UAC TurboTrain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
CN Turbo Train
VIA TurboTrain 2 cropped.jpg
VIA rail Turbo Train passing through Brockville, Ontario, Canada.
In service 1968–1982 (Canada)
1968–1980 (USA)
Manufacturer UAC
Constructed 1967–1968
Number built 8 trainsets
Formation 7 cars per trainset (Canadian)
5 cars per trainset (US)
Capacity 322 (seven-car set)
Operator Canadian National Railways
Via Rail
Amtrak
Specifications
Car body construction Aluminium
Train length 7 cars: 430 ft 8 in (131.27 m)
Car length Power Cars: 73 ft 3 in (22.33 m)
Intermediate Cars: 56 ft 10 in (17.32 m)
Width 10 ft 5 in (3.18 m)
Height Coach: 10 ft 11 in (3.33 m)
Dome: 12 ft 11 in (3.94 m)
Exhausts: 13 ft 10 in (4.22 m)
Floor height 2 ft 7 in (0.79 m)
Maximum speed 170 mph (274 km/h) (design)
120 mph (193 km/h) (service)
Weight 7 cars: 165.6 long tons (185.5 short tons; 168.3 tonnes)
Traction system Gas Turbine
Engine(s) Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6
Power output 7 car: 2,000 hp (1,491 kW) [1] (400 hp (298 kW) per engine)
UIC classification 7 car: B′1′1′1′1′1′1′B′
Track gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm)

The UAC TurboTrain was an early high-speed, gas turbine train manufactured by United Aircraft that operated in Canada between 1968 and 1984 and in the United States between 1968 and 1976. (Amtrak disposed of the trains in 1980.) It was one of the first gas turbine powered trains to enter service for passenger traffic, and was also one of the first tilting trains to enter service.

Description[edit]

Articulation[edit]

Passenger trains have fundamentally different needs than freight trains, but for much of early history the two needs had been served by the same engines for reasons of economy. The introduction of newer materials and construction methods, notably lightweight construction using aluminum and stainless steel, led to a revolution in design and the need for entire trainsets dedicated to passenger use.

This evolution led to the introduction of articulated trains (or "unit trains"), where the passenger cars were fixed to each other and difficult, or impossible, to separate. By sharing a single bogie between the cars, weight could be further reduced, and performance increased. The classic examples of the articulated passenger trainset are the M-10000 and Pioneer Zephyr of 1934. In practice, the flexibility offered by detachable cars proved too much to overcome any advantages of the articulated style, and the articulated trainset remained relatively rare, at least in North America.

Tilting trains[edit]

One major limitation to the evolution of existing trainsets to higher speeds was the centrifugal forces generated on curves at high speeds. The rails and cars could be strengthened to handle these stresses, but passengers could not. This limited speeds on many portions of mainline routes, where it would be difficult to lay new track with gentler curves.

The solution to this problem was the tilting train. Experiments with passive tilting cars (i.e. without an hydrodynamic control of the inclination of the car) had been carried out in the US as early as 1938, but no commercial development took place until the Spanish Talgo suspensions were introduced in the 1950s. The tilting mechanism was based on the passenger cars being suspended at their ends from wishbone (A-frame) suspension arms. On curves the cars would swing outward to angle the car floor to match the apparent "down". Since the suspension was between the cars, the Talgo design was naturally articulated. The Talgo II design used on the UAC was known to be plagued with defects and prone to frequent breakdowns.

C&O design study[edit]

A series of design studies carried out by Chesapeake and Ohio Railway (C&O) in the 1950s used the second-generation Talgo design for their car suspensions. The suspension arms for each neighboring pair of cars were attached to a common bogie between them, as opposed to having a pair separate bogies for each car. The bogies rode the common curve between the two cars, centered by traction springs that centered the axle between adjoining car bodies.[2] TurboTrain cars are 2 12 feet (76 cm) lower than conventional cars, to lower the center of gravity in relation to the swinging point at the top of the arms. The arms included air springs to smooth out the motion, although it still felt "odd" while the train navigated short turns in switchyards and stations.

Like the earlier articulated trains, this meant that train lengths would be difficult to change. Their solution to this problem was to modify the power cars (engines) to allow the trains to be coupled end-to-end. Since articulated trains required "special" cars at either end anyway (to fill in the otherwise missing bogie), the C&O was double-ended, with a power car at each end. The power cars were organized with their two diesel engines on either side of the train, and the operators cabin in a "pod" on top. This left enough room for a passageway to run between the engines and under the pod to the nose of the car, where a coupling and doors were hidden behind a pair of movable clamshell covers.[3] That way the train could be attached front-to-end with another, providing some of the flexibility in train lengths that coupled cars offered, while still being as lightweight as a normal articulated design.

TurboTrain[edit]

C&O's early work went undeveloped until the 1960s. At that time two major forces began operating that would re-invent the concept as the TurboTrain; one was the US Department of Transportation's (DOT) desire to update train service in the US as a result of the High Speed Ground Transportation Act of 1965, the other was CN Rail's desire to update their passenger service with the ending of "pooled service" (with CP Rail) between Toronto and Montreal.

United Aircraft (UAC) purchased the C&O patents to enter into the DOT's Northeast Corridor Demonstration Project. The TurboTrain was designed by personnel of the Corporate Systems Center Division (CSC) of UAC, at Farmington, Connecticut. The design was similar to the original C&O version, but modified to use turbine power instead of diesel. The chosen engines were a modified version of the Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6 (also a UAC division) known as the ST6 (apparently for Stationary Turbine), downrated from 600 to 300 hp (447 to 224 kW). The PT6 uses a "free turbine" that acts as a torque coupler, so the new design did not require a transmission and was able to drive the powered wheels directly. The power cars had three engine bays on either side of the car and could mount engines in pairs for two to six turbines, depending on the needs of the carrier.[4] Another ST6 drove an alternator to provide 'hotel' electrical power for the train. Each power car had a fuel capacity of 1,270 imperial gallons (5,774 l; 1,525 US gal).[5]

The turbine engines were smaller and lighter (300 pounds or 136 kilograms with accessories) than the diesels they replaced, so the original power cars ended up being much larger than needed. Instead of a major redesign, UAC re-arranged the interior of the existing layout. The control room "pod" on top was lengthened to produce a viewing area with seating, and additional seating was added along the main level as well. This produced the Power Dome Cars (PDC) that were 73 feet 3 inches (22.33 m) long (tip of nose to trailing articulated axle,[6] the Intermediate Cars (IC) were 56 feet 10 inches (17.32 m) long (axle to axle);[6] considerably shorter than the 85 feet (25.91 m) long conventional passenger cars of this period.

The ability to connect trains together remained largely unchanged, although the routing of the internal passage changed slightly to rise up into the observation area of the pod, then back down under the control room and from there to the nose.

Production and use[edit]

US service[edit]

Two Turbotrains (DOT1 and DOT2) were built at the Pullman Works in Chicago. High speed testing of the trains was performed from a base at Fields Point in Providence, RI, using track between Route 128 near Boston and Westerly, RI (track segments along this section, to this day, is the only area where Amtrak operates Acela revenue service at 150 mph). In a competition with a GE powered Metroliner on Penn Central's main-line between Trenton and New Brunswick, New Jersey on December 20, 1967, one of the TurboTrains reached 170.8 mph (274.9 km/h). This remains the world speed record for gas turbine-powered rail vehicles.[7]

On January 1, 1968 the TurboTrain program was transferred from CSC to Sikorsky Aircraft Division (SA) of UAC. The TurboTrain entered service for the Department of Transportation in June 1969 on the Penn Central (later Amtrak) between Boston and New York City. The American TurboTrain was built with three cars and was expanded to five in 1972. They reached as high as 90-100 mph in regular service.

In September 1976, Amtrak ceased revenue runs of Turbotrain trainsets and moved them to the Field's Point Maintenance Yard pending any possible sales to CN.[8]

Canadian service[edit]

CN TurboTrain in Toronto

In May 1966 Canadian National Railways ordered five seven-car TurboTrains for the Montreal-Toronto service. They planned to operate the trains in tandem, connecting two trains together into a larger fourteen-car arrangement with a total capacity of 644 passengers. The Canadian trains were built by Montreal Locomotive Works, with their ST6 engines supplied by UAC's Canadian division (now Pratt & Whitney Canada) in Longueuil, Quebec.

CN and their ad agency wanted to promote the new service as an entirely new form of transit, so they dropped the "train" from the name. In CN's marketing literature the train was referred to simply as the "Turbo", although it retained the full TurboTrain name in CN's own documentation and communication with UAC. A goal of CN's marketing campaign was to get the train into service for Expo 67, and the Turbo was rushed through its trials. It was late for Expo, a disappointment to all involved, but the hectic pace did not let up and it was cleared for service after only one year of testing – most trains go through six to seven years of testing before entering service.[9]

The Turbo's first demonstration run in December 1968 with Conductor James Abbey of Toronto in command, included a large press contingent. An hour into its debut run, the Turbo collided with a truck at a highway crossing near Kingston. Despite the concerns that lightweight trains like the Turbo would be dangerous in collisions, the train remained upright and largely undamaged. Large beams just behind the nose, designed for this purpose, absorbed the impact of the collision and limited the damage to the fiberglass clamshell doors and underlying metal. The train was returned from repairs within a week. No one was killed, though this event has been cited as a main deterrent to Canada’s efforts to develop modern passenger rail.[10]

Initial commercial service started soon after. On its first westbound run the Turbo attained 104 mph (167 km/h) 10 minutes outside of Dorval. During speed runs on April 22, 1976, it achieved 140.55 mph (226 km/h) near Gananoque, the Canadian record to this day.[9]

Technical problems, including brake systems freezing in winter, required a suspension of service in early January 1969. During the "downtime" CN changed their plans, and in 1971 a rebuild program began, converting the five seven-car sets to three nine-car sets. Several minor changes were added. The engine exhaust fouled the roof windows of the power car, so these were plated over, and a grill was added to the front of the engines just behind the clamshell doors. The remaining power and passenger cars were sold to Amtrak as two 4-car sets. One of those sets sideswiped a freight train on a test run in July 1973 and three of the cars were written off.[11] The sale of the surviving Power Dome Coach car was cancelled, and it stood spare until a sister unit caught fire and burned in September 1975.[11]

The three rebuilt 9-car sets entered service for CN in late 1973. CN ran the Turbos from Toronto-Montreal-Toronto with stops at Dorval, Kingston and Guildwood on the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor. Original train numbers were Train 62 which left Toronto at 12:45 p.m. and arrived in Montreal at 4:44 p.m. Train 63 left Montreal at 12:45 p.m. and arrived in Toronto at 4:44 p.m. (Both were daily trains.) Train 68 left Toronto at 6:10 p.m. and arrived in Montreal at 10:14 p.m., while Train 69 left Montreal at 6:10 p.m. and arrived in Toronto at 10:14 p.m. (The evening trains did not run on Saturdays.) The trip took 3 hours and 59 minutes downtown-to-downtown on trains 62 and 63, while the evening trains were slightly slower, taking four hours and four minutes to complete the run. Turbo service was about a full hour faster than CN's previous express trains, the "Rapido".

CN operated the Turbos until 1978, when their passenger operations were taken over by Via Rail, who continued the service.

One of the three remaining trains developed an oil leak and caught fire on the afternoon run from Montréal to Toronto on May 29, 1979. It was stopped west of Kingston. It took a while for the fire engines to arrive, driving on the railroad sleepers. The power car and two coaches were totally destroyed. Fortunately nobody was hurt, even though the passengers had to debark in a hurry. The train was eventually towed back to the Turcot yard in Montréal and remained there for a few years, covered by tarpaulins.

The Turbo's final run was on October 31, 1982, when they were replaced by the all-Canadian LRC trainsets from Bombardier Transportation, which employed conventional diesel-electric locomotives. Although they had an early reputation for unreliability, according to CN's records, the rebuilt TurboTrains had an availability rate of over 97% for the their careers with CN and Via.[9] The LRC suffered from similar teething problems, notably with the tilt system locking the cars in a tilted position.

Modeling[edit]

Bachmann Industries manufactured an N scale model of the Turbo in the late 1960s. Rapido Trains offers an HO scale model. In 2013, MTH Electric Trains released an O scale model in the Canadian National Railway and Penn Central liveries. Additional models are expected later in the year.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ http://www.sikorskyarchives.com/Turbo_Train.php
  2. ^ U.S. Patent 3,424,105, Articulated Car Single Axle Truck, Alan R Cripe.
  3. ^ U.S. Patent 2,859,705, Motor Train Power Unit, Passageway, and Cab Structure, Alan R Cripe
  4. ^ https://ia601607.us.archive.org/5/items/1969TurboTrainEquipmentDiagrams/TurboTrainDiagrams.pdf
  5. ^ Lewis 1983, pp. 32–33
  6. ^ a b Merrilees 1995, p. facing 28
  7. ^ "Dedication of plaque commemorating high speed rail in America" on the National Capital Land Transportation Committee's website
  8. ^ http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1310&dat=19770410&id=wjRWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zOcDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4555,2619267 Eugene Register-Guard, April 10, 1977, Amtrak peddling it's headaches, "The trains were taken from service last September and now are idle at the Field's Point Maintenance Yard near Providence, RI"
  9. ^ a b c Jerry Langton, "Model-train manufacturer on the right track", 8 December 2008
  10. ^ "Off the Rails". Retrieved 10 February 2010. 
  11. ^ a b Merrilees 1995, p. 28
  • Canadian National system time table October 27, 1968, to April 26, 1969.
  • Lewis, Donald C. (1983). Rail Canada, volume 4: Paint diagrams and outline drawings for Via Rail's locomotive and passenger car fleet. Vancouver, British Columbia: Lunch Pad Distributors, Inc. ISBN 0-920264-08-5. 
  • Merrilees, Andrew (1995). Lepkey, Gary; West, Brian, eds. Canadian National Railways Passenger Equipment 1867–1992. Ottawa, Ontario: Bytown Railway Society, Inc. ISBN 0-921871-01-0 Check |isbn= value (help). 
  • Shron, Jason (2008). TurboTrain: A Journey. Rapido Trains Inc. ISBN 978-0-9783611-0-5. 

External links[edit]