in the market-place. Suddenly artillery fire was opened on the Parian, and many of the peaceful Chinese traders, in their terror, hanged themselves; many were drowned in the attempt to reach the canoes in which to get away to sea; some few did safely arrive in Formosa Island and joined Koxinga's camp, whilst others took to the mountains. Some 8,000 to 9,000 Chinese remained quiet, but ready for any event, when they were suddenly attacked by Spaniards and natives. The confusion was general, and the Chinese seemed to be gaining ground; therefore the Governor sent the Ambassador Riccio and a certain Fray Joseph de Madrid to parley with them. The Chinese accepted the terms offered by Riccio, who returned to the Governor, leaving Fray Joseph with the rebels; but when Riccio went back with a general pardon and a promise to restore the two junk masters, he found that they had beheaded the priest. A general carnage of the Mongols followed, and Juan de la Concepcion says2 that the original intention of the Spaniards was to kill every Chinaman, but that they desisted in new of the inconvenience which would have ensued from the want of tradesmen and mechanics. Therefore they made a virtue of a necessity, 1 From this date the Molucca Islands were definitely evacuated and abandoned by the Spaniards, although as many men and as much material and money had been employed in garrisons and conveyance of subsidies there as in the whole Philippine Colony up to that period. '"Hist. Gen. de Philipinas," by Juan de la Concepcion, Vol. VII., p. 48, published at Manila, 1788. and graciously pardoned in the name of His Catholic Majesty all who laid down their arms. Riccio returned to Formosa Island, and found Koxinga preparing for warfare against the Philippines, but before he could carry out his intentions he died of fever. The chiefs successor, of a less bellicose spirit, sent Riccio a second time to Manila, and a treaty was agreed to, re-establishing commercial relations with the Chinese. Shortly after Koxinga's decease a rebellion was raised in Formosa; and the Island, falling at length into the hands of a Tartar party, became annexed to China under the new dynasty. Then Riccio was called upon to relate the part he had taken in Koxinga's affairs, and he was heard in council. Some present were in favour of invading the Philippines in great force because of the cruel and unwarranted general massacre of the Chinese in cold blood; but Riccio took pains to show how powerful Spain was, and how justified was the action of the Spaniards, as a measure of precaution, in view of the threatened invasion of Koxinga. The Chinese party was appeased, but had the Tartars cared to take up the cause of their conquered subjects, the fate of the Philippines would have been doubtful." 
  47. ^ [http://books.google.com/books?id=EkAbAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA178&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFgQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of California] A pronouncing gazetteer and geographical dictionary of the Philippine Islands, United States of America, with maps, charts and illustrations: Also the law of the civil government in the Philippine Islands passed by Congress and approved by the President July 1, 1902, with a complete index]. WASHINGTON: Govt. Print. Off.. 1902. p. 178. http://books.google.com/books?id=EkAbAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA178&dq=zamboanga+chinese+rebellions&hl=en&ei=i9q5TvfyE5O2hAf5rrSiBw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFgQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q&f=false [the University of California]. "1603. A conflagration destroyed a third partof Manila. Uprisingof 20,000Chinese. Spaniards, nativ. and Japanese unite and completely overcome the Chinese. 160f>. Fortunate expedition to the Moluccas. First mission of Recoleta monks arrived. Uprisliu; the Japanese; were conquered and prohibited from living in future together in one ward. Dutch corsair, Rlancariio, defeated and captured by I>on Pedro de Heredia..ISt Moro pirates numbering 15,000 lay waste the Visayan Islands, and sacked the capital of Tayabas, Luzon. 1S5. Foundation of the fort of Zamboanga, Mindanao, to hold in check the piracy of the Moros..S Uprising of the Chinese at Calamba. Laguna. Their forays against San Pedro Macate.Taytay, and Antipolo and ultimate defeat and submission. College of San Juan de Letran founded under the Dominicans. Don Francisco de A tienza conquered the Moros of Lanaoand took possession of the celebrated lake bearing this name. Victories of Don Pedro de Almonte over the Moros In Mindanao and Sulu...'prising in the provinces of Pampanga and Pangasinan, Luzon, quelled without bloodshed, "tt Chinese pirate Koseng demanded the submission of the archipelago, with serious threats. Upris, tag of the Chinese in the suburbs of Manila and their subsequent submission. Koseng died." 
  48. ^ The General History of Taiwan, 1920, Lian Heng
  49. ^ Wills Jr, John E. (1994). Mountain of Fame: Portraits in Chinese History. Princeton: Princeton University Press. p. 225. 
  50. ^ Croizier, Ralph C. (1977). Koxinga and Chinese Nationalism: History, Myth, and the Hero. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 20. 
  51. ^ Ibid.
  52. ^ Ibid, p. 11.
  53. ^ Wills, p. 222.
  54. ^ Croizier, p. 12.
  55. ^ Ibid, p. 47.
  56. ^ Ibid.
  57. ^ Ibid, p. 48.
  58. ^ Posonby Fane, R A B (1937). "Koxinga: Chronicles of the Tei Family, Loyal Servants of the Ming". Transactions of the Japan Society of London 34: 79. 
  59. ^ Croizier, p. 13.
  60. ^ Samuel H. Moffett (1998). A History of Christianity in Asia: 1500-1900. VOLUME II (2, illustrated ed.). Orbis Books. p. 222. ISBN 1570754500. http://books.google.com/books?ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&id=_XglAQAAIAAJ&dq=hambroek+daughter&q=one+sweet+young+seized+harem. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "He was beheaded publicly along with several other missionaries, including some of the women and children. One of Hambroek's daughters — a very sweet young girl, as a contemporary report described her — was seized by Koxinga for his harem when the fort fell.55" (Volume 2 of A History of Christianity in Asia, Samuel H. Moffett Volume 36 of American Society of Missiology series)
  61. ^ Samuel H. Moffett (2005). A history of Christianity in Asia, Volume 2. Issue 36 of American Society of Missiology series (2 ed.). Orbis Books. p. 222. ISBN 1570754500. http://books.google.com/books?ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&id=VEcKAQAAMAAJ&dq=hambroek+daughter&q=one+very+sweet+young+girl+seized+harem. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "He was beheaded publicly along with several other missionaries, including some of the women and children. One of Hambroek's daughters — a very sweet young girl, as a contemporary report described her — was seized by Koxinga for his harem when the fort fell.55" Original from the University of Michigan
  62. ^ Free China review, Volume 11. W.Y. Tsao. 1961. p. 54. http://books.google.com/books?id=QGzVAAAAMAAJ&q=hambroek+daughter&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zmjyTr7gI6bh0QHigo2cAg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwADgU. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "The half-Chinese, half- Japanese Koxinga (Cheng Cheng-kung in Chinese history), who drove the Dutch from Taiwan, married the daughter of Dutch missionary Antonius Ham- broek. Koxinga and his colleagues were very suspicious of the missionaries because of their involvement in civil affairs." Original from the University of Michigan
  63. ^ Jonathan Manthorpe (2008). Forbidden Nation: A History of Taiwan (illustrated ed.). Macmillan. p. 77. ISBN 0230614248. http://books.google.com/books?id=p3D6a7bK_t0C&pg=PA77&dq=happy+was+she+that+feel+to+the+lot+of+an+unmarried+man+being+thereby+freed+from+the+vexations+by+the+chinese+women+who+are+very+jealous&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YWvxTr37KeTo0QHU9d28Ag&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=happy%20was%20she%20that%20feel%20to%20the%20lot%20of%20an%20unmarried%20man%20being%20thereby%20freed%20from%20the%20vexations%20by%20the%20chinese%20women%20who%20are%20very%20jealous&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "The wives were given to Koxinga's captains as concubines and the small children were sent to China. Koxinga himself took one of Hambroek's teenage daughters — " a very sweet and pleasing maiden" according to Caeuw — as one of his ...concubines. Many women and children were killed too, but others were "preserved fo the use of the commanders, and then sold to the common soldiers. Happy was she that feel to the lot of an unmarried man being thereby freed from the vexations by the chinese women who are very jealous of their husbands." 
  64. ^ Ralph Covell (1998). Pentecost of the Hills in Taiwan: The Christian Faith Among the Original Inhabitants (illustrated ed.). Hope Publishing House. p. 96. ISBN 0932727905. http://books.google.com/books?id=oaP2UFZVGDoC&pg=PA96&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&ved=0CEEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "When eventually the fort surrendered, the Dutch women who survived were given as wives or concubines to the Chinese. One of Hambroek's daughters in the fort was taken by Koxinga. Those taken as concubines often were reduced to the status of slaves. As many as 100 of these prisoners, including some men but mostly women and their children, were still alive in 1684." 
  65. ^ James Wheeler Davidson (1903). The island of Formosa, past and present: History, people, resources, and commercial prospects. Tea, camphor, sugar, gold, coal, sulphur, economical plants, and other productions. Macmillan & co.. p. 44. http://books.google.com/books?id=QNMTAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=daughter%20hambroek%20sweet%20pleasing%20maiden%20koxinga%20concubines%20harem%20dutch%20women%20guard&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. ""21st October, 1661.—This afternoon, two little black boys deserted the town and made their appearance at the Castle. One of them was a slave of the sub-factor Michiel Baly, and the other was free born, but had been serving as a slave in the house of the mandarin Beepontok, Governor of the town. They told us as a fact—they themselves having been witnesses thereof—that Koxinga, enra«eil because his troops were daily diminishing in number, and especially because so many of his men had been killed and wounded on the 16th of last month, when our vessels appeared before the batteries of the enemy, first fed and regaled, and then beheaded, all the Dutch soldiers in his power; not only those who surrendered themselves after the dhpture of Fort Provintia, but those also who were s-cattered throughout the country at the various stations. The clergymen Hambroek, Mus, and Winshnm; the former secretary of the Court of Justice; Ossewayer, former judicatory officer in Soulang; Gillis Bocx and several inhabitants of Sakam, having been previously regaled in the same way, were afterwards beheaded; but the clergyman Leonardus, and the former unworthy Deputy-Governor of Provintia with his wife and five children, had been sent to China. The half-sister of Mr. Leonardus' wife, a girl of sixteen and the offspring of a Quinan father and a Japanese mother, was married to a Tartar mandarin, and was now living at Sakam, where she had not only adopted the Chinese manner of dress, but had also bandaged her feet. The daughter of the Rev. A. Hambroek, a very sweet and pleasing maiden, Koxinga took to be one of his concubines, and she had, consequently, lieen placed in his harem. All the remaining Dutch women were kept under guard in Castle Provintia." (MACMILLAN & CO. LONDON AND NEW YORK. KELLY & WALSH, LD. YOKOHAMA, SHANGHAI, HONGKONG, AND SINGAPORE)("JAPAN GAZETTE" PRESS. Yokohama.)
  66. ^ James Wheeler Davidson (1903). The island of Formosa, past and present: History, people, resources, and commercial prospects. Tea, camphor, sugar, gold, coal, sulphur, economical plants, and other productions. Macmillan & co.. p. 44. http://books.google.com/books?id=jAMxFLcYU4sC&pg=PA44&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&ved=0CGoQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. ""'Hit October, 1661.—This afternoon, two little black boys deserted the town and made their appearance at the Castle. One of them was a slave of the sub-factor Michiel Baly, and the other was free born, but bad been serving as a slave in the house of the mandarin Beepontok, Governor of the town. They told us as a fact—they themselves having been witnesses thereof—that Koxinga, enraged because his troops were daily diminishing in number, and especially because so many of his men had been killed and wounded on the 16th of last month, when our vessels appeared before the batteries of the enemy, first fed and regaled, and then beheaded, all the Dutch soldiers in his power; not only those who surrendered themselves after the capture of Fort Provintia, but those also who were scattered throughout the country at the various stations. The clergymen Hambroek, Mus, and Winshem; the former secretary of the Court of Justice; Ossewayer, former judicatory officer in Soulang; Gillis Bocx and several inhabitants of Sakam, having been previously regaled in the same way, were afterwards beheaded j but the clergyman Leonardus, and the former unworthy Deputy-Governor of Provintia with his wife and five children, had been sent to China. The half-sister of Mr. Leonardus' wife, a girl of sixteen and the offspring of a Quinan father and a Japanese mother, was married to a Tartar mandarin, and was now living at Sakam, where she had not only adopted the Chinese manner of dress, but had also bandaged her feet. The daughter of the Bev. A. Hambroek, a very sweet and pleasing maiden, Koxinga took to be one of his concubines, and she had, consequently, lieen placed in his harem. All the remaining Dutch women were kept under guard in Castle Provintia." Original from Harvard University (MACMILLAN & CO. LONDON AND NEW YORK KELLY & WALSH, LD. YOKOHAMA, SHANGHAI, HONGKONG, AND SINGAPORE "JAPAN GAZETTE" PRESS. Yokohama.)
  67. ^ An account of missionary success in the island of Formosa: published in London in 1650 and now reprinted with copious appendices, Volume 1. VOL. 1. LONDON 57 LUDGATE HILL: Trübner. 1889. p. 197. http://books.google.com/books?id=ywQTAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA197&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=zmjyTr7gI6bh0QHigo2cAg&ved=0CD0Q6AEwAzgU#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "now living at Sakam, where she had not only adopted the Chinese manner of dress, but had also bandaged her feet. The daughter of the Rev. A. Hambroek, a very sweet and pleasing maiden, Koxinga took to be one of his concubines, and she had, consequently, been placed in his harem. All the remaining Dutch women were kept under guard in Castle Provintia. It afterwards appeared, when these boys were put to the torture, that they had been sent to spy out the Castle. They persisted, however, in declaring that they had spoken the truth." Original from Harvard University
  68. ^ Royal Scottish Geographical Society (1896). Scottish geographical magazine, Volume 12. VOLUME XII. EDINBURGH: Royal Scottish Geographical Society.. p. 389. http://books.google.com/books?id=JyMcAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA389&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&ved=0CF4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "The sturdy Hollanders held out for nine long weary months, during which time they made several damaging attacks on the enemy; who, however, retaliated by perpetrating the most shocking cruelties on such Dutch people as were scattered throughout the island, their very clergymen being tortured to death, either by impalement or by crucifixion. Contemporary records unite in singling out the case of Rev. Antonius Hambroek, who was sent by Koxinga into the castle, under a flag of truce, to propose terms of surrender, and told to back these up with threats of most terrible vengeance. Mr. Hambroek was forced to leave his wife and two children (one of them described as a sweet and comely maiden of eighteen) in the invader's camp as pledges, which sufficiently proved that any failure of his undertaking would be a most ominous signal for those poor defenceless ones. And yet, this noble man was so far from persuading the garrison to surrender, that he encouraged them to continue the defence by hopes of relief, assuring them that Koxinga had lost some of his best ships and soldiers, and began to be weary of the siege. When his speech was ended, the Council left it to his own choice either to stay with them or return to the camp, where he could expect nothing but instant death. He had also two daughters within the Castle, who hung upon his neck, overwhelmed with grief and tears to see their father decided to go where he knew he must be sacrificed by the merciless foe. But he reminded them that having left his wife and his other two children as hostages, death would be their certain fate if he returned not; so, unlocking himself from his daughters' arms, he exhorted them all to a resolute defence, and cheerily said as he left the castle gate, that God might yet make use of him in bringing deliverance to his poor fellow-prisoners. Koxinga received his answer sternly, and without further delay issued an order for the massacre of all Dutch captives, and of every native who persisted in the profession of Christianity; Hambroek himself was put to death by decapitation, and the before-mentioned daughter compelled to become a member of his murderer's harem. At length, worn out with disappointment, fatigue, and famine, the little garrison was compelled to surrender, all the public property falling into the hands of the enemy, and the brave but heavy-hearted defenders being allowed to depart in their only remaining ship." Original from the University of Michigan
  69. ^ William Campbell (1896). Past and future of Formosa. HONGKONG, SHANGHAI, AND YOKOHAMA: KELLY AND WALSH, LIMITED. p. 5. http://books.google.com/books?id=VvcOAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA5&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YHLxTpe6G4nj0QHjtsm3Ag&ved=0CGQQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "The sturdy Hollanders held out for nine long weary months, during which time they made several damaging attacks on the enemy; who, however, retaliated by perpetrating the'most shocking cruelties on such Dutch people as were scattered throughout the island, their very clergymen being tortured to death, either by impalement or by crucifixion. Contemporary records unite in singling out the case of Eev. Antonius Hambroek, who was sent by Koxinga into the castle, under a flag of truce, to propose terms of surrender, and told to back these up with threats of most terrible vengeance. Mr. Hambroek was forced to leave his wife and two children (one of them described as a sweet and comely maiden of eighteen) in the invader's camp as pledges, which sufficiently proved that any failure of his undertaking would be a most ominous signal for those poor defenceless ones. And yet, this noble man was so far from persuading the garrison to surrender, that he encouraged them to continue the defence by hopes of relief, assuring them that Koxinga had lost some of his best ships and soldiers, and began to be weary of the siege. When his speech was ended, the Council left it to his own choice either to stay with them or return to the camp, where he could expect nothing but instant death. He had also two daughters within the Castle, who hung upon his neck, overwhelmed with grief and tears to see their father decided to go where he knew he must be sacrificed by the merciless foe. But he reminded them that having left his wife and his other two children as hostages, death would be their certain fate if he returned not; so, unlocking himself from his daughters' arms, he exhorted them all to a resolute defence, and cheerily said as he left the castle gate, that God might yet make use of him in bringing deliverance to his poor fellow-prisoners. Koxinga received his answer sternly, and without further delay issued an order for the massacre of all Dutch captives, and of every native who persisted in the profession of Christianity; Hambroek himself.was put to death by decapitation, and the before-mentioned daughter compelled to become a member of his murderer's harem. At length, worn out with disappointment, fatigue, and famine, the little garrison was compelled to surrender, all the public property falling into the hands of the enemy, and the brave but heavy-hearted defenders being allowed to depart in their only remaining ship." Original from Oxford University(LONDON: KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRÜBNER & CO., LIMITED PATERNOSTER HOUSE, CHARING CROSS ROAD)
  70. ^ William Campbell (1903). Formosa under the Dutch: described from contemporary records, with explanatory notes and a bibliography of the island (reprint ed.). SMC Publishing. p. 544. ISBN 9576380839. http://books.google.com/books?id=83dDAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA544&dq=hambroek+daughter&hl=en&sa=X&ei=A2byTrrEB8r40gHU_rCIAg&ved=0CDwQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=hambroek%20daughter&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "over the Dutch put him in possession of a spacious and comfortable place of retreat. Of course, any attempt to sum up the character of this man would require to avoid the excessive laudation of the Chinese on the one hand, and the unmitigated execration of Dntch writers on the other. His immediate surroundings would also require to be taken into account, as well as the times in which he lived. After, however, every allowance has been made, it is surely somewhat late in the day for any writer now to think of whitewashing the character of Koxinga, or to say that charges of colossal blackguardism and cruelty made out against him are met by pointing to many of his contemporaries as having been just as bad as he was, if not even much worse. This theory is one which seems to have great attraction for Mr. Davidson, who presents it in his newly-issued Island of Formosa. It is there stated on p. 53 that Koxinga was not really a cruel man, that it is doubtful if he ordered the Dutch clergymen to be executed, and that his diplomatic action in allowing the beleagured inmates of Castle Zeelandia to depart with their private effects should rather be looked upon as furnishing a more striking instance of generosity than can be met with in • all usages of war, even in our own times.-' On the other hand, however, it is vain to deny that Koxinga, this son of Brother Nicholas, and alumnus of Nanking University, who afterwards became the friend of Father Ricci, stamped out Christianity from Formosa with an appalling amount of heartless and most wanton cruelty. Who, without his knowledge, would have dared to regale and then lead out the Dutch clergymen for decapitation? Was Koxinga ignorant of the fact that a number of Hollanders were first crucified at Sakam, and then carried to Sinkang where they suffered excruciating agonies till death set them free? Is it for a moment to be supposed that the wholesale torturing and slaughter of the defenceless people of Formosa, represented on p. 89 of Mr. Davidson's book, took place without the express command or connivance of Koxinga? But nothing more is needed to settle the question under discussion than a reference to what took place between this chieftain and the Rev. Mr. Hambroek. The latter was sent into Castle Zeelandia to advise his countrymen against a continuance of the struggle, but he rather exhorted them to hold on, and then took his life in his hand with the message to Koxinga that the besieged would on no account allow the subject of surrender to be mentioned, although they were quite prepared to make every honourable attempt to meet the wishes of His Highness; which reply so enraged Koxinga that he soon after ordered Hambroek to be beheaded. Meanwhile the daughter of this brave Christian martyr, who is described as having been a very sweet and pleasing maiden, was chosen by Koxinga himself and made a member of his harem. And yet, Mr. Davidson would fain make out that Koxinga was not a vulgar pirate, nor a cruel man, seeing that the coarse unholy brute acted towards his vanquished foes in a far more generous way than, say, the United States did during her own great internal struggle, or as the Britishers have recently done in South Africa!" Original from the University of Virginia (LONDON : KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO. LTD DRYDEN HOUSE, 43 GERRARD STREET, SOHO MDCCCCIII)(Original edition published by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd. London 1903) (Reprinted by SMC Publishing Inc., 2001, 1992, 1987)
  71. ^ Neglected Formosa: a translation from the Dutch of Frederic Coyett's Verwaerloosde Formosa (reprint ed.). Chinese Materials Center. 1975. p. 186. http://books.google.com/books?ei=A2byTrrEB8r40gHU_rCIAg&id=Ff9EAAAAIAAJ&dq=hambroek+daughter&q=Meanwhile+the+daughter+of+this+brave+Christian+martyr%2C+who+is+described+as+having+been+a+very+sweet+and+pleasing+. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "Meanwhile the daughter of this brave Christian martyr, who is described as having been a very sweet and pleasing" (Issue 21 of Occasional series, Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center Issue 21 of Chinese Materials and Research Aids Service Center. Occasional series)
  72. ^ Owen Rutter (1923). Through Formosa: an account of Japan's island colony. T. F. Unwin, ltd.. p. 80. http://books.google.com/books?ei=A2byTrrEB8r40gHU_rCIAg&id=hMVwAAAAMAAJ&dq=hambroek+daughter&q=hambroek%27s+harem. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "Many of these wretched people, including the dauntless Hambroek and some of the women and children, were beheaded. Some, more unhappy still, were crucified. One of Mr. Hambroek 's daughters Koxinga took into his own harem, while the remainder of the women were divided amongst his officers." Original from the University of Michigan
  73. ^ Alfred Trumble, ed. (1891). The art collector: a journal devoted to the arts and the crafts, Volume 3. 454 W. 24th STREET, New York City: A. Trumble. p. 96. http://books.google.com/books?id=GU0cAQAAMAAJ&pg=RA1-PA96&dq=koxinga+formosa+always+belonged+to+china&hl=en&ei=3MniTaurB4fZgAfA-YGuBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CEoQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20formosa%20always%20belonged%20to%20china&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "In the Imperial Museum at Peking is a sword that belonged to the great warrior " Kwang Tai." It is rather a poor blade to have been the weapon of a general who was deservedly deified by his fellowcountrymen, yet it is valued at $10,000. The cutlass of Koxinga, the pirate king who conquered Formosa, was sold by one of his descendants in 1879 and brought $1,500. A spear of the notorious black-flag Lee Yu was eagerly purchased for $500 by an enthusiastic Canton collector. Corresponding figures have marked the sales of the personal effects of the great historical, military and literary characters of the empire. Of high popularity are dragons and other mythical animals in gold bronze. The casting is superb, though a little heavy when measured by Japanese or French standards. The finishing, when belonging to the period prior to 1700, is admirable It is free, graceful and original. Bronzes made since that date, and especially those in the present century, are clumsy, coarse and conventional to the last degree." Original from the University of Michigan
  74. ^ David C. King (2006). Taiwan (illustrated ed.). Children's Press. p. 50. ISBN 0516248561. http://books.google.com/books?id=m9fXAAAAMAAJ&q=Few+of+the+island+Chinese+were+sorry+when+the+Manchu,+or+Qing,+took+control+of+Taiwan+in+1684+and+made+it+part+of+China's+Fujian+province.+Although+Koxinga+did+not+rule+Taiwan+for+long,+he+is+still+regarded+as+a+popular+hero+for+freeing+taiwan+from+the+dutch&dq=Few+of+the+island+Chinese+were+sorry+when+the+Manchu,+or+Qing,+took+control+of+Taiwan+in+1684+and+made+it+part+of+China's+Fujian+province.+Although+Koxinga+did+not+rule+Taiwan+for+long,+he+is+still+regarded+as+a+popular+hero+for+freeing+taiwan+from+the+dutch&hl=en&ei=E8fiTZ-rHInKgQeGmfyRBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "Few of the island Chinese were sorry when the Manchu, or Qing, took control of Taiwan in 1684 and made it part of China's Fujian province. Although Koxinga did not rule Taiwan for long, he is still regarded as a popular hero for freeing taiwan from the dutch" 
  75. ^ Brian Kennedy (2008). Brian Kennedy, Elizabeth Guo. ed. Chinese Martial Arts Training Manuals: A Historical Survey (2, illustrated ed.). Blue Snake Books. p. 152. ISBN 1583941940. http://books.google.com/books?id=iSDt-uhm6t0C&pg=PA152&dq=koxinga+taiwan+always+part+of+china&hl=en&ei=K8fiTf2uHofLgQf_2pmRBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCkQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=koxinga%20taiwan%20always%20part%20of%20china&f=false. Retrieved Dec. 20 2011. "The Qinxi Tong is an example of a non-criminal fraternal organization. The original Qinxi group in Taiwan was made up of men who had been part of Koxinga's forces...affiliation with...the Hung Men...The Taiwanese Qinxi fraternal organization is still active, teaching martial arts and engaging in other activities." 
  76. ^ [3]

[edit] Bibliography & Further Reading

  • Clements, Jonathan. Coxinga and the Fall of the Ming Dynasty. Stroud: Sutton Publishing, 2004.
  • Croizier, Ralph C. Koxinga and Chinese Nationalism History, Myth, and the Hero. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
  • Keene, Donald Keene. The Battles of Coxinga: Chikamatsu’s Puppet Play, Its Background and Importance. London: Taylor’s Foreign Press, 1950.
  • Meij, Philip. Daghregister van Philip Meij: Het naervolgende sijnde 't geene per memorie onthouden van 't gepasseerde in 't geweldigh overvallen des Chinesen mandorijns Cocxinja op Formosa en geduijrende ons gevanckenis, beginnende 30 April 1661 en eijndigende 4 Februarij 1662. Dutch National Archive, VOC 1238: 848–914.
  • Paske-Smith, M. Western Barbarians in Japan and Formosa in Tokugawa Days, 1603–1868. New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp., 1968.
  • Wang Chong: Interpreting Zheng Chenggong: The Politics of Dramatizing a Historical Figure in Japan, China, and Taiwan (1700–1963). VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, 2008, ISBN 978-3639092660.
  • Wills, Jr., John E. Pepper, Guns and Parleys: The Dutch East India Company and China 1622–1681. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages